ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To summarize contemporary and emerging strategies for the diagnosis and management of metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), focusing on diagnostic testing and therapeutics. METHODS: Literature review using PUBMED-Medline databases as well as clinicaltrials.gov to include reported or ongoing clinical trials on treatment for mHSPC. We prioritized the findings from phase III randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and clinical practice guidelines. RESULTS: There have been significant changes to the diagnosis and staging evaluation of mHSPC with the integration of increasingly accurate positron emission tomography (PET) imaging tracers that exceed the performance of conventional computerized tomography (CT) and bone scan. Germline multigene testing is recommended for the evaluation of patients newly diagnosed with mHSPC given the prevalence of actionable alterations that may create candidacy for specific therapies. Although androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains the backbone of treatment for mHSPC, approaches to first-line treatment include the integration of multiple agents including androgen receptor synthesis inhibitors (ARSI; abiraterone) Androgen Receptor antagonists (enzalutamide, darolutamide, apalautamide), and docetaxel chemotherapy. The combination of ADT, ARSI, and docetaxel chemotherapy has recently been evaluated in a randomized trial and was associated with significantly improved overall survival including in patients with a high burden of disease. The role of local treatment to the prostate with radiation has been evaluated in randomized trials with additional studies underway evaluating the role of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy. CONCLUSION: The staging and initial management of patients with mHSPC has undergone significant advances in the last decade with advancements in the diagnosis, treatment and sequencing of therapies.
Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Docetaxel , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Hormones/therapeutic useABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Approximately 15% of prostate cancer patients have lymph node metastases at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP). However, there is no universally accepted standard of care for these men. The options for treatment in this subset of patients range from observation to a combination of adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (aADT) and radiation therapy (RT). RECENT FINDINGS: A recent systematic review showed that there was no clear choice out of the options above to treat these patients. Studies have shown that patients treated with adjuvant radiation therapy have lower all-cause mortality when compared to patients treated with salvage radiation therapy. In this review, we summarize treatment options for pathologic node-positive (pN1) patients and discuss the urgent need for robust clinical trials that includes observation as the control group to help establish a standard of care for treating patients with node-positive prostate cancer after RP.
Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Prostatectomy , Prostate-Specific AntigenABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Metastatic prostate cancer remains universally lethal. Although de-novo metastatic prostate cancer was historically managed with systemic therapy alone, local therapies are increasingly utilized in the early treatment of the disease, particularly in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC). OMPC represents an intermediate stage between clinically localized and widespread metastatic disease. Diseases classified within this stage present an opportunity for localized targeting of the disease prior to progression to widespread metastases. The purpose of this review is to discuss the contemporary and emerging local therapies for the treatment of OMPC. RECENT FINDINGS: To date, there are three utilized forms of local therapy for OMPC: cryoablation, radiation therapy, and cytoreductive prostatectomy. Cryoablation can be utilized for the total ablation of the prostate and has shown promising results in patients with OMPC either in combination with ADT or with ADT and systemic chemotherapy. Radiation therapy along with ADT has demonstrated improvement in progression-free survival. The STAMPEDE Arm G, PEACE-1, and the HORRAD clinical trials have investigated radiation therapy for mPCa compared to standard of care versus systemic therapy with varying results. Cytoreductive radical prostatectomy (CRP) in conjunction with ADT has also been proposed in the management of OPMC with promising results from case-control and retrospective studies. Currently there are larger controlled trials investigating CRP for OPMC including the SIMCAP, LoMP, TRoMbone, SWOG 1802, IP2-ATLANTA, g-RAMPP, and FUSCC-OMPCa trials. Given the novel nature of local treatments for OPMC, treatment selection is still controversial and requires long-term follow-up and randomized clinical trials to aid patient and clinician decision making.
Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostate/pathology , Prostatectomy/methods , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Metastasis/drug therapy , Neoplasm Metastasis/pathologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for men with clinical stage (CS) I or II testicular nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) has both staging and therapeutic implications. We aimed to investigate the impact of lymph node count (LNC) on outcome after primary RPLND for men with CS I or II NSGCT using a nationally representative data set. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of men who received a primary RPLND for CS I or II NSGCT was performed using the National Cancer Database. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine overall survival (OS) according to LNC. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with LNC >20 and factors predictive of lymph node-positive (pN+) disease after primary RPLND. RESULTS: Of 1,376 men who comprised our analytical cohort, 50.1% and 49.9% had 1-20 lymph nodes (LNs) and >20 LNs removed, respectively. Five-year OS rates were 96.4% and 99.1% for men with 1-20 and >20 LNs resected, respectively (p=0.004). A higher proportion of men with >20 LNs removed were treated at academic centers, had private insurance, presented with higher AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) CS and were more likely to have pN+ disease, compared to those with 1-20 LNs removed. Factors significantly associated with pN+ disease after RPLND include higher AJCC CS and LNC (per 10-count increase). CONCLUSIONS: Higher LNC after primary RPLND significantly increases the likelihood of identifying pN+ disease and is associated with improved OS. Our data support the therapeutic implications of a thoroughly performed RPLND in the primary setting.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal , Testicular Neoplasms , Humans , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Male , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/pathology , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/surgery , Retroperitoneal Space/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Testicular Neoplasms/pathology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The American Urological Association (AUA) Annual Meeting serves as the premier platform for presenting unpublished research in urology. Among selected abstracts, podium presentations represent the most impactful submissions. While podium presentations receive a large audience through conference attendance and social media posts, it is unclear how often they manifest as publications in peer-reviewed journals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Podium presentations from the 2017 AUA Annual Meeting were reviewed. Abstracts were assessed for publication between January 1, 2015 and May 31, 2020 allowing for a 3-year window of publication and accounting for publications prior to the submission deadline. Abstract authors were individually searched with key terms being added sequentially until <30 results were generated in PubMed®. Abstracts were deemed published if at least 1 author and 1 conclusion matched a manuscript. Publication rate, time to publication, and 2019 journal impact factor were collected. Statistical analysis was performed by linear and logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 872 podium presentations, 453 (51.9%) were published within 3 years. Median time from submission to publication was 12.5 months (IQR: 7.5-20.5). The number of articles published at 1, 2 and 3 years from submission was 203, 368 and 430, respectively. The median journal impact factor of publications was 3.2 (IQR: 2.0-5.8). Oncology studies (OR=1.21 [95% CI: 0.91-1.60], p=0.186) had similar rates of publication compared to non-oncology studies. CONCLUSIONS: While AUA podium presentations disseminate valuable data, approximately half were not published in peer-reviewed journals within 3 years. Therefore, care must be taken when promoting findings or adopting new practices based on these presentations alone.
Subject(s)
Congresses as Topic , Publishing/statistics & numerical data , Societies, Medical , Urology , Humans , Time Factors , United StatesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Salvage radical prostatectomy is rare due to the risk of postoperative complications. We compare salvage Retzius-sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (SRS-RARP) with salvage standard robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (SS-RARP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 72 patients across 9 centers were identified (40 SRS-RARP vs 32 SS-RARP). Demographics, perioperative data, and pathological and functional outcomes were compared using Student's t-test and ANOVA. Cox proportional hazard models and Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed to assess risk of incontinence and time to continence. Linear regression models were constructed to investigate postoperative pad use and console time. RESULTS: Median followup was 23 vs 36 months for SRS-RARP vs SS-RARP. Console time and estimated blood loss favored SRS-RARP. There were no differences in complication rates or oncologic outcomes. SRS-RARP had improved continence (78.4% vs 43.8%, p <0.001 for 0-1 pad, 54.1% vs 6.3%, p <0.001 for 0 pad), lower pads per day (0.57 vs 2.03, p <0.001), and earlier return to continence (median 47 vs 180 days, p=0.008). SRS-RARP was associated with decreased incontinence defined as >0-1 pad (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.10-0.79, p=0.016), although not when defined as >0 pad (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.31-1.01, p=0.053). On adjusted analysis SRS-RARP was associated with decreased pads per day. Lymph node dissection and primary treatment with stereotactic body radiation therapy were associated with longer console time. CONCLUSIONS: SRS-RARP is a feasible salvage option with significantly improved urinary function outcomes. This may warrant increased utilization of SRS-RARP to manage men who fail nonsurgical primary treatment for prostate cancer.
Subject(s)
Organ Sparing Treatments/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Salvage Therapy/adverse effects , Urinary Incontinence/epidemiology , Aged , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Incontinence Pads/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Organ Sparing Treatments/methods , Organ Sparing Treatments/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Prostate/pathology , Prostate/surgery , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatectomy/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Robotic Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Salvage Therapy/methods , Salvage Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Incontinence/etiology , Urinary Incontinence/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Stage III renal cell carcinoma (RCC) encompasses both lymph node-positive (pT1-3N1M0) and lymph node-negative (pT3N0M0) disease. However, prior institutional studies have indicated that among patients with stage III disease, those with lymph node disease have worse oncologic outcomes and experience survival that is similar to that of patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage IV disease. The objective of the current study was to validate these findings using a large, nationally representative sample of patients with kidney cancer. METHODS: Patients with AJCC stage III or stage IV RCC were identified using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). Patients were categorized as having lymph node-positive stage III (pT1-3N1M0), lymph node-negative stage III (pT3N0M0), or stage IV metastatic (pT1-3 N0M1) disease. Cox proportional hazards models compared outcomes while adjusting for comorbidities. Kaplan-Meier estimates illustrated relative survival when comparing staging groups. RESULTS: A total of 8988 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 6587 patients classified as having lymph node-negative stage III disease, 2218 as having lymph node-positive stage III disease, and 183 as having stage IV disease. Superior survival was noted among patients with lymph node-negative stage III disease, but similar survival was noted between patients with lymph node-positive stage III and stage IV RCC, with 5-year survival rates of 61.9% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 60.3%-63.4%), 22.7% (95% CI, 20.6%-24.9%), and 15.6% (95% CI, 11.1%-23.8%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Current RCC staging systems group pT1-3N1M0 and pT3N0M0 disease as stage III disease. However, the results of the current validation study suggest the need for further stratification and even placement of patients with pT1-3N1M0 disease into the stage IV category. Staging that accurately reflects oncologic prognosis may help clinicians better counsel and select patients who might derive the most benefit from lymphadenectomy, adjuvant systemic therapy, more rigorous imaging surveillance, and clinical trial participation.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/mortality , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Kidney Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Proportional Hazards Models , Statistics, Nonparametric , Survival Rate , Time FactorsABSTRACT
The most common symptom of bladder cancer (BC) is hematuria. However, not all patients with hematuria are diagnosed with BC. Here, we explored a novel method to discriminate BC from hematuria under nonmalignant conditions by measuring differences in urinary cell-free microRNA (miRNA) expression between patients with BC and those with hematuria. A multicenter study was performed using 543 urine samples obtained from the National Biobank of Korea, including 326 BC, 174 hematuria and 43 pyuria without cancer. The urinary miR-6124 to miR-4511 ratio was considerably higher in BC than in hematuria or pyuria, and enabled the discrimination of BC from patients with hematuria at a sensitivity of >90% (p < 0.001). Conclusively, the proposed noninvasive diagnostic tool based on the expression ratio of urinary cell-free miR-6124 to miR-4511 can reduce unnecessary cystoscopies in patients with hematuria undergoing evaluation for BC, with a minimal loss in sensitivity for detecting cancer.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/urine , Circulating MicroRNA/urine , Hematuria/diagnosis , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/urine , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sensitivity and Specificity , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/diagnosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Men with locally advanced prostate cancer (LAPCa) or regionally advanced prostate cancer (RAPCa) are at high risk for death from their disease. Clinical guidelines support multimodal approaches, which include radical prostatectomy (RP) followed by radiotherapy (XRT) and XRT plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). However, there are limited data comparing these substantially different treatment approaches. Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data, this study compared survival outcomes and adverse effects associated with RP plus XRT versus XRT plus ADT in these men. METHODS: SEER-Medicare data were queried for men with cT3-T4N0M0 (LAPCa) or cT3-T4N1M0 (RAPCa) prostate cancer. Propensity score methods were used to balance cohort characteristics between the treatment arms. Survival analyses were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: From 1992 to 2009, 13,856 men (≥65 years old) were diagnosed with LAPCa or RAPCa: 6.1% received RP plus XRT, and 23.6% received XRT plus ADT. At a median follow-up of 14.6 years, there were 2189 deaths in the cohort, of which 702 were secondary to prostate cancer. Regardless of the tumor stage or the Gleason score, the adjusted 10-year prostate cancer-specific survival and 10-year overall survival favored men who underwent RP plus XRT over men who underwent XRT plus ADT. However, RP plus XRT versus XRT plus ADT was associated with higher rates of erectile dysfunction (28% vs 20%; P = .0212) and urinary incontinence (49% vs 19%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Men with LAPCa or RAPCa treated initially with RP plus XRT had a lower risk of prostate cancer-specific death and improved overall survival in comparison with those men treated with XRT plus ADT, but they experienced higher rates of erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence.
Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Combined Modality Therapy/adverse effects , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatectomy/statistics & numerical data , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/statistics & numerical data , SEER Program , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most lethal genitourinary cancers. The presence of androgen receptor (AR) in RCC has recently been shown to be associated with higher tumour stage irrespective of gender. Because the clinical context of androgens in female RCC patients is similar to that of prostate cancer patients undergoing androgen-deprivation therapy, mechanisms underlying the emergence of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) may be at play in AR-positive RCC cells. Therefore, we hypothesized that AR-positive RCC has intratumoral steroidogenesis and that anti-androgen therapy may result in tumour suppression. METHODS: Mice were injected with an AR-positive RCC cell line. When tumours became palpable, surgical castration was performed and tumour volume was measured. Using ELISA, the levels of intracellular testosterone and dihydrotesterone were measured in AR-positive human RCC cell lines. Lastly, male mice containing xenografts were treated with enzalutamide or abiraterone acetate (AA) for 3 weeks to measure tumour volume. RESULTS: We first observed in vivo that castration retards the growth of AR-positive RCC tumour xenograft in mice. Next, AR-positive human RCC cell lines and tissues were found to have elevated levels of testosterone and dihydrotestosterone and express key enzymes required for intracellular androgen biosynthesis. A mouse xenograft study with AR-positive RCC cell line using the commonly used anti-androgen therapies showed significant tumour suppression (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Intracrine androgen biosynthesis is a potential source of androgen in AR-positive RCC and that the androgen signaling axis is a potential target of intervention in RCC.
Subject(s)
Androgens/biosynthesis , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/metabolism , Kidney Neoplasms/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Abiraterone Acetate/pharmacology , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Apoptosis/drug effects , Benzamides , Blotting, Western , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Dihydrotestosterone/metabolism , Female , Humans , Immunoenzyme Techniques , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Mice , Mice, Nude , Nitriles , Orchiectomy , Phenylthiohydantoin/analogs & derivatives , Phenylthiohydantoin/pharmacology , Prognosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , RNA, Messenger/genetics , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Receptors, Androgen/chemistry , Receptors, Androgen/genetics , Receptors, Androgen/metabolism , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Testosterone/metabolism , Tumor Cells, Cultured , Xenograft Model Antitumor AssaysABSTRACT
Prostate specific antigen (PSA) has transformed the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer by enabling early detection at global scale. Due to expression in both benign and malignant cells, PSA-based prostate cancer screening using single cut-points yields imperfect diagnostic performance and has led to the detection and over-treatment of low-grade prostate cancer. Additional challenges in the interpretation of PSA include substantial inter and intrapersonal variation, differences with age and prostate volume, and selection of standardized PSA value cutoffs for clinical application. In response, refinements to PSA including risk and age-based thresholds, age and genetic adjustments, PSA density, percentage free PSA, and PSA velocity have been proposed and extensively studied. In this review, we focus on the clinical role of PSA as a screening biomarker with a particular emphasis on its test characteristics, clinically actionable thresholds, and strategies to refine its clinical interpretation.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate if use of the Crowd-Sourced Assessment of Technical Skills (CSATS) platform and video peer review with constructive feedback is associated with improvement in technical skill and patient outcomes for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). METHODS: Five fellowship-trained urologists voluntarily submitted RALP cases for CSATS Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) scoring and expert narrative review between April 15, 2022-April 30, 2023. Surgeon-selected and randomly selected cases were reviewed. Surgeons underwent local peer review of videos with constructive feedback. Change in GEARS scores and frequency of postoperative outcomes over the 12-month periods before and during the study were analyzed in logistic regression models. Bias was assessed with sensitivity analysis comparing surgeon-selected to randomly selected cases. RESULTS: GEARS scores for randomly selected vs surgeon-selected cases did not differ significantly. Overall GEARS score correlated positively with annual surgical RALP volume (r = 0.39, P = .003) and negatively with years in practice (r = -0.34, P = .01). After adjusting for confounders, there was no significant improvement in overall GEARS Score (0.01 ± 0.02/month, P = .48); but likelihood of sepsis (Odds Ratio 0.07, 95% CI 0.01-1.00, P = .05) and pelvic fluid collection (Odds Ratio 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-0.99, P = .049) were significantly decreased during the intervention period (n = 165) compared to the prior 12months (n = 144). No outcome increased in likelihood (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Integration of CSATS and local video peer review is associated with significant improvement in patient outcomes after RALP, despite no significant change in surgeons' GEARS scores. This is the first study demonstrating improvement in patient RALP outcomes after implementation of such a paradigm in practicing surgeons.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: A subset of patients are diagnosed with lethal prostate cancer (CaP) early in life before prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening is typically initiated. To identify opportunities for improved detection, we evaluated patient sociodemographic factors associated with advanced vs. localized (CaP) diagnosis across the age spectrum. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database, identifying patients diagnosed with CaP from 2004 to 2020. We compared characteristics of patients diagnosed at the advanced (cN1 or M1) versus localized (cT1-4N0M0) stage. Using multivariable logistic regression, we evaluated the associations among patient clinical and sociodemographic factors and advanced diagnosis, stratifying patients by age as ≤55 (before screening is recommended for most patients), 56 to 65, 66 to 75, and ≥76 years. RESULTS: We identified 977,722 patients who met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at diagnosis was 65.3 years and 50,663 (5.1%) had advanced disease. Overall, uninsured (ORâ¯=â¯3.20, 95% CI 3.03-3.78) and Medicaid-insured (OR 2.58, 95% CI 2.48-2.69) vs. privately insured status was associated with higher odds of diagnosis with advanced disease and this effect was more pronounced for younger patients. Among patients ≤55 years, uninsured (OR 4.14, 95% CI 3.69-4.65) and Medicaid-insured (OR 3.39, 95% CI 3.10-3.72) vs. privately insured patients were associated with higher odds of advanced cancer at diagnosis. Similarly, residence in the lowest vs. highest income quartile was associated with increased odds of advanced CaP in patients ≤55 years (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02-1.30). Black vs. White race was associated with increased odds of advanced CaP at diagnosis later in life (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.09-1.25); however, race was not significantly associated with advanced stage CaP in those ≤55 years (Pâ¯=â¯0.635). CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographic disparities in diagnosis at advanced stages of CaP were more pronounced in younger patients, particularly with respect to insurance status. These findings may support greater attention to differential use of early CaP screening based on patient health insurance.
Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Sociodemographic Factors , Male , United States/epidemiology , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Insurance, Health , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Medicaid , Medically Uninsured , Insurance CoverageABSTRACT
Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with concurrent mutations in KRAS and the tumour suppressor LKB1 (KL NSCLC) is refractory to most therapies and has one of the worst predicted outcomes. Here we describe a KL-induced metabolic vulnerability associated with serine-glycine-one-carbon (SGOC) metabolism. Using RNA-seq and metabolomics data from human NSCLC, we uncovered that LKB1 loss enhanced SGOC metabolism via serine hydroxymethyltransferase (SHMT). LKB1 loss, in collaboration with KEAP1 loss, activated SHMT through inactivation of the salt-induced kinase (SIK)-NRF2 axis and satisfied the increased demand for one-carbon units necessary for antioxidant defence. Chemical and genetic SHMT suppression increased cellular sensitivity to oxidative stress and cell death. Further, the SHMT inhibitor enhanced the in vivo therapeutic efficacy of paclitaxel (first-line NSCLC therapy inducing oxidative stress) in KEAP1-mutant KL tumours. The data reveal how this highly aggressive molecular subtype of NSCLC fulfills their metabolic requirements and provides insight into therapeutic strategies.
Subject(s)
AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases , Antioxidants , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Glycine Hydroxymethyltransferase , Kelch-Like ECH-Associated Protein 1 , Lung Neoplasms , Mutation , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) , Kelch-Like ECH-Associated Protein 1/metabolism , Kelch-Like ECH-Associated Protein 1/genetics , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/metabolism , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/metabolism , Glycine Hydroxymethyltransferase/genetics , Glycine Hydroxymethyltransferase/metabolism , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/metabolism , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/metabolism , Antioxidants/metabolism , Animals , Oxidative Stress , Mice , Cell Line, Tumor , NF-E2-Related Factor 2/metabolism , NF-E2-Related Factor 2/geneticsABSTRACT
Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) is a pleiotropic growth factor that has been implicated in inflammation and prostate cancer (CaP) progression. We investigated the potential role of BMP-6 in the context of macrophages and castration-resistant prostate cancer. When the androgen-responsive murine (Tramp-C1 and PTENCaP8) and human (LNCaP) CaP cell lines were cocultured with macrophages in the presence of dihydrotestosterone, BMP-6 increased androgen-responsive promoter activity and cell count significantly. Subsequent studies revealed that BMP-6 increased the expression level of androgen receptor (AR) mRNA and protein in CaP cell lines only in the presence of macrophages. Simultaneously, the AR antagonists bicalutamide and MDV3100 partially or completely blocked BMP-6-induced macrophage-mediated androgen hypersensitivity in CaP cells. Abolishing interleukin-6 signaling with neutralizing antibody in CaP/macrophage cocultures inhibited the BMP-6-mediated AR upregulation in CaP cells. Using Tramp-C1 and PTENCaP8 cells with a tetracycline-inducible expression of BMP-6, the induction of BMP-6 in vivo resulted in a significant resistance to castration. However, this resistance was blocked after the removal of macrophages with clodronate liposomes. Taken together, these results show that BMP-6 induces castration resistance by increasing the expression of AR through macrophage-derived interleukin-6.
Subject(s)
Bone Morphogenetic Protein 6/immunology , Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating/immunology , Macrophages/immunology , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/immunology , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Androgens/genetics , Androgens/metabolism , Anilides/pharmacology , Animals , Benzamides , Benzofurans , Bone Morphogenetic Protein 6/genetics , Bone Morphogenetic Protein 6/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Dihydrotestosterone/pharmacology , Humans , Interleukin-6/biosynthesis , Interleukin-6/genetics , Interleukin-6/metabolism , Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating/pathology , Macrophages/metabolism , Macrophages/pathology , Male , Mice , Nitriles/pharmacology , Phenylthiohydantoin/analogs & derivatives , Phenylthiohydantoin/pharmacology , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Quinolines , Receptors, Androgen/genetics , Receptors, Androgen/metabolism , Tosyl Compounds/pharmacology , Up-Regulation/drug effectsABSTRACT
Background: extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) increases the detection rate of lymph node positive prostate cancer compared to a standard pelvic lymph node dissection (sPLND). However, improvement of patient outcomes remains questionable. Here we report and compare 3-year postoperative PSA recurrence rates between patients that underwent sPLND versus ePLND at the time of prostatectomy. Methods: 162 patients received a sPLND (which involvedremoval of periprostatic, external iliac, and obturator lymph nodes bilaterally), and 142 patients received an ePLND (which involved removal of periprostatic, external iliac, obturator, hypogastric, and common iliac nodes bilaterally). Decision to undergo ePLND versus sPLND at our institution was changed in 2016 based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline. The median follow-up time was 7 and 3 years for sPLND and ePLND patients, respectively. All node-positive patients were offered adjuvant radiotherapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis was carried out to assess the impact of a PLND on early postoperative PSA progression-free survival. Subgroup analyses were done for node-negative and node-positive patients, as well as Gleason score. Results: Gleason score and T stage were not significantly different between patients who received an ePLND and sPLND. The pN1 rate for ePLND and sPLND were 20% (28/142) and 6% (10/162), respectively. There was no difference in the use of adjuvant treatments in the pN0 patients. Significantly, more ePLND pN1 patients received adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (25/28 vs. 5/10 P = 0.012) and radiation (27/28 vs. 4/10 P = 0.002). Yet, no difference in biochemical recurrence between ePLND and sPLND was observed (P = 0.44). This remained true in subgroup analyses of node-positive (P = 0.26), node-negative (P = 0.78), Gleason Score 6-7 (P = 0.51), and Gleason Score 8-10 (P = 0.77). Conclusions: PLND provided no additional therapeutic benefit, even though ePLND patients were significantly more likely to have node-positive disease and undergo adjuvant treatment, compared to a sPLND.
ABSTRACT
To determine which method of radiotherapy proves more effective after prostatectomy: Adjuvant (ART) or early salvage (ESRT), we observed the pathologic and adverse risk factors of patients and their results from both treatments, looking specifically at biochemical-free survival rates, metastasis-free survival rates, and overall survival rates. Peer review articles containing their own data collected between 1986 and 2022 were reviewed. We reviewed 67 peer review articles and included 33 that met criteria. Studies focused on the adverse risk factors and the results of patients either before/after receiving adjuvant or early salvage/salvage radiotherapy were included in the analysis. Patient characteristics had an effect on what treatment a patient would receive; if a patient had more than one adverse risk factor such as a high Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, T-stage, or positive margins, they would receive immediate radiation after prostatectomy, which would classify as ART. If the patient had no adverse risk factors after surgery, they would be placed in an observation period to follow their PSA and overall health, and only if necessary, undergo ESRT. Of the 33 studies, ART was proven to be only slightly more beneficial when relating to biochemical recurrence-free survival while ART and ESRT results were similar in metastasis-free survival and overall survival. ART and ESRT are overall comparable in their patient outcomes, despite their own unique pros and cons. The use of ESRT reduces overtreatment in men who may not experience biochemical recurrence. However, in those with very high-risk pathologic features, a multi-disciplinary approach should be utilized to best determine which mode of radiation therapy after surgery is recommended.
ABSTRACT
Introduction and Objective: In 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the da Vinci single-port (SP) system, in which four instruments are still utilized, but enter through a single-site access trocar. Herein, we report the largest case series for SP robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) to date. Our primary aim is to analyze the perioperative and short-term outcomes of this procedure. Our secondary aim is an assessment of the learning curve with this new platform. Methods: A total of 157 patients underwent SP RARP by two surgeons who have completed >3000 multiport robotic surgeries collectively. Institutional Review Board-approved prospectively collected data were used. Basic demographic preoperative variables and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. Results: Median patient age and prostate-specific antigen was 63 years and 6.3 ng/mL before treatment (interquartile range [IQR] 4.7-8.2 ng/mL). Average prostate weight was 47 g. The median operating time was 195 minutes (IQR 165-221.25 minutes) with a median estimated blood loss of 100 mL (IQR 100-200 mL). Surgeon 1's operating time stabilized around case #56, and Surgeon 2 around case #26. Surgeon 2 used the transperitoneal approach for the first 7 cases. There were no intraoperative complications. There were six total postoperative complications (3.8%) and four (2.5%) were Clavien-Dindo scale ≥IIIa. One hundred ten patients went home same day, 45 stayed 1 night at the hospital, with only 2 patients requiring stay in the hospital for more than 1 night (70%, 29%, and 1% respectively). With the median follow-up period of 9 months, rates of biochemical recurrence, pad-free, and potency preservation were 8.3%, 82.5%, and 64.4%, respectively. Conclusions: This case series confirms the safety and efficacy of SP RARP with acceptable short-term outcomes. There is a significant learning curve for this new modality. Shorter hospital stay appears to be an early benefit of the SP platform.