ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Despite optimal conservative and medical treatment, some children with functional constipation (FC) continue to experience symptoms. Antegrade continence enema (ACE) surgery has been suggested as the primary surgical option after less invasive pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions have not been effective. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the outcomes of ACE for children with FC. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched (inception-March 2024) for studies evaluating ACE surgery performed in children with FC. The primary outcome was treatment success (as defined in the original manuscript), including at least defecation frequency and/or fecal incontinence frequency. Secondary outcomes were cessation of ACE, complications, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and patient/parent satisfaction. Quality of evidence was evaluated based on tools from the New-Ottawa Scale and Joanna Bridge Institute. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included, representing 477 children with FC treated with either an appendicostomy or a cecostomy. Reported treatment success rates varied widely, ranging from 32% to 100%. ACE treatment was stopped in 15% due to treatment success and in 8% due to treatment failure, leading to more invasive surgery. Complication rates ranged from 6% to 100%, requiring surgical intervention in 0% to 34%. An improvement in HRQoL following ACE treatment was reported in all three studies that assessed HRQoL. The two studies assessing patient/parent satisfaction, reported high satisfaction rates. CONCLUSION: Reported treatment success and complication rates following ACE surgery for children with FC vary widely. This systematic review highlights the necessity for uniform definitions and treatment guidelines for ACE surgery in children with FC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
ABSTRACT
Transition services-programs that support adolescents and young adults (AYAs) as they move from a child-centered to a more autonomous, adult-orientated healthcare system-have been associated with improved short- and long-term healthcare outcomes. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of evidence exploring transition services within the neurogastroenterology and motility (NGM) field. The overall aim of this article, endorsed by the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, is to promote a discussion about the role of transition services for patients with NGM disorders. The AYAs addressed herein are those who have: (a) a ROME positive disorder of gut-brain interaction (DGBI), (b) a primary or secondary motility disorder (including those with motility disorders that have been surgically managed), or (c) an artificial feeding requirement (parenteral or enteral tube feeding) to manage malnutrition secondary to categories (a) or (b). The issues explored in this position paper include the specific physical and psychological healthcare needs of patients with NGM disorders; key healthcare professionals who should form part of a secondary care NGM transition service; the triadic relationship between healthcare professionals, caregivers, and patients; approaches to selecting patients who may benefit most from transition care; methods to assess transition readiness; and strategies with which to facilitate transfer of care between healthcare professionals. Key areas for future research are also addressed, including the construction of NGM-specific transition readiness questionnaires, tools to assess post-transfer healthcare outcomes, and educational programs to train healthcare professionals about transition care in NGM.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The chest X-ray (CXR) remains a widely used examination in the evaluation of patients with fever, to diagnose or rule out pneumonia. Recently, a study by our group suggested that it has no diagnostic value in patients with fever without respiratory signs and/or symptoms. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to validate the results of our previous study. Design A retrospective study was conducted in two hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients All patients that were referred to the internal medicine emergency department between May 2018 and May 2019 with a suspected infection defined as fever (temperature ≥38°C) or hypothermia (temperature <36°C) or CRP ≥100µg/mL. Main measures We defined our primary outcome as the number of newly diagnosed pneumonia by CXR in cases of suspected infection with no obvious site of infection and nor localizing symptoms or signs. Key results We included 1052 patients, of which 106 did not have respiratory signs or symptoms. In this group, none of the CXRs (95% CI 0-2.36%) showed an infiltrate. Combined with our previous study, 176 CXRs were performed in patients with no respiratory signs or symptoms. None (95% CI 0-1.42%) showed an infiltrate. Conclusion Our results confirm that a CXR has no diagnostic value in the workup of fever without localizing signs or symptoms.