Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 71
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
J Infect Dis ; 229(1): 54-58, 2024 Jan 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37380166

ABSTRACT

Orthopoxvirus-specific T-cell responses were analyzed in 10 patients who had recovered from Mpox including 7 people with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH). Eight participants had detectable virus-specific T-cell responses, including a PWH who was not on antiretroviral therapy and a PWH on immunosuppressive therapy. These 2 participants had robust polyfunctional CD4+ T-cell responses to peptides from the 121L vaccinia virus (VACV) protein. T-cells from 4 of 5 HLA-A2-positive participants targeted at least 1 previously described HLA-A2-restricted VACV epitope, including an epitope targeted in 2 participants. These results advance our understanding of immunity in convalescent Mpox patients.


Subject(s)
Mpox (monkeypox) , Orthopoxvirus , Humans , HLA-A2 Antigen , Vaccinia virus , Epitopes , Viral Proteins
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 78(6): 1632-1639, 2024 Jun 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38483930

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There are no systematic measures of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) in patients maintaining central venous catheters (CVCs) outside acute care hospitals. To clarify the burden of CLABSIs in these patients, we characterized patients with CLABSI present on hospital admission (POA). METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of patients with CLABSI-POA in 3 health systems covering 11 hospitals across Maryland, Washington DC, and Missouri from November 2020 to October 2021. CLABSI-POA was defined using an adaptation of the acute care CLABSI definition. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes were collected via record review. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to assess factors associated with the all-cause mortality rate within 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 461 patients were identified as having CLABSI-POA. CVCs were most commonly maintained in home infusion therapy (32.8%) or oncology clinics (31.2%). Enterobacterales were the most common etiologic agent (29.2%). Recurrent CLABSIs occurred in a quarter of patients (25%). Eleven percent of patients died during the hospital admission. Among patients with CLABSI-POA, mortality risk increased with age (hazard ratio vs age <20 years by age group: 20-44 years, 11.2 [95% confidence interval, 1.46-86.22]; 45-64 years, 20.88 [2.84-153.58]; ≥65 years, 22.50 [2.98-169.93]) and lack of insurance (2.46 [1.08-5.59]), and it decreased with CVC removal (0.57 [.39-.84]). CONCLUSIONS: CLABSI-POA is associated with significant in-hospital mortality risk. Surveillance is required to understand the burden of CLABSI in the community to identify targets for CLABSI prevention initiatives outside acute care settings.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections , Humans , Male , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/microbiology , Female , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Aged , Adult , Central Venous Catheters/adverse effects , Central Venous Catheters/microbiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Maryland/epidemiology , Young Adult
3.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 77(1): 13-15, 2021 12 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34618026

ABSTRACT

Direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine is an increasingly popular modality for delivery of medical care via a virtual platform. As most DTC telemedicine visits focus on infection-related complaints, there is growing concern about the magnitude of antibiotic use associated with this setting. However, there is limited scholarship regarding adapting and implementing antibiotic stewardship principles in this setting as most efforts have been focused on hospitals with more recent work in long-term care facilities and primary care settings. We discuss utilizing the core elements for outpatient antibiotic stewardship as a framework for DTC antibiotic stewardship efforts moving forward.


Subject(s)
Antimicrobial Stewardship , Telemedicine , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Outpatients
4.
Fam Pract ; 37(2): 276-282, 2020 03 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31690948

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Perceived patient demand for antibiotics drives unnecessary antibiotic prescribing in outpatient settings, but little is known about how clinicians experience this demand or how this perceived demand shapes their decision-making. OBJECTIVE: To identify how clinicians perceive patient demand for antibiotics and the way these perceptions stimulate unnecessary prescribing. METHODS: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with clinicians in outpatient settings who prescribe antibiotics. Interviews were analyzed using conventional and directed content analysis. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 25 clinicians from nine practices across three states. Patient demand was the most common reason respondents provided for why they prescribed non-indicated antibiotics. Three related factors motivated clinically unnecessary antibiotic use in the face of perceived patient demand: (i) clinicians want their patients to regard clinical visits as valuable and believe that an antibiotic prescription demonstrates value; (ii) clinicians want to avoid negative repercussions of denying antibiotics, including reduced income, damage to their reputation, emotional exhaustion, and degraded relationships with patients; (iii) clinicians believed that certain patients are impossible to satisfy without an antibiotic prescription and felt that efforts to refuse antibiotics to such patients wastes time and invites the aforementioned negative repercussions. Clinicians in urgent care settings were especially likely to describe being motivated by these factors. CONCLUSION: Interventions to improve antibiotic use in the outpatient setting must address clinicians' concerns about providing value for their patients, fear of negative repercussions from denying antibiotics, and the approach to inconvincible patients.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Attitude of Health Personnel , Clinical Decision-Making , Inappropriate Prescribing , Ambulatory Care , Antimicrobial Stewardship , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Patient Education as Topic , Patient Satisfaction , Qualitative Research
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 68(1): e1-e35, 2019 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30423035

ABSTRACT

A panel of experts was convened by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) to update the 2004 clinical practice guideline on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) [1]. This guideline is intended to provide insight for healthcare professionals who prescribe and oversee the provision of OPAT. It considers various patient features, infusion catheter issues, monitoring questions, and antimicrobial stewardship concerns. It does not offer recommendations on the treatment of specific infections. The reader is referred to disease- or organism-specific guidelines for such support.


Subject(s)
Administration, Intravenous/methods , Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage , Drug Utilization/standards , Injections/methods , Outpatients , Americas , Communicable Diseases/drug therapy , Drug Therapy/methods , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic
6.
Clin Infect Dis ; 68(1): 1-4, 2019 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30551156

ABSTRACT

A panel of experts was convened by the Infectious Diseases Society of America to update the 2004 clinical practice guideline on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) [1]. This guideline is intended to provide insight for healthcare professionals who prescribe and oversee the provision of OPAT. It considers various patient features, infusion catheter issues, monitoring questions, and antimicrobial stewardship concerns. It does not offer recommendations on the treatment of specific infections. The reader is referred to disease- or organism-specific guidelines for such support.


Subject(s)
Administration, Intravenous/methods , Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage , Drug Utilization/standards , Injections/methods , Outpatients , Americas , Communicable Diseases/drug therapy , Drug Therapy/methods , Humans
7.
Clin Infect Dis ; 66(1): 11-19, 2018 01 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29020202

ABSTRACT

Background: To better monitor patients on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT), we need an improved understanding of risk factors for and timing of OPAT-associated adverse drug events (ADEs). Methods: We analyzed a prospective cohort of patients on OPAT discharged from 2 academic medical centers. Patients underwent chart abstraction and a telephone survey. Multivariable analyses estimated adjusted incident rate ratios (aIRR) between clinical and demographic risk factors and clinician-determined clinically significant ADEs. Descriptive data were used to present patient-reported ADEs. Results: Of 339 patients enrolled in the study, 18.0% experienced an ADE (N = 65), of which 49 were significant (14.5%, 2.24/1000 home-OPAT days). Patients with longer courses of therapy had lower rates of ADEs compared with patients treated for 0-13 days (14-27 days: aIRR, 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.99; at least 28 days: aIRR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.056-0.21). Risk factors for ADEs included female gender and receipt of daptomycin or vancomycin, while treatment for uncomplicated bacteremia and empiric treatment were associated with lower rates of ADEs. Conclusions: OPAT-related ADEs were common and often occurred within 2 weeks of hospital discharge. Patients on OPAT should be monitored more closely for ADEs, including clinical assessment and laboratory monitoring, especially within the first weeks after hospital discharge and particularly among women and patients who receive vancomycin.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/pathology , Injections/adverse effects , Outpatients , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors
10.
AIDS Behav ; 18(8): 1511-22, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24077931

ABSTRACT

Receiving care at multiple clinics may compromise the therapeutic patient-provider alliance and adversely affect the treatment of people living with HIV. We evaluated 12,759 HIV-infected adults in Philadelphia, PA between 2008 and 2010 to determine the effects of using multiple clinics for primary HIV care. Using generalized estimating equations with logistic regression, we examined the relationship between receiving care at multiple clinics (≥ 1 visit to two or more clinics during a calendar year) and two outcomes: (1) use of ART and (2) HIV viral load ≤ 200 copies/mL for patients on ART. Overall, 986 patients (8 %) received care at multiple clinics. The likelihood of attending multiple clinics was greater for younger patients, women, blacks, persons with public insurance, and for individuals in their first year of care. Adjusting for sociodemographic factors, patients receiving care at multiple clinics were less likely to use ART (AOR = 0.62, 95 % CI 0.55-0.71) and achieve HIV viral suppression (AOR = 0.78, 95 % CI 0.66-0.94) than individuals using one clinic. Qualitative data are needed to understand the reasons for visiting multiple clinics.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities/organization & administration , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Continuity of Patient Care/organization & administration , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Self Care/psychology , Adult , Ambulatory Care/psychology , CD4 Lymphocyte Count , Cohort Studies , Female , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/psychology , Humans , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Compliance/psychology , Philadelphia/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Self Care/statistics & numerical data , Viral Load
11.
AIDS Care ; 26(6): 716-22, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24188387

ABSTRACT

Non-AIDS defining malignancies, particularly colorectal cancer (CRC), may be more prevalent among persons living with HIV (PLWH). Further, PLWH may be less likely to receive CRC screening (CRCS). We studied the epidemiology of CRC and CRCS patterns in PLWH and HIV-uninfected persons in a large US Medicaid population. We performed a matched cohort study examining CRC incidence in 2006 and CRCS between 1999 and 2007. Study participants were continuously enrolled in the Medicaid programs of California, Florida, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. All PLWH enrollees were matched to five randomly sampled HIV-uninfected enrollees on 5-year age group, gender, and state. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for incident CRC (adjusted for comorbidity index) and the presence of CRCS (adjusted for comorbidity index and years in the data-set) among PLWH compared to HIV-uninfected enrollees were calculated. PLWH were not more likely to be diagnosed with CRC after adjusting for comorbidity index (unadjusted OR: 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.37-2.19; AOR 1.29; 95% CI: 0.98-1.70). While CRCS rates were low overall, PLWH were more likely to have received CRCS in unadjusted analyses (35.8% vs. 33.7%; OR 1.10, 95% CI: 1.07-1.13). This relationship was reversed after adjusting for comorbidity index and years in the data-set (AOR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.77-0.83). Limitations of the study include a focus on the Medicaid population, an inability to detect fecal occult blood tests (FOBT), and having half of patients between 50 and 55 years of age. In conclusion, PLWH were not more likely to be diagnosed with CRC, but in adjusted analyses, were less likely to have received CRCS. As we showed a low rate of CRCS overall in this Medicaid population, researchers, clinicians, and policy-makers should improve access to and uptake of CRCS among all Medicaid patients, and particularly among PLWH.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Insurance Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Algorithms , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Prevalence , Socioeconomic Factors , United States/epidemiology
13.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 69(6): 1003-13, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24075223

ABSTRACT

Patients with moderate to severe psoriasis often require systemic immunomodulatory medications that place them at risk for infection. Vaccination is a proven strategy to reduce infections. However, vaccination rates among patients with inflammatory autoimmune conditions, including psoriasis, remain low. We review the literature regarding vaccine-preventable illness and vaccinations commonly used in the United States in patients older than 18 years on immunosuppressive therapies that are used in the treatment of psoriasis. The medical board of the National Psoriasis Foundation recommends that dermatologists counsel patients on updating vaccinations in accordance with recommendations of the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices as any measures taken to prevent infection can increase the safety of immunomodulatory therapies.


Subject(s)
Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Vaccination , Contraindications , Humans , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Risk Factors , Travel , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors
14.
J Pharm Technol ; 29(5): 205-214, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25621307

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many hospitalized patients with complicated infections are discharged on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). However, little is known about how to improve the postdischarge care of OPAT patients. OBJECTIVE: The impact of an infectious diseases transitions service (IDTS) on OPAT patient readmissions, as well as on processes of care, was evaluated. METHODS: We performed a controlled, quasi-experimental evaluation over 15 months in an academic medical center. Intervention-arm patients, before and after the introduction of an IDTS, were seen by the general infectious diseases consult teams, while control-arm patients (discharged on OPAT after hospitalization with bacteremia) were not. The IDTS prospectively tracked all OPAT patients and coordinated follow-up. The impact of the IDTS was calculated using a differences-in-differences approach where the interaction between time (before vs after the IDTS intervention) and study arm (intervention vs control arm) was the variable of interest. The control arm was used only in primary outcome analyses (readmissions and emergency department visits). Secondary outcomes included process of care measures and non-readmission clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of 488 consecutive patients requiring OPAT, 362 were in the intervention arm (215 pre-intervention and 147 post-intervention) and 126 in the control arm (70 pre-intervention and 56 post-intervention). Compared to the control arm, the IDTS was not associated with changes in 60-day readmissions and/or emergency department visits (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.13-1.79). In the intervention arm, implementation of the IDTS was associated with fewer antimicrobial therapy errors (OR = 0.062; 95% CI = 0.015-0.262), increased laboratory test receipt (OR = 27.85; 95% CI = 12.93-59.99), and improved outpatient follow-up (OR = 2.44; 95% CI = 1.50-3.97). CONCLUSIONS: In a controlled evaluation, the IDTS did not affect readmissions despite improving process of care measures for targeted patients. Care coordination services may improve OPAT quality of care, but their relationship to readmissions is unclear.

15.
Am J Infect Control ; 51(4): 478-480, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36100033

ABSTRACT

Antibiotic resistance is increasing worldwide and can be largely attributed to excess antibiotic use. At our institution, 75% of patients were prescribed excess antibiotic days and total duration of therapy was appropriate in only 24.5% of cases per the reviewers. Choice of antibiotic was appropriate in 70.4% of cases.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Patient Transfer , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Quality Improvement , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Health Facilities
16.
Am J Infect Control ; 51(5): 594-596, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36642577

ABSTRACT

Infection prevention and surveillance training approaches for home infusion therapy have not been well defined. We interviewed home infusion staff who perform surveillance activities about barriers to and facilitators for central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) surveillance and identified barriers to training in CLABSI surveillance. Our findings show a lack of formal surveillance training for staff. This gap can be addressed by adapting existing training resources to the home infusion setting.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections , Catheterization, Central Venous , Cross Infection , Home Infusion Therapy , Humans , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Cross Infection/prevention & control
17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37113198

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Access to patient information may affect how home-infusion surveillance staff identify central-line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). We characterized information hazards in home-infusion CLABSI surveillance and identified possible strategies to mitigate information hazards. Design: Qualitative study using semistructured interviews. Setting and participants: The study included 21 clinical staff members involved in CLABSI surveillance at 5 large home-infusion agencies covering 13 states and the District of Columbia. Methods: Interviews were conducted by 1 researcher. Transcripts were coded by 2 researchers; consensus was reached by discussion. Results: Data revealed the following barriers: information overload, information underload, information scatter, information conflict, and erroneous information. Respondents identified 5 strategies to mitigate information chaos: (1) engage information technology in developing reports; (2) develop streamlined processes for acquiring and sharing data among staff; (3) enable staff access to hospital electronic health records; (4) use a single, validated, home-infusion CLABSI surveillance definition; and (5) develop relationships between home-infusion surveillance staff and inpatient healthcare workers. Conclusions: Information chaos occurs in home-infusion CLABSI surveillance and may affect the development of accurate CLABSI rates in home-infusion therapy. Implementing strategies to minimize information chaos will enhance intra- and interteam collaborations in addition to improving patient-related outcomes.

18.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 10(6): ofad283, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37323428

ABSTRACT

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) has become more common in clinical settings. Correspondingly, OPAT-related publications have also increased; the objective of this article was to summarize clinically meaningful OPAT-related publications in 2022. Seventy-five articles were initially identified, with 54 being scored. The top 20 OPAT articles published in 2022 were reviewed by a group of multidisciplinary OPAT clinicians. This article provides a summary of the "top 10" OPAT publications of 2022.

19.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 44(6): 948-950, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36916202

ABSTRACT

In total, 50 healthcare facilities completed a survey in 2021 to characterize changes in infection prevention and control and antibiotic stewardship practices. Notable findings include sustained surveillance for multidrug-resistant organisms but decreased use of human resource-intensive interventions compared to previous surveys in 2013 and 2018 conducted prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Antimicrobial Stewardship , COVID-19 , Cross Infection , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires , Delivery of Health Care , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Cross Infection/drug therapy
20.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 44(11): 1748-1759, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37078467

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) surveillance in home infusion therapy is necessary to track efforts to reduce infections, but a standardized, validated, and feasible definition is lacking. We tested the validity of a home-infusion CLABSI surveillance definition and the feasibility and acceptability of its implementation. DESIGN: Mixed-methods study including validation of CLABSI cases and semistructured interviews with staff applying these approaches. SETTING: This study was conducted in 5 large home-infusion agencies in a CLABSI prevention collaborative across 14 states and the District of Columbia. PARTICIPANTS: Staff performing home-infusion CLABSI surveillance. METHODS: From May 2021 to May 2022, agencies implemented a home-infusion CLABSI surveillance definition, using 3 approaches to secondary bloodstream infections (BSIs): National Healthcare Safety Program (NHSN) criteria, modified NHSN criteria (only applying the 4 most common NHSN-defined secondary BSIs), and all home-infusion-onset bacteremia (HiOB). Data on all positive blood cultures were sent to an infection preventionist for validation. Surveillance staff underwent semistructured interviews focused on their perceptions of the definition 1 and 3-4 months after implementation. RESULTS: Interrater reliability scores overall ranged from κ = 0.65 for the modified NHSN criteria to κ = 0.68 for the NHSN criteria to κ = 0.72 for the HiOB criteria. For the NHSN criteria, the agency-determined rate was 0.21 per 1,000 central-line (CL) days, and the validator-determined rate was 0.20 per 1,000 CL days. Overall, implementing a standardized definition was thought to be a positive change that would be generalizable and feasible though time-consuming and labor intensive. CONCLUSIONS: The home-infusion CLABSI surveillance definition was valid and feasible to implement.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Catheter-Related Infections , Catheterization, Central Venous , Cross Infection , Sepsis , Humans , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/diagnosis , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Reproducibility of Results , Sepsis/epidemiology , Bacteremia/diagnosis , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacteremia/prevention & control , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL