ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Late recurrence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is observed in some postoperative patients. In addition, some of these patients are lost to long-term postoperative follow-up. We reviewed the treatment results and prognosis of postoperative patients with RCC at Chiba University Hospital, with the aim of clarifying the proportion and background of patients lost to follow-up. METHODS: This retrospective study included 1176 RCC patients who underwent radical or/and partial nephrectomy. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and lost follow-up free survival (LFFS) were evaluated and the risk factors for LFFS identified. RESULTS: The median RFS for stage II and II cases was 188.3 and 104.0 months, respectively. Even in stage I, recurrence was observed in about 20% of patients 20 years after surgery. The Kaplan-Meier curve for LFFS showed a linear descent over time, with 50% of patients lost to follow-up within 25 years. Older age (≥ 62 years), histological type (clear cell RCC), and no recurrence were significant risk factors for lost follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up is necessary after RCC surgery because late recurrence cases are not uncommon. We believe that lifelong follow-up with imaging studies is recommended for postoperative RCC patients. Early detection of recurrence in postoperative patients is a very important issue, and it may be worthwhile for improving the prognosis of postoperative patients to focus on patients lost to follow-up who may have been overlooked.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Nephrectomy/methods , Prognosis , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Although novel techniques for avoiding incontinence during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy have been developed, long-term oncological outcomes are unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the long-term oncological outcomes and functional outcomes of novel nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with endopelvic fascia preservation for a single surgeon. Data from 100 patients who underwent structure-preserving prostatectomies performed by a single surgeon were retrospectively analyzed. The median console time was 123 min. Bilateral nerve-sparing was performed in 43% of patients underwent, and 57% underwent unilateral nerve-sparing surgery. Most patients (96%) reached complete pad-zero urinary continence by one year after surgery. Satisfactory erectile function was achieved in 97% of patients who underwent bilateral nerve-sparing surgery, and 80% of patients who underwent unilateral nerve-sparing surgery. The surgical margin was positive for 25% of patients, and the biochemical recurrence-free rate at 5 years was 77%. The cancer-specific survival rate was 100% during the median follow-up period of 4.5 years. Clavien-Dindo grade III complications occurred in 1% of cases. The outcomes for novel nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with endopelvic fascia preservation were similar to previously reported oncological outcomes, with satisfactory functional outcomes. This operative method may be useful for patients who are eligible for nerve-sparing surgery.