Amivantamab plus Chemotherapy in NSCLC with EGFR Exon 20 Insertions.

BACKGROUND: Amivantamab has been approved for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertions who have had disease progression during or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Phase 1 data showed the safety and antitumor activity of amivantamab plus carboplatin-pemetrexed (chemotherapy). Additional data on this combination therapy are needed. METHODS: In this phase 3, international, randomized trial, we assigned in a 1:1 ratio patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertions who had not received previous systemic therapy to receive intravenous amivantamab plus chemotherapy (amivantamab-chemotherapy) or chemotherapy alone. The primary outcome was progression-free survival according to blinded independent central review. Patients in the chemotherapy group who had disease progression were allowed to cross over to receive amivantamab monotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 308 patients underwent randomization (153 to receive amivantamab-chemotherapy and 155 to receive chemotherapy alone). Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the amivantamab-chemotherapy group than in the chemotherapy group (median, 11.4 months and 6.7 months, respectively; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30 to 0.53; P<0.001). At 18 months, progression-free survival was reported in 31% of the patients in the amivantamab-chemotherapy group and in 3% in the chemotherapy group; a complete or partial response at data cutoff was reported in 73% and 47%, respectively (rate ratio, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.32 to 1.68; P<0.001). In the interim overall survival analysis (33% maturity), the hazard ratio for death for amivantamab-chemotherapy as compared with chemotherapy was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.42 to 1.09; P = 0.11). The predominant adverse events associated with amivantamab-chemotherapy were reversible hematologic and EGFR-related toxic effects; 7% of patients discontinued amivantamab owing to adverse reactions. CONCLUSIONS: The use of amivantamab-chemotherapy resulted in superior efficacy as compared with chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertions. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; PAPILLON ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04538664.).

First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with or without chemotherapy for Japanese patients with non-small cell lung cancer: LIGHT-NING study.

OBJECTIVE: As first-line treatment for stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer, combination immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab, with or without chemotherapy, had demonstrated survival benefits over chemotherapy; however, data on Japanese patients are limited. METHODS: LIGHT-NING was a multicenter, observational study and retrospectively collected data. In this interim analysis, we analyzed patients who received combination immunotherapy between 27 November 2020 and 31 August 2021 for the treatment status, safety objectives (treatment-related adverse events and immune-related adverse events incidences), and effectiveness objectives (objective response rate and progression-free survival) to determine the characteristics and early safety information. RESULTS: We analyzed 353 patients, with a median follow-up of 7.1 (interquartile range, 5.0-9.7) months. Overall, 60.1 and 39.9% received nivolumab plus ipilimumab with and without chemotherapy, respectively. In these cohorts, the median age was 67 and 72 years; 10.8 and 35.5% were aged ≥75 years; 80.2 and 79.4% were male; 5.2 and 13.5% had a performance score ≥ 2; 32.1 and 27.0% developed grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events; treatment-related deaths were observed in 6 (2.8%) and 5 (3.5%) patients, respectively. Grade 3-4 immune-related adverse event incidence was the highest within the first month of treatment in both cohorts, although the immune-related adverse event risk persisted throughout. No new safety signals were observed at this interim analysis. The median progression-free survival was 6.0 (95% confidence interval, 5.2-7.6) and 5.8 (4.3-7.0) months in nivolumab plus ipilimumab with and without chemotherapy cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LIGHT-NING offers valuable insights into combination immunotherapy for untreated patients with stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer in Japanese real-world settings.

Pharmacokinetic and dose-finding study of osimertinib in patients with impaired renal function and low body weight.

The safety of osimertinib is limited in patients with severe or moderate renal impairment, or low body weight. This study aimed to investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and recommended dose (RD) of osimertinib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with impaired renal function and low body weight. Thirty-one eligible patients were enrolled and allocated into four cohorts: A, normal renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥ 50 mL/min/1.73 m2 ) and normal body weight (≥45 kg); B, moderate renal impairment (eGFR = 30-50 mL/min/1.73 m2 ); C, low body weight (<45 kg); and D, severe renal impairment (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or undergoing dialysis). PK parameters and safety were evaluated with a starting dose of 80 mg osimertinib administered orally once daily in cohorts A, B, and C and 40 mg once daily in cohort D. The PK parameters in cohorts A, B, and C were found to be similar. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed, and the RD was determined to be 80 mg once daily in patients with moderate renal function and low body weight. Four serious adverse events, acneiform rash, diarrhea, QTc prolongation, and interstitial lung disease, were noted. Although the PK parameters of osimertinib were similar across all cohorts, toxicity occurred more frequently in patients with impaired renal function and low body weight. Clinicians should prescribe osimertinib with caution in NSCLC patients with impaired renal function and low body weight.

Soluble interleukin-2 receptor as a predictive biomarker for poor efficacy of combination treatment with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies and chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) suppresses effector T-cells. Few studies have assessed serum sIL-2R in patients receiving immunotherapy. We evaluated the association between serum sIL-2R levels and the efficacy of anti-programmed cell death 1/ programmed death-ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) antibody combined with chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We prospectively enrolled NSCLC patients who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody combined with platinum-based chemotherapy between 8/2019 and 8/2020 and measured their serum sIL-2R. The patients were divided into high and low sIL-2R groups based on the median of sIL-2R levels at pretreatment. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients in the high and low sIL-2R groups were compared. The Kaplan-Meier curves of PFS and OS were evaluated using the log-rank test. The multivariate analysis of PFS and OS was performed using the Cox proportional hazard models. Among 54 patients (median age 65, range 34-84), 39 were male and 43 had non-squamous cell carcinoma. The sIL-2R cut-off value was 533 U/mL. Median PFS was 5.1 months (95% CI, 1.8-7.5 months) and 10.1 months (95% CI, 8.3-not reached [NR] months) in the high and low sIL-2R groups (P = 0.007), respectively. Median OS was 10.3 months (95% CI, 4.0-NR months) and NR (95% CI, 10.3-NR months) in the high and low sIL-2R groups (P = 0.005), respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that high sIL-2R was significantly associated with shorter PFS and OS. SIL-2R may be a biomarker for the poor efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody combined with chemotherapy.

EGFR-TKI re-administration after osimertinib failure in T790M mutation loss cases with re-biopsy.

Data on the re-administration of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) after osimertinib failure in patients with T790M-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is limited. EGFR-TKI re-administration efficacy may vary between patients with T790M loss and those with T790M persistent with re-biopsy after osimertinib treatment. Patients who received EGFR-TKI re-administration (gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, dacomitinib, and osimertinib) after osimertinib failure were identified from our database. T790M mutation status before EGFR-TKI re-administration was analyzed via repeat biopsy. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of EGFR-TKI re-administration, especially differences according to the T790M mutation status, via repeat biopsy. Until June 2020, 28 patients received EGFR-TKI re-administration and 17 underwent repeat biopsy after osimertinib failure. Patients were divided into three groups, including the T790M loss group, where active mutation persisted and T790M was lost (13/17); T790M remaining group, where both the active mutation and T790M persisted (3/17); and active mutation loss group where both the active mutation and T790M were lost (1/17). The overall response rate (ORR) of EGFR-TKI re-administration in the T790M loss group was 31% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 54%, which were higher than the ORR of 21% and DCR of 43% in the entire patient population. ORR and DCR of the not re-biopsy group were low (9% and 27%, respectively). The therapeutic effect of EGFR-TKI re-administration in patients with T790M-positive NSCLC after osimertinib failure is limited. EGFR-TKI re-administration may be considered in cases of T790M loss after repeat biopsy.

Monitoring epidermal growth factor receptor C797S mutation in Japanese non-small cell lung cancer patients with serial cell-free DNA evaluation using digital droplet PCR.

Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that is effective in treating both naïve and T790M-mutated EGFR-TKI-resistant non-small cell lung cancer patients. The EGFR C797S mutation is the major osimertinib resistance mechanism. The present study monitored the EGFR C797S mutation during osimertinib treatment in Japanese patients using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). In our first cohort, C797S detection was validated with tumor specimens and/or plasma samples from 26 patients using ddPCR with custom-designed probes detecting and discriminating T790M and C797S in cis and trans positions. In our second cohort, 18 patients with EGFR-T790M who were going to start osimertinib were analyzed using ddPCR by collecting the plasma samples every month from the beginning of the course of osimertinib. In the first cohort, C797S was detected in 15.4% of patients. C797S and T790M in cis and trans positions were distinguished using ddPCR. In the second cohort, serial cfDNA evaluation revealed that the rate of EGFR mutation changes with disease state. Increases of EGFR mutation were detected, including C797S several months before the diagnosis of disease progression. As with the first cohort, C797S and T790M in cis and trans position were distinguished by ddPCR at disease progression. Coincidentally, in the first cohort, next generation sequencing detected NRAS Q61K mutation and the resistance with NRAS Q61K mutation was overcome by trametinib. In the second cohort, serial cfDNA analysis was useful for evaluating bone oligo-progression and local radiation therapy.

Phase II study of the combination of S-1 with bevacizumab for patients with previously treated advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab and S-1 chemotherapy for patients with previously treated advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: This was a prospective single-arm study, including patients with non-squamous NSCLC who had received at least one chemotherapy regimen along with a platinum-based regimen. Bevacizumab 15 mg/kg was intravenously administered every 3 weeks, and S-1 40 mg/m2 was orally administered twice daily from day 1 (evening) through day 15 (morning). The treatment continued for 3 weeks/cycle until disease progression or until unacceptable toxicities occurred. During the lead-in part, six patients were evaluated for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate. In phase II, the primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: In the lead-in part, we evaluated the safety in the first six patients and observed no DLT. In phase II, a total of 46 patients were enrolled from September 2012 to December 2018. The median follow-up duration was 13.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-72.0]. The ORR was 28.3%. The median PFS and OS were 4.3 (95% CI 2.9-5.9) and 15.0 months (95% CI 9.8-30.3), respectively. The most common adverse events were hypertension (65.2%), diarrhea (47.8%), mucositis oral (45.7%), and proteinuria (43.5%), and the most common grade 3 adverse events were hypertension (23.9%) and proteinuria (6.5%). Grade 4/5 adverse events were not observed. CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab and S-1 combination chemotherapy showed high activity and were well tolerated in patients with previously treated advanced non-squamous NSCLC.

Drug resistance mechanisms in Japanese anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer and the clinical responses based on the resistant mechanisms.

The treatment for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive lung cancer has been rapidly evolving since the introduction of several ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKI) in clinical practice. However, the acquired resistance to these drugs has become an important issue. In this study, we collected a total of 112 serial biopsy samples from 32 patients with ALK-positive lung cancer during multiple ALK-TKI treatments to reveal the resistance mechanisms to ALK-TKI. Among 32 patients, 24 patients received more than two ALK-TKI. Secondary mutations were observed in 8 of 12 specimens after crizotinib failure (G1202R, G1269A, I1171T, L1196M, C1156Y and F1245V). After alectinib failure, G1202R and I1171N mutations were detected in 7 of 15 specimens. G1202R, F1174V and G1202R, and P-gp overexpression were observed in 3 of 7 samples after ceritinib treatment. L1196M + G1202R, a compound mutation, was detected in 1 specimen after lorlatinib treatment. ALK-TKI treatment duration was longer in the on-target treatment group than that in the off-target group (13.0 vs 1.2 months). In conclusion, resistance to ALK-TKI based on secondary mutation in this study was similar to that in previous reports, except for crizotinib resistance. Understanding the appropriate treatment matching resistance mechanisms contributes to the efficacy of multiple ALK-TKI treatment strategies.

Dissociated responses at initial computed tomography evaluation is a good prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with anti-programmed cell death-1/ligand 1 inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Dissociated responses (DR) are phenomena in which some tumors shrink, whereas others progress during treatment of patients with cancer. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the frequency and prognosis of DR in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with anti-programmed cell death-1/ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/L1) inhibitors. METHODS: This retrospective study included NSCLC patients who received anti-PD-1/L1 inhibitor as second- or later-line treatment. We excluded patients without radiological evaluation. In patients who showed progressive disease (PD) according to the RECIST 1.1 at the initial CT evaluation, we evaluated all measurable lesions in each organ to identify DR independently of RECIST 1.1. We defined DR as a disease with some shrinking lesions as well as growing or emerging new lesions. Cases not classified as DR were defined as 'true PD'. Overall survival was compared between patients with DR and those with true PD using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: The present study included 62 NSCLC patients aged 27-82 years (median: 65 years). DR and true PD were observed in 11 and 51 patients, respectively. The frequency of DR in NSCLC patients who showed PD to anti-PD-1/L1 was 17.7%. Median overall survival was significantly longer in patients with DR versus true PD (14.0 vs. 6.6 months, respectively; hazard ratio for death: 0.40; 95% confidence interval: 0.17-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with DR exhibited a relatively favorable prognosis.

Efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy for recurrence after chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced NSC LC.

PURPOSE: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recently, anti-PD-1 antibody therapy became a key treatment for stage IV NSCLC as the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and platinum doublet chemotherapy. However, the efficacy and toxicity of anti-PD-1 therapy for recurrence after CRT in stage III NSCLC are not well examined. METHODS: Patients who received anti-PD-1 therapy for recurrence after CRT were identified in our clinical database. The safety and efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: From March 1, 2013 to April 30, 2018, there were 20 patients who received anti-PD-1 therapy for recurrence after CRT. The median duration from CRT to initial anti-PD-1 therapy was 9.3 months. 12 patients (60%) were alive and 7 patients (35%) were still receiving anti-PD-1 therapy at the data cutoff point (median follow-up, 13.5 months). The ORR for anti-PD-1 therapy was 45.0%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from initiation of anti-PD-1 therapy was 8.4 months and 26.2 months, respectively. PFS in patients who had a short interval from last CRT to initial anti-PD-1 therapy seemed to have better outcomes (duration from last CRT to initial anti-PD-1 therapy < 9.3 months vs. ≥ 9.3 months; median PFS, 17.0 months vs. 4.9 months). Grade 3 or 4 immune-related adverse events occurred in 5% of patients. Only grade 1 pneumonitis was observed. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy for recurrence after CRT in stage III NSCLC might better than in stage IV NSCLC. The duration from CRT to initial anti-PD-1 therapy might be related to efficacy.

The Design of and Rationale for the Effect of Perioperative Inhaled Tiotropium for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Esophageal Cancer Surgery (EPITOPE): an Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study.

INTRODUCTION: Pneumonia is one of the most frequently occurring complications after esophagectomy and is associated with increased operative mortality. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is known to be a risk factor for pulmonary complications and operative mortality. However, in COPD patients preparing for esophagectomy, preventive measures against postoperative pneumonia have not yet been discovered. In this study, we evaluate the effect of perioperative inhaled tiotropium, a long-acting, antimuscarinic bronchodilator used in the management of COPD, on patients with COPD who undergo esophageal cancer surgery. METHODS/DESIGN: This study investigates the effect of perioperative inhaled tiotropium on patients with COPD who undergo esophagectomy. It is an open-label, randomized controlled trial conducted in a single center (EPITOPE study). A total of 32 enrolled patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either conventional management or inhalation of tiotropium in addition to the conventional management. Patients included in the intervention group receive tiotropium Respimat 5 µg (two inhalations of 2.5 µg) for at least 2 weeks before the esophagectomy. Following the esophagectomy, tiotropium is re-delivered, starting as early as possible and continuing until the postoperative evaluation (between 30 and 44 days after the operation). The primary outcome is the incidence of pneumonia within 30 days after esophagectomy. Secondary outcomes are the incidence of cardiovascular complications within 30 days after esophagectomy, the incidence of any postoperative complications within 30 days after esophagectomy, pulmonary function (preintervention, preoperative, and postoperative), walking distance in the incremental shuttle walking test (preintervention, preoperative, and postoperative), the incidence of adverse events, and mortality within 30 days after esophagectomy. DISCUSSION: The EPITOPE study is the first pilot study on the effects of perioperative inhaled tiotropium on patients with COPD undergoing esophagectomy. After completing this study, we will plan a multicenter RCT with the appropriate outcomes in the future.

Barcode sequencing identifies resistant mechanisms to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in circulating tumor DNA of lung cancer patients.

Most patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) will inevitably develop acquired resistance induced by treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI). The mechanisms of resistance to EGFR-TKI are multifactorial, and the detection of these mechanisms is critical for treatment choices in patients who have progressed after EGFR-TKI therapy. We evaluated the feasibility of a molecular barcode method using next-generation sequencing to detect multifactorial resistance mechanisms in circulating tumor DNA and compared the results with those obtained using other technologies. Plasma samples were collected from 25 EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC patients after the development of EGFR-TKI resistance. Somatic mutation profiles of these samples were assessed using two methods of next-generation sequencing and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). The positive rate for EGFR-sensitizing mutations was 18/25 (72.0%) using ddPCR, 17/25 (68.0%) using amplicon sequencing, and 19/25 (76.0%) using molecular barcode sequencing. Rate of the EGFR T790M resistance mutation among patients with EGFR-sensitizing mutations was shown to be 7/18 (38.9%) using ddPCR, 6/17 (35.3%) using amplicon sequencing, and 8/19 (42.1%) using molecular barcode sequencing. Copy number gain in the MET gene was detected in three cases using ddPCR. PIK3CA, KRAS and TP53 mutations were detected using amplicon sequencing. Molecular barcode sequencing detected PIK3CA, TP53, KRAS, and MAP2K1 mutations. Results of the three assays were comparable; however, in cell-free DNA, molecular barcode sequencing detected mutations causing multifactorial resistance more sensitively than did the other assays.

Phase Ia/Ib study of the pan-class I PI3K inhibitor pictilisib (GDC-0941) administered as a single agent in Japanese patients with solid tumors and in combination in Japanese patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

Pictilisib (GDC-0941) is an oral class I phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate kinase inhibitor. This phase Ia/Ib study investigated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of pictilisib in monotherapy or in combination with carboplatin-paclitaxel and bevacizumab (CP + BEV) in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors or non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. A standard 3 + 3 dose escalation design was applied. In stage 1, 140, 260, or 340 mg/day of pictilisib was administered once daily to 12 patients with advanced solid tumors. In stage 2, 260 or 340 mg/day of pictilisib was administered in combination with CP + BEV to 7 patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. In stage 1, 1 of 6 patients in the 340 mg/day cohort exhibited dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of grade 3 maculopapular rash. The maximum plasma concentration and area under the curve of pictilisib were dose-dependent. A reduction in phosphorylated AKT in platelet rich plasma was observed. No patient had an objective anti-tumor response. In stage 2, DLT was observed in 1 of 3 patients in the 260 mg/day cohort (grade 3 febrile neutropenia), and 2 of 4 patients in the 340 mg/day cohort (1 each of grade 3 febrile neutropenia and grade 3 febrile neutropenia/erythema multiforme). Partial responses were observed in 3 out of 7 patients. In conclusion, pictilisib was shown to have good safety and tolerability in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. A recommended dose of pictilisib in monotherapy was determined to be 340 mg once daily. For combination with CP + BEV, tolerability up to 260 mg/day was confirmed.

Efficacy of bevacizumab and erlotinib combination for leptomeningeal carcinomatosis after failure of erlotinib.

In patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harboring an epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) active mutation, central nervous system progression after a response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors is frequent. Central nervous system metastasis, especially leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC), is a serious complication and no standard treatment has been established for LMC. Here, we report two cases in which the addition of bevacizumab to erlotinib enhanced the efficacy against LMC; as a result, radiographic abnormalities decreased markedly and symptoms were well controlled. This combination treatment may be useful to treat LMC in patients with EGFR-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

Dramatic response to alectinib in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor with anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion gene.

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is a neoplasm characterized by the proliferaton of myofibroblasts with the infiltration of inflammatory cells. There is no standard treatment for patients with recurrent or metastatic IMT. We describe here a patient with hyper-progressive IMT with an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion gene that dramatically responded to alectinib without adverse events. His dramatic and enduring response supports the observation that alectinib may be considered a good treatment option for rare aggressive ALK-positive tumors.

Phase I trial of volasertib, a Polo-like kinase inhibitor, in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: This trial evaluated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacokinetics, and clinical effects of volasertib, a selective Polo-like kinase inhibitor that induces mitotic arrest and apoptosis, in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT01348347; 1230.15). METHODS: In this phase I, open-label, dose-escalation trial, sequential patient cohorts (3 + 3 dose-escalation design) received volasertib (200-350 mg) as a single dose by intravenous infusion over 2 h on day 1 every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the MTD of volasertib in Japanese patients with an advanced solid tumor; secondary endpoints included safety, pharmacokinetics, and clinical benefit. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with an advanced solid tumor were treated. Dose-limiting toxicities of grade 4 neutropenia for ≥7 days and grade 4 thrombocytopenia were both experienced by 2/6 patients in the 350 mg cohort. The MTD of volasertib in Japanese patients was 300 mg. The most common (≥3 patients) drug-related non-hematologic adverse events included fatigue, decreased appetite, and nausea. Exposure to volasertib and its metabolite increased with increasing doses. A partial response in a patient with gastric cancer and stable disease in eleven patients were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Volasertib had a manageable safety profile up to the MTD determined as 300 mg. Exposure to volasertib and its metabolite increased with increasing doses. The safety profile of volasertib in Japanese patients is comparable with those previously obtained in Caucasian patients. These data support enrollment of Japanese patients in global clinical trials without dose modification.

Phase I study of ipilimumab in phased combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in Japanese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Ipilimumab is an antibody that targets the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 to potentiate an antitumor response. Adding ipilimumab 10 mg/kg to paclitaxel (PTX) and carboplatin (CBDCA) in a phased schedule improved progression-free survival in a phase II non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) study. METHODS: This dose-escalating, phase I study was designed to identify the recommended dose of ipilimumab (3 or 10 mg/kg) by evaluating dose-limiting toxicity (DLT; Cycles 3 and 4) in phased combination with PTX (175 mg/m(2)) and CBDCA (area under the curve = 6) in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC. Treatment was administered intravenously every 3 weeks initially, followed by some eligible patients receiving maintenance ipilimumab once every 12 weeks. Additional endpoints included safety, tumor response, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were enrolled and 12 received ipilimumab (n = 6, 3 mg/kg; n = 6, 10 mg/kg) in combination with PTX and CBDCA. DLTs occurred in 2 patients (ipilimumab 3 mg/kg) and 1 patient (ipilimumab 10 mg/kg). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were decreased hemoglobin, leukopenia, and neutropenia. The most common immune-related AEs affected the skin, gastrointestinal, and nervous system. The safety profile was similar in both cohorts. Three patients in each cohort achieved a partial response. The pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of ipilimumab in Japanese patients was similar to that observed in previous studies in non-Japanese patients. Conclusions The recommended dose of ipilimumab in phased combination with PTX and CBDCA in Japanese patients with NSCLC was identified as 10 mg/kg. The safety profile was consistent with the previously defined AE profile.

Phase I and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics study of the MEK inhibitor RO4987655 in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.

RO4987655 is an oral and selective inhibitor of MEK, a key enzyme of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway. This phase I dose-escalation study of RO4987655 in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors aimed to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and to evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and anti-tumor activity. Patients received a single dose of RO4987655 (1, 2, 4, 5, or 6.5 mg) followed by continuous once-daily dosing (1, 2, or 4 mg QD) or twice-daily dosing (4, 5, or 6.5 mg BID) in 28-day cycles. A 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was used. PD was evaluated by pERK inhibition in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). In dose-escalation, 25 patients were enrolled. After the MTD was determined, a further six patients were administered the MTD for further confirmation of safety. MTD was determined as 8 mg/day (4 mg BID) due to a total of four dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of grade 3 creatine phosphokinase (CPK) elevation (2 DLTs each in 10 mg/day and 13 mg/day). Most commonly related adverse events included dermatitis acneiform, CPK elevation, and eye disorders. Plasma concentration of RO4987655 appeared to increase in a dose-proportional manner with a plasma half-life of 4.32 to 21.1 h. Following multiple dose administration, a steady-state condition was reached by Cycle 1 Day 8. The inhibitory effects of RO4987655 on pERK in PBMCs increased in a dose-dependent manner. One esophageal cancer patient had confirmed partial response and seven patients showed progression-free survival for longer than 16 weeks. The MTD of RO4987655 for Japanese patients was determined as 8 mg/day (4 mg BID). RO4987655 was tolerated up to the MTD with a favorable PK/PD profile in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected small cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis of 26 consecutive cases.

OBJECTIVE: Several clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected small cell lung cancer for a selected limited stage. However, it is unclear whether adjuvant chemotherapy is feasible in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of adjuvant chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer patients retrospectively in clinical practice. METHODS: From January 2002 to March 2012, 56 small cell lung cancer patients underwent surgery as initial therapy in our institute. Of these, 26 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. The clinical data of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The chemotherapy regimens were cisplatin and irinotecan in 16 patients, cisplatin and etoposide in 1 and carboplatin and etoposide in 9. Median follow-up time was 44.8 months. Nineteen (73%) patients received the full course of chemotherapy. Median recurrence-free survival was 21.4 months. Median survival time was not reached. There was no treatment-related death. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant chemotherapy may be generally safe and efficacious in selected small cell lung cancer patients.

Secondary osteosarcoma developing 10 years after chemoradiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.

A 53-year-old female patient was admitted with pain and a progressively enlarging mass in the right upper chest. Chest computed tomography revealed a mass lesion in the region of the right upper ribs. Ten years prior to this admission, the patient had undergone right lobectomy for lung adenocarcinoma. One year after the surgery, follow-up computed tomography had revealed tumor recurrence in the mediastinal and supraclavicular lymph nodes, and the patient had been treated by chemoradiotherapy. Thereafter, regular follow-up had revealed no evidence of recurrence of the non-small-cell lung cancer. Histopathological findings revealed proliferation of spindle-shaped malignant tumor cells in a background of osteoid, consistent with the diagnosis of osteosarcoma. The location of the tumor was consistent with the radiation field. Based on the clinicopathological findings, the patient was diagnosed as having secondary osteosarcoma occurring as a result of the chemoradiotherapy administered previously for the recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer. Unfortunately, the patient died of rapid progression of the osteosarcoma within a week of admission to the hospital. The autopsy revealed contiguous invasion by the tumor of the heart, with massive thrombus formation. The peripheral pulmonary arteries were diffusely occluded by metastatic tumors. Our case serves to highlight the risk of development of secondary sarcoma as a life-threatening late complication after chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, even after complete cure of the primary tumor.