Low-Dose Valganciclovir Prophylaxis Against Cytomegalovirus in Intermediate-Risk Liver and Dual-Abdominal Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Low-dose valganciclovir (VGC) for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis post-transplant has been employed due to cost and safety. The incidence of CMV disease in CMV intermediate-risk liver recipients at 1-year after standard-dose prophylaxis is approximately 5%. However, there are limited data on outcomes after using a "true" low-dose VGC prophylaxis regimen in liver and dual-abdominal transplant recipients as VGC was not dose-adjusted in all patients with impaired renal function in prior studies. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess the incidence of CMV associated with low-dose VGC prophylaxis in CMV intermediate-risk liver, simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK), and simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) recipients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) >60 mL/min. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of CMV intermediate-risk liver, SPK, and SLK recipients with CrCl >60 mL/min transplanted January 2018 to June 2022 who received VGC 450 mg daily for prophylaxis. The primary outcome was incidence of CMV infection 6-months post-transplant. RESULTS: Ninety-nine transplant recipients were included (79 liver, 11 SPK, 9 SLK). The primary outcome occurred in 13% of patients (liver 10%, SPK 36%, SLK 10%), including 1 case of CMV disease and 3 breakthrough infections. In addition, 6 patients experienced CMV infection between 6-months and 1-year. Recurrence occurred in 3 patients. There was no evidence of CMV resistance. Thirty patients experienced neutropenia within 1-year, 32 were prescribed granulocyte-colony stimulating factors, and 5 experienced thrombocytopenia. Two patients died due to graft-vs-host disease. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Low-dose VGC prophylaxis led to comparable CMV infection rates at 6-months in CMV intermediate-risk liver and SLK recipients. However, as SPK recipients displayed higher rates of CMV infection, low-dose VGC should be avoided in this population.

A systematic review of direct acting antiviral therapies in hepatitis C virus-negative liver transplant recipients of hepatitis C-viremic donors.

The introduction of safe and highly effective direct acting antivirals (DAAs) has significantly improved hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment outcomes after transplant. The solid organ transplant community has sought to identify strategies aimed at increasing the donor pool including the utilization of HCV-viremic organs in HCV-negative recipients. We will review the existing literature to evaluate DAA use for the treatment of HCV viremia post-liver transplant in patients who receive HCV-viremic allografts. A PubMed search was conducted and references for each study were also reviewed to identify additional articles. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case series, and case reports were included if: published in English language, evaluated DAA treatment outcomes after liver only or simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation with HCV-viremic allografts in HCV-negative recipients, and had full-text article availability. Our review included 16 studies and 2 case reports. The majority of liver transplant recipients were treated with a pangenotypic DAA for 12 weeks with a heterogeneous median time to initiation (range 1.7-118 days). Sustained virologic response was assessed in 253 liver transplant patients with 99.6% achieving cure with minimal DAA-attributed adverse drug events. There were 23 reported episodes of rejection, 12 deaths, and 1 graft loss among all studies. Treatment with DAA after transplantation of HCV-viremic livers into HCV-negative recipients appears to be safe and effective; however, long-term outcomes remain unknown. Transplant pharmacists play a key role in the development of center-specific protocols to optimize post-transplant outcomes in this unique patient population.

Clinical and Financial Implications of 2 Treatment Strategies for Donor-derived Hepatitis C Infections.

Transplanting hepatitis C viremic donor organs into hepatitis C virus (HCV)-negative recipients is becoming increasingly common; however, practices for posttransplant direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment vary widely. Protracted insurance authorization processes for DAA therapy often lead to treatment delays. METHODS: At our institution, 2 strategies for providing DAA therapy to HCV- recipients of HCV+ transplants have been used. For thoracic organ recipients, an institution-subsidized course of initial therapy was provided to ensure an early treatment initiation date. For abdominal organ recipients, insurance approval for DAA coverage was sought once viremia developed, and treatment was initiated only once the insurance-authorized supply of drug was received. To evaluate the clinical impact of these 2 strategies, we retrospectively collected data pertaining to the timing of DAA initiation, duration of recipient viremia, and monetary costs incurred by patients and the institution for patients managed under these 2 DAA coverage strategies. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-two transplants were performed using HCV viremic donor organs. Eighty-nine patients received DAA treatment without subsidy, and 62 received DAA treatment with subsidy. One patient who never developed viremia posttransplant received no treatment. Subsidizing the initial course enabled earlier treatment initiation (median, 4 d [interquartile range (IQR), 2-7] vs 10 [IQR, 8-13]; P < 0.001) and shorter duration of viremia (median, 16 d [IQR, 12-29] vs 36 [IQR, 30-47]; P < 0.001). Institutional costs averaged $9173 per subsidized patient and $168 per nonsubsidized patient. Three needlestick exposures occurred in caregivers of viremic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Recipients and their caregivers stand to benefit from earlier DAA treatment initiation; however, institutional costs to subsidize DAA therapy before insurance authorization are substantial. Insurance authorization processes for DAAs should be revised to accommodate this unique patient group.

Eight Weeks of Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Infection.

Short treatment duration of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) has been successfully used to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection in treatment-naive noncirrhotic patients with viral loads (VLs) under 6 million IU/mL. However, this short duration has not been studied in renal transplant recipients (RTRs), a patient population on lifelong immunosuppression. Here, we describe 3 RTRs who received 8 weeks of LDV/SOF, meeting the standard criteria for shortened treatment duration. All 3 patients tolerated treatment well and achieved sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR 12).