ABSTRACT
The present study investigated whether day 3 blastomere number has an effect on the clinical outcomes during single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles. A total of 3294 vitrified-warmed single day 5 blastocyst transferred cycles were analyzed in this retrospective study from January 2018 to December 2021. The cycles were divided into ≥ 7 and < 7 blastomere groups depending on the day 3 embryo blastomere number. The clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups, moreover multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate the correlation between the number of day 3 blastomeres and clinical outcomes. The chi-square test demonstrated that the rates of clinical pregnancy and live birth were significantly higher in the ≥ 7 blastomere group compared to the < 7 blastomere group with respect to single high-quality blastocyst transfer cycles. Conversely, these rates were similar in the two groups with respect to single low-quality blastocyst transfer cycles. These results were confirmed by multivariate logistic regression analysis. However, the miscarriage rate was higher in the < 7 blastomere group than in ≥ 7 group during low-quality blastocyst transfer cycles. These results suggested that day 3 blastomere number should be considered during single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles. Thus, blastocsyts derived from ≥ 7 blastomere embryos are preferred when choosing the same quality blastocysts.
Subject(s)
Blastomeres , Embryo Transfer , Pregnancy Rate , Vitrification , Humans , Female , Retrospective Studies , Pregnancy , Blastomeres/cytology , Embryo Transfer/methods , Adult , CryopreservationABSTRACT
This study aims to compare the embryological and clinical parameters of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles using testicular versus ejaculated sperm in male patients with elevated sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF). A total of 73 ICSI cycles were examined in couples where the male partner exhibited high levels of SDF. ICSI was performed using either ejaculated or testicular sperm. The primary outcomes were rates of blastocyst formation, high-quality embryo development, and clinical pregnancy. The DNA fragmentation index (DFI) for testicular sperm (16.81 ± 17.51) was significantly lower than that of ejaculated sperm (56.96 ± 17.56). While the blastocyst formation rate was significantly higher in the testicular sperm group compared to the ejaculated sperm group, no statistically significant differences were noted in fertilization rate (72.15% vs. 77.23%), rate of high-quality embryo formation (47.17% vs. 46.53%), clinical pregnancy (50% vs. 56.52%), Cumulative pregnancy (70.2% vs. 55.6%), or live birth rate (43.75% vs.43.48%). Testicular spermatozoa have no additional advantage over ejaculated spermatozoa except for blastocyst quality in patients with high SDF, the use of testicular spermatozoa for the first ICSI cycle in male infertility patients with high SDF should be undertaken after much consideration at present.