ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with metastatic Ewing sarcoma family of tumors (ESFT) remains poor. PROCEDURE: We retrospectively analyzed 57 patients diagnosed with metastatic ESFT between 2000 and 2018 to identify prognostic and therapeutic factors affecting the clinical outcome. RESULTS: The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate of the entire cohort was 46.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 33.0-59.4%). Treatment-related death was not observed. Multivariate analysis identified stem cell transplantation (SCT), response to first-line chemotherapy, and bone metastasis as independent risk factors for OS. Objective response rate to first-line chemotherapy was 65.1% in the 43 evaluable patients. There was no significant difference in the response to different types of first-line chemotherapy. Among patients with lung metastasis alone, the 3-year OS rate was higher in 13 patients who received local treatment than in four who did not, although the difference was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: One possible reason for the high OS rates was the absence of treatment-related mortality even in patients receiving SCT, which could be attributed to advances in the management of post-SCT complications. Novel first-line chemotherapy strategies need to be established to improve the disease status prior to SCT in a higher proportion of patients.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Bone Neoplasms/mortality , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Sarcoma, Ewing/mortality , Adolescent , Adult , Bone Neoplasms/pathology , Bone Neoplasms/therapy , Child , Child, Preschool , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/secondary , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Male , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Sarcoma, Ewing/pathology , Sarcoma, Ewing/therapy , Survival Rate , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients with Ewing's sarcoma family of tumors (ESFT) who experience relapse or progression have a poor prognosis. AIM: This study aimed to identify the prognostic and therapeutic factors affecting overall survival (OS) of patients with recurrent or refractory localized ESFT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with localized ESFT who experienced first relapse or progression between 2000 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The 5-year OS rate of the entire cohort was 48.3% (95% confidence interval, 29.9%-64.5%). Multivariate analysis of OS identified time to relapse or progression, but not stem cell transplantation (SCT), as the sole independent risk factor (hazard ratio, 35.8; P = .002). Among 31 patients who received salvage chemotherapy before local treatment, 21 received chemotherapy regimens that are not conventionally used for newly diagnosed ESFT. The objective response rate to first-line salvage chemotherapy was 55.2% in the 29 evaluable patients. Time to relapse or progression was significantly associated with response to first-line salvage chemotherapy (P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: The present study fails to demonstrate significant clinical benefit of SCT for recurrent or refractory localized ESFT. Recently established chemotherapy regimens may increase the survival rate of patients with recurrent or refractory localized ESFT while attenuating the beneficial effect of SCT.