Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 48
Filter
1.
Cell ; 186(26): 5840-5858.e36, 2023 12 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38134876

ABSTRACT

Short tandem repeat (STR) instability causes transcriptional silencing in several repeat expansion disorders. In fragile X syndrome (FXS), mutation-length expansion of a CGG STR represses FMR1 via local DNA methylation. Here, we find megabase-scale H3K9me3 domains on autosomes and encompassing FMR1 on the X chromosome in FXS patient-derived iPSCs, iPSC-derived neural progenitors, EBV-transformed lymphoblasts, and brain tissue with mutation-length CGG expansion. H3K9me3 domains connect via inter-chromosomal interactions and demarcate severe misfolding of TADs and loops. They harbor long synaptic genes replicating at the end of S phase, replication-stress-induced double-strand breaks, and STRs prone to stepwise somatic instability. CRISPR engineering of the mutation-length CGG to premutation length reverses H3K9me3 on the X chromosome and multiple autosomes, refolds TADs, and restores gene expression. H3K9me3 domains can also arise in normal-length iPSCs created with perturbations linked to genome instability, suggesting their relevance beyond FXS. Our results reveal Mb-scale heterochromatinization and trans interactions among loci susceptible to instability.


Subject(s)
Fragile X Syndrome , Humans , Fragile X Syndrome/genetics , Fragile X Syndrome/metabolism , Trinucleotide Repeat Expansion , DNA Methylation , Mutation , Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein/genetics , Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein/metabolism
2.
Cell ; 182(6): 1474-1489.e23, 2020 09 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32841603

ABSTRACT

Widespread changes to DNA methylation and chromatin are well documented in cancer, but the fate of higher-order chromosomal structure remains obscure. Here we integrated topological maps for colon tumors and normal colons with epigenetic, transcriptional, and imaging data to characterize alterations to chromatin loops, topologically associated domains, and large-scale compartments. We found that spatial partitioning of the open and closed genome compartments is profoundly compromised in tumors. This reorganization is accompanied by compartment-specific hypomethylation and chromatin changes. Additionally, we identify a compartment at the interface between the canonical A and B compartments that is reorganized in tumors. Remarkably, similar shifts were evident in non-malignant cells that have accumulated excess divisions. Our analyses suggest that these topological changes repress stemness and invasion programs while inducing anti-tumor immunity genes and may therefore restrain malignant progression. Our findings call into question the conventional view that tumor-associated epigenomic alterations are primarily oncogenic.


Subject(s)
Chromatin/metabolism , Chromosomes/metabolism , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/metabolism , DNA Methylation , Epigenesis, Genetic , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/genetics , Cell Division , Cellular Senescence/genetics , Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing , Chromosomes/genetics , Cohort Studies , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Computational Biology , DNA Methylation/genetics , Epigenomics , HCT116 Cells , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Microscopy, Electron, Transmission , Molecular Dynamics Simulation , RNA-Seq , Spatial Analysis , Tumor Suppressor Proteins/genetics , Tumor Suppressor Proteins/metabolism
3.
Nat Immunol ; 23(7): 1052-1062, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35726060

ABSTRACT

The high mobility group (HMG) transcription factor TCF-1 is essential for early T cell development. Although in vitro biochemical assays suggest that HMG proteins can serve as architectural elements in the assembly of higher-order nuclear organization, the contribution of TCF-1 on the control of three-dimensional (3D) genome structures during T cell development remains unknown. Here, we investigated the role of TCF-1 in 3D genome reconfiguration. Using gain- and loss-of-function experiments, we discovered that the co-occupancy of TCF-1 and the architectural protein CTCF altered the structure of topologically associating domains in T cell progenitors, leading to interactions between previously insulated regulatory elements and target genes at late stages of T cell development. The TCF-1-dependent gain in long-range interactions was linked to deposition of active enhancer mark H3K27ac and recruitment of the cohesin-loading factor NIPBL at active enhancers. These data indicate that TCF-1 has a role in controlling global genome organization during T cell development.


Subject(s)
Chromatin , Enhancer Elements, Genetic , CCCTC-Binding Factor/genetics , CCCTC-Binding Factor/metabolism , Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism , Enhancer Elements, Genetic/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation , T-Lymphocytes/metabolism
4.
Genes Dev ; 38(9-10): 436-454, 2024 Jun 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38866556

ABSTRACT

Genome organization can regulate gene expression and promote cell fate transitions. The differentiation of germline stem cells (GSCs) to oocytes in Drosophila involves changes in genome organization mediated by heterochromatin and the nuclear pore complex (NPC). Heterochromatin represses germ cell genes during differentiation, and NPCs anchor these silenced genes to the nuclear periphery, maintaining silencing to allow for oocyte development. Surprisingly, we found that genome organization also contributes to NPC formation, mediated by the transcription factor Stonewall (Stwl). As GSCs differentiate, Stwl accumulates at boundaries between silenced and active gene compartments. Stwl at these boundaries plays a pivotal role in transitioning germ cell genes into a silenced state and activating a group of oocyte genes and nucleoporins (Nups). The upregulation of these Nups during differentiation is crucial for NPC formation and further genome organization. Thus, cross-talk between genome architecture and NPCs is essential for successful cell fate transitions.


Subject(s)
Cell Differentiation , Drosophila Proteins , Genome, Insect , Nuclear Pore , Oogenesis , Animals , Oogenesis/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Cell Differentiation/genetics , Nuclear Pore/metabolism , Nuclear Pore/genetics , Genome, Insect/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental/genetics , Female , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Oocytes/metabolism , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Transcription Factors/genetics , Drosophila/genetics , Nuclear Pore Complex Proteins/metabolism , Nuclear Pore Complex Proteins/genetics
5.
Genes Dev ; 38(9-10): 415-435, 2024 Jun 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38866555

ABSTRACT

The association of genomic loci to the nuclear periphery is proposed to facilitate cell type-specific gene repression and influence cell fate decisions. However, the interplay between gene position and expression remains incompletely understood, in part because the proteins that position genomic loci at the nuclear periphery remain unidentified. Here, we used an Oligopaint-based HiDRO screen targeting ∼1000 genes to discover novel regulators of nuclear architecture in Drosophila cells. We identified the heterochromatin-associated protein Stonewall (Stwl) as a factor promoting perinuclear chromatin positioning. In female germline stem cells (GSCs), Stwl binds and positions chromatin loci, including GSC differentiation genes, at the nuclear periphery. Strikingly, Stwl-dependent perinuclear positioning is associated with transcriptional repression, highlighting a likely mechanism for Stwl's known role in GSC maintenance and ovary homeostasis. Thus, our study identifies perinuclear anchors in Drosophila and demonstrates the importance of gene repression at the nuclear periphery for cell fate.


Subject(s)
Cell Differentiation , Cell Nucleus , Chromatin , Drosophila Proteins , Animals , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Chromatin/metabolism , Chromatin/genetics , Cell Nucleus/metabolism , Cell Nucleus/genetics , Female , Cell Differentiation/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Stem Cells/metabolism , Stem Cells/cytology , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental/genetics , Drosophila/genetics , Germ Cells/metabolism
6.
Immunity ; 52(2): 257-274.e11, 2020 02 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32049053

ABSTRACT

Genetics is a major determinant of susceptibility to autoimmune disorders. Here, we examined whether genome organization provides resilience or susceptibility to sequence variations, and how this would contribute to the molecular etiology of an autoimmune disease. We generated high-resolution maps of linear and 3D genome organization in thymocytes of NOD mice, a model of type 1 diabetes (T1D), and the diabetes-resistant C57BL/6 mice. Multi-enhancer interactions formed at genomic regions harboring genes with prominent roles in T cell development in both strains. However, diabetes risk-conferring loci coalesced enhancers and promoters in NOD, but not C57BL/6 thymocytes. 3D genome mapping of NODxC57BL/6 F1 thymocytes revealed that genomic misfolding in NOD mice is mediated in cis. Moreover, immune cells infiltrating the pancreas of humans with T1D exhibited increased expression of genes located on misfolded loci in mice. Thus, genetic variation leads to altered 3D chromatin architecture and associated changes in gene expression that may underlie autoimmune pathology.


Subject(s)
Chromatin/metabolism , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Thymocytes/pathology , Animals , CCCTC-Binding Factor/metabolism , Chromosome Mapping , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/pathology , Epigenesis, Genetic , Gene Expression , Genetic Loci/genetics , Genetic Variation , Genome/genetics , Humans , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Inbred NOD , Pancreas/pathology , Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid
7.
Nature ; 620(7972): 209-217, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37438531

ABSTRACT

The human genome functions as a three-dimensional chromatin polymer, driven by a complex collection of chromosome interactions1-3. Although the molecular rules governing these interactions are being quickly elucidated, relatively few proteins regulating this process have been identified. Here, to address this gap, we developed high-throughput DNA or RNA labelling with optimized Oligopaints (HiDRO)-an automated imaging pipeline that enables the quantitative measurement of chromatin interactions in single cells across thousands of samples. By screening the human druggable genome, we identified more than 300 factors that influence genome folding during interphase. Among these, 43 genes were validated as either increasing or decreasing interactions between topologically associating domains. Our findings show that genetic or chemical inhibition of the ubiquitous kinase GSK3A leads to increased long-range chromatin looping interactions in a genome-wide and cohesin-dependent manner. These results demonstrate the importance of GSK3A signalling in nuclear architecture and the use of HiDRO for identifying mechanisms of spatial genome organization.


Subject(s)
Chromatin , Chromosome Positioning , Chromosomes, Human , Genome, Human , Glycogen Synthase Kinases , High-Throughput Screening Assays , Single-Cell Analysis , Humans , Chromatin/drug effects , Chromatin/genetics , Chromatin/metabolism , Chromosome Positioning/drug effects , Chromosomes, Human/drug effects , Chromosomes, Human/genetics , Chromosomes, Human/metabolism , DNA/analysis , DNA/metabolism , Genome, Human/drug effects , Genome, Human/genetics , Glycogen Synthase Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors , Glycogen Synthase Kinases/deficiency , Glycogen Synthase Kinases/genetics , High-Throughput Screening Assays/methods , Interphase , Reproducibility of Results , RNA/analysis , RNA/metabolism , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Single-Cell Analysis/methods , Cohesins
8.
Mol Cell ; 81(8): 1666-1681.e6, 2021 04 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33823140

ABSTRACT

Nuclear speckles are prominent nuclear bodies that contain proteins and RNA involved in gene expression. Although links between nuclear speckles and gene activation are emerging, the mechanisms regulating association of genes with speckles are unclear. We find that speckle association of p53 target genes is driven by the p53 transcription factor. Focusing on p21, a key p53 target, we demonstrate that speckle association boosts expression by elevating nascent RNA amounts. p53-regulated speckle association did not depend on p53 transactivation functions but required an intact proline-rich domain and direct DNA binding, providing mechanisms within p53 for regulating gene-speckle association. Beyond p21, a substantial subset of p53 targets have p53-regulated speckle association. Strikingly, speckle-associating p53 targets are more robustly activated and occupy a distinct niche of p53 biology compared with non-speckle-associating p53 targets. Together, our findings illuminate regulated speckle association as a mechanism used by a transcription factor to boost gene expression.


Subject(s)
Cell Nucleus/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation/genetics , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , RNA/genetics , Transcriptional Activation/genetics , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/genetics , DNA/genetics , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Intranuclear Inclusion Bodies/genetics , Protein Binding/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcription, Genetic/genetics
9.
Mol Cell ; 77(1): 67-81.e7, 2020 01 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31784359

ABSTRACT

Interactions between the genome and the nuclear pore complex (NPC) have been implicated in multiple gene regulatory processes, but the underlying logic of these interactions remains poorly defined. Here, we report high-resolution chromatin binding maps of two core components of the NPC, Nup107 and Nup93, in Drosophila cells. Our investigation uncovered differential binding of these NPC subunits, where Nup107 preferentially targets active genes while Nup93 associates primarily with Polycomb-silenced regions. Comparison to Lamin-associated domains (LADs) revealed that NPC binding sites can be found within LADs, demonstrating a linear binding of the genome along the nuclear envelope. Importantly, we identified a functional role of Nup93 in silencing of Polycomb target genes and in spatial folding of Polycomb domains. Our findings lend to a model where different nuclear pores bind different types of chromatin via interactions with specific NPC sub-complexes, and a subset of Polycomb domains is stabilized by interactions with Nup93.


Subject(s)
Chromatin/metabolism , Nuclear Pore/metabolism , Polycomb-Group Proteins/metabolism , Animals , Aquaporins/metabolism , Binding Sites/physiology , Cell Line , Drosophila/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Female , Gene Expression Regulation/physiology , Genome/physiology , Male , Nuclear Envelope/metabolism , Nuclear Pore Complex Proteins/metabolism
10.
Mol Cell ; 73(6): 1174-1190.e12, 2019 03 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30745086

ABSTRACT

Chromatin loops enable transcription-factor-bound distal enhancers to interact with their target promoters to regulate transcriptional programs. Although developmental transcription factors such as active forms of Notch can directly stimulate transcription by activating enhancers, the effect of their oncogenic subversion on the 3D organization of cancer genomes is largely undetermined. By mapping chromatin looping genome-wide in Notch-dependent triple-negative breast cancer and B cell lymphoma, we show that beyond the well-characterized role of Notch as an activator of distal enhancers, Notch regulates its direct target genes by instructing enhancer repositioning. Moreover, a large fraction of Notch-instructed regulatory loops form highly interacting enhancer and promoter spatial clusters termed "3D cliques." Loss- and gain-of-function experiments show that Notch preferentially targets hyperconnected 3D cliques that regulate the expression of crucial proto-oncogenes. Our observations suggest that oncogenic hijacking of developmental transcription factors can dysregulate transcription through widespread effects on the spatial organization of cancer genomes.


Subject(s)
Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/genetics , Chromatin/genetics , Lymphoma, B-Cell/genetics , Oncogenes , Receptors, Notch/genetics , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Binding Sites , Cell Lineage/genetics , Cell Proliferation/genetics , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/metabolism , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/pathology , Chromatin/metabolism , Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly , Cyclin D1/genetics , Cyclin D1/metabolism , Enhancer Elements, Genetic , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Gene Regulatory Networks , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Lymphoma, B-Cell/metabolism , Lymphoma, B-Cell/pathology , Mutation , Nucleic Acid Conformation , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Protein Binding , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc/metabolism , Receptors, Notch/metabolism , Signal Transduction/genetics , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/pathology
11.
PLoS Genet ; 18(11): e1010528, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36449519

ABSTRACT

The relationship between cohesin-mediated chromatin looping and gene expression remains unclear. NIPBL and WAPL are two opposing regulators of cohesin activity; depletion of either is associated with changes in both chromatin folding and transcription across a wide range of cell types. However, a direct comparison of their individual and combined effects on gene expression in the same cell type is lacking. We find that NIPBL or WAPL depletion in human HCT116 cells each alter the expression of ~2,000 genes, with only ~30% of the genes shared between the conditions. We find that clusters of differentially expressed genes within the same topologically associated domain (TAD) show coordinated misexpression, suggesting some genomic domains are especially sensitive to both more or less cohesin. Finally, co-depletion of NIPBL and WAPL restores the majority of gene misexpression as compared to either knockdown alone. A similar set of NIPBL-sensitive genes are rescued following CTCF co-depletion. Together, this indicates that altered transcription due to reduced cohesin activity can be functionally offset by removal of either its negative regulator (WAPL) or the physical barriers (CTCF) that restrict loop-extrusion events.


Subject(s)
Cell Cycle Proteins , Chromatin , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone , Gene Expression Regulation , Humans , CCCTC-Binding Factor/genetics , CCCTC-Binding Factor/metabolism , Cell Cycle Proteins/genetics , Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism , Chromatin/genetics , Genes, cdc , Genome , HCT116 Cells , Cohesins
12.
PLoS Genet ; 14(7): e1007393, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30001329

ABSTRACT

Metazoan chromosomes are folded into discrete sub-nuclear domains, referred to as chromosome territories (CTs). The molecular mechanisms that underlie the formation and maintenance of CTs during the cell cycle remain largely unknown. Here, we have developed high-resolution chromosome paints to investigate CT organization in Drosophila cycling cells. We show that large-scale chromosome folding patterns and levels of chromosome intermixing are remarkably stable across various cell types. Our data also suggest that the nucleus scales to accommodate fluctuations in chromosome size throughout the cell cycle, which limits the degree of intermixing between neighboring CTs. Finally, we show that the cohesin and condensin complexes are required for different scales of chromosome folding, with condensin II being especially important for the size, shape, and level of intermixing between CTs in interphase. These findings suggest that large-scale chromosome folding driven by condensin II influences the extent to which chromosomes interact, which may have direct consequences for cell-type specific genome stability.


Subject(s)
Adenosine Triphosphatases/metabolism , Cell Nucleus/metabolism , Chromosomes/metabolism , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila/physiology , Multiprotein Complexes/metabolism , Animals , Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism , Cell Line , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/metabolism , Genomic Instability/physiology , Interphase/genetics , Cohesins
13.
Mol Biol Evol ; 36(10): 2195-2204, 2019 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31270536

ABSTRACT

Condensins play a crucial role in the organization of genetic material by compacting and disentangling chromosomes. Based on studies in a few model organisms, the condensins I and II complexes are considered to have distinct functions, with the condensin II complex playing a role in meiosis and somatic pairing of homologous chromosomes in Drosophila. Intriguingly, the Cap-G2 subunit of condensin II is absent in Drosophila melanogaster, and this loss may be related to the high levels of chromosome pairing seen in flies. Here, we find that all three non-SMC subunits of condensin II (Cap-G2, Cap-D3, and Cap-H2) have been repeatedly and independently lost in taxa representing multiple insect orders, with some taxa lacking all three. We also find that all non-Dipteran insects display near-uniform low-pairing levels regardless of their condensin II complex composition, suggesting that some key aspects of genome organization are robust to condensin II subunit losses. Finally, we observe consistent signatures of positive selection in condensin subunits across flies and mammals. These findings suggest that these ancient complexes are far more evolutionarily labile than previously suspected, and are at the crossroads of several forms of genomic conflicts. Our results raise fundamental questions about the specific functions of the two condensin complexes in taxa that have experienced subunit losses, and open the door to further investigations to elucidate the diversity of molecular mechanisms that underlie genome organization across various life forms.


Subject(s)
Adenosine Triphosphatases/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Evolution, Molecular , Insecta/genetics , Multiprotein Complexes/genetics , Animals , Mammals/genetics , Selection, Genetic
14.
PLoS Genet ; 12(8): e1006169, 2016 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27541002

ABSTRACT

Following DNA replication, sister chromatids must stay connected for the remainder of the cell cycle in order to ensure accurate segregation in the subsequent cell division. This important function involves an evolutionarily conserved protein complex known as cohesin; any loss of cohesin causes premature sister chromatid separation in mitosis. Here, we examined the role of cohesin in sister chromatid cohesion prior to mitosis, using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to assay the alignment of sister chromatids in interphase Drosophila cells. Surprisingly, we found that sister chromatid cohesion can be maintained in G2 with little to no cohesin. This capacity to maintain cohesion is widespread in Drosophila, unlike in other systems where a reduced dependence on cohesin for sister chromatid segregation has been observed only at specific chromosomal regions, such as the rDNA locus in budding yeast. Additionally, we show that condensin II antagonizes the alignment of sister chromatids in interphase, supporting a model wherein cohesin and condensin II oppose each other's functions in the alignment of sister chromatids. Finally, because the maternal and paternal homologs are paired in the somatic cells of Drosophila, and because condensin II has been shown to antagonize this pairing, we consider the possibility that condensin II-regulated mechanisms for aligning homologous chromosomes may also contribute to sister chromatid cohesion.


Subject(s)
Adenosine Triphosphatases/genetics , Cell Nucleus/genetics , Chromosomes/genetics , DNA Replication/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Multiprotein Complexes/genetics , Animals , Chromatids/genetics , Chromosome Segregation/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Metaphase/genetics , Mitosis/genetics , RNA Interference , Sister Chromatid Exchange/genetics
15.
PLoS Genet ; 9(12): e1004013, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24385920

ABSTRACT

Homolog pairing, which plays a critical role in meiosis, poses a potential risk if it occurs in inappropriate tissues or between nonallelic sites, as it can lead to changes in gene expression, chromosome entanglements, and loss-of-heterozygosity due to mitotic recombination. This is particularly true in Drosophila, which supports organismal-wide pairing throughout development. Discovered over a century ago, such extensive pairing has led to the perception that germline pairing in the adult gonad is an extension of the pairing established during embryogenesis and, therefore, differs from the mechanism utilized in most species to initiate pairing specifically in the germline. Here, we show that, contrary to long-standing assumptions, Drosophila meiotic pairing in the gonad is not an extension of pairing established during embryogenesis. Instead, we find that homologous chromosomes are unpaired in primordial germ cells from the moment the germline can be distinguished from the soma in the embryo and remain unpaired even in the germline stem cells of the adult gonad. We further establish that pairing originates immediately after the stem cell stage. This pairing occurs well before the initiation of meiosis and, strikingly, continues through the several mitotic divisions preceding meiosis. These discoveries indicate that the spatial organization of the Drosophila genome differs between the germline and the soma from the earliest moments of development and thus argue that homolog pairing in the germline is an active process as versus a passive continuation of pairing established during embryogenesis.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Pairing/genetics , Germ Cells/cytology , Meiosis/genetics , Stem Cells/cytology , Animals , Chromosome Segregation/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/growth & development , Oocytes/cytology , Recombination, Genetic
16.
PLoS Genet ; 8(5): e1002667, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22589731

ABSTRACT

The pairing of homologous chromosomes is a fundamental feature of the meiotic cell. In addition, a number of species exhibit homolog pairing in nonmeiotic, somatic cells as well, with evidence for its impact on both gene regulation and double-strand break (DSB) repair. An extreme example of somatic pairing can be observed in Drosophila melanogaster, where homologous chromosomes remain aligned throughout most of development. However, our understanding of the mechanism of somatic homolog pairing remains unclear, as only a few genes have been implicated in this process. In this study, we introduce a novel high-throughput fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) technology that enabled us to conduct a genome-wide RNAi screen for factors involved in the robust somatic pairing observed in Drosophila. We identified both candidate "pairing promoting genes" and candidate "anti-pairing genes," providing evidence that pairing is a dynamic process that can be both enhanced and antagonized. Many of the genes found to be important for promoting pairing are highly enriched for functions associated with mitotic cell division, suggesting a genetic framework for a long-standing link between chromosome dynamics during mitosis and nuclear organization during interphase. In contrast, several of the candidate anti-pairing genes have known interphase functions associated with S-phase progression, DNA replication, and chromatin compaction, including several components of the condensin II complex. In combination with a variety of secondary assays, these results provide insights into the mechanism and dynamics of somatic pairing.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Pairing/genetics , Drosophila Proteins , Drosophila melanogaster , Heterochromatin/genetics , Meiosis , RNA Interference , Anaphase-Promoting Complex-Cyclosome , Aneuploidy , Animals , Cell Culture Techniques , Cell Cycle Proteins/genetics , Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/genetics , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/metabolism , DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/classification , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/cytology , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Microtubule-Associated Proteins/genetics , Microtubule-Associated Proteins/metabolism , Mitosis , Recombination, Genetic , Ubiquitin-Protein Ligase Complexes/genetics , Cohesins
17.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 109(52): 21301-6, 2012 Dec 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23236188

ABSTRACT

A host of observations demonstrating the relationship between nuclear architecture and processes such as gene expression have led to a number of new technologies for interrogating chromosome positioning. Whereas some of these technologies reconstruct intermolecular interactions, others have enhanced our ability to visualize chromosomes in situ. Here, we describe an oligonucleotide- and PCR-based strategy for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and a bioinformatic platform that enables this technology to be extended to any organism whose genome has been sequenced. The oligonucleotide probes are renewable, highly efficient, and able to robustly label chromosomes in cell culture, fixed tissues, and metaphase spreads. Our method gives researchers precise control over the sequences they target and allows for single and multicolor imaging of regions ranging from tens of kilobases to megabases with the same basic protocol. We anticipate this technology will lead to an enhanced ability to visualize interphase and metaphase chromosomes.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Painting/methods , Genome/genetics , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/methods , Oligonucleotide Probes/metabolism , Animals , Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Cell Nucleus/metabolism , Chromosomes/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/cytology , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Female , Gene Library , Humans , Interphase/genetics , Metaphase/genetics , Mice , Ovary/cytology , Ovary/metabolism , Staining and Labeling
18.
Cancer Discov ; 2024 Apr 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38655899

ABSTRACT

Gain-of-function mutations in the histone acetylation 'reader' ENL, found in AML and Wilms tumor, are known to drive condensate formation and gene activation in cellular systems. However, their role in tumorigenesis remains unclear. Using a conditional knock-in mouse model, we show that mutant ENL perturbs normal hematopoiesis, induces aberrant expansion of myeloid progenitors, and triggers rapid onset of aggressive AML. Mutant ENL alters developmental and inflammatory gene programs in part by remodeling histone modifications. Mutant ENL forms condensates in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells at key leukemogenic genes, and disrupting condensate formation via mutagenesis impairs its chromatin and oncogenic function. Moreover, treatment with an acetyl-binding inhibitor of mutant ENL displaces these condensates from target loci, inhibits mutant ENL-induced chromatin changes, and delays AML initiation and progression in vivo. Our study elucidates the function of ENL mutations in chromatin regulation and tumorigenesis, and demonstrates the potential of targeting pathogenic condensates in cancer treatment.

19.
PLoS Genet ; 6(8)2010 Aug 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20711363

ABSTRACT

Crossovers mediate the accurate segregation of homologous chromosomes during meiosis. The widely conserved pch2 gene of Drosophila melanogaster is required for a pachytene checkpoint that delays prophase progression when genes necessary for DSB repair and crossover formation are defective. However, the underlying process that the pachytene checkpoint is monitoring remains unclear. Here we have investigated the relationship between chromosome structure and the pachytene checkpoint and show that disruptions in chromosome axis formation, caused by mutations in axis components or chromosome rearrangements, trigger a pch2-dependent delay. Accordingly, the global increase in crossovers caused by chromosome rearrangements, known as the "interchromosomal effect of crossing over," is also dependent on pch2. Checkpoint-mediated effects require the histone deacetylase Sir2, revealing a conserved functional connection between PCH2 and Sir2 in monitoring meiotic events from Saccharomyces cerevisiae to a metazoan. These findings suggest a model in which the pachytene checkpoint monitors the structure of chromosome axes and may function to promote an optimal number of crossovers.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Segregation , Chromosomes/genetics , Crossing Over, Genetic , Drosophila/genetics , Meiosis , Animals , Drosophila/cytology , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Female , Male , Pachytene Stage
20.
Nat Commun ; 14(1): 5615, 2023 09 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37699887

ABSTRACT

Topologically Associating Domains (TADs) separate vertebrate genomes into insulated regulatory neighborhoods that focus genome-associated processes. TADs are formed by Cohesin-mediated loop extrusion, with many TAD boundaries consisting of clustered binding sites of the CTCF insulator protein. Here we determine how this clustering of CTCF binding contributes to the blocking of loop extrusion and the insulation between TADs. We identify enrichment of three features of CTCF binding at strong TAD boundaries, consisting of strongly bound and closely spaced CTCF binding peaks, with a further enrichment of DNA-binding motifs within these peaks. Using multi-contact Nano-C analysis in cells with normal and perturbed CTCF binding, we establish that individual CTCF binding sites contribute to the blocking of loop extrusion, but in an incomplete manner. When clustered, individual CTCF binding sites thus create a stepwise insulation between neighboring TADs. Based on these results, we propose a model whereby multiple instances of temporal loop extrusion blocking create strong insulation between TADs.


Subject(s)
Binding Sites , CCCTC-Binding Factor/genetics , Cluster Analysis , Protein Domains
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL