Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Mil Med ; 172(10): 1110-6, 2007 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17985777

ABSTRACT

The most-used safety recommendation for protective vests is that the impact should not cause more than a 44-mm impression in plasticine. The aim of this study was to investigate whether this criterion was sufficient if the vest was exposed to a high-velocity projectile. We tested the hypothesis with pigs divided into a 40-mm group (n = 10) and a 34-mm group (n = 8) protected by a vest allowing a 40-mm or 34-mm impression in plasticine, respectively. Five (50%) of 10 animals in the 40-mm group and 2 (25%) of 8 in the 34-mm group died due to the trauma. We observed severe lung hematoma, impaired circulation, desaturation, and electroencephalogram changes. These effects were more aggravated in the 40-mm group compared to the 34-mm group. Based on our results, the overall judgment is that the safety criterion of 44-mm impression is insufficient when a vest is exposed to a high-velocity projectile.


Subject(s)
Contusions/etiology , Lung Diseases/etiology , Protective Clothing , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/complications , Animals , Contusions/mortality , Electroencephalography , Female , Lung Diseases/mortality , Male , Potassium/blood , Swine , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/mortality
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL