ABSTRACT
Brow position, hairline shape, and forehead projection may confer cis-feminine identity, and facial feminization surgery (FFS) can improve gender dysphoria among transfeminine patients. Depending on the Ousterhout classification, burring, osteotomy, anterior frontal sinus setback, and augmentation, with subsequent fixation via metal or bioabsorbable plates, can address forehead projection. However, titanium mesh, often used in frontal sinus fracture repair, has not been described for forehead contouring in FFS. The purpose of this study was to study clinical outcomes associated with the use of titanium mesh for the stabilization of bone following anterior frontal sinus setback. A retrospective cohort study of trans-female and nonbinary patients undergoing primary FFS by our senior author between January 2021 and February 2023 was performed. Variables collected include demographics, Ousterhout classification, operative details, complications, and follow-up duration. Patients with prior FFS or facial trauma were excluded. Data were analyzed using SPSS, (IBM, Armonk, NY). Forty-three transfeminine patients were included for analysis. The cohort had an average age of 33.0±8.7 years and a median follow-up time of 3.0 months (IQR = 1.0-7.0). Among our cohort, 26 patients (60.5%) received titanium mesh and 17 patients (39.5%) underwent burring only for forehead contouring. There were no reported complications (ie, infection, hardware extrusion, or mucocele formation) or a need for forehead revisions among the entire cohort regardless of the frontal sinus reconstruction material utilized. Clinical outcomes were favorable among patients receiving titanium mesh anterior table fixation during FFS. Titanium mesh can be considered as an additional technique for frontal bossing reduction and anterior table fixation in FFS.
Subject(s)
Forehead , Frontal Sinus , Surgical Mesh , Titanium , Humans , Female , Frontal Sinus/surgery , Frontal Sinus/injuries , Retrospective Studies , Male , Adult , Forehead/surgery , Sex Reassignment Surgery/methods , Gender Dysphoria/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Feminization/surgery , Transgender Persons , Osteotomy/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Triple jaw surgery, inclusive of a LeFort osteotomy, bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, and genioplasty, is used to maximize functional and esthetic outcomes for patients. This is achieved through the procedure's measurable effects on the craniofacial skeleton but is also influenced by the soft tissue changes that occur as a result of the procedure. This study aims to characterize the three-dimensional (3D) soft tissue changes of triple jaw surgery. METHODS: Patient demographics were collected along with pre and postoperative 3D images (3D VECTRA photosystem, Canfield, Fairfield, NJ). Orolabial anthropometric measurements were performed using Mirror (Canfield Scientific Inc., Fairfield, NJ). RESULTS: Forty-eight 3D data sets were included. The male/female ratio was 0.6, with a mean age of 23.4 years. Significant postoperative decreases (P<0.001) were seen in the mean absolute distance from the lower lip to S-line and distance from lower lip to H-line. In female patients, upper vermilion fullness, lower lip height, lower vermilion fullness, distance from lower lip to S-line, and absolute distance from lower lip to H-line were found to fall within ideal norms postoperatively. In male patients, lower lip height, lower vermilion fullness, distance from lower lip to S-line, and absolute distance from lower lip to H-line were found to fall within ideal norms postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Triple jaw surgery has a significant soft tissue impact and can transform some orolabial measurements to conform to ideal norms.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Facial feminization may be performed to alleviate gender dysphoria among transfeminine patients. The upper third of the face has several characteristics, including hairline shape and position, brow position, and forehead protrusion, that may confer feminine identity. The purpose of this study is to conduct a scoping literature review of techniques performed for forehead feminization and to additionally study clinical outcomes within an institutional cohort. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to review articles that discussed techniques and clinical outcomes associated with procedures performed for feminization of the upper third of the face. A retrospective review of patients undergoing such procedures by the senior author was then conducted. Variables collected included demographic factors, operative details, and postoperative outcomes such as complications, revisions, and re-operations. RESULTS: Initial review yielded sixty-seven articles. Title and abstract review followed by standardized application of inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in a total of twenty-two studies for analysis. Priorities of forehead feminization entail frontal bossing reduction, frontonasal angle widening, orbital contouring, brow lifting, and hairline advancement. Eighty-five patients were included for analysis. The majority were of Caucasian race (56%) and had type 3 forehead classification (92%). The average planned setback of the anterior table was 4.12 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The core tenets of the feminization of the forehead lie in the overall creation of a harmonic curvature of the forehead with other facial features. Our multi-pronged analysis presents an updated review of these principles, which may help plastic surgeons in performing procedures to feminize the upper third of the face. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) custom implants have been fundamental in addressing bone malformations and restoring traumatic defects within the field of craniofacial surgery. Although such implants are generally considered safe and appropriate alternatives to autologous bone grafts, there has been a lack of standardized reporting of adverse events associated with PEEK implants. The purpose of this study is multi-fold: (1) to explore the current landscape of autologous and allogeneic materials utilized for bone grafting; (2) to analyze and characterize adverse events associated within PEEK implants from the widely accredited, FDA-run database, Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE); and using the data, (3) to provide guidance to craniofacial surgeons using PEEK implants in their surgical practice. MATERIAL/METHODS: A retrospective review of the adverse events associated with PEEK implants were performed through the FDA-run database, Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE). The database was surveyed from July 2013 to January 2023. Event types were categorized by injury or malfunction, and device-reported adverse events were recorded, respectively. RESULTS: Database search initially yielded 77 adverse event reports, but after duplicates were removed, 69 event reports were included in the analysis. These events were sorted into the following categories: device-related and patient-related. Event types were categorized by injury (48.3%) or malfunction (53.6%). The most common reported device-related adverse events were "Poor Fit" (53.6%) and "Adverse Event without Identified Use or Problem " (26.1%). The most common reported patient-related event was "Infection" (32.8%). Of these adverse event reports, 14 (20.2%) patients required a second surgery; 21(30.4%) required implant modification whereas in the operating room; 17 (24.6%) underwent implant removal. Nine (13%) patients experienced operative case delays due to implant modifications. CONCLUSION: Infection and poor fit were among the most commonly reported adverse events associated with PEEK customizable implants. Although PEEK implants have been widely implemented in addressing craniofacial bony defects, our database analysis does call for further investigation in studying the long-term outcomes associated with PEEK craniofacial implants. With such analyses and collaboration among plastic surgeons and device engineers, there is great opportunity for innovation of these devices.
ABSTRACT
Various sociodemographic factors affect patient access to care. This study aims to assess how factors such as government-funded insurance and socioeconomic status impact the ability of adolescents with cleft lip-associated nasal deformities to access secondary rhinoplasty procedures. Patients older than 13 years old with a history of cleft lip/palate were identified in the National Inpatient Sample database from 2010 to 2012. Those who received a secondary rhinoplasty were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) procedural codes. A multivariate logistic regression model with post hoc analyses was performed to analyze if insurance status, socioeconomic status, and hospital-level variables impacted the likelihood of undergoing rhinoplasty. Of the 874 patients with a cleft lip/palate history, 154 (17.6%) underwent a secondary rhinoplasty. After controlling for various patient-level and hospital-level variables, living in a higher income quartile (based on zip code of residence) was an independent predictor of receiving a secondary cleft rhinoplasty (odds ratio=1.946, P =0.024). Patients had lower odds of receiving a cleft rhinoplasty if care occurred in a private, nonprofit hospital compared with a government-owned hospital (odds ratio=0.506, P =0.030). Income status plays a significant role in cleft rhinoplasty access, with patients from lower income households less likely to receive a secondary cleft rhinoplasty. Hospital-specific factors such as geographic region, bed size, urbanization, and teaching status may also create barriers for patients and their families in accessing surgical care for cleft lip nasal deformities.
Subject(s)
Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Rhinoplasty , Adolescent , Humans , Rhinoplasty/methods , Cleft Lip/surgery , Nose/surgery , Cleft Palate/surgery , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Skin and soft tissue aging has been an important topic of discussion among plastic surgeons and their patients. While botulinum toxin, facial fillers, chemical peels, and surgical lifts preside as the mainstay of treatment to restore appearance of youth, emergent technologies, such as CRISPR-Cas9, proteostasis, flap biology, and stem cell therapies, have gained traction in addressing the aging process of skin and soft tissue. Several studies have introduced these advancements, but it remains unclear how safe and effective these therapeutics are in facial rejuvenation, and how they may fit in the existent treatment workflow for soft tissue aging. MATERIALS/METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify and assess therapeutics utilized in addressing skin and soft tissue aging. Variables collected included year of publication, journal, article title, organization of study, patient sample, treatment modality, associated outcomes. In addition, we performed a market analysis of companies involved in promoting technologies and therapeutics within this space. PitchBook (Seattle, WA), a public market database, was utilized to classify companies, and record the amount of venture capital funding allocated to these categories. RESULTS: Initial review yielded four hundred and two papers. Of these, thirty-five were extracted after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Though previous literature regards CRISPR-Cas9 technology as the most favorable anti-aging innovation, after reviewing the current literature, stem cell therapies utilizing recipient chimerism appeared to be the superior skin anti-aging technique when accounting for possible disadvantages of various techniques. The psychosocial and cosmetic outcomes from using cell therapy to modulate allograft survival and tolerance may confer more long-term proposed benefits than the technologies in CRISPR-Cas9, flap biology innovations, and autologous platelet-rich plasma use. Market analysis yielded a total of 87 companies, which promoted innovations in technology, biotechnology, biopharmaceuticals, cell-based therapies, and genetic therapy. CONCLUSION: This review provides physicians and patients with relevant, usable information regarding how therapeutics can impact treatment regimen for facial aesthetics and skin rejuvenation. Furthermore, the goal of this research is to elucidate the varying therapeutics to restore appearance of youth, present associated outcomes, and in doing so, present plastic surgeons and their colleagues with greater insight on the role of these therapeutics and technologies in clinical practice. Future studies can further assess the safety and efficacy of these innovations and discuss how these may fit within surgical plans among patients seeking rejuvenation procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Subject(s)
Cosmetic Techniques , Skin Aging , Humans , Adolescent , Aging , Face , Rejuvenation , EstheticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Permissive hypotension, defined as mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 60-70 mm Hg, has been regarded as favorable among surgeons performing rhinoplasty. Furthermore, management of blood pressure has been shown to promote greater visualization of the surgical field and decrease postoperative complications, such as ecchymosis and edema. While multiple therapies have been utilized to achieve permissive hypotension, it remains unclear how modalities compare in terms of safety and efficacy. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review to better understand the specific modalities and associated outcomes in managing blood pressure during rhinoplasty. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted in order to identify and assess therapeutics utilized in achieving permissive hypotension during rhinoplasty. Variables collected included year of publication, journal, article title, organization of study, patient sample, treatment modality, associated outcomes (i.e., intraoperative bleeding, edema, and ecchymosis), adverse events, complications, and satisfaction. Articles were then categorized by the level of evidence as set forth by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Any conflicts were resolved through discussion and full-text review among co-authors. Of note, the search was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. No funding was required to conduct this review of the literature. RESULTS: Initial review yielded sixty-five articles. Title and abstract review followed by standardized application of inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in a total of ten studies for analysis. Articles discussed multiple therapies for management of blood pressure during rhinoplasty, including dexmedetomidine, dexamethasone, gabapentin, labetalol, nitroglycerine, remifentanil, magnesium sulfate, clonidine, and metoprolol. Overall, intraoperative bleeding, as well as postoperative ecchymosis and edema were reduced when MAP was controlled. CONCLUSION: Given its intra- and postoperative benefits, permissive hypotension can be leveraged to improve outcomes in rhinoplasty. This study presents an updated comprehensive review of various modalities used to achieve permission hypotension in rhinoplasty. Future studies should explore how comorbidities may impact choice of treatment regimen among patients undergoing rhinoplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Subject(s)
Hypotension , Rhinoplasty , Humans , Hemorrhage , Hypotension/drug therapy , Rhinoplasty/methods , Treatment Outcome , Postoperative Complications/prevention & controlABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of psychosocial well-being on perioperative pain and opioid use among patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) undergoing alveolar bone grafting (ABG). DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Tertiary level craniofacial clinic. PARTICIPANTS: 34 patients with CLP (median age: 11.7 years), including 25 (73.5%) unilateral CLP and 9 (26.5%) bilateral CLP, who underwent ABG from 2015 to 2022. INTERVENTIONS: ABG using iliac crest bone graft. Patients were prospectively administered four patient-reported psychosocial instruments from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perioperative opioid use in morphine equivalent dosage/kilogram, patient-reported pain scores, and length of hospital stay after ABG. RESULTS: Patient-reported anxiety (r = 0.41, p = 0.02) and depressive symptoms (r = 0.35, p = 0.04) correlated to higher perioperative opioid usage. Multivariable regression models including psychosocial scores, total acetaminophen usage, length of surgery, and other simultaneous surgeries were developed for total opioid usage, patient-reported pain, and length of hospital stay. Patient-reported anxiety was independently predictive of higher perioperative opioid use (ß=0.36, p = 0.01) and higher pain scores (ß=0.39, p = 0.02), but not length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: We identified an association for patient-reported anxiety and perioperative opioid use and pain in a CLP cohort undergoing ABG. Future considerations in preoperative patient and family consultation may be indicated in patients self-reporting higher anxiety in an effort to minimize perioperative opioid usage.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Business fundamentals, such as leadership, negotiations, and personal finance, remain as an overlooked component of residency education. It remains unclear how faculty members in academic plastic surgery particularly view the integration of a business curriculum within plastic surgery residency curriculum and how one's personal exposure to business concepts may impact their perception on the importance of learning such concepts in surgical training. METHODS: A 15-question survey was distributed through the American College of Academic Plastic Surgeons members in order to assess how academic plastic surgeons perceived the importance of a business curriculum and, if applicable, how the formalized study of these concepts were incorporated within plastic surgery residency programs. Surgeons were also queried about barriers toward organizing and executing such a curriculum and about the importance of certain topics for education. RESULTS: Fifty-five academic plastic surgeons, representing 25 institutions, completed the survey. More than 60% of academic plastic surgeons either strongly agreed or agreed to a formalized business curriculum being a necessary component of residency curriculum, and more than 70% either strongly agreed or agreed to wishing for more instruction in such concepts. CONCLUSION: This study elucidates how academic plastic surgeons perceive the education of business fundamentals during plastic surgery training. Although the majority of respondents found such teachings as valuable, our findings suggest limited resources allocated to these important concepts. Future efforts should incentivize plastic surgery programs to provide formal instruction within the business of medicine and, in doing so, position trainees for success in their careers.
Subject(s)
Internship and Residency , Surgeons , Surgery, Plastic , Curriculum , Humans , Surgery, Plastic/education , Surveys and Questionnaires , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Pediatric septorhinoplasty has sparked controversial debate amongst craniofacial surgeons, particularly due to its potential growth disturbances of the face and nose. The purpose of this study is (1) to conduct a systematic literature review that explores unique considerations and limitations associated with performing rhinoplasty in the pediatric population; (2) to discuss objective indicators for determining craniofacial skeleton maturation; (3) to perform a case series to further understand whether the age of menarche serves as a good proxy for estimating the time of facial growth maturation, and by extension, whether a post-menarchal patient is a suitable candidate for rhinoplasty. METHODS: Systematic literature review was performed in order to assess unique considerations and limitations of pediatric rhinoplasty. Retrospective chart review and anthropometric (9 linear, 3 angular, 6 indices) measurements were performed for ten pediatric female patients who underwent open septo-rhinoplasty. Follow-up times ranged from 66 to 103 weeks. Patients were separated into 2 cohorts according to age at the time of menarche. Cohort 1 consisted of patients who had undergone menses for longer than 2 years at the time of rhinoplasty, whereas Cohort 2 comprised of patients who either had menses within 2 years of rhinoplasty or did not have menses at the time of rhinoplasty. Data included demographic factors, procedural variables, revision surgeries, and complications. Measurements were conducted using VECTRA software (Canfield Scientific, Parsippany, NJ). Differences in measurements between the 2 postoperative timepoints were compared. RESULTS: Literature review yielded 17 articles, which had conflicting opinions regarding pediatric rhinoplasty and ultimately, highlighting the need for a more objective tool for guiding the decision to perform rhinoplasty.Patients in Cohort 1 had minimal deviations in measurements over time, within the exception of an increase in nasal tip projection and a decrease in nasolabial angle and facial width. Patients in Cohort 2 had decreases in facial height, upper facial height, nasal tip angle, and nasofrontal angle. Nasolabial angle decreased for both cohorts. Of the ten patients, 1 in Cohort 2 underwent revision rhinoplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Our case series suggests that anthropometric measurements remain relatively more stable for patients who have undergone menses for more than 2 years, compared to those who have not. Although this study has limitations, further investigation is warranted in order to determine whether age of menarche may serve as a useful tool for craniofacial surgeons in guiding the decision to perform rhinoplasty.
Subject(s)
Rhinoplasty , Child , Female , Humans , Menarche , Nose/surgery , Reoperation , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Within the academic surgical setting resident involvement may confer longer operative times. The increasing pressures to maximize clinical productivity and decreasing reimbursement rates, however, may conflict with these principles. This study calculates the opportunity cost of resident involvement in craniofacial surgery. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was conducted with patients who underwent craniofacial procedures from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2005 to 2012. Patients were selected based on relevant Current Procedural Terminology codes for craniofacial pathologies (ie, trauma, head and neck reconstruction, orthognathic surgery, and facial reanimation). Variables included patient demographics, operative time, and presence or absence of resident trainee. Average relative value units were calculated to determine the opportunity cost of resident involvement for each craniofacial procedure. RESULTS: In total, 2096 patients were identified through the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2005 to 2012. Resident involvement was associated with a statistically significant higher operative time (Pâ<â0.001) for facial reanimation, facial trauma, orthognathic surgery, and head and neck reconstruction. The opportunity costs per case associated with resident involvement were the highest for head and neck reconstruction ($1468.04), followed by orthognathic surgery ($1247.03), facial trauma ($533.03), and facial reanimation ($358.32). Resident involvement was associated with higher rate of complications for head and neck reconstruction (Pâ<â0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Resident involvement is associated with longer operative times, higher complications, and higher re-operations, compared to attending exclusive surgical care. Future studies may consider how reimbursements should align incentives to promote resident education and training.
Subject(s)
Internship and Residency , Adult , Clinical Competence , Humans , Operative Time , Postoperative Complications , Quality Improvement , Reoperation , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The determination of facial growth maturity is crucial before surgical intervention in pediatric patients. To the author's knowledge, there are several indicators of skeletal maturity, but there remains a lack of consensus regarding their application when determining surgical timing. The purpose of this study was to determine the most accurate skeletal maturity indicator in predicting facial growth maturation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was done to determine the most predictive indicator for facial growth maturity. We hypothesized that menses' onset was the most predictive of these maturity indicators. This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A systematic search of MEDLINE, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus databases, and Google Scholar, was done in October 2020 to identify citations related to maturity indicators assessing craniofacial growth. The quality of evidence was determined using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Cohort Studies. RESULTS: Of the 13,289 articles screened, 1 retrospective and 1 prospective study met inclusion criteria. No articles were identified that provided evidence for our hypothesis. Based on the 2 included studies, it was concluded that a handwrist x-ray was more predictive of facial growth cessation (compared to other skeletal maturity indicators). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the literature, handwrist radiography serves as the most predictive method in determining the facial growth maturity. The paucity of articles within this investigation highlights the need for greater research efforts to investigate the predictability of indicators to evaluate facial growth maturation. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020207388.
Subject(s)
Retrospective Studies , Child , Humans , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: Artificial intelligence (Al)-based analyses may serve as a more objective tool for measuring cosmetic improvements following aesthetic plastic surgery. This preliminary proof-of-concept study utilized a novel commercial facial recognition software to assess perceived changes in age and attractiveness among patients receiving rhinoplasty.This study was a retrospective evaluation of three-dimensional photographs of patients who underwent rhinoplasty by the senior author (DS). Both pre- and post-operative (> 12-month follow-up) Vectra three-dimensional images (Canfield Scientific, Parsippany, NJ) were assessed using Haystack AI Software (Haystack AI, New York, NY). Facial attractiveness (score 1-10) and apparent age were predicted. A retrospective chart review of demographic variables was additionally performed. Paired t tests were used to compare age and attractiveness scores before and after surgery. Multivariate linear regression was performed to identify factors associated with age and attractiveness scores.One hundred twenty-four patients receiving rhinoplasty met the study criteria (average age: 35.58). Overall, rhinoplasty was associated with increases in Al-rated attractiveness (+0.28, P = 0.03) and decreases in perceived age relative to the patient's true age (-1.03 years, P = 0.03). Greater decreases in postoperative perceived age were achieved in patients who appeared older than their actual age preoperatively ( P < 0.001).Facial recognition software was successfully used to evaluate improvements in perceived age and attractiveness in patients undergoing aesthetic rhinoplasty. Patients were perceived by the software as younger and more attractive following rhinoplasty. Age reversal was greatest among patients who appeared much older than their actual age at the time of surgery.Level of Evidence: IV.
Subject(s)
Facial Recognition , Rhinoplasty , Adult , Artificial Intelligence , Beauty , Esthetics, Dental , Humans , Proof of Concept Study , Retrospective Studies , SoftwareABSTRACT
Social determinants of health (SDOH) are integral to consider when delivering craniomaxillofacial and facial reconstructive care for patients. The American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA) has instituted a formalized multidisciplinary care team model that recognizes such determinants and has aggregated patient-led organizations to strengthen patients' education and support system. This review discusses the need for all surgeons engaged in facial and craniomaxillofacial reconstruction to consider SDOH in their practice. Additionally, we explore how factors such as race, insurance status, education level, cost, and access to follow-up care, impact surgical care for craniosynostosis, facial trauma, orthognathic surgery, head and neck cancer, and facial paralysis. We propose that the ACPA team model be applied to other societies that care for the broader scope of patients in need of facial and craniomaxillofacial reconstruction to strengthen the communication, collaboration, and standardization of care delivery that is personalized to the needs of each patient.
Subject(s)
Cleft Palate , Craniosynostoses , Cleft Palate/surgery , Face , Facial Bones/surgery , Humans , Social Determinants of HealthABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Older age cleft palate (CP) repair in international settings has been associated with increased surgical morbidity. This study assesses the prevalence and risks associated with late-age CP repair (age > 5 years) in the United States. METHODS: Primary CP repair patients less than the age of 18 years were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement pediatric database from 2012 to 2018. Total postoperative complications, readmissions, reoperations, duration of surgery, and length of stay were recorded. T-tests and χ2 analyses were used to compare variables between age groups 0-5, 6-10, and 11-17. RESULTS: A total of 10,022 primary CP procedures were identified from 2012 to 2018, of which 868 (8.6%) received repair at age > 5 years. Hispanic patients constituted a larger proportion of CP repair from ages 11 to 17 years than repair at other ages (P < .001). In comparison with children treated from ages 0 to 5 years, children operated on between ages 6 and 10 or 11 and 17 years experienced no increases in unplanned readmissions, reoperations, or complication rates after surgery. Patients of ages 6-10 years and 11-17 years had decreased operating room time (P < .001) compared with younger patients. Patients of ages 11-17 years also had decreased hospital length of stay (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Many children in the United States received primary CP repair after the age of 5 years likely due to late treatment of submucosal clefts or delayed care among international immigrants/adoptees. Old age procedures were not associated with increased short-term surgical morbidity in comparison with surgery at earlier time points. The causes and implications of older age primary surgery warrant further study.
Subject(s)
Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cleft Lip/surgery , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , Cleft Palate/surgery , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Neurosurgical Procedures , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have evaluated the effect of post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) on autologous breast reconstruction, but the variability of PMRT regimens and inadequate controls have made results difficult to interpret. Therefore, in this study, irradiated free-flaps are compared to non-irradiated internal controls in patients who underwent immediate bilateral reconstruction followed by unilateral PMRT to better delineate the effect of PMRT. The role of regional nodal irradiation (RNI) is also specifically assessed. METHODS: Appropriate patients were identified through retrospective review. Complications such as fat necrosis, fibrosis, infection, delayed healing, and flap loss, as well as revision surgeries, among the irradiated free-flaps were compared to those on the contralateral non-irradiated side. Additional analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of patient demographics and treatment characteristics, such as RNI, on complications involving the irradiated free-flaps. RESULTS: Seventy-three women were included. There was no significant difference between complication rates for the irradiated and non-irradiated free-flaps (39.7% vs. 38.4%, p = .78), although irradiated free-flaps were more likely to have fibrosis (17.0% vs. 0.0%; p < .0001) and multiple complications (9.6% vs. 0.0%; p = .02). Both groups underwent a similar number of revision surgeries (42.5% vs. 41.1%; p = .29). Looking at the irradiated free-flaps, internal mammary node (IMN) irradiation was the only factor predictive of complications (IRR 3.80, CI 1.32-10.97; p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: PMRT may contribute to free-flap fibrosis, but does not appear to affect the overall risk of complications or revision surgeries. However, additional counseling is warranted if IMN irradiation is likely, as it is potentially associated with increased complications.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Mammaplasty , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Mastectomy , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: Although the use of a one-sided segmental maxillary osteotomy has been described for repairing alveolar clefts, there remains little consensus regarding the indications and outcomes of such approaches. This brief clinical note aims to summarize previous studies of one-sided segmental maxillary osteotomies for alveolar cleft (AC) repair. A literature search yielded only 2 articles that described the use of a single-sided segmental maxillary osteotomies (SMO) for AC repair. The overall outcomes for the implementation of SMO in correcting AC were positive without major or minor complications. Although the available studies show promising results for the single-sided SMO technique, further validation is warranted to assess the indications and outcomes for this technique.
Subject(s)
Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Bone Transplantation , Cleft Lip/surgery , Cleft Palate/surgery , Humans , Maxilla/surgery , Maxillary OsteotomyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Rhinoplasty in older adults requires unique consideration of the aging nose. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature pertaining to rhinoplasty in the aging population, review the senior author's experience, and describe techniques aimed at addressing age-related features. It was hypothesized that consistent age-related nasal dysmorphology is described in the literature and standard rhinoplasty techniques may effectively address these changes. Furthermore, it was hypothesized that rhinoplasty is more commonly performed for posttraumatic and functional indications than for aesthetic reasons. METHODS: A literature review including publications describing rhinoplasty in patients over 55 years old was conducted. Additionally, a retrospective review of the senior author's cases was performed. Pre- and postoperative photographs were used to compare anthropometric changes. Demographic factors, surgical indications, and operative details were collected. RESULTS: Nine articles met the study criteria. Manifestations of the aging nose included soft tissue atrophy, bony fragility and resorption, tip ptosis, internal and external valve collapse, and worsening dorsal hump. Twenty-seven patients were included in this institutional review. Primary indication for rhinoplasty was posttraumatic deformity in 17 (63%) patients and nasal obstructive symptoms in 10 (37%) patients. Tip refinement and ptosis were addressed through tip grafts (70%), columellar struts (26%), and caudal septal extension grafts (67%). Nasal obstruction was relieved through septoplasty (96%), turbinate ablation (85%), and spreader grafts (70%). CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a systematic review of rhinoplasty in the older adult as well as a retrospective review of the senior author's patients. Unique considerations specific to this population should be integrated into treatment planning.