Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Cutan Pathol ; 47(10): 888-895, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32310306

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The immune checkpoint molecule PD-L1 represents an important target in oncological immune therapy. The aim of our study was to evaluate PD-L1 expression and the composition of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in Kaposi sarcoma. METHODS: Immunohistochemical stains were performed for PD-L1, CD3, CD33, CD68, and CD168 in 24 Kaposi sarcoma samples. In PD-L1-positive cases, the double stains for PD-L1, CD31, podoplanin, and HHV8 were added. RESULTS: PD-L1 was observed in 71% of the samples and was predominantly located in the TME. PD-L1 expression was significantly higher in nodular stage than in patch/plaque stage. The TME consisted of CD68+/CD163+ macrophages, CD33+ myloid-derived suppressor cells and monocytes and CD3+ T-cells. The TME showed a peritumoral distribution in nodular stage, in contrast to a diffuse distribution in patch/plaque stage. In 12 samples (50%), no plasma cells were found. CONCLUSION: In nodular stage of KS, the TME is pushed back in the periphery of the tumor nodules. The PD-L1-positive TME between the tumor cells might protect them from the immune attack. An anti-PD-L1 treatment might be promising in KS patients.


Subject(s)
B7-H1 Antigen/metabolism , Sarcoma, Kaposi/immunology , Sarcoma, Kaposi/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antigens, CD/metabolism , Antigens, Differentiation, Myelomonocytic/metabolism , Female , Herpesvirus 8, Human/immunology , Herpesvirus 8, Human/isolation & purification , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Immunohistochemistry/methods , Macrophages/immunology , Macrophages/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Monocytes/immunology , Monocytes/pathology , Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells/immunology , Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells/pathology , Neoplasm Staging/methods , Receptors, Cell Surface/metabolism , Retrospective Studies , Sarcoma, Kaposi/diagnosis , Sarcoma, Kaposi/virology , Skin Neoplasms/virology , Tumor Microenvironment/immunology
4.
BMC Womens Health ; 10: 29, 2010 Oct 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20977764

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cellulite is a widespread problem involving females' buttocks and thighs based on the female specific anatomy. Given the higher number of fat cells stored in female fatty tissue in contrast to males, and the aging process of connective tissue leads to an imbalance between lipogenesis and lipolysis with subsequent large fat cells bulging the skin. In addition, microcirculatory changes have been suggested, however remain largely unknown in a controlled clinical setting. We hypothesize that the combination of extracorporeal shockwave and a daily gluteal muscle strength program is superior to the gluteal muscle strength program alone in cellulite. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized-controlled trial. IRB approval was granted at Hannover Medical School, Germany on May 22, 2009. For allocation of participants, a 1:1 ratio randomization was performed using opaque envelopes for the concealment of allocation. Reporting: according to CONSORT 2010. Eligible patients were females aged 18 or over and 65 or younger with cellulite with documented cellulite 1°-4° according to the Nürnberger score. Exclusion criteria were suspected or evident pregnancy, no cellulite, no informed consent or age under 18 years or above 65 years. Patients were recruited by advertisements in local regional newspapers and via the Internet. ANALYSIS: Intention-to-treat. OUTCOME PARAMETERS: a) Photonumeric severity scale, b) Nürnberger Score, c) circumference measurements, d) capillary blood flow, e) tissue oxygen saturation, f) postcapillary venous blood flow. Intervention group: Six sessions of extracorporeal focused shock wave for six sessions (2000 impulses, 0,25 mJ/m2 every 1-2 weeks) at both gluteal and thigh regions plus a specific gluteal strength exercise training. CONTROL GROUP: Six sessions of sham extracorporeal focused shock wave for six sessions (2000 impulses, 0,01 mJ/m2 every 1-2 weeks) at both gluteal and thigh regions plus a specific gluteal strength exercise training. FOLLOW-UP: 12 weeks. Blinding was achieved for all participants enrolled in the trial, the photograph taking the digital images for the primary outcome measure, the two assessors of the outcome measures, all additional health care providers and for the analyst from the biometrical department. Only one researcher (BJ) was aware of the group assignment performing the randomisation and the extracorporeal shock wave therapy. DISCUSSION: This randomised-controlled trial will provide much needed evidence on the clinical effectiveness of focused extracorporal shock wave therapy as an adjunct to gluteal strength training in females suffering cellulite.


Subject(s)
High-Energy Shock Waves/therapeutic use , Muscle Strength/physiology , Resistance Training , Subcutaneous Fat/pathology , Adolescent , Aged , Buttocks/pathology , Buttocks/physiology , Clinical Protocols , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Severity of Illness Index , Skin/pathology , Thigh/pathology , Thigh/physiology , Young Adult
5.
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) ; 3(2): 143-55, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24297647

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has been demonstrated to improve wound healing and skin regeneration such as in burn wounds and scars. We hypothesized that the combination of focused ESWT and a daily gluteal muscle strength program is superior to SHAM-ESWT and gluteal muscle strength training in moderate to severe cellulite. METHODS: This was a single-center, double-blinded, randomized-controlled trial. For allocation of participants, a 1:1 ratio randomization was performed using opaque envelopes for the concealment of allocation. Eligible patients were females aged 18-65 years with cellulite. The primary outcome parameter was the photo-numeric Cellulite Severity Scale (CSS) determined by two blinded, independent assessors. The intervention group (group A) received six sessions of focused ESWT (2,000 impulses, 0.35 mJ/mm(2), every 1-2 weeks) at both gluteal and thigh regions plus specific gluteal strength exercise training. The control group (group B) received six sessions of SHAM-ESWT plus specific gluteal strength exercise training. RESULTS: The CSS in group A was 10.9 ± 3.8 (mean ± SE) before intervention and 8.3 ± 4.1 after 12 weeks (P = 0.001, 2.53 improvement, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.43-3.62). The CSS in group B was 10.0 ± 3.8 before intervention and 10.1 ± 3.8 after 12 weeks (P = 0.876, 95% CI 1.1-0.97). The change of the CSS in group A versus group B was significantly different (P = 0.001, -24.3 effect size, 95% CI -36.5 to -12.1). CONCLUSION: The combination of non-invasive, focused ESWT (0.35 mJ/mm(2), 2,000 impulses, 6 sessions) in combination with gluteal strength training was superior to gluteal strength training and SHAM-ESWT in moderate to severe cellulite in terms of the CSS in a 3-month perspective. Long-term results have to be evaluated in terms of the sustainability of these effects.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL