Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 37(2): 470-4, 2001 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11216965

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We sought to study the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on exercise-induced myocardial ischemia. BACKGROUND: Although angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been shown to reduce ischemic events after myocardial infarction, few data are available regarding their direct anti-ischemic effects in patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS: We studied 43 patients (average age 63 +/- 8 years) with exercise-induced myocardial ischemia (> or =0.1 mV ST depression, despite optimal beta blockade) and normal left ventricular function (ejection fraction >0.50). In a double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel design, patients were treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (enalapril 10 mg twice daily) or placebo. Assessments were made after three weeks (short-term) and 12 weeks (long-term). RESULTS: At baseline, the groups were well matched for all clinical characteristics. After three weeks, there was a slight but not significant increase in time to 0.1 mV ST depression in both groups (p = NS); rate pressure product (RPP = heart rate x systolic blood pressure) was also unaffected. After 12 weeks, however, time to 0.1 mV ST depression further increased in the enalapril group (5.6 +/- 1.9 min) but was unchanged in the placebo group (4.4 +/- 1.3 min; p < 0.05 between groups). In contrast, RPP was not affected. Concentrations of both atrial and brain natriuretic peptides at peak exercise tended to be lower by enalapril, if compared to placebo (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition may reduce exercise-induced myocardial ischemia in patients with normal left ventricular function. Further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms involved.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/administration & dosage , Angina Pectoris/drug therapy , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Coronary Disease/drug therapy , Enalapril/administration & dosage , Exercise Test/drug effects , Adolescent , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Electrocardiography/drug effects , Enalapril/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Function, Left/drug effects
2.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 37(1): 81-8, 2001 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11153777

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We sought to prospectively compare nitrogen-13 (13N)-ammonia/18fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)-guided management with stress/rest technetium-99m (99mTc)-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)-guided management. BACKGROUND: Patients with evidence of jeopardized (i.e., ischemic or viable) myocardium may benefit from revascularization, whereas patients without it should be treated with drugs. Both PET and SPECT imaging have been proven to delineate jeopardized myocardium. When patient management is based on identification of jeopardized myocardium, it is unknown which technique is most accurate for long-term prognosis. METHODS: In a clinical setting, 103 patients considered for revascularization with left ventricular wall motion abnormalities and suspicion of jeopardized myocardium underwent both PET and SPECT imaging. The imaging results were used in a randomized fashion to determine management (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [PTCA], coronary artery bypass graft surgery [CABG] or drug treatment). Follow-up for cardiac events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction and revascularization) was recorded for 28 +/- 1 months. The study was designed to have a power of 80% to detect a 20% difference in the event rate between PET- and SPECT-based management. RESULTS: Management decisions in 49 patients randomized to PET (12 who had PTCA, 14 CABG and 23 drug therapy) were comparable with 54 patients randomized to SPECT (15 who had PTCA, 13 CABG and 26 drug therapy). In terms of cardiac event-free survival, no differences between PET and SPECT were observed (11 vs. 13 cardiac events for PET and SPECT, respectively; p = NS by the Kaplan-Meier statistic). CONCLUSIONS: No difference in patient management or cardiac event-free survival was demonstrated between management based on 13N-ammonia/18FDG PET and that based on stress/rest 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT imaging. Both techniques may be used for management of patients considered for revascularization with suspicion of jeopardized myocardium.


Subject(s)
Coronary Disease/diagnostic imaging , Exercise Test , Myocardial Infarction/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon , Tomography, Emission-Computed , Aged , Coronary Disease/mortality , Coronary Disease/therapy , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Predictive Value of Tests , Survival Rate
3.
Eur J Cancer ; 37(14): 1781-9, 2001 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11549432

ABSTRACT

The cost-effectiveness of autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) compared with autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) for refractory or relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or Morbus Hodgkin (MH) was assessed. Costs were determined from the induction chemotherapy regimen up to 3 months after discharge from hospital following the transplantation. Quality of life was measured by the EuroQol, the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL) and the SF-36. Patients were randomised according to a 2:1 ratio to undergo either PBSCT or ABMT. 62 patients underwent PBSCT and 29 ABMT. Costs of the transplantation period were significantly lower in the PBSCT group (15008 Euros) than in the ABMT group (19000 Euros). Significant differences in quality of life were all in favour of PBSCT and emerged using the RSCL, both on 14 days after the transplantation and three months after discharge. We conclude that PBSCT is associated with lower costs and a better quality of life than ABMT for patients with refractory or relapsed NHL or MH.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow Transplantation/economics , Health Care Costs , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/economics , Lymphoma/economics , Quality of Life , Adolescent , Adult , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Hodgkin Disease/economics , Hodgkin Disease/therapy , Humans , Lymphoma/therapy , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/economics , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Prospective Studies
4.
Neth Heart J ; 10(3): 118-124, 2002 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25696077

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) does not terminate spontaneously and may cause left ventricular dysfunction and thromboembolic complications. For restoration of sinus rhythm electrical cardioversion (ECV) is most effective. However, AF frequently relapses, necessitating re-ECV and institution of potentially harmful antiarrhythmic drugs. If AF is accepted, rate control and prevention of thromboembolic complications using negative chronotropic drugs and warfarin is pursued. It is our hypothesis that rate control therapy is not inferior to ECV therapy in preventing morbidity and mortality. METHODS: RACE (RAte Control versus Electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation) is a randomised comparison of serial ECV therapy (repeat ECV as soon as possible after a relapse and institution of an antiarrhythmic drug: sotalol, class IC drug and amiodarone) and rate control therapy (resting heart rate <100 bpm using digitalis, calcium channel blockers and/or ß-blockers) in patients with persistent AF. Morbidity (heart failure, side effects of drugs, thromboembolic complications, bleeding and pacemaker implantation), mortality, quality of life and cost-effectiveness are primary and secondary endpoints. Included are patients with a recurrence of persistent AF, present episode <1 year and a maximum of two previous successful ECVs during the last two years. This study is a multicentre study in 31 centres throughout the Netherlands. All 520 patients have now been included. Follow-up is two years. The results are expected this year.

5.
Br J Haematol ; 114(2): 319-26, 2001 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11529850

ABSTRACT

The present study analysed whether autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PSCT) improves engraftment, quality of life and cost-effectiveness when compared with autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT). Relapsing progressive lymphoma patients (n = 204; non-Hodgkin's lymphoma n = 166; Hodgkin's disease n = 38) were, after induction treatment with the DHAP-VIM (cisplatin, cytarabine, dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide, methotrexate) regimen, randomly (2:1) assigned to the harvest of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-mobilized stem cells after the second DHAP course or autologous bone marrow cells before the second DHAP course. These stem cells were reinfused following high-dose myeloblative chemotherapy. After induction, 118 patients obtained a partial or complete response and were eligible for randomization. In the PSCT arm (n = 76) significantly faster engraftment of neutrophils [> or = 0.1 and > or = 0.5 x 10(9)/l: 10.7 d (7-36, median, range), 15 (9-45) versus 13 (8-25) and 26 (14-80), P < 0.01] and thrombocytes [> or = 20 x 10(9)/l: 13 d (7-51) versus 18 (11-65), P < 0.01] were observed. In addition, significantly fewer transfusions of red blood cells [6 (0-23) versus 8 (2-24), P < 0.01] and platelets [4 (0-60) versus 8 (2-55), P = 0.01] were required in the PSCT arm. These findings were associated with a significant reduction in the median days of intravenous antibiotics in patients with fever [8.5 (0-30) versus 14 (0-34), P = 0.04] and hospital stay [27 (8-51) versus 34 (24-78), P < 0.05]. Quality of life demonstrated a significant difference in favour of the PSCT arm. Total transplantation costs were significantly lower in the PSCT arm [$13,954 ($4913- 29,532) versus $17 668 ($10,170-44,083) P < 0.05], as a result of the reduced hospital stay and lower antibiotic costs. In summary, these results indicate that PSCT is superior to ABMT with regard to engraftment, supportive care, quality of life and cost.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Lymphoma/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Bone Marrow Transplantation/economics , Chi-Square Distribution , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cytarabine/therapeutic use , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Disease-Free Survival , Etoposide/therapeutic use , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/economics , Hodgkin Disease/drug therapy , Hodgkin Disease/mortality , Hodgkin Disease/surgery , Humans , Ifosfamide/therapeutic use , Lymphoma/drug therapy , Lymphoma/mortality , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/drug therapy , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/mortality , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/surgery , Male , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Recurrence , Statistics, Nonparametric , Survival Rate , Transplantation, Autologous
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL