Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 62(3): 389-394, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34994402

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM® ) is a point-of-care test of coagulation. ROTEM® -defined hypercoagulability has been identified in pregnant women and in non-pregnant patients with diabetes mellitus. Pregnancy is known to be a hypercoagulable state, but the influence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) on coagulation is unknown. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the combined effect of pregnancy and GDM on coagulation using ROTEM® and to compare this to healthy pregnant women presenting for elective caesarean delivery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ethics approval was granted for recruitment of women presenting for elective caesarean delivery. Women with pre-existing conditions affecting coagulation were excluded. Group N included health pregnant women at term and Group G included pregnant women at term with GDM. Data regarding GDM management and glycaemic control were collected. Poor glycaemic control was defined by markers of accelerated fetal growth and elevated fasting or postprandial blood glucose levels. The ROTEM® parameters (extrinsically activated thromboelastometric test (EXTEM) / fibrin polymerisation test (FIBTEM) amplitude at five minutes, coagulation time, maximum clot firmness and clot formation time) were compared between the two groups using Student's t-test. RESULTS: There were 75 women in Group N and 21 women in Group G. Mean age and median body mass index values were comparable for both groups. There were no statistical differences found between the EXTEM and FIBTEM parameters analysed for the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was no association between GDM and increased hypercoagulability as demonstrated by ROTEM® parameters in healthy pregnant women presenting for elective caesarean delivery at term.


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational , Thrombophilia , Blood Coagulation , Blood Coagulation Tests , Diabetes, Gestational/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Thrombelastography , Thrombophilia/diagnosis
2.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 60(5): 714-719, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32141059

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM® ) is a point-of-care coagulation test which has been used to demonstrate hypercoagulability in pregnant populations and obese populations. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the combined effect of pregnancy and obesity on coagulation using ROTEM® in healthy pregnant women of varying body mass indices (BMIs) presenting for elective caesarean delivery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ethics approval was granted for recruitment of women presenting for elective caesarean delivery. Women with any condition affecting coagulation were excluded. The ROTEM® parameters of extrinsically activated thromboelastometric test / fibrin polymerisation test (EXTEM/FIBTEM) amplitude at five minutes (A5), coagulation time (CT), maximum clot firmness (MCF) and clot formation time (CFT) were compared between three different groups: normal weight, overweight and obese women. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-five women presenting for elective caesarean delivery met inclusion criteria and were divided into three groups; normal weight (BMI < 25 kg/m2 , n = 86), overweight (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m2 , n = 54) and obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 , n = 45). They had a mean (SD) age of 32.7 ± 5.0 years and the median (interquartile range) BMI of 21.9 kg/m2 (20.5-23.0), 27.0 kg/m2 (26.0-28.5), 36.0 kg/m2 (32.2-41.8) for the normal weight, overweight and obese groups respectively. Forty-one (22.2%) women were nulliparous. Across the three groups for FIBTEM A5 (P = 0.018), FIBTEM MCF (P = 0.032), FIBTEM CFT (P = 0.047) and EXTEM MCF (P = 0.015) there was evidence of increasing coagulability with increasing BMI. However, following Bonferroni correction, this was no longer significant. CONCLUSIONS: There is no association between BMI and ROTEM® parameters in pregnant women presenting for elective caesarean delivery at term.


Subject(s)
Blood Coagulation , Thrombelastography , Adult , Blood Coagulation Tests , Female , Humans , Obesity/complications , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, Third
3.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 51(2): 109-13, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21466510

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) guidelines published in 2005 changed the management of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions. Asymptomatic low-grade abnormalities may be treated conservatively as many regress spontaneously. Cervical changes reflect infection with the human papilloma virus (HPV). Risk factors for acquiring HPV are the same as those for other sexually transmitted infections (STIs). AIMS: To perform a comparison of the Papanicolaou (PAP) smear, histology results of the cervical biopsy and large loop excision of transformation zone (LLETZ) to determine what proportion were over treated, and conversely what proportion would have been under treated in relation to the 2005 NHMRC guidelines. This group of patients was reviewed also for history of STI or concurrent infection. METHODS: Retrospective chart audit of LLETZ procedures and related histology in a population of women under 25 years between 1999 and 2003 presenting to a colposcopy clinic at a regional hospital. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-one asymptomatic women underwent LLETZ procedures. Of them, 27.6% reported a history of STI and 9.2% had a positive test result or history of Chlamydia. Based on the 2005 NHMRC guidelines, which require high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) on PAP or biopsy, 34% of women had no indication for LLETZ. Of these, 65% were over treated having no HSIL on LLETZ histology and 35% would have been under treated. CONCLUSIONS: The 2005 NHMRC guidelines should result in 33.9% fewer LLETZ procedures being performed in the younger age group. This has benefits for their future fertility needs. STI screening would be beneficial in this group when seen at colposcopy clinics, as they have significant rates of prior or current infection.


Subject(s)
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Unnecessary Procedures , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/surgery , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/surgery , Biopsy , Female , Humans , Papanicolaou Test , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Unnecessary Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Vaginal Smears , Young Adult , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology
4.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 49(5): 554-7, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19780744

ABSTRACT

The triad of obstructed hemivagina, renal anomaly and uterus didelphys is an uncommon cause of abdominal pain and menstrual discomfort in adolescent girls. Accurate diagnosis and surgical treatment can be delayed for several months or even years. Adolescent girls presenting with these symptoms should have a baseline pelvic ultrasound scan to establish uterine anatomy. In those with ultrasound findings of Müllerian anomalies appropriate follow up would include a magnetic resonance imaging, preferably at a tertiary centre with expertise in interpretation of Müllerian anatomy, as well as early consultation and referral to a centre with experience in the management of these rare conditions. Appropriate surgery would be a single stage procedure to either excise or completely divide the obstructing septum. There is currently no consensus on concurrent laparoscopy. We present a case series of four patients with the triad of uterus didelphys, obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal agenesis managed between 2005-2009 at a tertiary centre for paediatric and adolescent gynaecology.


Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Multiple/surgery , Endometriosis/etiology , Endometriosis/surgery , Hematocolpos/etiology , Hematocolpos/surgery , Adolescent , Child , Endometriosis/diagnostic imaging , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Humans , Kidney/abnormalities , Laparoscopy , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Ultrasonography , Uterus/abnormalities , Vagina/abnormalities
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL