Safety and tolerability of elbasvir/grazoprevir in chronic hepatitis C virus therapy: Integrated analysis from clinical trials.

Direct-acting antiviral treatments for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are generally safe; however, understanding the safety profile of each regimen is essential for their continued use. Safety data were pooled from 12 clinical trials of elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) that enrolled adult participants with HCV infection. Pooled analyses are presented for participants receiving EBR/GZR for 12 weeks and those receiving EBR/GZR plus ribavirin (RBV) for 16-18 weeks. Safety data are also presented for participants with comorbidities receiving EBR/GZR for 12 weeks in individual clinical trials (chronic kidney disease [CKD] stage 4/5, inherited blood disorders [IBLD] or receiving opioid agonist therapy [OAT]). Among 1743 participants receiving EBR/GZR for 12 weeks, 1068 (61.3%) reported ≥1 adverse event (AE) and 491 had AEs (28.2%) considered drug-related. The most frequent AEs were headache (10.6%), fatigue (8.7%), nasopharyngitis (5.8%), nausea (5.1%) and diarrhoea (5.0%). Serious AEs were reported by 37 participants (2.1%), and 12 (0.7%) discontinued treatment due to an AE. In populations with CKD 4/5 or IBLD or receiving OAT, safety was similar in participants receiving EBR/GZR for 12 weeks and those receiving placebo. Some AEs occurred at higher frequencies in participants receiving RBV compared with those receiving EBR/GZR alone: fatigue (32.7% vs 8.7%); headache (21.6% vs 10.6%); and nausea (15.8% vs 5.1%). Safety was similar in participants with and those without cirrhosis. Grade 3/4 alanine aminotransferase elevations were reported in 0.7% participants. EBR/GZR is a safe treatment option for individuals with HCV genotype (GT) 1 or GT4 infections, even those with challenging comorbidities such as CKD or IBLD and those receiving OAT.

Pitavastatin is a more sensitive and selective organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1B clinical probe than rosuvastatin.

AIMS: Rosuvastatin and pitavastatin have been proposed as probe substrates for the organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B, but clinical data on their relative sensitivity and selectivity to OATP1B inhibitors are lacking. A clinical study was therefore conducted to determine their relative suitability as OATP1B probes using single oral (PO) and intravenous (IV) doses of the OATP1B inhibitor rifampicin, accompanied by a comprehensive in vitro assessment of rifampicin inhibitory potential on statin transporters. METHODS: The clinical study comprised of two separate panels of eight healthy subjects. In each panel, subjects were randomized to receive a single oral dose of rosuvastatin (5 mg) or pitavastatin (1 mg) administered alone, concomitantly with rifampicin (600 mg) PO or IV. The in vitro transporter studies were performed using hepatocytes and recombinant expression systems. RESULTS: Rifampicin markedly increased exposures of both statins, with greater differential increases after PO vs. IV rifampicin only for rosuvastatin. The magnitudes of the increases in area under the plasma concentration-time curve were 5.7- and 7.6-fold for pitavastatin and 4.4- and 3.3-fold for rosuvastatin, after PO and IV rifampicin, respectively. In vitro studies showed that rifampicin was an inhibitor of OATP1B1 and OATP1B3, breast cancer resistance protein and multidrug resistance protein 2, but not of organic anion transporter 3. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that pitavastatin is a more sensitive and selective and thus preferred clinical OATP1B probe substrate than rosuvastatin, and that a single IV dose of rifampicin is a more selective OATP1B inhibitor than a PO dose.

Switch to fixed-dose doravirine (100 mg) with islatravir (0·75 mg) once daily in virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1 on bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide: 48-week results of a phase 3, randomised, controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Doravirine and islatravir is an investigational, once-daily regimen with high antiviral potency, favourable safety and tolerability, and a low propensity for resistance. We investigated a switch from bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) in virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, non-inferiority trial at 89 research, community, and hospital-based clinics in 11 countries. Adults aged 18 years or older with fewer than 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL for at least 3 months on bictegravir (50 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (25 mg) and no history of previous virological failure on any past or current regimen were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-generated randomisation allocation schedule, with block randomisation based on a block size of four, to switch to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) or continue bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide orally once daily, with matching placebos taken by all participants. Participants, investigators, study staff, and sponsor personnel involved in study drug administration or clinical evaluation of participants were masked to treatment assignment until week 48. Participants were instructed at each visit to take one tablet from each of the two bottles received, one of study drug and one of placebo, once daily, and participants were assessed at baseline and weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with greater than or equal to 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL at week 48 in the full analysis set (ie, all participants who received at least one dose of study drug; US Food and Drug Administration snapshot; prespecified non-inferiority margin 4%). The study is ongoing, with all remaining participants in post-treatment follow-up, and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04223791. FINDINGS: We screened 726 individuals for eligibility between Feb 18 and Sept 3, 2020, of whom 643 (88·6%) participants were randomly assigned to a treatment group (183 [28·5%] women and 460 [71·5%] men). 322 participants were switched to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) and 321 continued bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide (two participants [one with a protocol deviation and one who withdrew] assigned to bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide did not receive treatment). The last follow-up visit for the week 48 analysis occurred on Aug 26, 2021. At week 48, two (0·6%) of 322 participants in the doravirine and islatravir group compared with one (0·3%) of 319 participants in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group had greater than or equal to 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL (difference 0·3%, 95% CI -1·2 to 2·0). The per-protocol analysis showed consistent results. 25 (7·8%) participants in the doravirine and islatravir group had headache compared with 23 [7·2%] participants in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group; 101 (31·4%) compared with 98 (30·7%) had infections; and eight (2·5%) participants in each group discontinued therapy due to adverse events. 32 (9·9%) participants had treatment-related adverse events in the islatravir and doravirine group comapred with 38 (11·9%) in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group. In the islatravir and doravirine group, CD4 cell counts (mean change -19·7 cells per µL) and total lymphocyte counts (mean change -0·20 × 109/L) were decreased at 48 weeks. INTERPRETATION: Switching to daily doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) was non-inferior to bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide at week 48. However, decreases in CD4 cell and total lymphocyte counts do not support the further development of once-daily doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg). FUNDING: Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co.

Brief Report: Efficacy and Safety of Oral Islatravir Once Daily in Combination With Doravirine Through 96 Weeks for Treatment-Naive Adults With HIV-1 Infection Receiving Initial Treatment With Islatravir, Doravirine, and Lamivudine.

BACKGROUND: Islatravir (MK-8591) is a nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor in development for treatment and prevention of HIV-1. We present efficacy and safety data for islatravir and doravirine (DOR) through 96 weeks of the phase 2b trial (NCT03272347). METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging trial, participants initially received islatravir (0.25, 0.75, or 2.25 mg) with doravirine (100 mg) and lamivudine (3TC, 300 mg) or a fixed-dose combination of doravirine, 3TC, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DOR/3TC/TDF) daily. Beginning at week 24, participants receiving islatravir stopped 3TC if HIV-1 RNA from the prior visit was <50 copies per milliliter and continued taking the assigned islatravir dose (still blinded) with doravirine. All islatravir groups transitioned to open-label use of 0.75 mg between weeks 60 and 84. Efficacy end points at week 96 included the proportion of participants maintaining HIV-1 RNA of <50 copies per milliliter (FDA Snapshot). Safety was assessed by adverse event (AE) reporting. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-one treatment-naive participants received the study drugs and were included in the analyses. Through week 96, HIV-1 RNA<50 copies per milliliter was maintained in 86.2% (25/29), 90.0% (27/30), and 67.7% (21/31) of participants in the 0.25-, 0.75-, and 2.25-mg islatravir groups, respectively, 81.1% (73/90) of the combined islatravir group, and 80.6% (25/31) of the DOR/3TC/TDF group. One participant in the 2.25-mg islatravir group had Protocol-Defined Virologic Failure after week 48. Drug-related AE rates were higher for DOR/3TC/TDF participants (22.6%) compared with islatravir (combined 7.8%). Two participants (2.2%) receiving islatravir with doravirine and one (3.2%) receiving DOR/3TC/TDF discontinued because of an AE. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment regimens containing islatravir and doravirine maintained viral suppression through week 96 and were well tolerated regardless of dose.

Safety and immunogenicity of a modified process hepatitis B vaccine in healthy adults ≥50 years.

BACKGROUND: Generating protective immune responses in older adults (particularly ≥65 y) remains challenging for vaccines in general. This study examined the immune response engendered in older adults by RECOMBIVAX HB™ manufactured using a modified adjuvant (modified-process hepatitis B vaccine; mpHBV), RECOMBIVAX-HB™, and ENGERIX-B™. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, multicenter study enrolled healthy, seronegative subjects (N=538) to receive mpHBV (10 µg hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg]), RECOMBIVAX-HB™ (10 µg HBsAg), or ENGERIX-B™ (20 µg HBsAg) at Day 1, Month 1, and Month 6. Prespecified analysis of subpopulations 50-64 y and ≥65 y was conducted. Serum antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs) was measured Predose 1 and 1 mo Postdose 3. RESULTS: For subjects ≥50 y, seroprotection rates (SPR, anti-HBs titer ≥10 mIU/mL) were 75.7% (95% CI: 68.0,82.2) for mpHBV, 68.0% (95% CI: 59.8,75.5) for RECOMBIVAX HB™, and 84.0% (95% CI: 77.0,89.6) for ENGERIX-B™. For subjects 50-64 y, SPRs were 82.1% (95% CI: 73.8,88.7) for mpHBV, 77.4% (95% CI: 68.7,84.7) for RECOMBIVAX-HB™, and 88.5% (95% CI: 81.1,93.7) for ENGERIX-B™. For subjects ≥65 y, SPRs were 57.5% (95% CI: 40.9,73.0) for mpHBV, 34.4% (95% CI: 18.6,53.2) for RECOMBIVAX-HB™, and 67.7% (95% CI: 48.6,83.3) for ENGERIX-B™. There were 6 non-vaccine related serious adverse events reported. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of subjects ≥50 y old achieved seroprotection. The sub-population ≥65 y had lower vaccination responses than the 50-64 y sub-population. For subjects ≥65 y, mpHBV and ENGERIX-B™ groups achieved higher seroprotection rates than the RECOMBIVAX-HB group. The safety profile of mpHBV was consistent with the other groups.

Using the power law model to predict the long-term persistence and duration of detectable hepatitis A antibody after receipt of hepatitis A vaccine (VAQTA™).

VAQTA™ (Hepatitis A Vaccine, inactivated [HAVi]; Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA) is currently licensed for prevention of disease caused by hepatitis A virus in persons ≥12 months of age. This report summarizes statistical models developed to evaluate the long-term persistence and duration of detectable hepatitis A antibody (total antibody levels with no distinction on class) after receipt of HAVi in healthy children and adolescents (V251-023 and V251-035) and in healthy adults (V251-034). The statistical models presented, conducted separately for each of the three studies, are based on models that have been used in the literature to estimate the duration of antibody to protect against human papillomavirus (HPV) disease. In the absence of observed study data on hepatitis A antibody persistence for vaccine recipients over several decades, an extrapolation from a kinetic model of antibody decay was used to estimate the duration of detectable antibody. Extrapolation of observed antibody titers from postvaccination, Year 2.5-3.5, Year 5-6, and Year 10 in 165 children and adolescents who received HAVi at Day 0 and Week 24 in V251-023 suggests that detectable levels of antibody may persist after the second dose for many years. This model suggests that 25 to 50 years Postdose 1 in a two-dose series of HAVi, 99.4% of the study population will have detectable levels of hepatitis A antibody.

Safety and immunogenicity of VAQTA® in children 12-to-23 months of age with and without administration of other US pediatric vaccines.

Safety and immunogenicity data from 5 clinical trials conducted in the US in children 12-to-23 months old where HAVi was administered alone or concomitantly with other pediatric vaccines (M-M-R®II, Varivax®, TRIPEDIA®, Prevnar®, ProQuad®, PedvaxHIB®, and INFANRIX®) were combined. Among 4,374 participants receiving ≥ 1 dose of HAVi, 4,222 (97%) had safety follow-up and the proportions reporting adverse events (AE) were comparable when administered alone (69.4%) or concomitantly with other pediatric vaccines (71.1%). The most common solicited injection-site AEs were pain/tenderness (Postdose 1: 25.8%; Postdose 2: 26.1%) and redness (Postdose 1: 13.6%; Postdose 2: 15.1%). The most common vaccine-related systemic AEs were fever (≥ 100.4ºF, 12.2%) and irritability (8.1%). Serious AEs (SAEs) were observed at a rate of 0.4%; 0.1% were considered vaccine-related. No deaths were reported within 14 days following a dose of HAVi. These integrated analyses also showed that protective antibody concentrations were elicited in 100% of toddlers after two doses and 92% after a single dose, regardless of whether HAVi was given concomitantly with other vaccines or alone. These results demonstrate that HAVi was well-tolerated whether given alone or concomitantly with other vaccines, with a low incidence of vaccine-related SAEs. HAVi was immunogenic in this age group regardless of whether administered with or without other pediatric vaccines and whether 1 or 2 doses were administered. HAVi did not impact the immune response to other vaccines. These data continue to support the routine use of HAVi with other pediatric vaccines in children ≥ 12 months of age.

Concomitant proton pump inhibitor use does not reduce the efficacy of elbasvir/grazoprevir: A pooled analysis of 1,322 patients with hepatitis C infection.

Concomitant proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use reduces plasma concentrations of certain nonstructural protein 5A inhibitors, which are key components of modern hepatitis C infection (HCV) treatments. These reduced concentrations may decrease efficacy, leading to challenging treatment failures due to the development of resistance-associated substitutions. This post-hoc analysis assessed 12-week sustained viral response (SVR12) and pharmacokinetics of fixed-dose combination elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) in patients with HCV infection and self-reported PPI use. Data were derived from six phase 3 EBR/GZR trials with treatment-naive or treatment-experienced genotype 1- or 4-infected patients, with or without compensated cirrhosis. Baseline PPI use was defined as ≥7 consecutive days of use between study days -7 and 7. Bivariate analyses assessed PPI use and factors associated with SVR12 with sex, age (continuous and dichotomous), cirrhosis status, prior treatment status, baseline HCV RNA (continuous and dichotomous), HCV genotype, and baseline resistance-associated substitutions as variables in the models. Overall, 12% (162/1,322) of EBR/GZR-treated patients reported baseline PPI use. Of those, 96% achieved SVR12. In patients without PPI use, 97% achieved SVR12. PPI use was not a predictive factor in achieving SVR12 based on a univariate analysis (P = 0.188). In the bivariate models, none of the interaction terms involving PPI use were statistically significant. There was no significant effect of PPI usage, regardless of adjustment for considered factors. The estimated area under the curve and maximum concentration values for EBR were comparable among patients with and without reported PPI use. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that PPI use with EBR/GZR had no clinically significant effect on SVR12 rates in genotype 1/4-infected patients with or without compensated cirrhosis. (clinicaltrials.gov identifiers: NCT02092350, NCT02105467, NCT02105662, NCT02105688, NCT02105701, NCT02358044) (Hepatology Communications 2017;1:757-764).

Concomitant use of VAQTA with PedvaxHIB and Infanrix in 12 to 17 month old children.

Open-label, multicenter, randomized study (NCT00289913) evaluated immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of Vaqta (hepatitis A vaccine) administered with PedvaxHIB (Haemophilus b conjugate vaccine [Meningococcal protein conjugate]) & Infanrix (diphtheria/tetanus/acellular pertussis vaccine) in healthy, 15-month-old children. Five groups were evaluated: Group 1 received Vaqta/Infanrix PedvaxHIB on Day-1 and Vaqta at Week-24; Group 2 received Infanrix PedvaxHIB on Day-1, Vaqta at Week-4, and Vaqta at Week-28; Group 3 received Vaqta/PedvaxHIB on Day-1 and Vaqta Week-24; Group 4 received PedvaxHIB on Day-1, Vaqta at Week-4, and Vaqta at Week-28; and Group 5 (safety only) received Vaqta on Day-1 and Vaqta at Week-24. Hepatitis A seropositivity rate (SPR: ≥10 mIU/mL), Hib capsular polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP) antibody response (>1.0 µg/mL), and geometric mean titers (GMT) to pertussis toxin (PT), pertussis filamentous hemagglutinin antibody (FHA), and pertactin were examined. Non-inferiority statistical criteria required a difference >10% in Hepatitis A SPR, PRP >1.0 µg/mL, and a GMT ratio of >0.67 for pertussis antigens. Injection-site and systemic adverse events (AEs) and daily temperatures were collected. Hepatitis A SPRs were 100% for Groups 1-4, regardless of initial serostatus. Anti-PRP titers were comparable (98.1% - 97.0%) for Groups 1-4. GMT and mean fold-rise were comparable for all 3 pertussis antigen components between concomitant and nonconcomitant groups. Criteria for non-inferiority of immune responses for concomitant vs nonconcomitant administration were met for Hepatitis A, Hib, and pertussis antigens. No statistically significant incidence differences of individual AEs were found between concomitant and nonconcomitant groups. No serious vaccine-related AEs or deaths were reported; no subject discontinued due to an AE. Immune responses to Vaqta, PedvaxHIB, and Infanrix given concomitantly were non-inferior to nonconcomitant responses. Vaqta administered with PedvaxHIB & Infanrix had an acceptable safety profile in 15-month-old children.

Safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant hepatitis B vaccine manufactured by a modified process in renal pre-dialysis and dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients with renal insufficiency are hyporesponsive to vaccination, including to hepatitis B vaccines. A manufacturing process modification for a hepatitis B vaccine (mpHBV) was studied in renal pre-dialysis and dialysis patients. METHODS: This randomized, open-label, multicenter, estimation study enrolled previously unvaccinated, HBV-seronegative adult dialysis and pre-dialysis patients (N=276, median age 72.0 years). At 0, 1, 6, and 8 months, group 1 received a 1 mL intramuscular dose of mpHBV (containing 40 µg HBsAg) as a single injection, while group 2 received a 1 mL intramuscular dose of a licensed hepatitis B vaccine as two injections (each containing 20 µg HBsAg; 40 µg HBsAg total). Serum antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs) was measured predose 1, and 1 month postdose 3 and 4. Anti-HBs geometric mean concentration (GMC) and seroprotection rate (SPR, % of subjects with anti-HBs titer ≥10 mIU/mL) were estimated at months 7 and 9. RESULTS: For group 1, month 7 SPR was 48.5% (49/101, 95% CI: 38.4%, 58.7%); with an additional dose, month 9 SPR increased to 66.7% (66/99, 95% CI: 56.5%, 75.8%). For group 2, month 7 SPR was 57.7% (64/111, 95% CI: 47.9%, 67.0%); with an additional dose, month 9 SPR increased to 69.2% (72/104, 95% CI: 59.4%, 77.9%). group 1 GMCs at months 7 and 9 were 27.5 mIU/mL (95% CI: 15.7, 48.0) and 61.7 mIU/mL (95% CI: 34.2, 111.5), respectively. group 2 GMCs at months 7 and 9 were 48.7 mIU/mL (95% CI: 28.7, 82.7) and 115.8 mIU/mL (95% CI: 65.2, 205.5), respectively. There were 22 serious adverse events; none were considered related to study vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Both formulations were immunogenic in this population but required more vaccinations to reach seroprotective levels than comparable regimens in healthy individuals, as expected. The relatively reduced SPRs seen in this population support the need for routine screening and re-dosing in this population.

Analysis of safety data in children after receiving two doses of ProQuad® (MMRV).

BACKGROUND: In randomized clinical studies, over 11,800 children, 12 months to 6 years of age, were administered ProQuad(®), a combination measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella vaccine (MMRV). This paper describes the safety following a 2-dose regimen of MMRV administered to children in the second year of life. METHODS: Safety data from five clinical studies were combined for all children who were scheduled to receive two doses of MMRV ∼3-6 months apart. All vaccinated children were followed for safety following each dose of MMRV. RESULTS: Of 3112 children who received a first dose of MMRV, 2780 (89.3%) received a second dose of MMRV. Overall, 70.5% and 57.7% of children reported ≥1 adverse experiences following first and second doses of MMRV, respectively. Injection-site redness was statistically significantly higher postdose 2 than postdose 1, while injection-site pain/tenderness was statistically significantly higher postdose 1 compared to postdose 2. Rashes were statistically significantly lower postdose 2 compared to postdose 1. Ten febrile seizures (8 postdose 1, 2 postdose 2) were reported following MMRV vaccination. The incidence of febrile seizures postdose 1 of MMRV was 0.26% (8/3019) compared to 0.07% (2/2695) postdose 2 of MMRV. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of two doses of MMRV has an acceptable safety profile in children 12 to 23 months of age. There is a small increase in the risk of febrile seizures following the first dose of MMRV as compared to the component vaccines, but the risk for any individual child is relatively low.

Concomitant administration of hepatitis A vaccine with measles/mumps/rubella/varicella and pneumococcal vaccines in healthy 12- to 23-month-old children.

This open-label, multicenter, randomized, comparative study evaluated immunogenicity, safety and tolerability of concomitant (Group 1; n=330) vs. non-concomitant (Group 2; n=323) VAQTA™ (25U/0.5 mL) (hepatitis A vaccine; HAV) with ProQuad™ (measles/mumps/rubella/varicella; MMRV) and Prevnar™ (7-valent pneumococcal; PCV-7) in healthy, 12-23 mo old children. Group 1 received HAV/MMRV/PCV-7 concomitantly on Day 1 and second doses of HAV/MMRV at Week 24. Group 2 received MMRV/PCV-7 on Day 1, HAV at Weeks 6 and 30 and MMRV at Week 34. Hepatitis A seropositivity rate (SPR: ≥10 mIU/mL; 4 weeks postdose 2), varicella zoster-virus (VZV) SPR (≥5 gpELISA units/mL) and geometric mean titers (GMT) to S. pneumoniae were examined. Injection-site and systemic adverse experiences (AEs) and daily temperatures were collected. Hepatitis A SPR were 100% for Group 1 and 99.4% for Group 2 after two HAV doses; risk difference=0.7 (95%CI: -1.4,3.8, non-inferior) regardless of initial serostatus. VZV SPR was 93.3% for Group 1 and 98.3% for Group 2; risk difference=-5.1 (95%CI: -9.3, -1.4; non-inferior). S. pneumoniae GMT fold-difference (7 serotypes) ranged from 0.9 to 1.1; non-inferior. No statistically significant differences in the incidence of individual AEs were seen when HAV was administered concomitantly vs. non-concomitantly. Three (all Group 2 post-administration of MMRV/PCV-7) of 11 serious AEs were considered possibly vaccine-related: dehydration and gastroenteritis (same subject) on Day 52; febrile seizure on Day 9. No deaths were reported. Antibody responses to each vaccine given concomitantly were non-inferior to HAV given non-concomitantly with MMRV and PCV-7. Administration of HAV with PCV-7 and MMRV had an acceptable safety profile in 12- to 23-mo-old children.

Immunogenicity and safety of a Haemophilus influenzae B (Hib)-hepatitis B vaccine with a modified process hepatitis B component administered with concomitant pneumococcal conjugate vaccine to infants.

BACKGROUND: A hepatitis B vaccine was manufactured with a modified process (mpHBV) that incorporated double the usual amount of phosphate. Following a study in young adults, the mpHBV was evaluated in infants in a combination hepatitis B and Haemophilus influenzae B vaccine (mpHBV-Hib). METHODS: The mpHBV-Hib was compared with the licensed bivalent HBV-Hib vaccine Comvax™ for immunogenicity and safety. Both vaccines contained 5 µg/0.5 mL of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and 7.5 µg/0.5 mL of PRP-OMPC (polyribosylribitol phosphate outer membrane protein complex). A total of 543 infants were randomized 1:1 to receive either vaccine at 2, 4 and 12 months of age. A pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) was given concomitantly. Immunogenicity was assessed at 1-month post-dose 3. RESULTS: Seroprotection rates [% subjects with anti-hepatitis B surface antigen antibody titers (anti-HBs) ≥10 mIU/mL)] were 100% and 99% for mpHBV-Hib and the licensed control (Comvax™), respectively. Anti-HBs geometric mean titers (GMTs) were 4204 (95% CI, 3411-5182) and 1683 (95% CI, 1350-2099) mIU/mL, respectively. Anti-PRP seroprotection rates (SPR) at ≥0.15 µg/mL and at ≥1.0 µg/mL were 97% and 94%, respectively, for mpHBV-Hib and 96% and 92%, respectively, for the control. Anti-PRP GMTs were 7.1 µg/mL for mpHBV-Hib and 8.0 µg/mL for the control. Reactogenicity of the two vaccines was similar. CONCLUSIONS: The mpHBV in combination with Hib and with co-administered PCV was highly immunogenic. The safety profile of mpHBV-Hib was comparable to the licensed control. Both the control and mpHBV-Hib met acceptability criteria for seroprotection rates to hepatitis B, with higher anti-HBs GMTs noted for mpHBV-Hib.

A randomized, multicenter, open-label clinical trial to assess the anamnestic immune response 4 to 8 years after a primary hepatitis B vaccination series.

This open-label, randomized study challenged 4- to 8-year-old children from Spain (N = 1478) with a single dose of hepatitis B vaccine to estimate anamnestic responses. At the time of preimmunization, 15.9% to 51.2% of subjects had antibody values ≥10 mIU/mL. One month postimmunization, 91.6% to 97.3% of subjects had antibody titers ≥10 mIU/mL. There were no serious, vaccine-related, adverse experiences, and no discontinuations as a result of adverse experience.