Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res ; 15(3): 241-9, 2003 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12527098

ABSTRACT

We investigated whether the brain-behavior relationship (BBR) between regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) as measured by positron emission tomography (PET) and individual accuracy in verbal working memory (WM) can be modulated by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the left or right middle frontal gyrus (MFG). Fourteen right-handed male subjects received a 30-s rTMS train (4 Hz, 110% motor threshold) to the left or right MFG during a 2-back WM task using letters as stimuli. Simultaneously an rCBF PET tracer was injected and whole-brain functional images were acquired. A hypothesis-driven region-of-interest-analysis of the left and right MFG BBR as well as an explorative whole-brain analysis correlating the individual accuracy with rCBF was carried out. Without rTMS we found a negative BBR in the left but no significant BBR in the right MFG. This negative BBR is best explained by an increased effort of volunteers with an inferior task performance. Left-sided rTMS led to a shift of the BBR towards the superior frontal gyrus (SFG) and to a positive BBR in anterior parts of the left SFG. With rTMS of the right MFG the BBR was posterior and inferior in the left inferior frontal gyrus. Beyond the cognitive subtraction approach this correlation analysis provides information on how the prefrontal cortex is involved based on individual performance in working memory. The results are discussed along the idea of a short-term plasticity in an active neuronal network that reacts to an rTMS-induced temporary disruption of two different network modules.


Subject(s)
Cerebrovascular Circulation/physiology , Frontal Lobe/physiology , Magnetics , Memory, Short-Term/physiology , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Adult , Brain/physiology , Frontal Lobe/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Regional Blood Flow/physiology , Tomography, Emission-Computed
2.
Neuroimage ; 18(2): 390-400, 2003 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12595192

ABSTRACT

Macroscopic magnetic field inhomogeneities severely limit sensitivity of blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) functional MRI (fMRI) in frontal and central brain regions close to brain stem. A single-shot multiecho echo-planar imaging method (TurboPEPSI) was developed that combines quantitative T(2)* mapping with gradient compensation of local susceptibility inhomogeneities in multiple volumes of interest (VOIs). Gradient compensation was optimized in individual subjects based on magnetic field mapping and applied at selected echo times, interleaved with acquisition of uncompensated echoes. Intrinsic T(2)* values from uncompensated echoes were obtained in real-time simultaneously with effective T(2)* values from gradient compensated echoes. It is demonstrated that up to three VOIs can be compensated in a single excitation, in addition to collecting uncompensated data, using 8-echo acquisition on a clinical 1.5 Tesla scanner. A theory was developed to optimize the sequence of uncompensated and compensated echoes to achieve maximum BOLD sensitivity. Gradient compensation increased effective T(2)* values in left and right amygdala on average by 18.8 +/- 7.5 ms, while maintaining sensitivity in uncompensated brain areas. In orbitofrontal cortex effective T(2)* values increased by 22.2 +/- 5.3 ms. A CO(2) challenge paradigm was used to demonstrate that this gradient compensation method significantly enhances BOLD signal changes in amygdala as compared to conventional echo-planar imaging (EPI) and uncompensated TurboPEPSI.


Subject(s)
Artifacts , Brain/blood supply , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Oxygen Consumption/physiology , Echo-Planar Imaging/methods , Humans , Mathematical Computing , Regional Blood Flow/physiology , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL