Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Ann Diagn Pathol ; 19(5): 341-6, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26254510

ABSTRACT

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, clinically aggressive primary cutaneous neuroendocrine carcinoma. The present series describes clinicopathological features of 16 MCCs diagnosed at a tertiary cancer referral center. Sixteen MCCs occurred in 10 men and 6 women (M/F = 1.6:1), between the ages 37 and 74 years (mean, 58.3; median, 58.6), commonly in lower extremities (7) (43.7%) and head and neck sites (5) (31.2%), followed by upper extremities (3) (18.7%) and abdominal wall (1). Tumor size varied from 0.5 to 9.9 cm. Histopathologically, most tumors were composed of round to oval cells, mostly arranged diffusely with hyperchromatic nuclei, including "sudden" pleomorphism in some tumors. Variable features included coexisting Bowen disease (2/16), along with squamous, pseudoglandular, and rhabdomyoblastic dedifferentiation, all in a single tumor. Immunohistochemically, tumor cells were positive for at least a single epithelial marker in all 16 cases (100%) cases, including CK20, mostly paranuclear "dot-like" (12/13, 92.3%); CK (8/9, 88.8%), AE1/AE3 (3/3, 100%), and CK7 (1/6, 16.6%), along with neuroendocrine markers (16/16, 100%), including synaptophysin (11/13, 84.6%), chromogranin (12/15, 80%), and CD56 (4/4, 100%). Among other immunohistochemical markers, positive CKIT/CD117 was positive in 3 of 3 tumors. Surgical resection was performed in 11 (100%) of 11 cases, with adjuvant chemotherapy offered in a single case. Two cases with large-sized tumors, along with another case developed lymph node metastasis, including 1 who later developed pulmonary metastasis. Two patients were free of disease and 2 were alive with disease. Merkel cell carcinomas exhibit a diverse histopathological spectrum, including coexisting Bowen disease and, rarely, rhabdomyoblastic dedifferentiation, in some cases. Optimal immunohistochemical markers include CK20, synaptophysin, chromogranin, and CD56 for a timely diagnosis. Surgical resection is the treatment mainstay. Large-sized tumors and MCCs showing dedifferentiation portend a relatively more aggressive clinical course. Other recent developments in this tumor are discussed herewith.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Merkel Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Merkel Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/epidemiology , Female , Humans , India/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/secondary , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Staging , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology
2.
Indian J Gastroenterol ; 25(3): 161-2, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16877838

ABSTRACT

Gall bladder metastasis from renal cell carcinoma is rare. We report a 46-year-old man with isolated gall bladder metastasis from renal cell carcinoma 11 months after radical nephrectomy. He underwent cholecystectomy and frozen section revealed the metastatic tumor. Sixteen months later, the patient is free of disease.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/secondary , Gallbladder Neoplasms/secondary , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Cholecystectomy , Frozen Sections , Gallbladder Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Nephrectomy , Reoperation
3.
Indian J Med Ethics ; 11(3): 175-8, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25101550

ABSTRACT

Dr Eric Suba has been distorting facts and persistently disseminating biased and misleading views and statements regarding our studies over the past several years. His article in the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics fails to mention the facts that seem unfavourable to his arguments, and the ethical concerns are unsubstantiated by the evidence. In this context, we present the following clarifications for the attention of your readers, notably with regard to: (i) the study design and inclusion of a control group; (ii) the informed consent of the women participating in the study; (iii) the conformity with international ethical standards and guidelines, and (iv) the provision of screening to women in the control arm of the studies. We also highlight the benefits that are flowing from this research and the risk that misinformation may further delay access for women to life-saving cervical cancer screening.


Subject(s)
Mass Screening/economics , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/mortality , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Female , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL