Experts' recommendations in laser use for the treatment of urolithiasis: a comprehensive guide by the European Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) and Training-Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group.

PURPOSE: To identify laser lithotripsy settings used by experts for specific clinical scenarios and to identify preventive measures to reduce complications. METHODS: After literature research to identify relevant questions, a survey was conducted and sent to laser experts. Participants were asked for preferred laser settings during specific clinical lithotripsy scenarios. Different settings were compared for the reported laser types, and common settings and preventive measures were identified. RESULTS: Twenty-six laser experts fully returned the survey. Holmium-yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) was the primary laser used (88%), followed by thulium fiber laser (TFL) (42%) and pulsed thulium-yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Tm:YAG) (23%). For most scenarios, we could not identify relevant differences among laser settings. However, the laser power was significantly different for middle-ureteral (p = 0.027), pelvic (p = 0.047), and lower pole stone (p = 0.018) lithotripsy. Fragmentation or a combined fragmentation with dusting was more common for Ho:YAG and pulsed Tm:YAG lasers, whereas dusting or a combination of dusting and fragmentation was more common for TFL lasers. Experts prefer long pulse modes for Ho:YAG lasers to short pulse modes for TFL lasers. Thermal injury due to temperature development during lithotripsy is seriously considered by experts, with preventive measures applied routinely. CONCLUSIONS: Laser settings do not vary significantly between commonly used lasers for lithotripsy. Lithotripsy techniques and settings mainly depend on the generated laser pulse's and generator settings' physical characteristics. Preventive measures such as maximum power limits, intermittent laser activation, and ureteral access sheaths are commonly used by experts to decrease thermal injury-caused complications.

The Uniform grading tooL for flexIble ureterorenoscoPes (TULIP-tool): a Delphi consensus project on standardised evaluation of flexible ureterorenoscopes.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a standardised tool to evaluate flexible ureterorenoscopes (fURS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A three-stage consensus building approach based on the modified Delphi technique was performed under guidance of a steering group. First, scope- and user-related parameters used to evaluate fURS were identified through a systematic scoping review. Then, the main categories and subcategories were defined, and the expert panel was selected. Finally, a two-step modified Delphi consensus project was conducted to firstly obtain consensus on the relevance and exact definition of each (sub)category necessary to evaluate fURS, and secondly on the evaluation method (setting, used tools and unit of outcome) of those (sub)categories. Consensus was reached at a predefined threshold of 80% high agreement. RESULTS: The panel consisted of 30 experts in the field of endourology. The first step of the modified Delphi consensus project consisted of two questionnaires with a response rate of 97% (n = 29) for both. Consensus was reached for the relevance and definition of six main categories and 12 subcategories. The second step consisted of three questionnaires (response rate of 90%, 97% and 100%, respectively). Consensus was reached on the method of measurement for all (sub)categories. CONCLUSION: This modified Delphi consensus project reached consensus on a standardised grading tool for the evaluation of fURS - The Uniform grading tooL for flexIble ureterorenoscoPes (TULIP) tool. This is a first step in creating uniformity in this field of research to facilitate future comparison of outcomes of the functionality and handling of fURS.

Positioning the role of urine cytology within the diagnostic pathway for UTUC: supportive but inconclusive.

PURPOSE: With the introduction of kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) for low-risk Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC), correct risk-stratification has become crucial. High-grade cytology is one of the decisive variables to stratify a tumor as high-risk. To position the role of urine cytology in the diagnostic pathway of UTUC patients, we evaluated the accuracy of urine cytology by comparing the outcomes with histopathology. METHOD: Patients with UTUC evaluated between 2010 and 2020, and diagnosed by imaging, cytology and histopathology were selected. Descriptive statistics were used to compare cytology with histopathological outcomes using crosstabs. Clinical performance characteristics of cytology were determined for the presence of a malignancy. RESULTS: This study included 176 patients with confirmed histopathological UTUC. Concordance between cytology and biopsy results was found in 14.8% of low-grade tumors and 16.8% of high-grade tumors. Comparing cytology with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) specimens revealed concordance rates of 1.6% for low-grade tumors and 22.9% for high-grade tumors. Notably, 51.1% of urine cytology results were false negative. Sensitivity for detecting high-grade and low-grade tumors with a positive urine cytology was 56.6% and 52.6%, respectively, with specificities of 54.8% and 37.2%. CONCLUSION: In the current study, cytology appears to exhibit limited reliability when used as a sole diagnostic tool for assessing tumor grade and consequently risk stratification. It is imperative to recognize these limitations, optimize urine sampling techniques, and leverage a combination of diverse diagnostic methods for the most effective and individualized treatment decision-making.

Experts' recommendations in laser use for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive guide by the European Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) and Training Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.) group.

PURPOSE: To highlight and compare experts' laser settings during endoscopic laser treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), to identify measures to reduce complications, and to propose guidance for endourologists. METHODS: Following a focused literature search to identify relevant questions, a survey was sent to laser experts. We asked participants for typical settings during specific scenarios (ureteroscopy (URS), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), and percutaneous treatment). These settings were compared among the reported laser types to find common settings and limits. Additionally, we identified preventive measures commonly applied during surgery. RESULTS: Twenty experts completed the survey, needing a mean time of 12.7 min. Overall, most common laser type was Holmium-Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet (Ho:YAG) (70%, 14/20) followed by Thulium fiber laser (TFL) (45%, 9/20), pulsed Thulium-Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet (Tm:YAG) (3/20, 15%), and continuous wave (cw)Tm:YAG (1/20, 5%). Pulse energy for the treatment of distal ureteral tumors was significantly different with median settings of 0.9 J, 1 J and 0.45 J for Ho:YAG, TFL and pulsed Tm:YAG, respectively (p = 0.048). During URS and RIRS, pulse shapes were significantly different, with Ho:YAG being used in long pulse and TFL in short pulse mode (all p < 0.05). We did not find further disparities. CONCLUSION: Ho:YAG is used by most experts, while TFL is the most promising alternative. Laser settings largely do not vary significantly. However, further research with novel lasers is necessary to define the optimal approach. With the recent introduction of small caliber and more flexible scopes, minimal-invasive UTUC treatment is further undergoing an extension of applicability in appropriately selected patients.

Donor kidney lithiasis and back-table endoscopy: a successful combination.

INTRODUCTION: Urolithiasis in renal allografts is relatively rare with an incidence of 0.17-4.40%. It is nonetheless an important issue, as there is a risk of obstruction, sepsis and even loss of the renal allograft. The management of stones in renal allografts remains challenging because of the anatomy, the renal denervation and the use of immunosuppressive medication. CASE PRESENTATION: This report discusses the ex-vivo treatment of asymptomatic nephrolithiasis in a living donor kidney allograft. A CT abdomen revealed a lower pole stone (5.9 × 5.5 × 5.0 mm; 920 HU) in the right kidney of the potential donor. After multidisciplinary discussion, it was decided to procure the right kidney despite the presence of a documented nephrolithiasis. After discussion with both donor and recipient, an ex-vivo flexible ureterorenoscopy for stone removal on the back table just before implantation of the allograft was planned. The stone was found in the lower pole covered by a thin film of the urothelium. The thin film of urothelium was opened with a laser and the stone fragments were retrieved with a basket. CT after one month showed no residual stones in the transplanted kidney. CONCLUSION: Back-table endoscopy in a renal allograft is a feasible technique and should be discussed as an option in case of urolithiasis in a kidney that is considered for transplantation. Furthermore, the appropriate treatment of donor kidney lithiasis is another, although rare, method to expand the living donor renal allograft pool.

Could the region you live in prevent or precipitate kidney stone formation due to mineral intake through tap water? An analysis of nine distribution regions in Flanders.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the mineral content of tap water in Flanders and assess if the region one lives in could prevent or precipitate stone formation due to a difference in mineral content. METHODS: Data from six water companies providing tap water to nine regions in Flanders regarding calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium and sulphate content in tap water was retrieved. Minimum and maximum values were collected and compared between the different geographical regions. RESULTS: The highest calcium level was found in region 9 with a value of 157.0 mg/L, which is almost 10 times the value found in region 8 (16.1 mg/L). Region 6 had the highest magnesium (31.8 mg/L), potassium (30.5 mg/L), sodium (126.6 mg/L) and sulphate (218.5 mg/L) levels. The lowest level of magnesium (2.7 mg/L) was found in region 1, which was almost 12 times lower as in Region 6. Region 9 had the lowest level of potassium (1.5 mg/L), which is a factor 20 lower than Region 6. The lowest sodium and sulphate levels were found in region 8 (6.8 mg/L and 3.0 mg/L), respectively. The difference between the highest and lowest level of sulphate was a factor 70. CONCLUSION: There is a broad range in the minerals found in tap water between the different production sites in the nine distribution regions in Flanders. However, due to the high standards tap water has to meet in Flanders, the region one lives in will not lead to a higher or lower risk of kidney stone formation if the advised 2 to 3 L per day are consumed.

How to evaluate a flexible ureterorenoscope? Systematic mapping of existing evaluation methods.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to identify, map and review scope-related and user-related parameters used to evaluate the quality of flexible ureterorenoscopes. Thereby identifying key items and variability in grading systems. METHODS: A literature search of four databases (MEDLINE [Ovid], EMBASE [Ovid], Web of Science, Google scholar and the Cochrane Library) was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines encompassing articles published up to August 2020. A total of 2386 articles were screened. RESULTS: A total of 48 articles were included in this systematic scoping review. All studies had a prospective design. Five key items in the assessment of flexible ureterorenoscopy were distinguished: 'Manoeuvrability' (87.5%), 'Optics' (64.6%), 'Irrigation' (56.3%), 'Handling' (39.6%) and 'Durability' (35.4%). After regrouping, every key item could be divided into specific subcategories. However, the quality assessment showed a wide variation in denomination, method of measurement, circumstances of measurement, tools used during measurements, number of measurements performed, number of observers, and units of outcomes. CONCLUSION: The research field regarding quality assessment of ureterorenoscopes is heterogeneous. In this systematic scoping review we identified five key parameters: Manoeuvrability, Optics, Irrigation, Handling and Durability, used to grade flexible ureterorenoscopes. However, within these categories we found a wide variety in terms of method of measurements. A standardised, uniform grading tool is required to assess and compare the quality of flexible ureterorenoscopes in the future.

Fluoroscopy-use during ureterorenoscopy: are urologists concerned about radiation exposure? A nationwide survey in Belgium and The Netherlands.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the use and awareness of radiation during URS among Belgian and Dutch urologists. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An online questionnaire was send to all members of the Belgian and Dutch Association of Urology. RESULTS: 170 urologists finished the complete questionnaire. 10% of the respondents are not familiar with the ALARA-principle. 29% starts with a KUB and 48% makes an XRPG at the beginning of the procedure. 85% uses fluoroscopy to place a wire or ureteral access sheet, 18% during stone treatment, 59% to screen for missed stones or calyces, 90% to place a JJ-stent or ureter-catheter and 23% to check for extravasation. 82% do not document radiation data. 51% does not wear a dosimeter during fluoroscopy. Almost all wear a lead apron during fluoroscopy, 47% uses additional thyroid shields and only 4% uses lead glasses. 88% intentionally reduces fluoroscopy time, 75% reduces the exposed area with a diaphragm, 72% brings the radiation source close to the patient and 44% uses pulsed fluoroscopy. CONCLUSION: There is a wide variety in the use and awareness of radiation during URS. To further reduce radiation and its negative effect for patients and medical staff, awareness about radiation safety should increase among urologists.

Pre-Use Ureteroscope Contamination after High Level Disinfection: Reprocessing Effectiveness and the Relation with Cumulative Ureteroscope Use.

PURPOSE: We assessed the frequency of preoperative and persistent microbial contamination of flexible ureteroscopes after reprocessing and the relation of contamination to cumulative ureteroscope use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the effectiveness of high level disinfection with peracetic acid as well as data on ureteroscope use for 20 new flexible ureteroscopes from December 2015 to December 2017 at a single center. In the operating room pre-use and postuse microbial samples of the ureteroscope shaft and working channel were collected to evaluate microbial contamination after reprocessing. Positive cultures were defined as 30 cfu/ml or greater of skin flora, or 10 cfu/ml or greater of uropathogenic microorganisms. A generalized estimating equation model was used to analyze whether cumulative ureteroscope use was associated with positive pre-use cultures. RESULTS: Microbial samples were collected during 389 procedures. Pre-use ureteroscope cultures were positive in 47 of 389 procedures (12.1%), of which uropathogens were found in 9 of 389 (2.3%) and skin flora in 38 of 389 (9.8%). Urinary tract infection symptoms did not develop in any of the patients who underwent surgery with a uropathogen contaminated ureteroscope. In 1 case the pre-use culture contained the same bacteria type as the prior postuse culture. Cumulative ureteroscope use was not associated with a higher probability of positive cultures. CONCLUSIONS: Microbial contamination of reprocessed ureteroscopes was found in an eighth of all procedures. Notably uropathogenic microorganisms were discovered in a small proportion of all procedures. Persistent ureteroscope contamination with uropathogens was only rarely encountered. Cumulative ureteroscope use was not associated with a higher probability of microbial contamination.

Same Session Bilateral Ureteroscopy for Multiple Stones: Results from the CROES URS Global Study.

PURPOSE: This study presents a comparison of the international experience with ipsilateral and bilateral ureteroscopy for multiple, bilateral ureteral and renal stones vs single stone treatment. Patient and treatment characteristics and outcomes were compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CROES (Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society) Ureteroscopy Global Study includes 114 centers in 32 countries. Patients undergoing bilateral ureteroscopy, ipsilateral ureteroscopy for multiple stones and ureteroscopy for a single stone were examined from January 2010 to October 2012. Intraoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were identified for each patient. Inverse probability weighted regression adjustment analyses were done to compare outcomes independent of differences among centers and patient characteristics. RESULTS: The CROES Ureteroscopy Global Study consists of 11,885 patients. A total of 2,153 patients (18.7%) were treated for multiple stones, of whom 1,880 (87.3%) and 273 (12.7%) underwent ipsilateral and bilateral ureteroscopy, respectively. Inverse probability weighted regression adjustment models for bilateral vs ipsilateral ureteroscopy and multiple vs single stone treatments showed that patients with bilateral ureteroscopy and multiple stone treatments had lower stone-free rates, higher re-treatment rates and longer operative times compared to patients who underwent ipsilateral ureteroscopy and single stone treatment. There was no difference in complication rates among bilateral, ipsilateral and single stone ureteroscopy. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a large series of patients who underwent bilateral and ipsilateral ureteroscopy. Our findings suggest a decrease in stone-free rates, increased re-treatment rates, increased operative times and longer hospital stay in patients treated for multiple stones. The treatment of multiple stones and bilateral ureteroscopy are safe compared to single stone treatment and ipsilateral ureteroscopy, respectively.

Outcome from 5-year live surgical demonstrations in urinary stone treatment: are outcomes compromised?

PURPOSE: To compare intra- and post-operative outcomes of endourological live surgical demonstrations (LSDs) and routine surgical practice (RSP) for urinary stones. METHODS: Consecutive ureterorenoscopic (URS) and percutaneous (PNL) urinary stone procedures over a 5-year period were reviewed. Procedures were divided into LSDs and RSP. Differences between the groups were separately analysed for URS and PNL. Primary outcomes included intra- and post-operative complication rates and grades. Secondary outcomes were operation time, length of hospital stay, stone-free rate, and retreatment rate. Pearson's Chi-square analysis, Mann-Whitney U test, and logistic and linear regression were used to compare outcomes between LSDs and RSP. RESULTS: During the study period, we performed 666 URSs and 182 PNLs, and 151 of these procedures were LSDs. Among URSs, the overall intra-operative complication rate was 3.2% for LSDs and 2.5% for RSP (p = 0.72) and the overall post-operative complication rate was 13.7% for LSDs and 8.8% for RSP (p = 0.13). Among PNLs, the overall intra-operative complication rate was 8.9% for LSDs and 5.6% for RSP (p = 0.52) and the overall post-operative complication rate was 28.6% for LSDs and 34.9% for RSP (p = 0.40). For both URSs and PNLs, no statistically significant differences in complication grade scores were observed between LSDs and RSP. Operation time was significantly longer for LSD-URS group, but there was no difference between the PNL groups. There were no significant differences in length of hospital stay and stone-free rate. The retreatment rate was higher in the LSD-URS group compared with RSP-URS group but similar between the PNL groups. Multiple logistic regression analyses, adjusting for confounders, revealed no association between LSD and more or less favourable outcomes as compared to RSP. CONCLUSION: Live surgical demonstrations do not seem to compromise patients' safety and outcomes when performed by specialised endourologists.

Lessons learned from the CROES percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to give an overview of the data derived from the CROES PCNL Global Study published previously in 25 articles. METHODS: A comprehensive overview of the outcome of the CROES PCNL Global Study was made, analysed and compared with the current literature and guidelines. RESULTS: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) was predominately performed in prone position. Although the supine position claims to be favourable over the prone approach, the present study showed a longer operation time and lower stone-free rate (SFR). This might be explained by differences in definition in operation time and methods in the evaluation of residual stones. Ultrasound (US)-guided access proves beneficial in lowering puncture time and radiation exposure. Renal anomalies can safely be treated by PCNL and have similar outcomes to a normal situation. In patients with a solitary kidney, however, there is a lower SFR and more bleeding. Also, severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients have less favourable outcome. Morbidity and complications following PCNL are dominated by fever (10.5%) and bleeding (7.8%). A matched control analysis confirmed that antibiotic prophylaxis gives a threefold lower post-operative fever rate. In a multivariate analysis, it was elegantly demonstrated that bleeding was directly related to the size of the dilatation: the larger the bore, the higher the chance for bleeding. Elderly patients are at higher risk of complications and longer hospital stay. Overall, obese patients have similar outcome as the general population; however, super-obese (BMI > 40) patients have a higher chance of more severe complications. For the first time, this database illustrated a significant relationship between results and complications of PCNL, and caseload volume. The optimal case volume per centre appears to be 120 PCNL's/year. Finally, a nomogram has been developed that enables better patient counselling and decision-making. CONCLUSION: The CROES PCNL Global Study is the largest real-life study providing new insights into general and special conditions. Because of the vast number of patients included, rare conditions including renal anomalies, solitary kidneys and patient characteristics like severe CKD, super obesity and old age could be analysed. Besides this information, a nomogram was developed. And for the first time, the influence of caseload volume was established.

How well tolerated is supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been described in 1988 and several modifications followed since. Despite claimed benefits, supine PCNL is still neglected by the majority of urologists. Lack of experience and the fear of complications are possible explanations for the resistance to supine positioning. This review evaluates recent literature on the use of supine PCNL, focussing on benefits and safety. RECENT FINDING: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Global Study and several (retrospective) reports comment on efficacy and safety of PCNL, differences in techniques, or identify conditions and patient factors for best practice. Anesthesiologic benefits (especially in the high risk, cardiopulmonary compromised, patient) and anatomical advantages are described in supine position theoretically favoring safety of supine PCNL. However, there are no prospective randomized studies conducted to support this assumption. Overall, benefits in efficacy or safety, of one position over the other, are not yet proven. SUMMARY: Supine PCNL has advantages in selected patients. Ultimately, the decision on position should be made on patient's characteristics and surgeon's preference and experience.

Heavy as a rock or light as dust: a comparison between the perceived workload for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, ureterorenoscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Introduction: There are three common treatment options for kidney stones: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL), ureterorenoscopy (URS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). The choice of treatment is based on stone- and patient-related characteristics. However, some stones are eligible for several approaches and the decision is made based on patient and urologist's preferences. This study evaluates which approach has the highest workload. Material and methods: Between March and August 2022, five members of the Amsterdam Endourology Research Group collected data from 22 ESWL, 31 URS and 22 PNL procedures. After each procedure, the SURG-TLX questionnaire was completed by the surgeon to evaluate workload. Six dimensions were scored for each procedure, including: mental demands, physical demands, temporal demands, task complexity, situational stress, and distractions. The total workload, and the median for each dimension, was calculated and compared for the three treatments. Results: ESWL scored significantly lower than URS for mental demands, physical demands, temporal demands, situational stress, distraction and total workload. However, task complexity did not differ significantly between the two techniques. Compared with PNL, ESWL scored significantly lower for all dimensions. Finally, PNL received significantly higher scores for mental demands, physical demands, temporal demands, situational stress, distractions and total workload than URS. Only task complexity showed no significant difference between both groups. Conclusions: Urologists perceive the highest workload during PNL, followed by URS and finally ESWL. A follow-up study is needed to identify stressors that increase perceived workload with the purpose to address these variables and as final objective to improve urologists' workload, patient safety and treatment outcomes.

Volumetric in vivo visualization of upper urinary tract tumors using optical coherence tomography: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: Knowledge of tumor stage and grade is paramount for treatment decision making in cases of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma but this condition cannot be accurately assessed by current techniques. Optical coherence tomography can hypothetically provide the urologist with real-time intraoperative information on tumor grade and stage. In this pilot study we report what are to our knowledge the first results of optical coherence tomography for grading and staging upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight consecutive patients underwent ureterorenoscopy for suspicion or followup of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Optical coherence tomography data sets were intraoperatively obtained from the ureter and renal pelvis. All patients eventually underwent nephroureterectomy. Optical coherence tomography staging was done by visual inspection of lesions found on optical coherence tomography images. Optical coherence tomography grading was done by quantifying optical coherence tomography signal attenuation in mm(-1) on lesions and comparing results with the histopathological diagnosis. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: For 7 in vivo optical coherence tomography diagnoses staging was in accordance with histology. In patient 8 tumor thickness transcended optical coherence tomography imaging depth range and, therefore, invasiveness findings were inconclusive. For grading the median attenuation coefficient for grade 2 and 3 lesions was 1.97 (IQR 1.57-2.30) and 3.53 mm(-1) (IQR 2.74-3.94), respectively (p<0.001). Healthy urothelium was too thin to reliably determine the attenuation coefficient. CONCLUSIONS: Optical coherence tomography is a promising, minimally invasive tool for real-time intraoperative optical diagnosis of tumors in the upper urinary tract. Our results warrant future research in a larger sample size to determine the accuracy of grading and staging by optical coherence tomography, and its possible implementation in the diagnostic algorithm for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Longer is Better for Endoscopic Follow-up of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma After Ureteroscopic Treatment: An Evaluation Spanning 10 Years of Data.

BACKGROUND: Tumour recurrences are frequent among patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with ureteroscopy (URS). Therefore, guidelines recommend a strict follow-up regimen, but there is little evidence on how to do this. OBJECTIVE: To analyse outcomes during our follow-up regimen and the impact on treatment in terms of ipsilateral UTUC recurrence, treatment conversion, and tumour upgrading, and to evaluate potential prognostic factors, including second-look URS outcomes. A secondary objective was to evaluate survival outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The single-centre cohort included all adult patients with nonmetastatic UTUC treated with URS from January 2010 to December 2020. Follow-up involved endoscopy at 3-mo intervals in the first year, then at 6-mo intervals up to year 3, and yearly thereafter. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive analyses were performed for the follow-up outcomes. The Andersen-Gill model for recurrent event analysis was used to analyse tumour recurrences, and multivariable Cox regression to analyse for predictors for treatment conversion in low-grade tumours. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: We analysed 71 patients with median follow-up of 49.5 mo. The overall 2-yr recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was 22%. In low-grade disease, the 1-yr RFS rate was 50% and the 2-yr RFS rate was 29%. Treatment was converted to radical nephroureterectomy for 23 patients, at a median time to conversion of 9.9 mo. Upgrading was seen in 13 patients, at a median time to upgrading of 21.9 mo. No factors were prognostic for either tumour recurrence or treatment conversion. The 5-yr OS, CSS, and MFS rates were 82%, 86%, and 84%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that it is rational to extend endoscopic follow-up for UTUC treated with URS, as clinically relevant events (treatment conversion and tumour upgrading) occur beyond the current 6-mo guideline recommendation. Second-look URS outcomes were not prognostic for tumour recurrence or treatment conversion during follow-up. PATIENT SUMMARY: Our study results show that for patients with cancer of the upper urinary tract treated with kidney-sparing surgery through a small telescope called a ureteroscope (URS), most of the clinically relevant events (treatment conversion and tumour upgrading) occur outside the current recommended follow-up of 6 months. Therefore, URS follow-up should be extended for these patients.

Is It the Load That Breaks You or the Way You Carry It: How Demanding Is Endourology?

Objective: Surgical outcomes are dependent on multiple factors. Besides patient-related or procedure-related factors, several surgeon-related factors contribute to surgical outcomes. The Surgery Task Load Index (SURG-TLX) questionnaire helps to assess the impact of several stressors on the perceived demands of surgeons during surgery. In this study, we evaluate the applicability of the SURG-TLX questionnaire for endourologic procedures and set a first point of reference. Materials and Methods: Between March and August 2022, 15 urologists and urology residents at a tertiary referral center for endourology completed the SURG-TLX questionnaire after endourologic procedures. After data acquisition, all participants were asked to evaluate the applicability of the questionnaire for endourologic procedures. Results: A total of 130 procedures were included between March and August 2022. Situational stress had the lowest median score (3.0/20; interquartile range [IQR] 2.0-7.0) and task complexity the highest (5.0/20; IQR 3.0-8.0). After weighing, the dimensions showed different proportions when compared with the nonweighted scores. Distractions received the highest score (15.0/100; IQR 7.5-32.8), temporal demands (6.0/100; IQR 3.0-12.5), and situational stress the lowest (6.0/100; IQR 2.0-21.0). This was caused by the higher weight that was attributed to distractions (3.4/5), as opposed to task complexity (2.6/5). In the questionnaire regarding applicability of the SURG-TLX, the overall satisfaction (6.0/10; IQR 5.0-7.0) and clarity (6.5/10; IQR 5.0-7.5) were moderate. The user-friendliness and applicability of the questionnaire were rated high (7.0/10; IQR 5.5-8.0 and 7.0/10; IQR 6.0-8.0, respectively) and task load (3.0/10; IQR 2.0-5.0) and time load (2.0/10; IQR 2.0-3.5) low. Conclusion: The SURG-TLX questionnaire is appropriate to assess the different dimensions of workload during endourologic procedures. Furthermore, the perceived workload during endourologic procedures is relatively low.

Survival and Long-term Effects of Kidney-sparing Surgery Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy on Kidney Function in Patients with Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

Background: Current European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines discriminate between high- and low-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) to determine treatment by means of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) or kidney-sparing surgery (KSS). Objective: To compare long-term oncological outcomes and renal function for patients with UTUC treated by RNU versus KSS. Design setting and participants: A retrospective cohort study, including 186 renal units with nonmetastatic UTUC treated in a tertiary referral centre between 2010 and 2021, was conducted. Intervention: RNU, ureterorenoscopy, percutaneous tumour resection, and segmental ureteral resection. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and renal function were analysed by means of the log-rank test and the independent-sample t test. Results and limitations: OS was 71.1% for the RNU group and 81.9% for the KSS group. In a cohort matched for propensity weight based on EAU risk stratification progression-free survival (PFS; RNU 96.0%; KSS 86.0%), MFS (RNU 72.0%; KSS 84.0%), CSS (RNU 84.0%; KSS 86.0%), and OS (RNU 76.0%; KSS 76.0%) were all similar between both groups. No significant differences in renal function were seen at 2 and 5 yr after the intervention. Although this series represents the largest cohort of (high-risk) UTUC patients treated by means of KSS to date, it is not suitable for performing a multivariate analysis. Conclusions: PFS, MFS, CSS, and OS were all comparable when analysing the RNU and KSS groups. Similar results for groups with evenly distributed risk factors and a large percentage of high-risk disease suggest that current risk stratification might not be accurate in discriminating low-risk from high-risk disease. Patient summary: In this report, we looked at outcomes for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in a specialised hospital. We conclude that kidney-sparing surgery and radical nephroureterectomy have comparable outcomes and that risk factors for worse outcome might not be identified correctly.

Can operator-controlled imaging reduce fluoroscopy time during flexible ureterorenoscopy?

Introduction: Fluoroscopy is routinely used during ureterorenoscopy. According to the 'As Low As Reasonably Achievable' (ALARA) principle, radiation exposure should be kept as low as reasonably achievable to decrease the risk of negative long-term effects of radiation for patients and medical staff. This study aims to assess if operator-controlled imaging during flexible ureterorenoscopy for nephrolithiasis could reduce fluoroscopy time when compared to radiographer-controlled imaging. Material and methods: This study was a bicentric, retrospective comparison between patients treated for nephrolithiasis with flexible ureterorenoscopy with either operator-controlled imaging or radiographer-controlled imaging. A total of 100 patients were included, 50 were treated with operator-controlled imaging and 50 with radiographer-controlled imaging. Patients undergoing flexible ureterorenoscopy with a total stone burden <20 mm and data on radiation exposure were included. Patient characteristics, stone characteristics, surgical details and fluoroscopy time were recorded for each patient and both groups were compared. Patient data were expressed as median. A 2-sided p-value <0.005 was considered statistically significant. Results: This study found no significant differences between both groups regarding the patient and stone characteristics. However, it found a significant shorter fluoroscopy time in the operator-controlled imaging group of 33.5 seconds (IQR 16.0-70.0) compared to 57.0 seconds (IQR 36.8-95.3) in the radiographer-controlled imaging group (p = 0.001). Conclusions: This study shows that operator-controlled imaging in flexible ureterorenoscopy could reduce fluoroscopy time when compared to radiographer-controlled imaging. Operator-controlled imaging might therefore allow urologists to perform ureterorenoscopy with greater independence while additionally reducing fluoroscopy time and its consequent negative effects for medical staff and patients.