The role of plasmapheresis therapy for perioperative management in ABO-incompatible adult living donor liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Although living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) was established as a treatment for end-stage liver disease in Japan, the indication for LDLT across an ABO-incompatible barrier remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the role of plasmapheresis in incompatible LDLT. METHODS: Eleven adult patients (seven men and four women) who underwent incompatible LDLT were enrolled in this study. Of these three patients had hepatocellular carcinoma, three chronic hepatitis C, one Wilson's disease, one autoimmune hepatitis, one chronic hepatitis B, one hemochromatosis, and one fulminant hepatic failure. The immunosuppressive regimen consisted of tacrolimus, prednisolone, mycophenolate mofetil (or cyclophosphamide), and prostaglandin E1 in all patients. Multiple plasmapheresis was performed perioperatively to reduce the recipient's antibody titers against the donor's blood type. RESULTS: Plasmapheresis was useful for the reduction of the recipient's antibody titers to x 16 or lower before and after transplantation. There was no difference in transplant outcome between the 11 patients with incompatible blood group and 30 patients with identical or compatible blood groups. DISCUSSION: Major postoperative complications such as intrahepatic biliary complications and hepatic necrosis may occur in incompatible transplantation. Several investigators suggested that anti-immunoglobulin (Ig) M and anti-IgG antibody titers sustained these complications. The antibody titers must be decreased sufficiently with plasmapheresis. An elevation of anti-ABO titers after transplantation may be a predictive risk factor for increased mortality and morbidity. In order to perform LDLT in a safer manner, plasmapheresis is an indispensable treatment to improve the outcome of ABO-incompatible cases.

Machine perfusion preservation for kidney grafts with a high creatinine from uncontrolled donation after cardiac death.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the usefulness of machine perfusion preservation parameters as selection criteria for donation after cardiac arrest (DCD) with high creatinine level. The aim of this study is to evaluate to whether DCD donor >50 years old and with high creatinine are acceptable. METHODS: We examined 17 kidneys from uncontrolled DCD who showed creatinine levels >3.0 mg/dL before procurement. The study included the following two groups: group 1 (n = 9), donor age <50 years old versus group 2 (n = 8), donor age >50 years old. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in donors or preservation conditions among the 2 groups, including age, terminal creatinine, warm ischemic time, cold perfusion time, and total ischemic time. A greater resistance of 47.9 mmHg/mL per min/g was observed among group 2, compared with 42.5 mmHg/mL per min/g in group 1. A shorter ATN period (8.2 days) was noted in group 1, compared with 21.2 days for group 2. The flow rate (mL/g/min) was not significantly different between the two groups. The best-Cr level was 1.22 mg/dL in group 1 and 1.94 mg/dL in group 2. CONCLUSION: Machine perfusion flow was a reliable indicator of graft viability in uncontrolled DCD, particularly kidneys with high creatinine level. Even older donors were acceptable if the machine perfusion preservation parameters such as flow rate and pressure were acceptable; however, they may show severe delayed graft function.