Pharmacist-led patient education and adverse event management in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving afatinib in a community-based, real-world clinical setting.

PURPOSE: To describe the outcomes of a pharmacist-led multi-center, collaborative patient education and proactive adverse event management program in a community-based oncology setting. METHODS: Patients with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm+) non-small cell lung cancer, newly prescribed with oral afatinib, and monitored as part of the Florida Cancer Specialists patient management program, were included in a retrospective, observational analysis. During follow-up, data were collected on adverse event frequency, and changes in afatinib dosing. Data analyses were descriptive and exploratory in nature. RESULTS: The mean age of the 123 patients included in the analysis was 69 years, and 78% were female. At the time of the analysis, 3 patients had discontinued before receiving treatment, 89 patients had discontinued afatinib treatment, and 31 patients were continuing to receive afatinib treatment. The most common afatinib-related adverse events were diarrhea (85%), rash/skin reactions (58%), stomatitis/mucositis (19%), and paronychia (16%). Overall, 13% of patients discontinued due to afatinib-related adverse events. The median duration of treatment was 4 months in patients who discontinued due to adverse events, 6 months in those who discontinued for other reasons, and 18 months in those who were continuing to receive therapy. Afatinib dose-reductions were more frequent in patients continuing treatment versus those who discontinued due to adverse events (77% vs. 42%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that adverse events in patients with EGFRm + non-small cell lung cancer receiving afatinib can be successfully managed in a community-based, real-world setting with the help of collaborative pharmacist-led patient education, adverse event monitoring, and continuous support.

Impact of a Best Practices Program in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Receiving Selinexor.

Best practice (BP) in cancer care consists of a multifaceted approach comprising individualized treatment plans, evidence-based medicine, the optimal use of supportive care and patient education. We investigated the impact of a BP program in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) receiving selinexor. Features of the BP program that were specific to selinexor were initiating selinexor at doses ≤80 mg once weekly and the upfront use of standardized antiemetics. Study endpoints included time to treatment failure (TTF), duration of therapy, dose limiting toxicities and overall survival. Comparative analysis on TTF and duration of therapy was conducted using a log-rank test and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression. Over the ensuing 12-month post-BP period, 41 patients received selinexor-based therapy compared to 68 patients who received selinexor-based therapy pre-BP implementation. Patients treated in the post-BP period had reductions in TTF (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.92). Patients in the pre-BP period were four times more likely to stop therapy than those in the post-period (odds ratio [OR] = 4.0, 95% CI: 1.75 to 9.3). The findings suggest a BP program tailored to selinexor could increase the time to treatment failure, increase treatment duration and lower the incidence of drug limiting toxicities.

Defining appropriate quality performance metrics for pharmacies dispensing oral oncology therapies.

Pharmacy benefit managers use measures like the medication possession ratio (MPR) as a performance/quality metric to evaluate specialty pharmacies and assess direct and indirect remuneration clawback fees. Abundant evidence shows that measuring MPR does not correlate with patients' experiences while on oral cancer oncolytics and does not accurately reflect their clinical outcomes. The authors demonstrate that as an alternative to MPR, the Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute's Rx To Go in-house pharmacy offers value; it uses a multifaceted approach to comprehensively evaluate the services that specialty oncology pharmacies provide to patients with cancer who are being treated with oral oncolytics.