Development and Validation of a Protein Risk Score for Mortality in Heart Failure : A Community Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome with high mortality. Current risk stratification approaches lack precision. High-throughput proteomics could improve risk prediction. Its use in clinical practice to guide the management of patients with HF depends on validation and evidence of clinical benefit. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a protein risk score for mortality in patients with HF. DESIGN: Community-based cohort. SETTING: Southeast Minnesota. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with HF enrolled between 2003 and 2012 and followed through 2021. MEASUREMENTS: A total of 7289 plasma proteins in 1351 patients with HF were measured using the SomaScan Assay (SomaLogic). A protein risk score was derived using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and temporal validation in patients enrolled between 2003 and 2007 (development cohort) and 2008 and 2012 (validation cohort). Multivariable Cox regression was used to examine the association between the protein risk score and mortality. The performance of the protein risk score to predict 5-year mortality risk was assessed using calibration plots, decision curves, and relative utility analyses and compared with a clinical model, including the Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure mortality risk score and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide. RESULTS: The development (n = 855; median age, 78 years; 50% women; 29% with ejection fraction <40%) and validation cohorts (n = 496; median age, 76 years; 45% women; 33% with ejection fraction <40%) were mostly similar. In the development cohort, 38 unique proteins were selected for the protein risk score. Independent of ejection fraction, the protein risk score demonstrated good calibration, reclassified mortality risk particularly at the extremes of the risk distribution, and showed greater clinical utility compared with the clinical model. LIMITATION: Participants were predominantly of European ancestry, potentially limiting the generalizability of the findings to different patient populations. CONCLUSION: Validation of the protein risk score demonstrated good calibration and evidence of predicted benefits to stratify the risk for death in HF superior to that of clinical methods. Further studies are needed to prospectively evaluate the score's performance in diverse populations and determine risk thresholds for interventions. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Division of Intramural Research at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health.

Proteomics for heart failure risk stratification: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome with persistently high mortality. High-throughput proteomic technologies offer new opportunities to improve HF risk stratification, but their contribution remains to be clearly defined. We aimed to systematically review prognostic studies using high-throughput proteomics to identify protein signatures associated with HF mortality. METHODS: We searched four databases and two clinical trial registries for articles published from 2012 to 2023. HF proteomics studies measuring high numbers of proteins using aptamer or antibody-based affinity platforms on human plasma or serum with outcomes of all-cause or cardiovascular death were included. Two reviewers independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. A third reviewer resolved conflicts. We assessed the risk of bias using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Exposure tool. RESULTS: Out of 5131 unique articles identified, nine articles were included in the review. The nine studies were observational; three used the aptamer platform, and six used the antibody platform. We found considerable heterogeneity across studies in measurement panels, HF definitions, ejection fraction categorization, follow-up duration, and outcome definitions, and a lack of risk estimates for most protein associations. Hence, we proceeded with a systematic review rather than a meta-analysis. In two comparable aptamer studies in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction, 21 proteins were identified in common for the association with all-cause death. Among these, one protein, WAP four-disulfide core domain protein 2 was also reported in an antibody study on HFrEF and for the association with CV death. We proposed standardized reporting criteria to facilitate the interpretation of future studies. CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review of nine studies evaluating the association of proteomics with mortality in HF, we identified a limited number of proteins common across several studies. Heterogeneity across studies compromised drawing broad inferences, underscoring the importance of standardized approaches to reporting.

Use of win time for ordered composite endpoints in clinical trials.

Consider the choice of outcome for overall treatment benefit in a clinical trial which measures the first time to each of several clinical events. We describe several new variants of the win ratio that incorporate the time spent in each clinical state over the common follow-up, where clinical state means the worst clinical event that has occurred by that time. One version allows restriction so that death during follow-up is most important, while time spent in other clinical states is still accounted for. Three other variants are described; one is based on the average pairwise win time, one creates a continuous outcome for each participant based on expected win times against a reference distribution and another that uses the estimated distributions of clinical state to compare the treatment arms. Finally, a combination testing approach is described to give robust power for detecting treatment benefit across a broad range of alternatives. These new methods are designed to be closer to the overall treatment benefit/harm from a patient's perspective, compared to the ordinary win ratio. The new methods are compared to the composite event approach and the ordinary win ratio. Simulations show that when overall treatment benefit on death is substantial, the variants based on either the participants' expected win times (EWTs) against a reference distribution or estimated clinical state distributions have substantially higher power than either the pairwise comparison or composite event methods. The methods are illustrated by re-analysis of the trial heart failure: a controlled trial investigating outcomes of exercise training.

Comparison of Bayesian and frequentist monitoring boundaries motivated by the Multiplatform Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic highlighted the need to conduct efficient randomized clinical trials with interim monitoring guidelines for efficacy and futility. Several randomized coronavirus disease 2019 trials, including the Multiplatform Randomized Clinical Trial (mpRCT), used Bayesian guidelines with the belief that they would lead to quicker efficacy or futility decisions than traditional "frequentist" guidelines, such as spending functions and conditional power. We explore this belief using an intuitive interpretation of Bayesian methods as translating prior opinion about the treatment effect into imaginary prior data. These imaginary observations are then combined with actual observations from the trial to make conclusions. Using this approach, we show that the Bayesian efficacy boundary used in mpRCT is actually quite similar to the frequentist Pocock boundary. METHODS: The mpRCT's efficacy monitoring guideline considered stopping if, given the observed data, there was greater than 99% probability that the treatment was effective (odds ratio greater than 1). The mpRCT's futility monitoring guideline considered stopping if, given the observed data, there was greater than 95% probability that the treatment was less than 20% effective (odds ratio less than 1.2). The mpRCT used a normal prior distribution that can be thought of as supplementing the actual patients' data with imaginary patients' data. We explore the effects of varying probability thresholds and the prior-to-actual patient ratio in the mpRCT and compare the resulting Bayesian efficacy monitoring guidelines to the well-known frequentist Pocock and O'Brien-Fleming efficacy guidelines. We also contrast Bayesian futility guidelines with a more traditional 20% conditional power futility guideline. RESULTS: A Bayesian efficacy and futility monitoring boundary using a neutral, weakly informative prior distribution and a fixed probability threshold at all interim analyses is more aggressive than the commonly used O'Brien-Fleming efficacy boundary coupled with a 20% conditional power threshold for futility. The trade-off is that more aggressive boundaries tend to stop trials earlier, but incur a loss of power. Interestingly, the Bayesian efficacy boundary with 99% probability threshold is very similar to the classic Pocock efficacy boundary. CONCLUSIONS: In a pandemic where quickly weeding out ineffective treatments and identifying effective treatments is paramount, aggressive monitoring may be preferred to conservative approaches, such as the O'Brien-Fleming boundary. This can be accomplished with either Bayesian or frequentist methods.

Effect of Thromboprophylaxis on Clinical Outcomes After COVID-19 Hospitalization.

BACKGROUND: Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 have an increased incidence of thromboembolism. The role of extended thromboprophylaxis after hospital discharge is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether anticoagulation is superior to placebo in reducing death and thromboembolic complications among patients discharged after COVID-19 hospitalization. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04650087). SETTING: Done during 2021 to 2022 among 127 U.S. hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Adults aged 18 years or older hospitalized with COVID-19 for 48 hours or more and ready for discharge, excluding those with a requirement for, or contraindication to, anticoagulation. INTERVENTION: 2.5 mg of apixaban versus placebo twice daily for 30 days. MEASUREMENTS: The primary efficacy end point was a 30-day composite of death, arterial thromboembolism, and venous thromboembolism. The primary safety end points were 30-day major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. RESULTS: Enrollment was terminated early, after 1217 participants were randomly assigned, because of a lower than anticipated event rate and a declining rate of COVID-19 hospitalizations. Median age was 54 years, 50.4% were women, 26.5% were Black, and 16.7% were Hispanic; 30.7% had a World Health Organization severity score of 5 or greater, and 11.0% had an International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism risk prediction score of greater than 4. Incidence of the primary end point was 2.13% (95% CI, 1.14 to 3.62) in the apixaban group and 2.31% (CI, 1.27 to 3.84) in the placebo group. Major bleeding occurred in 2 (0.4%) and 1 (0.2%) and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 3 (0.6%) and 6 (1.1%) apixaban-treated and placebo-treated participants, respectively. By day 30, thirty-six (3.0%) participants were lost to follow-up, and 8.5% of apixaban and 11.9% of placebo participants permanently discontinued the study drug treatment. LIMITATIONS: The introduction of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines decreased the risk for hospitalization and death. Study enrollment spanned the peaks of the Delta and Omicron variants in the United States, which influenced illness severity. CONCLUSION: The incidence of death or thromboembolism was low in this cohort of patients discharged after hospitalization with COVID-19. Because of early enrollment termination, the results were imprecise and the study was inconclusive. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health.

The efficacy of slow-rate ventriculolumbar perfusion chemotherapy for leptomeningeal carcinomatosis: a phase II study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the symptomatic response and side effects of ventriculolumbar perfusion (VLP) methotrexate chemotherapy with a low perfusion rate in patients with leptomeningeal metastasis. METHODS: Patients in a single-arm, two-stage phase II trial based on Simon's minimax design received VLP with a reduced (15 cc/h) perfusion rate with the purpose of decreasing constitutional side effects such as nausea/vomiting, insomnia, and confusion. The primary outcome was control of increased intracranial pressure (ICP). The secondary outcome was an occurrence of side effects. The results were compared with those of a previous trial of VLP with a 20-cc/h perfusion rate. RESULTS: Total 90 patients were enrolled. Out of 65 patients with increased ICP, 32 achieved normalized ICP after VLP chemotherapy (bias-adjusted response rate = 51%). The incidence of moderate-to-severe nausea/vomiting was reduced to 46% from 64% in the previous study, and that of sleep disturbance was increased to 13% from 9%, but both failed to reach statistical significance. The incidence of moderate-to-severe confusion was significantly reduced to 12% from 23% in the previous study (p = 0.04). Median overall survival was better among patients with controlled ICP than among those who remained with increased ICP (193 days vs. 94 days, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Compared with a higher perfusion rate, the low perfusion rate failed to provide non-inferior ICP control or improved side effects, except for confusion. The relationship between VLP perfusion rate and ICP control needs to be evaluated in future trials adjusting for bias from uncompleted protocol due to poor general condition.

Family History of Gastric Cancer and Helicobacter pylori Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori infection and a family history of gastric cancer are the main risk factors for gastric cancer. Whether treatment to eradicate H. pylori can reduce the risk of gastric cancer in persons with a family history of gastric cancer in first-degree relatives is unknown. METHODS: In this single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we screened 3100 first-degree relatives of patients with gastric cancer. We randomly assigned 1838 participants with H. pylori infection to receive either eradication therapy (lansoprazole [30 mg], amoxicillin [1000 mg], and clarithromycin [500 mg], each taken twice daily for 7 days) or placebo. The primary outcome was development of gastric cancer. A prespecified secondary outcome was development of gastric cancer according to H. pylori eradication status, assessed during the follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 1676 participants were included in the modified intention-to-treat population for the analysis of the primary outcome (832 in the treatment group and 844 in the placebo group). During a median follow-up of 9.2 years, gastric cancer developed in 10 participants (1.2%) in the treatment group and in 23 (2.7%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21 to 0.94; P = 0.03 by log-rank test). Among the 10 participants in the treatment group in whom gastric cancer developed, 5 (50.0%) had persistent H. pylori infection. Gastric cancer developed in 0.8% of participants (5 of 608) in whom H. pylori infection was eradicated and in 2.9% of participants (28 of 979) who had persistent infection (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.70). Adverse events were mild and were more common in the treatment group than in the placebo group (53.0% vs. 19.1%; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among persons with H. pylori infection who had a family history of gastric cancer in first-degree relatives, H. pylori eradication treatment reduced the risk of gastric cancer. (Funded by the National Cancer Center, South Korea; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01678027.).

Fostamatinib for the Treatment of Hospitalized Adults With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring hospitalization is characterized by robust antibody production, dysregulated immune response, and immunothrombosis. Fostamatinib is a novel spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor that we hypothesize will ameliorate Fc activation and attenuate harmful effects of the anti-COVID-19 immune response. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in hospitalized adults requiring oxygen with COVID-19 where patients receiving standard of care were randomized to receive fostamatinib or placebo. The primary outcome was serious adverse events by day 29. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients underwent randomization (30 to fostamatinib and 29 to placebo). Serious adverse events occurred in 10.5% of patients in the fostamatinib group compared with 22% in placebo (P = .2). Three deaths occurred by day 29, all receiving placebo. The mean change in ordinal score at day 15 was greater in the fostamatinib group (-3.6 ±â€…0.3 vs -2.6 ±â€…0.4, P = .035) and the median length in the intensive care unit was 3 days in the fostamatinib group vs 7 days in placebo (P = .07). Differences in clinical improvement were most evident in patients with severe or critical disease (median days on oxygen, 10 vs 28, P = .027). There were trends toward more rapid reductions in C-reactive protein, D-dimer, fibrinogen, and ferritin levels in the fostamatinib group. CONCLUSION: For COVID-19 requiring hospitalization, the addition of fostamatinib to standard of care was safe and patients were observed to have improved clinical outcomes compared with placebo. These results warrant further validation in larger confirmatory trials. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04579393.

Exon splicing analysis of intronic variants in multigene cancer panel testing for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer.

The use of multigene panel testing for patients with a predisposition to breast/ovarian cancer is increasing as the identification of variants is useful for diagnosis and disease management. We identified pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants of high-and moderate-risk genes using a 23-gene germline cancer panel in 518 patients with hereditary breast and ovarian cancers (HBOC). The frequency of P/LP variants was 12.4% (64/518) for high- and moderate-penetrant genes, namely, BRCA2 (5.6%), BRCA1 (3.3%), CHEK2 (1.2%), MUTYH (0.8%), PALB2 (0.8%), MLH1 (0.4%), ATM (0.4%), BRIP1 (0.4%), TP53 (0.2%), and PMS2 (0.2%). Five patients possessed two P/LP variants in BRCA1/2 and other genes. We also compared the results from in silico splicing predictive tools and exon splicing patterns from patient samples by analyzing RT-PCR product sequences in six P/LP intronic variants and two intronic variants of unknown significance (VUS). Altered transcriptional fragments were detected for P/LP intronic variants in BRCA1, BRIP1, CHEK2, PARB2, and PMS2. Notably, we identified an in-frame deletion of the BRCA1 C-terminal (BRCT) domain by exon skipping in BRCA1 c.5152+6T>C-as known VUS-indicating a risk for HBOC. Thus, exon splicing analysis can improve the identification of veiled intronic variants that would aid decision making and determination of hereditary cancer risk.

Histologic Response and Toxicity following Interval-Compressed Four-Drug Therapy Given Preoperatively in Children and Young Adults with Osteosarcoma: A Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVES: The histologic response to chemotherapy is an important prognostic factor in osteosarcoma. Thus, we attempted to develop an effective neoadjuvant regimen to achieve an improvement in histologic response. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with a high-grade osteosarcoma received 2 courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy non-randomly with either the MAP regimen (methotrexate 12 g/m2, cisplatin 120 mg/m2, and doxorubicin 75 mg/m2) or MAPI regimen (MAP plus ifosfamide 9 g/m2). We applied interval compression to MAPI by shortening the preoperative period to be aligned with that of MAP. Adjuvant chemotherapy was tailored according to the necrosis rate of resected tumor specimens. Necrosis rate, toxicity, and survival outcome were compared retrospectively between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The median interval between the beginning of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery was 97.0 days in the MAPI group (17 patients) and 90.5 days in the MAP group (12 patients; p = 0.19). The good histologic response (>90% of necrosis) was observed in 71% of MAPI and in 42% of MAP (p = 0.12). Major toxicities of grade 3 or worse were not different between the 2 groups. The probability of 5-year progression-free survival and overall survival of the MAPI group were 74 and 83%, and those in the MAP group were 50 and 75%, showing no difference. CONCLUSIONS: Interval-compressed MAPI therapy given in a similar duration of the preoperative phase to that of conventional MAP therapy showed a marginal trend toward a better histologic response without a significant increase in major toxicities. Regarding the proportion of good histologic response, 71% is one of the highest values ever reported in the literature. The results warrant further testing in a prospective way in a larger cohort.

Factors associated with metastasis in superior mesenteric vein lymph node in subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Retrospective case control study.

OBJECTIVE: The revised Japanese treatment guideline for gastric cancer recommends dissection of the superior mesenteric vein lymph node (No. 14v LN) if there is metastasis in infrapyloric lymph node (No. 6 LN). However, it is still controversial whether LN dissection is necessary. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors associated with metastasis in No. 14v LN. METHODS: Patients who underwent D2 lymphadenectomy between 2003 and 2010 were included. We excluded patients who underwent total gastrectomy, had multiple lesions, or had missing data about the status of metastasis in the LNs that were included in D2 lymphadenectomy. Clinicopathologic characteristics and the metastasis in regional LNs were compared between patients with No. 14v LN metastasis (14v+) and those without (14v-). RESULTS: Five hundred sixty patients were included in this study. Univariate analysis showed that old age, larger tumor size, tumor location, differentiation, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, perineural invasion, T classification, and N classification were related to metastasis in No. 14v LN. Multivariate analysis showed differentiation (P=0.027) and N classification (P<0.001) were independent related factors. Metastasis in infrapyloric lymph node (No. 6 LN) and proxiaml splenic lymph node (No. 11p LN) was independently associated with metastasis in No. 14v LN. CONCLUSIONS: Differentiation and N classification were independent factors associated with No. 14v LN metastasis, and No. 6 and No. 11p LN metastasis were independent risk factors for No. 14v LN metastasis.

Survival of patients receiving systematic therapy for metachronous or synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: The differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients according to treatment, type of metastasis, and Heng criteria risk are unclear. In this study, we compared survival according to various such parameters. METHODS: Between 2000 to 2014, 214 mRCC patients, of whom 171 (79.9%) were intermediate-risk and 43 (20.1%) were poor-risk, were retrospectively selected; 126 (58.9%) patients were treated with immunotherapy (IT) and 88 (41.1%) with targeted therapy (TT). Moreover, 144 patients had synchronous mRCCs (67.3%, SM) and 70 had metachronous mRCCs (32.7%, MM). The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and CSS. RESULTS: During a median 4.2 (1.0-70.4) months of systemic treatment and 98.3 (4.8-147.6) months of follow-up, the median PFS and CSS were 4.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.8-5.5) and 13.8 (95% CI, 9.8-18.3) months, respectively. The PFS and CSS were significantly better in the MM (5.9 and 21.3 months) and intermediate-risk groups (5.2 and 18.3 months) than those in the SM (4.4 and 9.6 months) and poor-risk groups (2.7 and 5.8 months), respectively (p < 0.05). Further stratification showed that TT produced significantly better PFS than IT in intermediate-risk patients with SM and a treatment-free interval (TFI) < 1 year, and in those with MM with a TFI ≥1 year (p < 0.05). There were no differences in survival outcomes according to various other subgroup stratifications (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Dividing patients into specific subcategories helps to better predict therapeutic outcomes.

Association of MRI findings with clinical characteristics and prognosis in patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis from non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imagining (MRI) is helpful for diagnosis of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) and localizing LMC symptoms. Goal of this study is how MRI findings of LMC are associated with clinical characteristics or prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: We retrospectively collected data on 283 patients with LMC from NSCLC, adenocarcinoma based on cerebrospinal fluid cytology. All patients had brain MRI with gadolinium enhancement at LMC diagnosis, and spinal MRI was performed at the physician's discretion. We evaluated the prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) of all patients and subgroup of patients with central nervous system cause of death. RESULTS: Two-hundred sixteen patients (76%) had definite or suggestive LMC findings and 67 had negative findings on brain MRI. Of the 37 patients who presented with cauda equina syndrome, 35 (95%) exhibited typical spinal MRI findings. Median OS of all patients was 3.65 months (95% confidence interval, 3.06-4.18). There was no significant difference in median OS between MRI-negative and MRI-positive groups (4.31 vs. 3.48 months, p = 0.711), whereas negative MRI finding showed longer median OS significantly in a subgroup of 77 patients with a central nervous system cause of death (p = 0.035). Considering clinical characteristics, progressive systemic disease, and altered mentality were significant prognostic factors associated with poor OS, whereas presenting symptom of headache with nausea/vomiting, intra-CSF chemotherapy, WBRT after LMC diagnosis, and concurrent RTKi treatment were significant for favorable OS in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Positive MRI findings suggests heavier disease burden than negative MRI findings in patients with LMC who died of a central nervous system cause. Spinal MRI findings in patients with LMC correlate with cauda equina symptoms.

Phase I/II clinical trial of modulated electro-hyperthermia treatment in patients with relapsed, refractory or progressive heavily treated ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of modulated electro-hyperthermia (mEHT) treatment and to reveal whether mEHT treatment is feasible and effective as second-line therapy in recurrent and progressive ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients were treated with mEHT with dose escalation during the first cycle (two sessions each week for three weeks) to determine the MTD. Additional cycles were carried out with the determined dose. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined grade ≥ 2: skin burns and inability to endure the hyperthermic state of the study. The Fact-O quality of life scale was used to assess health-related well-being. RESULTS: Nineteen patients with recurrent and progressive ovarian cancer were enrolled. In the first cycle of mEHT treatment, no patient developed DLT with applied power up to 110 W, 130 W, and 150 W/day; the 150 W was the maximal applied power. Stable disease was observed in only one patient (12.5%). With median progression of 4.0 months (range, 2-17 months), 18 patients (95%) demonstrated disease progression. With median overall survival of 8.0 months (range, 2-32 months), 18 patients (95%) had died. Physical well-being scores were significantly decreased over the study period, although social, emotional, and functional well-being scores did not significantly change. CONCLUSIONS: The mEHT treatment was feasible in patients with recurrent or progressive ovarian cancer without any complication and optimal dose of mEHT treatment was up to 150 W for 1 hour/day.

Three-year interval for endoscopic screening may reduce the mortality in patients with gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic screening has been adopted in South Korea for the national screening of gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to assess the effect on overall survival of GC patients and determine the optimal endoscopic screening interval. METHODS: The baseline characteristics and overall survival of GC patients treated at the National Cancer Center, Korea, between 2010 and 2016 were compared between those without a history of endoscopic evaluation (group N) and those in whom the interval between the last endoscopic evaluations and diagnosis of GC was ≤ 1, 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, or > 4 years (groups 1-5, respectively). RESULTS: A total of 2362 patients met the criteria for the study (1060 in group N and 1302 in groups 1-5). More patients in groups 1-5 were diagnosed with stage I GC (83.7, 83.7, 71.8, 78.2, and 71.6%, respectively) than in group N (62.4%, P < 0.001) and were treated endoscopically (38.8, 33.8, 24.7, 21.8, and 15.5%, respectively, vs. 13.5%; P < 0.001). Group 2 had less-advanced tumor stages (P = 0.001) and was more likely to have received endoscopic treatments (P = 0.026) than group 3. Hazard ratios for death were significantly lower in groups 2 (0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-0.64) and 3 (0.57; 95% CI, 0.33-0.98) than in group N; the decrease was not significant in group 4 (0.49, 95% CI, 0.20-1.20). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic screening every 3 years may reduce the mortality of GC patients, though screenings at least every 2 years may benefit patients with less-advanced stages.

Use of adjuvant chemotherapy in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients with or without the 21-gene expression assay.

PURPOSE: We assessed the use of chemotherapy in breast cancer patients to investigate the factors that changed trends in chemotherapy following the adoption of the 21-gene expression assay in tumor genomic profiling. METHODS: Our study used 2033 patients from the National Cancer Center in Korea diagnosed with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer (tumor size of 0.5 cm or larger and 0-3 node metastases) from 2010 to 2015. We analyzed use of the 21-gene expression assay, changes in frequency of adjuvant chemotherapy use, and clinicopathological factors related to adjuvant chemotherapy to assess the impact of the 21-gene expression assay. RESULTS: Adjuvant chemotherapy use declined from 33.33% (2011) to 13.59% (2015) [relative risk (RR), 0.71; 95% CI 0.56-0.89; ptrend = 0.004] in patients with 21-gene expression assay data. Among patients without assay data, adjuvant chemotherapy use decreased from 76.79 to 40.17% between 2010 and 2015 (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.84-0.91; ptrend < 0.001), especially for patients with node-negative/micrometastasis (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.81-0.89; ptrend < 0.001). The frequency of adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly decreased after introduction of the 21-gene expression assay (p < 0.001). Tumor size (p < 0.001), progesterone receptor (PgR) status (p = 0.001), and proliferation index (Ki-67) levels (p < 0.001) were important factors for chemotherapy decision-making in node-negative/micrometastasis patients who did not undergo the assay. CONCLUSIONS: For HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer patients with 0-1 node metastases, chemotherapy use declined significantly after the adoption of the 21-gene assay. PgR status and Ki-67 were useful for chemotherapy decision-making in cases without the 21-gene assay.

Prognostic Implications of Multiplex Detection of KRAS Mutations in Cell-Free DNA from Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is known to provide potential biomarkers for predicting clinical outcome, but its value in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has not been fully evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical applicability of quantitative analysis of multiplex KRAS mutations in cell-free DNA from patients with PDAC. METHODS: A total of 106 patients with PDAC were enrolled in this prospective study. The concentration and fraction of KRAS mutations were determined through multiplex detection of KRAS mutations in plasma samples by use of a droplet digital PCR kit (Bio-Rad). RESULTS: KRAS mutations were detected in 96.1% of tissue samples. Eighty patients (80.5%) harbored KRAS mutations in cfDNA, with a median KRAS mutation concentration of 0.165 copies/µL and a median fractional abundance of 0.415%. Multivariable analyses demonstrated that the KRAS mutation concentration [hazard ratio (HR), 2.08; 95% CI, 1.20-3.63] and KRAS fraction (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.02-2.95) were significant factors for progression-free survival. KRAS mutation concentration (HR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.05-3.67) also had prognostic implications for overall survival. Subgroup analyses showed that KRAS mutation concentration and fractional abundance significantly affected progression-free survival in resectable PDAC (P = 0.016). Moreover, when combined with the cancer biomarker CA19-9, the KRAS mutation concentration in cfDNA showed additive benefits for the prediction of overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that multiplex detection of KRAS mutations in plasma cfDNA is clinically relevant, providing a potential candidate biomarker for prognosis of PDAC.

Phase II Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Transanal Endoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Total mesorectal excision has become the standard treatment for rectal cancer, and several investigators have shown that a transanal approach is a feasible option. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of transanal endoscopic total mesorectal excision in patients with rectal cancer. DESIGN: This study was a prospective, single-arm phase II trial. It was registered on clinicaltrials.gov under identifier NCT02406118. SETTINGS: Inpatients at a hospital specializing in oncology were selected. PATIENTS: This prospective study enrolled 49 patients with rectal cancer located 3 to 12 cm from the anal verge who were scheduled to undergo radical surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopy-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was total mesorectal excision quality and circumferential resection margin. Secondary end points included the number of harvested lymph nodes, operation time, and 30-day postoperative complications. RESULTS: From March 2015 to April 2016, 32 men and 17 women with rectal cancer were enrolled. The mean age was 61.2 years, and mean BMI was 23.3 kg/m. The mean operating time was 158 minutes, and the mean estimated blood loss was 89.3 mL. There were no intraoperative complications and no conversions to open surgery. Successful treatment based on total mesorectal excision quality and circumferential resection margin was achieved in 45 patients (91.8%). Fifteen patients (30.6%) had 30-day postoperative complications, including 7 (14.3%) with anastomotic dehiscence, 5 (10.2%) with urinary retention, 2 (4.1%) with abdominal wound complications, and 1 (2.0%) with ileus. There was no postoperative mortality. LIMITATIONS: This was a noncomparative single-arm trial conducted at a single institution. CONCLUSIONS: Transanal endoscopic total mesorectal excision showed acceptable results based on perioperative and short-term oncologic outcomes. Further investigations are necessary to show the benefits and long-term outcomes of this procedure. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A563.

Body mass index and mortality in patients with gastric cancer: a large cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The effects of obesity on prognosis in gastric cancer are controversial. AIMS: To evaluate the association between body mass index (BMI) and mortality in patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: A single-institution cohort of 7765 patients with gastric cancer undergoing curative gastrectomy between October 2000 and June 2016 was categorized into six groups based on BMI: underweight (< 18.5 kg/m2), normal (18.5 to < 23 kg/m2), overweight (23 to < 25 kg/m2), mildly obese (25 to < 28 kg/m2), moderately obese (28 to < 30 kg/m2), and severely obese (≥ 30 kg/m2). Hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: We identified 1279 (16.5%) all-cause and 763 (9.8%) disease-specific deaths among 7765 patients over 83.05 months (range 1.02-186.97) median follow-up. In multivariable analyses adjusted for statistically significant clinicopathological characteristics, preoperative BMI was associated with OS in a non-linear pattern. Compared with normal-weight patients, underweight patients had worse OS [HR 1.42; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-1.77], whereas overweight (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.73-0.97), mildly obese (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.66-0.90), and moderately obese (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.59-1.01) patients had better OS. DSS exhibited a similar pattern, with lowest mortality in moderately obese patients (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.39-0.85). Spline analysis showed the lowest all-cause mortality risk at a BMI of 26.67 kg/m2. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing curative gastric cancer surgery, those who were overweight or mildly-to-moderately obese (BMI 23 to < 30 kg/m2) preoperatively had better OS and DSS than normal-weight patients.

Treatment Results and Prognostic Factors of Brain Metastases From Ovarian Cancer: A Single Institutional Experience of 56 Patients.

OBJECTIVES: The most appropriate treatments for brain metastases from ovarian cancer have not been established mainly because of its rarity. The objective of this study was to describe clinical results of treatment and prognostic factors of patients with brain metastases from ovarian cancer treated at a single institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrieved information from the electronic medical records of 56 consecutive patients (2.8%) with brain metastases, from a total of 2008 patients with ovarian cancer. Endpoints were the pattern of treatment failure, progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Radiation was the most common initial treatment for brain metastases (59%), followed by surgery (23%). The median progression-free survival was 9.8 months. Radiological progression was confirmed in 20 patients: 7 had leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (37%), 8 had local recurrence, and 5 had distant recurrence. Median OS was 11.25 months, and the 1-year OS rate was 48.2%. Patients received surgery for single metastasis as initial treatment showed median OS of 24.1 months, which was significantly prolonged compared with the other patients (P = 0.0002). Of the 48 patients who died, 29 (60%) died of systemic disease and 7 (15%) died of central nervous system progression. Karnofsky Performance Status greater than or equal to 70, control of systemic cancer, serous histology, and surgery for brain metastases were associated with improved OS in multivariable analysis (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection for single or symptomatic brain metastases from ovarian cancer prolonged OS significantly. Multimodality treatment, including control of systemic cancer, appeared to be an important factor in prolonging OS.