Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
BMC Cancer ; 18(1): 1010, 2018 Oct 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30348163

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B (RANK)-signaling is involved in tumor growth and spread in experimental models. Binding of RANK ligand (RANKL) to RANK activates signaling, which is inhibited by osteoprotegerin (OPG). We have previously shown that circulating soluble RANKL (sRANKL) and OPG are associated with breast cancer risk. Here we extend these findings to provide the first data on pre-diagnosis concentrations of sRANKL and OPG and risk of breast cancer-specific and overall mortality after a breast cancer diagnosis. METHODS: Two thousand six pre- and postmenopausal women with incident invasive breast cancer (1620 (81%) with ER+ disease) participating in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort were followed-up for mortality. Pre-diagnosis concentrations of sRANKL and OPG were quantified in baseline serum samples using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and electrochemiluminescent assay, respectively. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for breast cancer-specific and overall mortality were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: Especially in women with ER+ disease, higher circulating OPG concentrations were associated with higher risk of breast cancer-specific (quintile 5 vs 1 HR 1.77 [CI 1.03, 3.04]; ptrend 0.10) and overall mortality (q5 vs 1 HR 1.39 [CI 0.94, 2.05]; ptrend 0.02). sRANKL and the sRANKL/OPG ratio were not associated with mortality following a breast cancer diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: High pre-diagnosis endogenous concentrations of OPG, the decoy receptor for RANKL, were associated with increased risk of death after a breast cancer diagnosis, especially in those with ER+ disease. These results need to be confirmed in well-characterized patient cohorts.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Osteoprotegerin/metabolism , RANK Ligand/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Limit of Detection , Middle Aged , Osteoprotegerin/blood , Prognosis , Risk
2.
Int J Cancer ; 136(2): 399-410, 2015 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24890047

ABSTRACT

The role of endogenous androgens and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) in ovarian carcinogenesis is poorly understood. Epithelial invasive ovarian cancer (EOC) is a heterogeneous disease and there are no prospective data on endogenous androgens and EOC risk by tumor characteristics (histology, grade, stage) or the dualistic model of ovarian carcinogenesis (i.e. type I vs. type II, leading to less or more aggressive tumors). We conducted a nested case-control study in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort evaluating androgens and SHBG and invasive EOC risk by tumor characteristics. Female participants who provided a blood sample and were not using exogenous hormones at blood donation were eligible (n = 183,257). A total of 565 eligible women developed EOC; two controls (n = 1,097) were matched per case. We used multivariable conditional logistic regression models. We observed no association between androgens, SHBG and EOC overall. A doubling of androstenedione reduced risk of serous carcinomas by 21% (odds ratio (OR)log2 = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.64-0.97]). Moreover, associations differed for low-grade and high-grade carcinomas, with positive associations for low-grade and inverse associations for high-grade carcinomas (e.g. androstenedione: low grade: ORlog2 = 1.99 [0.98-4.06]; high grade: ORlog2 = 0.75 [0.61-0.93], phet ≤ 0.01), similar associations were observed for type I/II tumors. This is the first prospective study to evaluate androgens, SHBG and EOC risk by tumor characteristics and type I/II status. Our findings support a possible role of androgens in ovarian carcinogenesis. Additional studies exploring this association are needed.


Subject(s)
Androgens/blood , Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/blood , Fallopian Tube Neoplasms/blood , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/blood , Ovarian Neoplasms/blood , Peritoneal Neoplasms/blood , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Case-Control Studies , Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/epidemiology , Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/pathology , Europe/epidemiology , Fallopian Tube Neoplasms/epidemiology , Fallopian Tube Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/pathology , Nutritional Status , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Peritoneal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Peritoneal Neoplasms/pathology , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin/metabolism
3.
Am J Clin Nutr ; 95(5): 1172-81, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22440851

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2007 the World Cancer Research Fund Report concluded that there was limited and inconsistent evidence for an effect of coffee and tea consumption on the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). OBJECTIVE: In the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC), we aimed to investigate whether coffee intakes, tea intakes, or both are associated with the risk of EOC. DESIGN: All women participating in the EPIC (n = 330,849) were included in this study. Data on coffee and tea consumption were collected through validated food-frequency questionnaires at baseline. HRs and 95% CIs were estimated by using Cox proportional hazards models. Furthermore, we performed an updated meta-analysis of all previous prospective studies until April 2011 by comparing the highest and lowest coffee- and tea-consumption categories as well as by using dose-response random-effects meta-regression analyses. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 11.7 y, 1244 women developed EOC. No association was observed between the risk of EOC and coffee consumption [HR: 1.05 (95% CI: 0.75, 1.46) for the top quintile compared with no intake] or tea consumption [HR: 1.07 (95% CI: 0.78, 1.45) for the top quintile compared with no intake]. This lack of association between coffee and tea intake and EOC risk was confirmed by the results of our meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: Epidemiologic studies do not provide sufficient evidence to support an association between coffee and tea consumption and risk of ovarian cancer.


Subject(s)
Coffee/chemistry , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Tea/chemistry , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Endpoint Determination , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/etiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/etiology , Prevalence , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL