ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The molecular, endoscopic, and histological features of IBD-associated CRC differ from sporadic CRC. The objective of this study was to describe the prevalence, clinical features, and prognosis of IBD-associated CRC compared to patients with sporadic CRC in a US statewide population-based cohort. METHODS: All newly diagnosed cases of CRC between 1996 and 2011 were obtained from Utah Cancer Registry. IBD was identified using a previously validated algorithm, from statewide databases of Intermountain Healthcare, University of Utah Health Sciences, and the Utah Population Database. Logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors associated with IBD-associated cancer and Cox regression for differences in survival. RESULTS: Among 12,578 patients diagnosed with CRC, 101 (0.8%) had a prior history of IBD (61 ulcerative colitis and 40 Crohn's disease). The mean age at CRC diagnosis was greater for patients without IBD than those with IBD (67.1 vs 52.8 years, P < 0.001). Individuals with IBD-associated CRC were more likely to be men (odds ratio [OR] 1.90, 95% CI 1.23-2.92), aged less than 65 years (OR 6.77, 95% CI 4.06-11.27), and have CRC located in the proximal colon (OR 2.79, 95% CI 1.85-4.20) than those with sporadic CRC. Nearly 20% of the IBD-associated CRCs had evidence of primary sclerosing cholangitis. After adjustment for age, gender, and stage at diagnosis, the excess hazard of death after CRC diagnosis was 1.7 times higher in IBD than in non-IBD patients (95% CI 1.27-2.33). CONCLUSIONS: The features of patients with CRC and IBD differ significantly from those without IBD and may be associated with increased mortality.
Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative/complications , Colorectal Neoplasms/etiology , Crohn Disease/complications , Adult , Age Factors , Age of Onset , Aged , Cholangitis, Sclerosing/complications , Colitis, Ulcerative/epidemiology , Colitis, Ulcerative/pathology , Colon/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Crohn Disease/epidemiology , Crohn Disease/pathology , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Utah/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Inadequate bowel preparation is the most common cause of failed colonoscopy, and repeat failure occurs in more than 20 % of follow-up attempts. Limited data suggest that next-day follow-up may reduce the risk for repeat inadequate preparation. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate differences in prep quality with next-day follow-up after initial inadequate preparation. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Academic center. PATIENTS: Outpatient screening and surveillance colonoscopies between 7/2002 and 6/2007. INTERVENTION: Comparison of next-day versus any other day ("non-next-day") repeat colonoscopy outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Aronchick scale, polyp and adenoma detection rates. RESULTS: Of 20,798 initial colonoscopies, 857 (4.1 %) had inadequate preparation. 460 (54 %) were lost to follow-up. One hundred and fourteen (13 %) had next-day and 283 (33 %) had non-next-day colonoscopy with mean follow-up of 8.8 months. On follow-up examination, 29.8 % of next-day and 23.3 % of non-next-day colonoscopies had inadequate bowel preparation (p = 0.48). The adenoma detection rate for the next-day group improved from 3.5 to 38.6 % on follow-up, compared to 20.5 and 36.8 % in the non-next-day group. There was no significant difference between groups in detection of total adenoma (p = 0.73) or advanced adenomas (p = 0.20) on follow-up examinations. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design, differences in baseline colonoscopy characteristics. CONCLUSION: The results confirm the need for repeat examination after a colonoscopy with inadequate bowel prep, as there was substantial increase in adenoma detection on follow-up. There were no differences in outcomes between next-day versus non-next-day colonoscopy. These data support repeating after inadequate colonoscopy within 1 year as convenient for patient and physician.
Subject(s)
Adenomatous Polyps/pathology , Colon/pathology , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Colonic Polyps/pathology , Colonoscopy , Laxatives/administration & dosage , Polyethylene Glycols/administration & dosage , Therapeutic Irrigation/methods , Academic Medical Centers , Administration, Oral , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment FailureABSTRACT
While prior studies have largely focused on family communication of diagnostic single-gene test results or specific types of cancer testing results, far less work has investigated family communication of cancer-related genetic results that include multi-gene panels, a broad array of cancer types/stages, and participants without family history of cancer. The study we report here examined individuals' anticipated barriers and benefits to sharing genetic information with family members. An 80+ gene panel was performed on participants recruited from Mayo Clinic, diagnosed with different cancer types, who did not have a family history suggestive of an inherited risk. Participants completed a 49-item survey before receiving genetic test results. Family variant testing was provided to family members at no cost, allowing factors influencing intent to share to be examined in the absence of financial burdens. In all, 1721 of 2984 individuals who received genetic testing completed the survey (57.7% completion rate). Participants' intent to share with parents, siblings, and children was inversely related to the number of anticipated barriers to sharing and directly related to the number of anticipated benefits to sharing. Of those participants who did not intend to share with parents, siblings, and adult children, 64.8%, 30.3%, and 67.6% reported that there were no barriers, while 17.1%, 24.5%, and 40.2.% reported there were no benefits. Findings indicate that barriers to sharing genetic information with family members vary across family member types, and an inability to identify at least one benefit of sharing with family members is a predictor of intent not to share.
Subject(s)
Disclosure , Family/psychology , Genetic Counseling/psychology , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/psychology , Neoplasms/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Genetic Carrier Screening/ethics , Humans , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
Cigarette smoking (CS), hormone therapy (HT), and folate intake (FI) are each thought to influence colorectal cancer risk, but the underlying molecular mechanisms remain incompletely defined. The TP53 (p53) protein, encoded by the TP53 tumor-suppressor gene that is commonly mutated in colorectal cancer, can be readily assessed to differentiate biologically distinct colorectal cancer subtypes. In this prospective cohort study, we examined CS-, HT-, and FI-associated colorectal cancer risks by TP53 protein expression level among Iowa Women's Health Study (IWHS) participants. The IWHS recruited 41,836 randomly selected Iowa women, ages 55 to 69 years, with a valid driver's license at study entry in 1986. Self-reported exposure variables were assessed at baseline. Incident colorectal cancer cases were ascertained by annual linkage with the Iowa Cancer Registry. Archived, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens were collected and evaluated for TP53 protein expression by immunohistochemistry. Multivariate Cox regression models were fit to estimate relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between CS, HT, or FI and TP53-defined colorectal cancer subtypes. Informative environmental exposure and protein expression data were available for 492 incident colorectal cancer cases: 222 (45.1%) TP53 negative, 72 (14.6%) TP53 low, and 198 (40.2%) TP53 high. Longer duration (>5 years) of HT was inversely associated with TP53 high colorectal cancers (RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.27-0.94). No other statistically significant associations were observed. These data support possible heterogeneous effects from HT on TP53-related pathways of colorectal carcinogenesis in older women.