Successful expansion of community-based drug-resistant TB care in rural Eswatini - a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Provision of drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) treatment is scarce in resource-limited settings. We assessed the feasibility of ambulatory DR-TB care for treatment expansion in rural Eswatini. METHODS: Retrospective patient-level data were used to evaluate ambulatory DR-TB treatment provision in rural Shiselweni (Eswatini), from 2008 to 2016. DR-TB care was either clinic-based led by nurses or community-based at the patient's home with involvement of community treatment supporters for provision of treatment to patients with difficulties in accessing facilities. We describe programmatic outcomes and used multivariate flexible parametric survival models to assess time to adverse outcomes. Both care models were costed in supplementary analyses. RESULTS: Of 698 patients initiated on DR-TB treatment, 57% were women and 84% were HIV-positive. Treatment initiations increased from 27 in 2008 to 127 in 2011 and decreased thereafter to 51 in 2016. Proportionally, community-based care increased from 19% in 2009 to 77% in 2016. Treatment success was higher for community-based care (79%) than clinic-based care (68%, P = 0.002). After adjustment for covariate factors among adults (n = 552), the risk of adverse outcomes (death, loss to follow-up, treatment failure) in community-based care was reduced by 41% (adjusted hazard ratio 0.59, 95% CI: 0.39-0.91). Findings were supported by sensitivity analyses. The care provider's per-patient costs for community-based (USD13 345) and clinic-based (USD12 990) care were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory treatment outcomes were good, and community-based care achieved better treatment outcomes than clinic-based care at comparable costs. Contextualised DR-TB care programmes are feasible and can support treatment expansion in rural settings.

OBJECTIFS: La fourniture de traitement de la tuberculose résistante aux médicaments (TB-R) est rare dans les pays à ressources limitées. Nous avons évalué la faisabilité des soins ambulatoires de la TB-R pour l'extension du traitement en zone rurale d'Eswatini. MÉTHODES: Des données rétrospectives au niveau du patient ont été utilisées pour évaluer la fourniture d'un traitement ambulatoire de la TB-R dans la zone rurale de Shiselweni (Eswatini), de 2008 à 2016. Les soins pour la TB-R étaient dispensés soit en clinique sous la direction d'infirmiers ou en milieu communautaire au domicile du patient avec l'implication des aidants au traitement pour la fourniture d'un traitement aux patients ayant des difficultés à accéder aux établissements. Nous décrivons ici les résultats programmatiques et avons utilisé des modèles de survie paramétriques flexibles multivariés pour évaluer le délai d'apparition de résultats défavorables. Les deux modèles de soins ont été chiffrés dans des analyses supplémentaires. RÉSULTATS: Sur 698 patients initiés sous traitement de la TB-R, 57% étaient des femmes et 84% étaient VIH positifs. Les initiations aux traitements sont passées de 27 en 2008 à 127 en 2011 et ont ensuite diminué à 51 en 2016. Proportionnellement, les soins communautaires ont augmenté de 19% en 2009 à 77% en 2016. Le taux de réussite du traitement était supérieur pour les soins communautaires (79%) que pour ceux dispensés en clinique (68%, P = 0,002). Après ajustement pour les facteurs de covariable chez les adultes (n = 552), le risque de résultats indésirables (décès, perte au suivi, échec du traitement) dans les soins communautaires a été réduit de 41% (rapport de risque ajusté de 0,59, IC95%: 0,39-0,91). Les résultats ont été étayés par des analyses de sensibilité. Les coûts par patient sur base du prestataire de soins pour les soins communautaires (13.345 USD) et en clinique (12.990 USD) étaient similaires. CONCLUSIONS: Les résultats des traitements ambulatoires ont été bons et les soins dispensés dans la communauté ont obtenu de meilleurs résultats que ceux dispensés en clinique à des coûts comparables. Des programmes de prise en charge contextualisés de la TB-R sont réalisables et peuvent soutenir l'expansion du traitement en milieu rural.

Field suitability and diagnostic accuracy of the Biocentric® open real-time PCR platform for plasma-based HIV viral load quantification in Swaziland.

BACKGROUND: Viral load (VL) testing is being scaled up in resource-limited settings. However, not all commercially available VL testing methods have been evaluated under field conditions. This study is one of a few to evaluate the Biocentric platform for VL quantification in routine practice in Sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: Venous blood specimens were obtained from patients eligible for VL testing at two health facilities in Swaziland from October 2016 to March 2017. Samples were centrifuged at two laboratories (LAB-1, LAB-2) to obtain paired plasma specimens for VL quantification with the national reference method and on the Biocentric platform. Agreement (correlation, Bland-Altman) and accuracy (sensitivity, specificity) indicators were calculated at the VL thresholds of 416 (2.62 log10) and 1000 (3.0 log10) copies/mL. Leftover samples from patients with discordant VL results were re-quantified and accuracy indicators recalculated. Logistic regression was used to compare laboratory performance. RESULTS: A total of 364 paired plasma samples (LAB-1: n = 198; LAB-2: n = 166) were successfully tested using both methods. The correlation was high (R = 0.82, p < 0.01), and the Bland-Altman analysis showed a minimal mean difference (- 0.03 log10 copies/mL; 95% CI: -1.15 to 1.08). At the clinical threshold level of 3.0 log10 copies/mL, the sensitivity was 88.6% (95% CI: 78.7 to 94.9) and the specificity was 98.3% (95% CI: 96.1 to 99.4). Sensitivity was higher in LAB-1 (100%; 95% CI: 71.5 to 100) than in LAB-2 (86.4%; 95% CI: 75.0 to 94.0). Most upward (n = 8, 2.2%) and downward (n = 11, 3.0%) misclassifications occurred at the 2.62 log threshold, with LAB-2 having a 16 (95% CI: 2.26 to 113.27; p = 0.006) times higher odds of downward misclassification. After retesting of discordant leftover samples (n = 17), overall sensitivity increased to 93.5% (95% CI: 85.5 to 97.9) and 97.1% (95% CI: 90.1 to 99.7) at the 2.62 and 3.0 thresholds, and specificity increased to 98.6% (95% CI: 96.5 to 99.6) and 99.0% (95% CI: 97.0 to 99.8) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The test characteristics of the Biocentric platform were overall comparable to the national reference method for VL quantification. One laboratory tended to misclassify VL results downwards, likely owing to unmet training needs and lack of previous hands-on practice.

Challenges and successes in the implementation of option B+ to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV in southern Swaziland.

BACKGROUND: Universal antiretroviral therapy (ART) for all pregnant/ breastfeeding women living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), known as Prevention of mother-to child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) Option B+ (PMTCTB+), is being scaled up in most countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. In the transition to PMTCTB+, many countries face challenges with proper implementation of the HIV care cascade. We aimed to describe the feasibility of a PMTCTB+ approach in the public health sector in Swaziland. METHODS: Lifelong ART was offered to a cohort of HIV+ pregnant women aged ≥16 years at the first antenatal care (ANC1) visit in 9 public sector facilities, between 01/2013 and 06/2014. The study enrolment period was divided into 3 phases (early: 01-06/2013, mid: 07-12/2013 and late: 01-06/2014) to account for temporal trends. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional-hazards regression models were applied for ART initiation and attrition analyses. RESULTS: Of 665 HIV+ pregnant women, 496 (74.6%) initiated ART. ART initiation increased in later study enrolment phases (mid: aHR: 1.41; later: aHR: 2.36), and decreased at CD4 ≥ 500 (aHR: 0.69). 52.9% were retained in care at 24 months. Attrition was associated with ANC1 in the third trimester (aHR: 2.37), attending a secondary care facility (aHR: 1.98) and ART initiation during later enrolment phases (mid aHR: 1.48; late aHR: 1.67). Of 373 women eligible, 67.3% received a first VL. 223/251 (88.8%) were virologically suppressed (< 1000 copies/mL). Of 670 infants, 53.6% received an EID test, 320/359 had a test result recorded and of whom 7 (2.2%) were HIV+. CONCLUSIONS: PMTCTB+ was found to be feasible in this setting, with high rates of maternal viral suppression and low transmission to the infant. High treatment attrition, poor follow-up of mother-baby pairs and under-utilisation of VL and EID testing are important programmatic challenges.