Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Journal subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Brain Inj ; 36(9): 1196-1203, 2022 07 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35996323

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Physicians play a key role in ensuring athletes with concussion safely return to sport. Research has shown deficiencies in concussion education amongst physicians and medical students. However, studies have not previously been conducted in UK medical schools. OBJECTIVES: To assess students' concussion knowledge and learning in Scottish Medical Schools. DESIGN: A survey with 23 questions was distributed to Year 3-6 medical students studying in Scotland in October 2020. The survey included the following: (1) demographics, (2) concussion knowledge, e.g. 'What is the role of headgear in preventing concussion?' (3) concussion learning, 'In which part of the curriculum should concussion be taught?.' Frequencies of responses were calculated for each question. RESULTS: 200 students responded (response rate 8%). The average symptoms and management score were 87.3% and 31% respectively. 15% of participants knew that headgear has no role in preventing concussions and one participant identified the minimum "return to sport" timeframes for adults and children. 15% had learnt about concussion at medical school with 92.5% interested in receiving concussion teaching at medical school. CONCLUSION: Knowledge gaps exist in managing and preventing sports-related concussion. There is a discrepancy between levels of concussion teaching and the desire and importance placed on concussion education.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries , Brain Concussion , Sports , Students, Medical , Adult , Athletes , Athletic Injuries/diagnosis , Brain Concussion/diagnosis , Child , Humans
2.
Med Teach ; 42(7): 830-831, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32432953

ABSTRACT

Medical schools in the UK have been forced to dramatically restructure teaching and assessment amidst the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. As part of this, some have opted to assess progression through open book examinations (OBE). I aim to share my thoughts as an unsettled 4th year medical student about to embark on my first set of clinical exams conducted in this format. The difficulties associated with preparing for examinations under such unique and challenging circumstances cannot be underestimated. Working from home, during social distancing, surrounds students with the extra family stresses that we are all facing during this pandemic. This combined with a new, unfamiliar examination format will inevitably lead to students feeling daunted. While some would argue that an OBE may reward good problem solvers, students still require a strong foundation of knowledge. The luxury of reference will not be afforded in all clinical settings thus leading to concerns regarding students skimming over essential learning points. Furthermore, we cannot ignore the increased opportunity for academic misconduct resulting from an open book assessment format. Why are medical schools placing undue stress on students who could instead focus their attention on living compassionately for others during this difficult time?


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Education, Medical/organization & administration , Educational Measurement/methods , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Students, Medical/psychology , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Clinical Competence , Education, Medical/standards , Educational Measurement/standards , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , United Kingdom/epidemiology
3.
Med Teach ; 43(2): 242, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32780602
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL