Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Crit Care ; 28(1): 154, 2024 05 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38725060

ABSTRACT

Healthcare systems are large contributors to global emissions, and intensive care units (ICUs) are a complex and resource-intensive component of these systems. Recent global movements in sustainability initiatives, led mostly by Europe and Oceania, have tried to mitigate ICUs' notable environmental impact with varying success. However, there exists a significant gap in the U.S. knowledge and published literature related to sustainability in the ICU. After a narrative review of the literature and related industry standards, we share our experience with a Green ICU initiative at a large hospital system in Texas. Our process has led to a 3-step pathway to inform similar initiatives for sustainable (green) critical care. This pathway involves (1) establishing a baseline by quantifying the status quo carbon footprint of the affected ICU as well as the cumulative footprint of all the ICUs in the healthcare system; (2) forming alliances and partnerships to target each major source of these pollutants and implement specific intervention programs that reduce the ICU-related greenhouse gas emissions and solid waste; and (3) finally to implement a systemwide Green ICU which requires the creation of multiple parallel pathways that marshal the resources at the grass-roots level to engage the ICU staff and institutionalize a mindset that recognizes and respects the impact of ICU functions on our environment. It is expected that such a systems-based multi-stakeholder approach would pave the way for improved sustainability in critical care.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units , Humans , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units/trends , Critical Care/methods , Critical Care/trends , Sustainable Development/trends , Carbon Footprint , Hospitals/trends , Hospitals/standards , Texas
2.
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J ; 19(4): 97-99, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37547891

ABSTRACT

Cardiac surgery is quite common in the United States. Outcomes after cardiac surgery are not only dependent on how the surgery went and how the anesthesia care was provided intraoperatively but also on the optimal management in the postoperative critical care setting. It is of paramount importance that the cardiac intensivist has a comprehensive understanding of cardiopulmonary physiology and the sequelae of cardiopulmonary bypass. Most preventable deaths after cardiac surgery have been linked to postoperative problems in the intensive care unit (ICU).1,2 Failure to recognize and rescue a patient from potentially reversible complications is a cause of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Patients who undergo cardiac surgery often present with multiple rapidly changing clinical problems; they are initially unstable with extremely fluid and dynamic clinical status. Postoperative care of these patients requires knowledge of general fundamental concepts of patient care as well as concepts unique to this set of patients. The initial management of these patients as they return from the operating room is critical, because clinical errors at this time can have far-reaching implications. The initial management should begin even before the patient arrives in the cardiovascular intensive care unit (CVICU). It is vital that the cardiac intensivist reviews the chart and notes the type of surgery, indications, preoperative hemodynamic data, comorbid conditions, medications, and allergies. Upon the patient's arrival in the CVICU, a careful systematic assessment of the patient begins with obtaining a comprehensive handoff from the surgical and anesthesia team. The cardiac intensivist should ascertain what procedure was done in the operating room and inquire as to any intraoperative events that might impact the patient's postoperative course. Then, they should physically examine the patient as part of this initial evaluation. During the initial assessment, the intensivist should avoid focusing on any one issue and attempt to get a global picture of the patient's clinical status. A thorough knowledge of the specific monitoring and drug delivery lines is imperative, as is knowledge of where the drains are placed. Once the initial assessment is complete, specific issues can be identified, prioritized, and addressed.3,4.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Humans , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Intensive Care Units , Critical Care , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Cardiopulmonary Bypass
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL