How To Choose The Best Lateralization And Distalization Of The Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty To Optimize The Clinical Outcome In Cuff Tear Arthropathy.

PURPOSE: Lateralization shoulder angle (LSA) and distalization shoulder angle (DSA) are two parameters that had been described for a better planification of the arthroplasty, but the range of these angles are very wide. The purpose of this study was to investigate the best combination in terms of lateralization and distalization to optimize the outcome of Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty(RTSA) for cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) with a functional deltoid. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study, conducted between 2014 and 2018 at a specialized shoulder unit in Paris, focused on patients exclusively treated with RTSA for CTA, ensuring a minimum follow-up of 1 year. The primary outcome measure was the ASES score. Secondary outcome measures included range of motion and patient-reported outcomes at the final follow-up, such as the Constant score, SSV, SST, and VAS. Optimal RTSA outcomes were delineated by scores surpassing the patient's acceptable symptom state (PASS) for ASES, set in literature at 76. Patients were categorized into two groups based on ASES scores at the last follow-up: those below and those above 76. The capabilities of LSA and DSA to predict the outcome of interest were assessed and the corresponding optimal thresholds for having better outcome were calculated using the Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were included in the study with a mean age of 74.51 ± 6.79. Correlation analysis revealed significant medium correlation between ASES and both LSA (r = -0.43, p = .001) and DSA (r = 0.39, p = .002). The DSA of patients with ASES > 76 was 48.55 ± 12.44 with an IQR of 39.5 - 57.5, as compared to lower values for patients with ASES < 76, which was 37.82 ± 9.8 (IQR 32 - 46.5) (p=0.009). Similarly, the LSA of patients with ASES > 76 was 86.43 ± 11.4 (IQR 79.5 - 93.5), as compared to higher values for patients with ASES < 76, which was 100.09 ± 7.63 (IQR 93 - 105.5) (p<0.001). The ROC curve confirmed LSA and DSA as good predictors for the ASES outcome, with AUCs of 0.851 and 0.741, respectively. The optimal LSA should be no more than 90.5° (Se=100%, Sp=67.7%). The optimal DSA should be no less than 37.5° (Se=78.4%, Sp=63.6%). CONCLUSION: The LSA and DSA angle could represent a helpful tool to optimize the clinical outcomes of an adaptable RTSA in CTA with a functional deltoid and a complete passive range of motion.

Instability after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective review of thirty one cases.

PURPOSE: A retrospectively analyze of instability after RSA in terms of aetiology, treatment and final functional outcome. METHODS: A bicentric retrospective study of 31 patients (mean age 67.6 years; 42-83) treated for RSA instability using RSA Arrow System (FH Orthopedics, Mulhouse, France), mean follow-up 41months (range 12-158). Aetiologies for dislocation were evaluated using a previously described classification system for RSA instability. Actions performed during the Revision Surgeries were analyzed and grouped into five categories. Clinical outcome measures included range of motion, SSV, VAS, Constant-Murley scores, satisfaction level and recurrence of instability. RESULTS: The most frequent aetiology for RSA instability was loss of compression (18), followed by impingement (8) and loss containment (5). Total RSA revision (bipolar procedure) involving both distalization and lateralization occurred in 13 instances. Isolated distalization through the humerus was performed in ten patients and Isolated lateralization through the glenoid in three patients. Three cases of components exchange due to mechanical failure were noted. Bone graft was used in nine instances. Three patients (10%) suffered recurrent instability following Revision Surgery and required an additional stabilizing procedure. At final follow-up all 31 RSA were reported as stable with a mean VAS of 1.1, SSV 54.5%, constant score 48.3, constant ponderate 74.9%. CONCLUSION: The management of unstable RSA represent a challenge that can be successfully overcome with a revision surgery with compromised functional results. Loss of compression was the most common cause for primary and recurrent RSA instability that were treated principally with bipolar revisions involving component lateralization and distalization.

Non-vascularized coracoid process autograft for glenoid reconstruction in revision shoulder arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: To report the radiological and clinical outcomes of non-vascularized coracoid process autografts used for glenoid reconstruction during revision shoulder arthroplasty. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This is a retrospective, monocentric study from January 2016 to October 2022 targeting patients treated with a coracoid bone graft for glenoid reconstruction during revision of shoulder arthroplasty. The primary outcome measures were coracoid graft union rate and graft-implant osseointegration. Secondary outcome measures included clinical and CT-scan identified radiological complications and functional outcomes as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Range of Motion (ROM), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Constant score (absolute and ponderate), and ASES score. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (9 males, 6 females; mean age 66.9 years, range 38-85) were included. At a mean follow-up of 20.9 months (range 12-56 months), 93.3% achieved complete graft integration. One case of partial lysis without baseplate loosening was noted. Regarding range of motion, the mean forward elevation was 130° (range 90°-170°), external rotation at the side 25° (range 10°-40°), external rotation in 90° of abduction 45° (range 10°-80°), and internal rotation 52° (range 10-80°). The mean VAS for pain was 1.1 (range 0-8), mean SSV 67.3% (range 40-90%), mean ASES score 85.5 (range 65-98.3), mean Absolute Constant score 58.6 (range 21-83), and mean Ponderate Constant score 77.5% (range 28.8-110.7%). No neurological injuries were reported. CONCLUSION: Utilizing a non-vascularized coracoid graft during shoulder arthroplasty revision is a safe, reproducible, and time-efficient technique that demonstrated satisfactory osseointegration, implant stability, good functional results, and a low complication rate.

A novel pulsed electromagnetic field device as an adjunct therapy to surgical treatment of distal radius fractures: a prospective, double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether using a Fracture Healing Patch (FHP) device that generates pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF), applied at the fracture site immediately after open reduction and internal fixation surgery, can accelerate healing of acute distal radius fractures. METHODS: In a prospective, double-blind, randomized, and sham-controlled study, thirty-two patients with DRFs treated with ORIF were included. Patients were allocated to a PEMF (active) group (n = 15) or a control (sham) group (n = 17). All patients were assessed with regard to functional Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), SF12, and radiological union outcomes (X-rays and computed tomography (CT) scans) at 2, 4, 6, and 12 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: Patients treated with the FHP demonstrated significantly bone bridging at 4 weeks as assessed by CT (70% vs 54%, p = 0.05). Mean grip strength in the active group was significantly higher as compared to control (16 ± 9 kg vs 7 ± 3.5 kg, respectively, p = 0. 02). The function subscale of the PRWE was significantly better in PEMF-treated group at 6 weeks after surgery (27.2 VS 35.5, p = 0.04). No statistically significant differences were found in SF12. CONCLUSION: PEMF application after ORIF of DRFs is safe, may accelerate bone healing which could lead to an earlier return to daily life activities and work. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Adherence of Patients to Methods of Self-Reduction of Shoulder Dislocation Taught via Smartphones: A Medium-Term Follow-up Survey.

INTRODUCTION: Self-reduction of a shoulder dislocation may reduce the time from injury to reduction and to the relief of patient discomfort. The purpose of this study was to assess adherence to earlier acquired self-reduction techniques during real-time recurrent shoulder dislocation. METHODS: A telephone survey was conducted among 58 patients previously taught shoulder self-reduction via an instructional video sent to their smartphones during a visit to the emergency department (ED) for the treatment of anterior shoulder dislocation. Participants were queried on recurrent dislocations, use of self-reduction methods, success rate, the effect that instruction in self-reduction had on their willingness to participate in recreational sports activities, on the decision to avoid surgery, and on the overall level of satisfaction with self-reduction methods. RESULTS: Forty-five patients (77.6%; average age 31.4±11.7 y, 10 females) were available for follow-up at an average 60.8±11.0 mo after the index visit to the ED. Eighteen of 23 patients (78.2%) who experienced a recurrent dislocation during the follow-up period attempted self-reduction, and 12 of them successfully achieved self-reduction. Sixteen patients (35.6%) reported that the knowledge in self-reduction increased their willingness to participate in recreational sports activities, whereas 4 (8.9%) patients reported that knowledge in self-reduction affected their decision not to undergo surgical stabilization. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals who sustain recurrent shoulder dislocations should be educated on shoulder self-reduction with the aims of minimizing discomfort, obviating referral to the ED, and motivating participation in recreational activities.

Patient Expectations of Pain Versus Experienced Expectations of Pain Following Shoulder Injection.

PURPOSE: Corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma, and hyaluronic acid injections to either the subacromial space (SAS) or the glenohumeral joint (GHJ) of the shoulder are commonly used for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes in outpatient settings. The first aim of this study was to determine whether the anticipated pain level differed significantly from the actual pain level experienced by patients who underwent shoulder injections. The second aim was to determine whether there was a significant difference in these pain levels between SAS and GHJ injections. The secondary goal was to investigate the correlation between patients' demographic data, anxiety characteristics, and pain scores. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. METHODS: This study involved patients who completed a three-part questionnaire prior as well as following an injections to the GHJ\SAS. FINDINGS: Sixty-three patients (28 males; 35 females), mean age of 54.28 years (standard deviation 13.95, range 25 to 84) met the inclusion criteria. There was a significant difference between the anticipated and the experienced pain (visual analog score 6.03 vs 3.17, P < .001). Experienced pain of the GHJ injections (n = 34) was rated as being greater than that of the SAS injections (n = 29) with borderline significance (visual analog scale 3.79 vs 2.36; P = .05). Forty-five patients (71.42%) reported a decrease in at least one pain category between anticipated and experienced pain compared to an increase reported by two patients (3.17%). CONCLUSIONS: Injections to the GHJ and SAS were shown to be significantly less painful than anticipated by the patients. GHJ injections were perceived as more painful than SAS injections. Communicating this evidence-based reassuring information with patients prior to an injection may alleviate fear of the procedure, reduce the perception of pain, and ultimately improve compliance with the procedure.

Accuracy of reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle according to the size of the baseplate.

BACKGROUND: Glenoid inclination must be assessed precisely during preoperative planning for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to position the glenoid baseplate correctly. We hypothesized that a more dynamic measurement method would better match the diversity of glenoid heights in the population and the variety of commercialized glenoid baseplates. Our purpose was to describe a new method to measure the RSA angle accounting for the baseplate size. METHODS: Computed tomography scans of 50 shoulders that underwent RSA for primary osteoarthritis or cuff tear arthropathy between June 2019 and February 2020 were included (mean age, 76 years). Three variants of the RSA angle were measured: the RSA angle as originally described by Boileau et al, the relative RSA 25 angle (which simulates the implantation of a 25-mm baseplate), and the relative RSA 29 angle (which simulates the implantation of a 29-mm baseplate). Measurements in the 2-dimensional true reformatted scapular plane were made by 3 independent operators. RESULTS: The mean R-S distance (ie, distance between point R [intersection of supraspinatus fossa line with glenoid surface] and point S [inferior border of glenoid]) was 24.2 ± 4.0 mm. The mean RSA angle was 20.3° ± 8.4°, whereas the mean relative RSA 25 angle was 19.3° ± 7.8° and the mean relative RSA 29 angle was 15.6° ± 7.6°. The mean difference between the RSA angle and the relative RSA 25 angle was 1.0° ± 4.1° (P = .16). The mean difference between the RSA angle and the relative RSA 29 angle was 4.7° ± 3.8° (P < .0001). In half of the shoulders in our series, the difference between the RSA angle and the RSA 29 angle exceeded 5°. CONCLUSION: The RSA angle is a reproducible measure of the inclination of the inferior part of the glenoid that is reliable in most cases for glenoid baseplates of 24-25 mm in height. However, surgeons should be aware that the RSA angle may overestimate the superior orientation of the inferior glenoid for baseplates of different sizes or for small- or large-stature patients. In these cases, the relative RSA angle adapted to the size of the baseplate more accurately evaluates the inclination of the inferior glenoid.

Long-term outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair and Hill-Sachs remplissage for bipolar bone defects.

PURPOSE: To evaluate long-term results after arthroscopic Bankart repair and Hill-Sachs remplissage (BHSR) in bipolar bone defects with less than 20% of glenoid bone loss (GBL) and to analyse risk factors for recurrent dislocation. METHODS: From 2009-2012, 43 patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability were treated with BHSR. Inclusion criteria were GBL < 20% and minimum of 4-yearfollow-up. There were 35 males and 8 females with a mean age of 29 years (range 16-53). The mean ISIS score was 3.6 (range 2-6). Patients were evaluated for recurrence, range of motion and functional outcomes (Walch-Duplay and Rowe score). Post-operative MRI was performed at least 6 months after surgery to evaluate infraspinatus capsulotenodesis healing. Glenoid track was assessed retrospectively from pre-operative computed tomography. Mean follow-up was 7.3 years (range 4-11). RESULTS: At the last follow-up, good to excellent outcomes were reported in 86% of patients. Average post-operative Walch-Duplay was 87.9 (range 75-100) and ROWE 93.7 (range 70-100). Infraspinatus capsulotenodesis healing was achieved in 86%. The rate of recurrence and revision surgery was 9.3% and 13.9%, respectively. Recurrence was associated with higher ISIS score (p = 0.0191) and lower age at surgery (p = 0.0227). Four (9.3%) Hill-Sachs lesions were considered off-track. The presence of off-track Hill-Sachs was associated with higher risk of recurrence (p < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic BHSR improves shoulder instability in the setting of bipolar bone defects with less than 20% of GBL. Patient-related factors and pre-operative glenoid track should be taken into consideration to reduce the risk of recurrence.

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in fibromyalgia patients had comparable outcomes to a matched control group.

BACKGROUND: Although fibromyalgia is associated with poor outcomes following orthopedic surgeries, several studies show some benefit from surgical intervention and nevertheless recommend operative treatment when indicated. There is sparse evidence of the effect of fibromyalgia on the outcomes of shoulder surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of fibromyalgia on patient-reported outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). METHODS: All patients with a confirmed diagnosis of fibromyalgia who underwent ARCR in one institution between 2010 and 2021 were included. Data retrieved from medical records included demographics, characteristics of the cuff tear and the surgical procedure, and preoperative and last follow-up (minimum 1 year) postoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, Subjective Shoulder score (SSV), and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A matched controlled group of patients without fibromyalgia who had undergone ARCR was selected according to age, sex, and preoperative DASH, SSV, and NPRS scores. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in demographics, cuff tear and surgical procedure characteristics, and preoperative scores between the fibromyalgia and control groups. The fibromyalgia patients' postoperative scores for all 3 measurements showed significant improvement: SSV by 32.1 (P = 0.004), DASH by 20.3 (P = 0.016), and NPRS by 2.33 (P = 0.017). There were no significant differences in the postoperative DASH, SSV, and NPRS between the fibromyalgia and control groups. CONCLUSION: Fibromyalgia patients with rotator cuff tears who undergo ARCR do not have inferior patient-reported outcomes compared with non-fibromyalgia controls. Fibromyalgia should not be a considered a contraindication for ARCR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Failed Latarjet Treated With Full Arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette Procedure Using Two Cortical Suture Buttons Leads to Satisfactory Clinical Outcomes and Low Recurrence Rate.

PURPOSE: To report clinical and radiologic outcomes of arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette using 2 cortical suture buttons in a series of patients with previous failed Latarjet and persistent glenoid bone loss. METHODS: Between 2015 and 2019, patients with recurrent anterior instability after failed Latarjet underwent arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette procedure using 2 cortical buttons for graft fixation. Exclusion criteria were open and primary Eden-Hybinette and less than one year follow-up. Functional assessment was performed using Rowe and Walch-Duplay scores, subjective shoulder value, visual analog scale, and degree of satisfaction. Iliac crest bone graft placement and healing were assessed postoperatively with computed tomography imaging. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients with a mean age of 28 years (range, 21-43 years) at time of revision were included. The mean glenoid bone loss was 23% (range, 18%-42%). Medium or deep Hill-Sachs lesion (Calandra 2 and 3) was present in 65% of cases. At a mean follow-up of 3 ± 1.6 years, all but 1 patient (94%) considered their shoulder stable, and 15 patients (88%) were satisfied or very satisfied. The subjective shoulder value increased from 51% to 87% (P < .05), the Walch-Duplay increased from 23 to 86 points (P < .05), and Rowe scores improved from 30 to 92 points (P < .05). Apprehension was still positive in 3 patients (17.6%), with this percentage being greater in the presence of Hill-Sachs Calandra 3 (P = .02). Postoperative computed tomography scans showed optimal bone autograft position in all patients (below the glenoid equator and flush to the glenoid rim). Iliac crest bone graft healed to the anterior glenoid neck in 16 shoulders (94%). The rate of recurrent instability was 11.7% but only 1 patient required revision surgery (5.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette using 2 cortical buttons leads to satisfactory clinical outcomes and a low recurrence rate after failed Latarjet, allowing successful reconstruction of the anterior glenoid rim and simultaneous treatment of capsular deficiency and humeral bone loss. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level IV, retrospective case series.

Arthroscopic Trillat procedure combined with capsuloplasty: an effective treatment modality for shoulder instability associated with hyperlaxity.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe the results of an arthroscopic Trillat procedure utilized to treat patients with symptomatic antero-inferior shoulder instability associated with hyperlaxity. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on 19 consecutive shoulders (17 patients, 2 bilateral) who underwent a Trillat procedure combined with anterio-inferior capsulolabral plasty from 2016 to 2019. Patients included in the study presented with shoulder instability combined with shoulder hyperlaxity and no glenoid or humeral bone loss. Clinical assessment included range of motion, apprehension, and instability tests. Outcome measures Constant-Murley score (CMS) scale, Walch-Duplay, ROWE, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Post-operatively, healing of the coracoid osteoclasy was evaluated by CT scan. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 24.8 months (range, 12-51). Post-operatively, none of the patients experienced a recurrent dislocation or subluxation and the anterior apprehension test was negative in all shoulders. Post-operative motion deficits of 22.1° ± 15.8 [p < 0.05] and 12.4° ± 10.1 [p < 0.05] loss were documented for ER1 and ER2, respectively. All functional scores exhibited significant improvements. Post-operative CT scan was available in 16 shoulders and revealed coracoid union in 15/16 shoulders and an asymptomatic fibrous non-union without coracoid or implant migration in one patient. CONCLUSION: The arthroscopic Trillat procedure combined with an antero-inferior capsulolabral plasty is effective in preventing recurrent instability and eliminating shoulder apprehension among patients suffering from anterior and or inferior hyperlaxity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Biodegradable balloon spacer for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears is associated with improved functional outcomes, low revisions, and complications rate at minimum one year follow-up.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to investigate the efficacy of the InSpace balloon spacer with a specific focus on clinical and patient-related parameters, functional scores InSpace durability, and satisfaction in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCT) at minimum one year follow-up. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2018, patients with symptomatic IRCTs were treated with InSpace balloon implantation. Demographic characteristics, concomitant procedures, and patient's reported outcomes (PROMs) were obtained as well as satisfaction rate and willingness to undergo the procedure again. Need for subsequent surgery and conversion to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) and time to conversion were also evaluated. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients (mean age of 70 years, range 46-86) who underwent an InSpace (OrthoSpace, Inc., Caesarea, Israel) balloon implantation were included. Mean follow-up was 56 months (median = 49.6, range 16-129 months). Sixteen out of our 29 pseudoparalytic patients (55.2%) exceed 90° of forward flexion post-surgery with mean improvement of 73° (20-150). Patients older than 65 years of age displayed a statistically significant improved ASES score (60.6 to 46.4, P < 0.05). Patients who underwent a subscapularis (SSC) repair demonstrated a superior ASES score (63.4 compared to 50.4, P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current study, spacer implantation is a low-risk, clinically effective treatment for the patients with IRCTs. Patient-specific parameters such as age, BMI, and gender should be considered during patient selection process. SSC tendon tears should be repaired if needed. Improvement in function and symptoms from this procedure may negate or delay the need for RTSA even for some of the pseudoparalytic patients.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with isolated latissimus dorsi or combined with teres major transfer for lack of external rotation: a comparative study.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) associated with two techniques: L'Episcopo procedure (combined teres major and latissimus dorsi transfer) and modified L'Episcopo procedure (isolated latissimus dorsi transfer). METHODS: A retrospective review of 36 RSAs (mean age 69.8 years; SD 8.9) associated with either L'Episcopo procedure (Group 1, 21 cases) or modified L'Episcopo procedure (Group 2, 15 cases) was performed between 2007 and 2020. Clinical outcome measures consisted of range of motion (ROM), SSV, VAS, and Constant-Murley scores. These scores were compared between the two groups. Radiographs were assessed for transfer site bony lesions. RESULTS: With a mean follow-up of 40.8 months (6-98; SD 28.8), no significant differences were revealed in the clinical outcomes: Constant score, SSV, VAS, ROM. The entire study group demonstrated a significant improvement in post-operative functional outcome scores and ROM parameters compared to their pre-operative state, IR measures being the only exception (p = 0.26). Radiographs demonstrated transfer site bony lesions in 60% of the patients (18/30). Three complications (8.3%) were noted in the study. CONCLUSION: At the short-term follow-up, RSA combined with either latissimus dorsi (LD) transfer in isolation or in association with teres major proved to be equally effective in restoring external rotation in the settings of an irreparable postero-superior cuff tear treated with RSA. Although the LD transfer group displayed a tendency towards superior ROM, this was not supported statistically. Post-operative radiographs confirmed the presence of bony lesions at the transfer fixation sites in both groups of patients (52% vs. 72%).

Shoulder assessment by smartphone: a valid alternative for times of social distancing.

BACKGROUND: The delivery of orthopaedic care via telemedicine services has the potential to promote accessibility and decrease medical care expenses, while facilitating the control of infectious disease spreading. The purpose of this study was to assess agreement regarding diagnosis, recommended course of management and the perceived need for additional diagnostic testing between a video examination (VE) and a face to face (FTF) assessment of patients with shoulder disorders. METHODS: Forty-seven (18 females) patients presenting to a shoulder surgery clinic were assessed consecutively by VE and a FTF examination. All assessments were conducted by a shoulder specialist. Agreement regarding the established diagnosis, the recommended course of management and the need for additional diagnostic tests was assessed using percent agreement and kappa (95% CI) coefficient. Differences in the content, duration and satisfaction between the two examination modes were also assessed. RESULTS: Percent agreement and kappa (95% CI) coefficient for agreement regarding diagnosis were 85.1% and 0.82 (0.69-0.94), respectively. Percent agreement and kappa (95% CI) coefficient regarding the recommended course of management and the need for additional diagnostic testing were 61.7% and 0.43 (0.22-0.63), and 74.5% and 0.49 (0.25-0.74), respectively. The VE resulted in collection of less physical examination information, took longer to complete and was associated with less satisfaction by both patient and examiner. CONCLUSIONS: Video examination of patients with shoulder disorders may present a valid alternative to FTF examination. Nevertheless, the content of the video-based physical examination may need to be modified to facilitate a clearer detection of indications for specific interventions or diagnostic tests.

Self-reduction techniques taught via smartphone are effective for anterior shoulder dislocation: prospective randomized study.

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the effectiveness of three methods for self-assisted shoulder reduction demonstrated using a smartphone video link. BACKGROUND: Anterior shoulder dislocation is very common among young adults. Patients often seek medical assistance in the emergency department to reduce their shoulder. Many techniques for shoulder reduction had been described, some of which do not require professional assistance and can be performed by patients themselves. METHODS: Patients admitted with anterior shoulder dislocation were randomized to either the Stimson, Milch or the Boss-Holtzach-Matter technique. Each patient was given a link to watch a short instructional video on his smartphone and instructed to attempt self-reduction. Success of the reduction, pain level, patient satisfaction and complications were recorded. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 58 patients (mean age was 31.6 (18-66, median = 27), 82% males, 88% right hand dominant). Success rate using Boss-Holtzach-Matter (10 of 19, 53%) and self-assisted Milch (11 of 20, 55%) were significantly higher than with the self-assisted Stimson method (3 of 19, 16%), p < 0.05. Pain levels improved from 8.4 (2-10) to 3.1 (0-10) following the reduction. Patient subjective satisfaction from the reduction attempt was 6.7 (0-10). No complications were observed. CONCLUSION:  Both the Self-assisted Milch and the Boss-Holtzach-Matter techniques are ideal for reduction of anterior shoulder dislocation without medical assistance. Both methods can be successfully performed without assistance or previous education and taught using an instructional video. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Mid- to long-term outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty with latissimus dorsi and teres major transfer for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears.

AIM: The objective of this study was to describe the outcome of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) combined with modified L'Episcopo procedure at long-term follow-up (5 to 12 years). METHODS: A retrospective review of 17 RSAs (mean age 67.2 years) with the modified L'Episcopo procedure conducted between 2006 and 2016 was performed. All patients had a combined loss of active elevation and external rotation with an irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tear. Clinical assessment was performed with a minimum follow-up of five years (mean 97.3 months). Outcome measures included range of motion, subjective shoulder value (SSV), visual analogue scale (VAS), and Constant-Murley scores. RESULTS: All patients (16) demonstrated a significant improvement in all clinical and functional parameters. VAS pain scores improved from 6 ± 2.6 to 1 ± 1; SSV improved from 35 ± 14 to 72 ± 10; active forward elevation increased from 66° ± 34 to 125° ± 29; and active external rotation arm at the body increased from -11° ± 22 to 21° ±11 and in 90° of abduction from -10° ± 17 to 37° ± 24. The mean Constant score improved from 25 ± 11 to 59 ± 8. Active internal rotation did not significantly change (p = 0.332). CONCLUSION: At long-term follow-up, RSA combined with modified L'Episcopo procedure resulted in significant improvements in pain, range of motion, and functional scores for patients with shoulder pseudoparalysis and a lack of active external rotation caused by a massive posterosuperior cuff tear with a teres minor deficiency.

Video examination via the smartphone: A reliable tool for shoulder function assessment using the constant score.

BACKGROUND: The use of video examinations (VE) may improve patient care by offering them a low-cost and easy access to physicians, save traveling expenses and shorten waiting time. The aim of this study was to validate the use of Smartphones for distant assessment of shoulder function by comparing the Constant scores (CS) of patients obtained by both VE and conventional face-to-face (FTF) examination. METHODS: Fifty-one subjects (age 19-80 years; women:men 18:33) who presented to a shoulder clinic with a variety of complaints were prospectively recruited and underwent FTF and VE in alternating order. CS obtained by the two methods were compared. Four patients were unable to complete the VE due to technical problems or non-compliance. RESULTS: Forty-seven (92%) subjects successfully completed both examinations. The mean difference in CS was -0.53 points (95%CI: -2.6:1.6), with limits of agreement of -7.7:6 points. Agreement of correlation coefficient, accuracy and precision were 0.91 (95%CI: 0.86:0.96), 0.99 (95%CI: 0.92:1.00) and 0.91 (95%CI: 0.86:0.96), respectively. CONCLUSION: VE can obtain a reliable estimate of shoulder function. The mean video CS was only -0.53 points from the mean frontal CS. Individual variations of CS did not exceed a 7-point distance from the "gold standard" estimate.

Biomechanical evaluation of suture buttons versus cortical screws in the Latarjet-Bristow procedure: a fresh-frozen cadavers study.

INTRODUCTION: A commonly used method of fixation of the transferred coracoid in the traditional Latarjet-Bristow procedure (open or arthroscopic) is by two bicortical screws. Although mechanically effective, screw fixation is also a major source of hardware and neurologic complications. This study aimed to compare the biomechanical performances of traditional metal screws and endobuttons as fixators of the Latarjet-Bristow procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine fresh-frozen cadaveric human scapulae with the conjoined tendon attached to the coracoid process were used for the Latarjet-Bristow procedure. The specimens were randomly assigned one of two groups: fixation using two 4.5-mm cannulated partially threaded Latarjet-Bristow experience screws or fixation using a suture-button construct. Specimens were secured in a material testing machine and cyclically preconditioned from 2 to 10 N at 0.1 Hz for ten cycles. They were then pulled to failure at a normalized displacement rate of 400% of the measured gauge length per minute. The maximal load-to-failure, stiffness and stress were calculated using a custom script. The failure mechanism and site were recorded for each specimen. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the maximal load-to-failure or other biomechanical properties of the two fixation techniques, but the failure mechanisms were unique to each one. Four specimens fixated with screws underwent graft failures (fracture) through the proximal or distal drill hole. Five specimens fixated with endobuttons underwent failure due to glenoid bone fractures. CONCLUSIONS: A single endobutton fixation appears to be biomechanically comparable to screw fixation in the Latarjet-Bristow procedure and provides a lower risk for graft fracture. Further studies with more numerous specimens are warranted to conclusively validate these findings.

Preemptive Analgesia in Hip Arthroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Preemptive Periacetabular or Intra-articular Bupivacaine in Addition to Postoperative Intra-articular Bupivacaine.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of intra-articular and periacetabular blocks for postoperative pain control after hip arthroscopy. METHODS: Forty-two consecutive patients scheduled for hip arthroscopy were randomized into 2 postoperative pain control groups. One group received preemptive intra-articular 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% injection, and the second group received preemptive periacetabular 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% injection. Before closure all patients received an additional dose of 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% intra-articularly. Data were compared with respect to postoperative pain with visual analog scale (VAS) and analgesic consumption, documented in a pain diary for 2 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were treated with intra-articular injection, and 21 patients with peri-acetabular injection. There were no significant differences with regards to patient demographics or surgical procedures. VAS scores recorded during the first 30 minutes postoperatively and 18 hours after surgery were significantly lower in the periacetabular group compared with in the intra-articular group (0.667 ± 1.49 vs 2.11 ± 2.29; P < .045 and 2.62 ± 2.2 vs 4.79 ± 2.6; P < .009). There were no differences between the groups with regard to analgesic consumption. CONCLUSIONS: Periacetabular injection of bupivacaine 0.5% was superior to intra-articular injection in pain reduction after hip arthroscopy at 30 minutes and 18 hours postoperatively. However, total analgesic consumption over the first 2 postoperative weeks and VAS pain measurements were not significantly affected. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, randomized controlled trial.

Rotator interval closure has no additional effect on shoulder stability compared to Bankart repair alone.

PURPOSE: Arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) provides satisfactory results for recurrent anterior shoulder instability, but the high recurrence rate post-ABR remain a concern. One of the adjunct procedures proposed to improve ABR results is arthroscopic rotator interval closure (ARIC). This study prospectively evaluated the outcomes of ABRs alone compared to combined ABR + ARIC and identified risk factors related to failure of each procedure. METHODS: Thirty-nine consecutive patients (mean age 23.1 (18.3-37.5) years; 37 males) underwent arthroscopic stabilization for recurrent anterior traumatic shoulder instability. Twenty patients underwent ABR alone and 19 underwent ABR + ARIC. Remplissage was added when glenoid engagement was observed during surgery. All patients were prospectively followed, and their postoperative courses were reviewed and functionally assessed at the last visit. RESULTS: The re-dislocation rate was higher in the ABR + ARIC group compared to the ABR only group at a mean follow-up of 4.2 (2-5.6) years (3 vs. 0, P = 0.06). More subluxations were found in the ABR only group (2 vs. 1, respectively; P = 0.58). The final limitation of range of motion (ROM) compared with the preoperative ROM was similar in both groups. Remplissage procedures were performed more often in the ABR only group [12 (60%) vs. 4 (21%), P = 0.013]. CONCLUSIONS: ARIC performed as an adjunct to ABR showed no superiority in attaining value-added stability compared to ABR alone. Adding a remplissage procedure may achieve better stability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2.