Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
Nat Med ; 27(2): 310-320, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33462444

ABSTRACT

The role of the androgen receptor (AR) in estrogen receptor (ER)-α-positive breast cancer is controversial, constraining implementation of AR-directed therapies. Using a diverse, clinically relevant panel of cell-line and patient-derived models, we demonstrate that AR activation, not suppression, exerts potent antitumor activity in multiple disease contexts, including resistance to standard-of-care ER and CDK4/6 inhibitors. Notably, AR agonists combined with standard-of-care agents enhanced therapeutic responses. Mechanistically, agonist activation of AR altered the genomic distribution of ER and essential co-activators (p300, SRC-3), resulting in repression of ER-regulated cell cycle genes and upregulation of AR target genes, including known tumor suppressors. A gene signature of AR activity positively predicted disease survival in multiple clinical ER-positive breast cancer cohorts. These findings provide unambiguous evidence that AR has a tumor suppressor role in ER-positive breast cancer and support AR agonism as the optimal AR-directed treatment strategy, revealing a rational therapeutic opportunity.


Subject(s)
Androgens/pharmacology , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Estrogen Receptor alpha/genetics , Receptors, Androgen/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/genetics , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/antagonists & inhibitors , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/genetics , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6/antagonists & inhibitors , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6/genetics , Female , Humans , MCF-7 Cells , Nuclear Receptor Coactivator 3/genetics , Receptors, Androgen/drug effects , Signal Transduction/drug effects
2.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 109(3): e157-e159, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31430463

ABSTRACT

We report an extremely rare tumor in an adult patient who presented with recurrent pericardial effusion. The mass was an extracardiac tumor on the left atrial roof, which was excised by open heart surgery. Histologic examination confirmed a cardiac anastomosing hemangioma.


Subject(s)
Heart Atria , Heart Neoplasms/complications , Hemangioma/complications , Pericardial Effusion/etiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence
3.
Clin Cancer Res ; 24(10): 2328-2341, 2018 05 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29514843

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Consensus is lacking regarding the androgen receptor (AR) as a prognostic marker in breast cancer. The objectives of this study were to comprehensively review the literature on AR prognostication and determine optimal criteria for AR as an independent predictor of breast cancer survival.Experimental Design: AR positivity was assessed by immunostaining in two clinically validated primary breast cancer cohorts [training cohort, n = 219; validation cohort, n = 418; 77% and 79% estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) positive, respectively]. The optimal AR cut-point was determined by ROC analysis in the training cohort and applied to both cohorts.Results: AR was an independent prognostic marker of breast cancer outcome in 22 of 46 (48%) previous studies that performed multivariate analyses. Most studies used cut-points of 1% or 10% nuclear positivity. Herein, neither 1% nor 10% cut-points were robustly prognostic. ROC analysis revealed that a higher AR cut-point (78% positivity) provided optimal sensitivity and specificity to predict breast cancer survival in the training (HR, 0.41; P = 0.015) and validation (HR, 0.50; P = 0.014) cohorts. Tenfold cross-validation confirmed the robustness of this AR cut-point. Patients with ERα-positive tumors and AR positivity ≥78% had the best survival in both cohorts (P < 0.0001). Among the combined ERα-positive cases, those with comparable or higher levels of AR (AR:ERα-positivity ratio >0.87) had the best outcomes (P < 0.0001).Conclusions: This study defines an optimal AR cut-point to reliably predict breast cancer survival. Testing this cut-point in prospective cohorts is warranted for implementation of AR as a prognostic factor in the clinical management of breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 24(10); 2328-41. ©2018 AACR.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Receptors, Androgen/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Prognosis , ROC Curve , Receptors, Androgen/blood , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Reproducibility of Results
4.
Mol Oncol ; 12(9): 1608-1622, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30117261

ABSTRACT

Breast and prostate cancer research to date has largely been predicated on the use of cell lines in vitro or in vivo. These limitations have led to the development of more clinically relevant models, such as organoids or murine xenografts that utilize patient-derived material; however, issues related to low take rate, long duration of establishment, and the associated costs constrain use of these models. This study demonstrates that ex vivo culture of freshly resected breast and prostate tumor specimens obtained from surgery, termed patient-derived explants (PDEs), provides a high-throughput and cost-effective model that retains the native tissue architecture, microenvironment, cell viability, and key oncogenic drivers. The PDE model provides a unique approach for direct evaluation of drug responses on an individual patient's tumor, which is amenable to analysis using contemporary genomic technologies. The ability to rapidly evaluate drug efficacy in patient-derived material has high potential to facilitate implementation of personalized medicine approaches.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/drug therapy , Patient-Specific Modeling , Precision Medicine/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cell Proliferation , Epithelial Cells , Estrogen Receptor alpha/metabolism , Female , Gelatin Sponge, Absorbable , Heterografts , Humans , Ki-67 Antigen/biosynthesis , Male , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/metabolism , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/pathology , Organoids , Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Receptors, Androgen/metabolism , Signal Transduction , Translational Research, Biomedical , Tumor Cells, Cultured , Tumor Microenvironment
6.
Sci Rep ; 6: 28950, 2016 06 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27358191

ABSTRACT

Small glutamine-rich tetratricopeptide repeat-containing protein α (SGTA) has been implicated as a co-chaperone and regulator of androgen and growth hormone receptor (AR, GHR) signalling. We investigated the functional consequences of partial and full Sgta ablation in vivo using Cre-lox Sgta-null mice. Sgta(+/-) breeders generated viable Sgta(-/-) offspring, but at less than Mendelian expectancy. Sgta(-/-) breeders were subfertile with small litters and higher neonatal death (P < 0.02). Body size was significantly and proportionately smaller in male and female Sgta(-/-) (vs WT, Sgta(+/-) P < 0.001) from d19. Serum IGF-1 levels were genotype- and sex-dependent. Food intake, muscle and bone mass and adiposity were unchanged in Sgta(-/-). Vital and sex organs had normal relative weight, morphology and histology, although certain androgen-sensitive measures such as penis and preputial size, and testis descent, were greater in Sgta(-/-). Expression of AR and its targets remained largely unchanged, although AR localisation was genotype- and tissue-dependent. Generally expression of other TPR-containing proteins was unchanged. In conclusion, this thorough investigation of SGTA-null mutation reports a mild phenotype of reduced body size. The model's full potential likely will be realised by genetic crosses with other models to interrogate the role of SGTA in the many diseases in which it has been implicated.


Subject(s)
Molecular Chaperones/metabolism , Animals , Body Size , Female , Male , Mice , Mice, Knockout , Molecular Chaperones/genetics , Survival Analysis
7.
Mol Endocrinol ; 27(2): 350-65, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23292282

ABSTRACT

To identify biologically relevant groupings or clusters of nuclear receptors (NR) that are associated with breast neoplasia, with potentially diagnostic, discriminant or prognostic value, we quantitated mRNA expression levels of all 48 members of the human NR superfamily by TaqMan low-density array analysis in 116 curated breast tissue samples, including pre- and postmenopausal normal breast and both ERα(+) and ERα(-) tumor tissue. In addition, we have determined NR levels in independent cohorts of tamoxifen-treated ERα(+) and ERα(-) tissue samples. There were differences in relative NR mRNA expression between neoplastic and normal breast, and between ER(+) and ER(-) tumors. First, there is overexpression of the NUR77 subgroup and EAR2 in neoplastic breast. Second, we identify a signature of five NR (ERα, EAR2, NUR77, TRα, and RARγ) that classifies breast samples with more than 97% cross-validated accuracy into normal or cancer classes. Third, we find a novel negative association between five NR (TRß, NUR77, RORγ, COUP-TFII, and LRH1) and histological grade. Finally, four NR (COUP-TFII, TRß, PPARγ, and MR) are significant predictors of metastasis-free survival in tamoxifen-treated breast cancers, independent of ER expression. The present study highlights the discriminant and prognostic value of NR in breast cancer; identifies novel, clinically relevant, NR signatures; and highlights NR signaling pathways with potential roles in breast cancer pathophysiology and as new therapeutic targets.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Carcinoma, Ductal/genetics , Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear/metabolism , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , COUP Transcription Factor II/metabolism , Carcinoma, Ductal/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Ductal/mortality , Eosinophil Cationic Protein/biosynthesis , Female , Gene Expression , Gene Expression Profiling , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Genes, erbA/physiology , Humans , Nuclear Receptor Subfamily 4, Group A, Member 1/biosynthesis , PPAR gamma/metabolism , Prognosis , RNA, Messenger/analysis , RNA, Messenger/genetics , Receptors, Androgen/metabolism , Receptors, Estrogen/biosynthesis , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism , Survival , Tamoxifen/therapeutic use , Transcriptome
8.
Clin Cancer Res ; 18(13): 3562-70, 2012 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22573351

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Targeting Hsp90 has significant potential as a treatment for prostate cancer, but prototypical agents such as 17-allylamino-17 demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG) have been ineffective in clinical trials. Recently, a phase I study aimed at defining a biologically active dose reported the first response to an Hsp90 inhibitor in a patient with prostate cancer, which supports the development of new generation compounds for this disease. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The biological actions of two new synthetic Hsp90 inhibitors, NVP-AUY922 and NVP-HSP990, were evaluated in the prostate cancer cell lines PC-3, LNCaP, and VCaP and in an ex vivo culture model of human prostate cancer. RESULTS: In cell lines, both NVP-AUY922 and NVP-HSP990 showed greater potency than 17-AAG with regard to modulation of Hsp90 client proteins, inhibition of proliferation, and induction of apoptotic cell death. In prostate tumors obtained from radical prostatectomy that were cultured ex vivo, treatment with 500 nmol/L of NVP-AUY922, NVP-HSP990, or 17-AAG caused equivalent target modulation, determined by the pharmacodynamic marker Hsp70, but only NVP-AUY922 and NVP-HSP990 showed antiproliferative and proapoptotic activity. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides some of the first evidence that new generation Hsp90 inhibitors are capable of achieving biologic responses in human prostate tumors, with both NVP-AUY922 and NVP-HSP990 showing potent on-target efficacy. Importantly, the ex vivo culture technique has provided information on Hsp90 inhibitor action not previously observed in cell lines or animal models. This approach, therefore, has the potential to enable more rational selection of therapeutic agents and biomarkers of response for clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Benzoquinones/pharmacology , HSP90 Heat-Shock Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Isoxazoles/pharmacology , Lactams, Macrocyclic/pharmacology , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pyridones/pharmacology , Pyrimidines/pharmacology , Resorcinols/pharmacology , Aged , Apoptosis/drug effects , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Cell Survival/drug effects , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , G2 Phase Cell Cycle Checkpoints/drug effects , Gene Expression/drug effects , HSP70 Heat-Shock Proteins/genetics , HSP70 Heat-Shock Proteins/metabolism , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Tissue Culture Techniques , Tumor Cells, Cultured/drug effects
9.
Mol Cell Endocrinol ; 362(1-2): 202-10, 2012 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22750718

ABSTRACT

Links between a low vitamin D status and an increased risk of breast cancer have been observed in epidemiological studies. These links have been investigated in human tissue homogenates and cultured cell lines. We have used non-malignant, malignant and normal reduction mammoplasty breast tissues to investigate the biological and metabolic consequences of the application of vitamin D to intact ex vivo human breast tissue. Tissues were exposed to 1α,25(OH)(2)D(3) (1,25D; active metabolite) and 25(OH)D (25D; pre-metabolite). Changes in mRNA expression and protein expression after vitamin D exposure were analysed. Results indicate that while responses in normal and non-malignant breast tissues are similar between individuals, different tumour tissues are highly variable with regards to their gene expression and biological response. Collectively, malignant breast tissue responds well to active 1,25D, but not to the inactive pre-metabolite 25D. This may have consequences for the recommendation of vitamin D supplementation in breast cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Calcifediol/physiology , Calcitriol/physiology , Receptors, Calcitriol/metabolism , 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 1-alpha-Hydroxylase/genetics , 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 1-alpha-Hydroxylase/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Calcifediol/pharmacology , Calcitriol/pharmacology , Cell Proliferation , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21/genetics , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21/metabolism , Female , Gene Expression , Humans , Imidazoles/pharmacology , Ki-67 Antigen/metabolism , Piperazines/pharmacology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2/antagonists & inhibitors , Steroid Hydroxylases/genetics , Steroid Hydroxylases/metabolism , Tissue Culture Techniques , Up-Regulation , Vitamin D3 24-Hydroxylase
10.
Pathol Oncol Res ; 17(3): 613-7, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21240663

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) types in tissue and HPV antibodies in prostatic disease. Prostate tissue samples were collected from 51 patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma and 11 with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). All tissue samples were confirmed by histology. Plasma samples were available for 52 prostate patients. We investigated HPV DNA prevalence by PCR, and PCR positive samples were HPV type determined by sequencing. Prevalence of antibodies against twenty-seven HPV proteins from fourteen different HPV types was assessed in the plasma samples. The HPV DNA prevalence in the tissue samples was 14% (7/51) for prostate cancer samples and 27% (3/11) for BPHs. HPV-18 was the only type detected in tissue samples (10/62). No significant difference in HPV prevalence between the prostate cancer and BPH samples was found. HPV-positive cells were identified in eight of our thirteen prostate tissue slides (3/3 BPH and 5/10 adenocarcinoma) by in situ hybridisation, and the positive cells were found in epithelial cells and peripheral blood cells. Serology data showed no significant increase in levels of antibodies against any of the HPV-18 proteins tested for in prostatic disease patients. Antibodies against HPV-1, HPV-4, HPV-6 and HPV-11 were significantly higher in the group of males with prostatic disease. Our study did not show an association between prostatic disease and either presence of HPV DNA in samples or previous exposure of high-risk HPV.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/virology , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/etiology , Prostatic Hyperplasia/virology , Prostatic Neoplasms/virology , Adenocarcinoma/complications , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , DNA, Viral/blood , DNA, Viral/genetics , Humans , In Situ Hybridization , Male , Middle Aged , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/pathology , Prognosis , Prostatic Hyperplasia/complications , Prostatic Hyperplasia/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/complications , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Survival Rate
11.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 19(7): 1755-65, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20615888

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of preanalytic conditions that biospecimens are subjected to is critically important because novel surgical procedures, tissue sampling, handling, and storage might affect biomarker expression or invalidate tissue samples as analytes for some technologies. METHODS: We investigated differences in RNA quality, gene expression by quantitative real-time PCR, and immunoreactive protein expression of selected prostate cancer biomarkers between tissues from retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). Sections of tissue microarray of 23 RALP and 22 RRP samples were stained with antibodies to androgen receptor (AR) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as intersite controls, and 14 other candidate biomarkers of research interest to three laboratories within the Australian Prostate Cancer BioResource tissue banking network. Quantitative real-time PCR was done for AR, PSA (KLK3), KLK2, KLK4, and HIF1A on RNA extracted from five RALP and five RRP frozen tissue cores. RESULTS: No histologic differences were observed between RALP and RRP tissue. Biomarker staining grouped these samples into those with increased (PSA, CK8/18, CKHMW, KLK4), decreased (KLK2, KLK14), or no change in expression (AR, ghrelin, Ki67, PCNA, VEGF-C, PAR2, YB1, p63, versican, and chondroitin 0-sulfate) in RALP compared with RRP tissue. No difference in RNA quality or gene expression was detected between RALP and RRP tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in biomarker expression between RALP and RRP tissue exist at the immunoreactive protein level, but the etiology is unclear. IMPACT: Future studies should account for changes in biomarker expression when using RALP tissues, and mixed cohorts of RALP and RRP tissue should be avoided.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/biosynthesis , Laparoscopy/methods , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , RNA, Neoplasm/metabolism , Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Gene Expression , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Male , Middle Aged , Prostate-Specific Antigen/biosynthesis , Prostate-Specific Antigen/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , RNA, Neoplasm/genetics , Receptors, Androgen/biosynthesis , Receptors, Androgen/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Robotics/methods , Specimen Handling
12.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 19(10): 2611-22, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20841388

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Epigenetic alterations are common in prostate cancer, yet how these modifications contribute to carcinogenesis is poorly understood. We investigated whether specific histone modifications are prognostic for prostate cancer relapse, and whether the expression of epigenetic genes is altered in prostate tumorigenesis. METHODS: Global levels of histone H3 lysine-18 acetylation (H3K18Ac) and histone H3 lysine-4 dimethylation (H3K4diMe) were assessed immunohistochemically in a prostate cancer cohort of 279 cases. Epigenetic gene expression was investigated in silico by analysis of microarray data from 23 primary prostate cancers (8 with biochemical recurrence and 15 without) and 7 metastatic lesions. RESULTS: H3K18Ac and H3K4diMe are independent predictors of relapse-free survival, with high global levels associated with a 1.71-fold (P < 0.0001) and 1.80-fold (P = 0.006) increased risk of tumor recurrence, respectively. High levels of both histone modifications were associated with a 3-fold increased risk of relapse (P < 0.0001). Epigenetic gene expression profiling identified a candidate gene signature (DNMT3A, MBD4, MLL2, MLL3, NSD1, and SRCAP), which significantly discriminated nonmalignant from prostate tumor tissue (P = 0.0063) in an independent cohort. CONCLUSIONS: This study has established the importance of histone modifications in predicting prostate cancer relapse and has identified an epigenetic gene signature associated with prostate tumorigenesis. IMPACT: Our findings suggest that targeting the epigenetic enzymes specifically involved in a particular solid tumor may be a more effective approach. Moreover, testing for aberrant expression of epigenetic genes such as those identified in this study may be beneficial in predicting individual patient response to epigenetic therapies.


Subject(s)
Histones/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Cohort Studies , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , Epigenesis, Genetic , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Histones/metabolism , Humans , Male , Microarray Analysis , Prognosis , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery
13.
Cancer Res ; 69(15): 6131-40, 2009 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19638585

ABSTRACT

There is emerging evidence that the balance between estrogen receptor-alpha (ER(alpha)) and androgen receptor (AR) signaling is a critical determinant of growth in the normal and malignant breast. In this study, we assessed AR status in a cohort of 215 invasive ductal breast carcinomas. AR and (ER(alpha)) were coexpressed in the majority (80-90%) of breast tumor cells. Kaplan-Meier product limit analysis and multivariate Cox regression showed that AR is an independent prognostic factor in (ER(alpha))-positive disease, with a low level of AR (less than median of 75% positive cells) conferring a 4.6-fold increased risk of cancer-related death (P = 0.002). Consistent with a role for AR in breast cancer outcome, AR potently inhibited (ER(alpha))transactivation activity and 17beta-estradiol-stimulated growth of breast cancer cells. Transfection of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells with either functionally impaired AR variants or the DNA-binding domain of the AR indicated that the latter is both necessary and sufficient for inhibition of (ER(alpha)) signaling. Consistent with molecular modeling, electrophoretic mobility shift assays showed binding of the AR to an estrogen-responsive element (ERE). Evidence for a functional interaction of the AR with an ERE in vivo was provided by chromatin immunoprecipitation data, revealing recruitment of the AR to the progesterone receptor promoter in T-47D breast cancer cells. We conclude that, by binding to a subset of EREs, the AR can prevent activation of target genes that mediate the stimulatory effects of 17beta-estradiol on breast cancer cells.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/metabolism , Estrogen Receptor alpha/antagonists & inhibitors , Receptors, Androgen/metabolism , Animals , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , COS Cells , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Cell Line, Tumor , Chlorocebus aethiops , DNA, Neoplasm/metabolism , Estrogen Receptor alpha/biosynthesis , Estrogen Receptor alpha/genetics , Estrogen Receptor alpha/metabolism , Humans , Models, Molecular , Prognosis , Receptors, Androgen/biosynthesis , Receptors, Androgen/genetics , Response Elements , Signal Transduction , Transcriptional Activation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL