Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors and COVID-19: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Evidence for Significant Geographical Disparities.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: While the COVID-19 pandemic is constantly evolving, it remains unclear whether the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) affects the clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 infection. For this meta-analysis, PubMed, CENTRAL, and grey literature were searched from their inception to 19 May 2020 for randomized, controlled trials or observational studies that evaluate the association between the use of either ACE inhibitors or ARBs and the risk for major clinical endpoints (infection, hospitalization, admission to ICU, death) in adult patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, a subgroup geographical analysis of outcomes was performed. Studies including less than 100 subjects were excluded from our analysis. RECENT FINDINGS: In total, 25 observational studies were included. ACE inhibitors and ARBs were not associated with increased odds for SARS-CoV-2 infection, admission to hospital, severe or critical illness, admission to ICU, and SARS-CoV-2-related death. In Asian countries, the use of ACE inhibitors/ARBs decreased the odds for severe or critical illness and death (OR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.16-0.89, I2 = 83%, and OR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.39-0.99, I2 = 0%, respectively), whereas they increased the odds for ICU admission in North America and death in Europe (OR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.37-2.23, I2 = 0%, and OR = 1.68, 95% CI 1.05-2.70, I2 = 82%, respectively). ACE inhibitors might be marginally protective regarding SARS-CoV-2-related death compared with ARBs (OR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.74-1.00, I2 = 0%). Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the aforementioned associations between ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and SARS-CoV-2.

Early diagnosis and surgical intervention untie the Gordian knot in newborns with colonic atresia: report of two cases and review of the literature.

Incidence of colonic atresia in living infants ranges from 1:5,000 to 1:60,000 (average 1:20,000). It constitutes 1.8 to 15% of all cases of atresia of the gastrointestinal tract. In 58.56-75% of all cases is right-sided. We aim, through the presentation of two cases of colonic atresia which we encountered and after systematic research of the current literature, at addressing three major issues: diagnostic approach, operative strategy and management of the prognostic parameters of the colonic atresia. The common parameter in these two cases was the early diagnosis, which played a significant role in the uncomplicated postoperative course. The first case was a type I sigmoid atresia. Contrast's escape during contrast enema examination due to accidental rupture of the distal part of the colon led to diagnosis. Side-to-side anastomosis, restoration of the rupture and a central loop sigmoidostomy were urgently performed. The second case was a type III atresia at the level of the ascending colon, which was early diagnosed via pregenital ultrasonography, in which colonic dilation was depicted. Restoration of the intestinal continuity early after birth was performed at a time. In conclusion, we believe that early diagnosis, selection of the appropriate operative strategy and prompt recognition of potential post-operative complications, especially rupture of the anastomosis, contribute to the optimization of the prognosis in patients with colonic atresia.

Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells-1 (TREM-1) and its soluble in the plasma form (sTREM-1) as a diagnostic biomarker in neonatal sepsis.

Neonatal sepsis, defined as sepsis occurring within the first 28 days of life, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. It is undeniable that finding and appliance of biomarkers in clinical practice is of great importance, aiming at the early recognition of the impending clinical deterioration and the prompt and targeted therapeutic intervention. A er systematic and thorough research of the limited relevant literature, we attempt to present a documented point-of-view on the diagnostic value of TREM-1 and its soluble form both in early and late onset neonatal sepsis.

Growing challenge of post-liver transplantation non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the leading causes of chronic liver disease, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma worldwide, with an estimated prevalence of 25%. Post-liver transplantation (LT) recurrent or de novo hepatic steatosis is a common complication in recipients, irrespective of transplantation indication. Risk factors for graft steatosis mainly include obesity, immunosuppression, donor steatosis, and genetic factors. Liver transplant recipients are at high risk of developing insulin resistance, new-onset diabetes, and post-transplantation metabolic syndrome that is highly associated with immunosuppressive treatment. Post-LT NAFLD is often underdiagnosed due to the poor sensitivity of most routine imaging methods. The gold standard for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis is liver biopsy, which is, however, limited to more complex cases due to its invasive nature. There is no approved pharmacotherapy in NAFLD. Lifestyle modification remains the cornerstone in NAFLD treatment. Other treatment strategies in post-LT NAFLD include lifestyle modifications, pharmacotherapy, bariatric surgery, and tailored immunosuppression. However, these approaches originate from recommendations in the general population, as there is scarce data regarding the safety and efficacy of current management strategies for NAFLD in liver transplant patients. Future prospective studies are required to achieve tailored treatment for these patients.

Liraglutide in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: A few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have assessed the use of liraglutide as a treatment option in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We aimed at critically appraising and summarizing these RCTs, providing precise effect estimates regarding the safety and efficacy of liraglutide in NAFLD. METHODS: We searched major databases and grey literature from their inception to May 2019, for RCTs comparing liraglutide with placebo or active comparator in patients with NAFLD. We defined as primary efficacy outcomes the observed changes in hepatic fat content (HFC) and alanine aminotransferase levels (ALT). Metabolic outcomes of interest and major safety endpoints were also assessed. RESULTS: We included five trials with 371 randomised participants in total. Liraglutide produced a non-significant decrease in HFC and ALT levels, compared to control. It induced a significant reduction in body mass index, primarily driven by reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes, while it did not affect significantly glycated hemoglobin levels and Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance. We also showed that liraglutide significantly decreased serum triglyceride levels, also driven by the observed reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes, however it did not significantly affect the rest lipid parameters. Liraglutide was associated with increased incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events, while, no other safety issues were identified. CONCLUSION: Our results do not substantiate the use of liraglutide in patients with NAFLD yet, despite its promising role.

Glycemic efficacy and safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist on top of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor treatment compared to sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor alone: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are now considered as key players in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The purpose of this meta-analysis was to provide precise effect estimates regarding the safety and efficacy of the addition of a GLP-1RA on top of SGLT-2i treatment. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: PubMed and CENTRAL, along with grey literature sources, were searched from their inception to May 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a duration ≥ 12 weeks, evaluating the safety and efficacy of addition of a GLP-1RA on a SGLT-2i compared to SGLT-2i alone in patients with T2DM. We also used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the credibility of our summary estimates. RESULTS: We identified three eligible RCTs, pooling data retrieved from 1,042 patients with T2DM in total. Administration of the maximum dose of a GLP-1RA on top of SGLT-2i treatment compared to SGLT-2i alone resulted in significant decrease in HbA1c by 0.91% (95% CI; -1.41 to -0.42) [GRADE: moderate], in body weight by 1.95 kg (95% CI; -3.83 to -0.07) [GRADE: moderate], in fasting plasma glucose by 1.53 mmol/L (95% CI; -2.17 to -0.88) [GRADE: moderate] and in systolic blood pressure levels by 3.64 mm Hg (95% CI -6.24 to -1.03). No significant effects on lipid profile and diastolic blood pressure were demonstrated. A significant increase in the risk for any hypoglycemia (RR: 2.62, 95% CI; 1.15-5.96, I2 = 33%) [GRADE: moderate] and for nausea (RR: 3.21, 95% CI; 1.36-7.54, I2 = 63%) [GRADE: moderate] and a non-significant increase in the risk for diarrhoea (RR: 1.64, 95% CI; 0.98-2.75, I2 = 0%) [GRADE: low] were documented. No other safety issues were identified. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that a GLP-1RA/SGLT-2i combination, if tolerated, exerts significant beneficial effects on glycemic control and body weight loss, however increasing the risk for any hypoglycemia and gastrointestinal adverse events.