Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 32
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 209(2): 137-152, 2024 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37772985

ABSTRACT

Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). To date, clinical practice guidelines regarding treatment for patients with SSc-ILD are primarily consensus based. Methods: An international expert guideline committee composed of 24 individuals with expertise in rheumatology, SSc, pulmonology, ILD, or methodology, and with personal experience with SSc-ILD, discussed systematic reviews of the published evidence assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Predetermined conflict-of-interest management strategies were applied, and recommendations were made for or against specific treatment interventions exclusively by the nonconflicted panelists. The confidence in effect estimates, importance of outcomes studied, balance of desirable and undesirable consequences of treatment, cost, feasibility, acceptability of the intervention, and implications for health equity were all considered in making the recommendations. This was in accordance with the American Thoracic Society guideline development process, which is in compliance with the Institute of Medicine standards for trustworthy guidelines. Results: For treatment of patients with SSc-ILD, the committee: 1) recommends the use of mycophenolate; 2) recommends further research into the safety and efficacy of (a) pirfenidone and (b) the combination of pirfenidone plus mycophenolate; and 3) suggests the use of (a) cyclophosphamide, (b) rituximab, (c) tocilizumab, (d) nintedanib, and (e) the combination of nintedanib plus mycophenolate. Conclusions: The recommendations herein provide an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the treatment of patients with SSc-ILD and are intended to serve as the basis for informed and shared decision making by clinicians and patients.


Subject(s)
Lung Diseases, Interstitial , Scleroderma, Systemic , Humans , United States , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/drug therapy , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/etiology , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Rituximab/therapeutic use , Scleroderma, Systemic/complications , Lung
2.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 205(9): e18-e47, 2022 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35486072

ABSTRACT

Background: This American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana de Tórax guideline updates prior idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) guidelines and addresses the progression of pulmonary fibrosis in patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) other than IPF. Methods: A committee was composed of multidisciplinary experts in ILD, methodologists, and patient representatives. 1) Update of IPF: Radiological and histopathological criteria for IPF were updated by consensus. Questions about transbronchial lung cryobiopsy, genomic classifier testing, antacid medication, and antireflux surgery were informed by systematic reviews and answered with evidence-based recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. 2) Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF): PPF was defined, and then radiological and physiological criteria for PPF were determined by consensus. Questions about pirfenidone and nintedanib were informed by systematic reviews and answered with evidence-based recommendations using the GRADE approach. Results:1) Update of IPF: A conditional recommendation was made to regard transbronchial lung cryobiopsy as an acceptable alternative to surgical lung biopsy in centers with appropriate expertise. No recommendation was made for or against genomic classifier testing. Conditional recommendations were made against antacid medication and antireflux surgery for the treatment of IPF. 2) PPF: PPF was defined as at least two of three criteria (worsening symptoms, radiological progression, and physiological progression) occurring within the past year with no alternative explanation in a patient with an ILD other than IPF. A conditional recommendation was made for nintedanib, and additional research into pirfenidone was recommended. Conclusions: The conditional recommendations in this guideline are intended to provide the basis for rational, informed decisions by clinicians.


Subject(s)
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis , Lung Diseases, Interstitial , Antacids/therapeutic use , Biopsy , Humans , Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis/drug therapy , Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis/therapy , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Lung/pathology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/pathology , United States
3.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 202(10): e121-e141, 2020 11 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33185464

ABSTRACT

Background: Evidence-based guidelines are needed for effective delivery of home oxygen therapy to appropriate patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and interstitial lung disease (ILD).Methods: The multidisciplinary panel created six research questions using a modified Delphi approach. A systematic review of the literature was completed, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to formulate clinical recommendations.Recommendations: The panel found varying quality and availability of evidence and made the following judgments: 1) strong recommendations for long-term oxygen use in patients with COPD (moderate-quality evidence) or ILD (low-quality evidence) with severe chronic resting hypoxemia, 2) a conditional recommendation against long-term oxygen use in patients with COPD with moderate chronic resting hypoxemia, 3) conditional recommendations for ambulatory oxygen use in patients with COPD (moderate-quality evidence) or ILD (low-quality evidence) with severe exertional hypoxemia, 4) a conditional recommendation for ambulatory liquid-oxygen use in patients who are mobile outside the home and require >3 L/min of continuous-flow oxygen during exertion (very-low-quality evidence), and 5) a recommendation that patients and their caregivers receive education on oxygen equipment and safety (best-practice statement).Conclusions: These guidelines provide the basis for evidence-based use of home oxygen therapy in adults with COPD or ILD but also highlight the need for additional research to guide clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Home Care Services/standards , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/therapy , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/methods , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Societies, Medical , United States
4.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 202(3): e36-e69, 2020 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32706311

ABSTRACT

Background: This guideline addresses the diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). It represents a collaborative effort among the American Thoracic Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax.Methods: Systematic reviews were performed for six questions. The evidence was discussed, and then recommendations were formulated by a multidisciplinary committee of experts in the field of interstitial lung disease and HP using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.Results: The guideline committee defined HP, and clinical, radiographic, and pathological features were described. HP was classified into nonfibrotic and fibrotic phenotypes. There was limited evidence that was directly applicable to all questions. The need for a thorough history and a validated questionnaire to identify potential exposures was agreed on. Serum IgG testing against potential antigens associated with HP was suggested to identify potential exposures. For patients with nonfibrotic HP, a recommendation was made in favor of obtaining bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid for lymphocyte cellular analysis, and suggestions for transbronchial lung biopsy and surgical lung biopsy were also made. For patients with fibrotic HP, suggestions were made in favor of obtaining BAL for lymphocyte cellular analysis, transbronchial lung cryobiopsy, and surgical lung biopsy. Diagnostic criteria were established, and a diagnostic algorithm was created by expert consensus. Knowledge gaps were identified as future research directions.Conclusions: The guideline committee developed a systematic approach to the diagnosis of HP. The approach should be reevaluated as new evidence accumulates.


Subject(s)
Alveolitis, Extrinsic Allergic/diagnosis , Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid/cytology , Inhalation Exposure , Lung/pathology , Lymphocytes/immunology , Pulmonary Fibrosis/diagnosis , Adult , Alveolitis, Extrinsic Allergic/complications , Alveolitis, Extrinsic Allergic/immunology , Alveolitis, Extrinsic Allergic/pathology , Biopsy , Bronchoscopy , Cryosurgery , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Medical History Taking , Pulmonary Fibrosis/etiology , Pulmonary Fibrosis/immunology , Pulmonary Fibrosis/pathology , Serologic Tests , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 71(4): e1-e36, 2020 08 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32628747

ABSTRACT

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) represent over 190 species and subspecies, some of which can produce disease in humans of all ages and can affect both pulmonary and extrapulmonary sites. This guideline focuses on pulmonary disease in adults (without cystic fibrosis or human immunodeficiency virus infection) caused by the most common NTM pathogens such as Mycobacterium avium complex, Mycobacterium kansasii, and Mycobacterium xenopi among the slowly growing NTM and Mycobacterium abscessus among the rapidly growing NTM. A panel of experts was carefully selected by leading international respiratory medicine and infectious diseases societies (ATS, ERS, ESCMID, IDSA) and included specialists in pulmonary medicine, infectious diseases and clinical microbiology, laboratory medicine, and patient advocacy. Systematic reviews were conducted around each of 22 PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) questions and the recommendations were formulated, written, and graded using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Thirty-one evidence-based recommendations about treatment of NTM pulmonary disease are provided. This guideline is intended for use by healthcare professionals who care for patients with NTM pulmonary disease, including specialists in infectious diseases and pulmonary diseases.


Subject(s)
Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous , Mycobacterium abscessus , Mycobacterium kansasii , Adult , Humans , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous/diagnosis , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous/drug therapy , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous/epidemiology , Mycobacterium avium Complex , Nontuberculous Mycobacteria
6.
Clin Infect Dis ; 71(4): 905-913, 2020 08 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32797222

ABSTRACT

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) represent over 190 species and subspecies, some of which can produce disease in humans of all ages and can affect both pulmonary and extrapulmonary sites. This guideline focuses on pulmonary disease in adults (without cystic fibrosis or human immunodeficiency virus infection) caused by the most common NTM pathogens such as Mycobacterium avium complex, Mycobacterium kansasii, and Mycobacterium xenopi among the slowly growing NTM and Mycobacterium abscessus among the rapidly growing NTM. A panel of experts was carefully selected by leading international respiratory medicine and infectious diseases societies (ATS, ERS, ESCMID, IDSA) and included specialists in pulmonary medicine, infectious diseases and clinical microbiology, laboratory medicine, and patient advocacy. Systematic reviews were conducted around each of 22 PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) questions and the recommendations were formulated, written, and graded using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Thirty-one evidence-based recommendations about treatment of NTM pulmonary disease are provided. This guideline is intended for use by healthcare professionals who care for patients with NTM pulmonary disease, including specialists in infectious diseases and pulmonary diseases.


Subject(s)
Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous , Mycobacterium abscessus , Mycobacterium kansasii , Adult , Humans , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous/diagnosis , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous/drug therapy , Mycobacterium avium Complex , Nontuberculous Mycobacteria
7.
Eur Respir J ; 56(1)2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32636299

ABSTRACT

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) represent over 190 species and subspecies, some of which can produce disease in humans of all ages and can affect both pulmonary and extrapulmonary sites. This guideline focuses on pulmonary disease in adults (without cystic fibrosis or human immunodeficiency virus infection) caused by the most common NTM pathogens such as Mycobacterium avium complex, Mycobacterium kansasii, and Mycobacterium xenopi among the slowly growing NTM and Mycobacterium abscessus among the rapidly growing NTM. A panel of experts was carefully selected by leading international respiratory medicine and infectious diseases societies (ATS, ERS, ESCMID, IDSA) and included specialists in pulmonary medicine, infectious diseases and clinical microbiology, laboratory medicine, and patient advocacy. Systematic reviews were conducted around each of 22 PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) questions and the recommendations were formulated, written, and graded using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Thirty-one evidence-based recommendations about treatment of NTM pulmonary disease are provided. This guideline is intended for use by healthcare professionals who care for patients with NTM pulmonary disease, including specialists in infectious diseases and pulmonary diseases.


Subject(s)
Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous , Mycobacterium abscessus , Mycobacterium kansasii , Adult , Humans , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous/diagnosis , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous/drug therapy , Mycobacterium avium Complex , Nontuberculous Mycobacteria
8.
Clin Infect Dis ; 68(10): 1611-1615, 2019 05 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31506700

ABSTRACT

Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is a common finding in many populations, including healthy women and persons with underlying urologic abnormalities. The 2005 guideline from the Infectious Diseases Society of America recommended that ASB should be screened for and treated only in pregnant women or in an individual prior to undergoing invasive urologic procedures. Treatment was not recommended for healthy women; older women or men; or persons with diabetes, indwelling catheters, or spinal cord injury. The guideline did not address children and some adult populations, including patients with neutropenia, solid organ transplants, and nonurologic surgery. In the years since the publication of the guideline, further information relevant to ASB has become available. In addition, antimicrobial treatment of ASB has been recognized as an important contributor to inappropriate antimicrobial use, which promotes emergence of antimicrobial resistance. The current guideline updates the recommendations of the 2005 guideline, includes new recommendations for populations not previously addressed, and, where relevant, addresses the interpretation of nonlocalizing clinical symptoms in populations with a high prevalence of ASB.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Asymptomatic Infections , Bacteriuria/drug therapy , Disease Management , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology , Adult , Aged , Antimicrobial Stewardship , Bacteriuria/diagnosis , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Neutropenia/complications , Pregnancy , Prevalence , Transplant Recipients , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy
9.
Clin Infect Dis ; 68(10): e83-e110, 2019 05 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30895288

ABSTRACT

Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is a common finding in many populations, including healthy women and persons with underlying urologic abnormalities. The 2005 guideline from the Infectious Diseases Society of America recommended that ASB should be screened for and treated only in pregnant women or in an individual prior to undergoing invasive urologic procedures. Treatment was not recommended for healthy women; older women or men; or persons with diabetes, indwelling catheters, or spinal cord injury. The guideline did not address children and some adult populations, including patients with neutropenia, solid organ transplants, and nonurologic surgery. In the years since the publication of the guideline, further information relevant to ASB has become available. In addition, antimicrobial treatment of ASB has been recognized as an important contributor to inappropriate antimicrobial use, which promotes emergence of antimicrobial resistance. The current guideline updates the recommendations of the 2005 guideline, includes new recommendations for populations not previously addressed, and, where relevant, addresses the interpretation of nonlocalizing clinical symptoms in populations with a high prevalence of ASB.


Subject(s)
Asymptomatic Infections , Bacteriuria/drug therapy , Disease Management , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antimicrobial Stewardship , Bacteriuria/diagnosis , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Neutropenia/complications , Pregnancy , Prevalence , Transplant Recipients , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy
10.
Clin Infect Dis ; 68(1): 1-4, 2019 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30551156

ABSTRACT

A panel of experts was convened by the Infectious Diseases Society of America to update the 2004 clinical practice guideline on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) [1]. This guideline is intended to provide insight for healthcare professionals who prescribe and oversee the provision of OPAT. It considers various patient features, infusion catheter issues, monitoring questions, and antimicrobial stewardship concerns. It does not offer recommendations on the treatment of specific infections. The reader is referred to disease- or organism-specific guidelines for such support.


Subject(s)
Administration, Intravenous/methods , Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage , Drug Utilization/standards , Injections/methods , Outpatients , Americas , Communicable Diseases/drug therapy , Drug Therapy/methods , Humans
11.
Clin Infect Dis ; 68(1): e1-e35, 2019 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30423035

ABSTRACT

A panel of experts was convened by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) to update the 2004 clinical practice guideline on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) [1]. This guideline is intended to provide insight for healthcare professionals who prescribe and oversee the provision of OPAT. It considers various patient features, infusion catheter issues, monitoring questions, and antimicrobial stewardship concerns. It does not offer recommendations on the treatment of specific infections. The reader is referred to disease- or organism-specific guidelines for such support.


Subject(s)
Administration, Intravenous/methods , Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage , Drug Utilization/standards , Injections/methods , Outpatients , Americas , Communicable Diseases/drug therapy , Drug Therapy/methods , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic
12.
Clin Infect Dis ; 68(6): e1-e47, 2019 03 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30566567

ABSTRACT

These clinical practice guidelines are an update of the guidelines published by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) in 2009, prior to the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. This document addresses new information regarding diagnostic testing, treatment and chemoprophylaxis with antiviral medications, and issues related to institutional outbreak management for seasonal influenza. It is intended for use by primary care clinicians, obstetricians, emergency medicine providers, hospitalists, laboratorians, and infectious disease specialists, as well as other clinicians managing patients with suspected or laboratory-confirmed influenza. The guidelines consider the care of children and adults, including special populations such as pregnant and postpartum women and immunocompromised patients.

13.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 198(5): e44-e68, 2018 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30168753

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This document provides clinical recommendations for the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). It represents a collaborative effort between the American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Latin American Thoracic Society. METHODS: The evidence syntheses were discussed and recommendations formulated by a multidisciplinary committee of IPF experts. The evidence was appraised and recommendations were formulated, written, and graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. RESULTS: The guideline panel updated the diagnostic criteria for IPF. Previously defined patterns of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) were refined to patterns of UIP, probable UIP, indeterminate, and alternate diagnosis. For patients with newly detected interstitial lung disease (ILD) who have a high-resolution computed tomography scan pattern of probable UIP, indeterminate, or an alternative diagnosis, conditional recommendations were made for performing BAL and surgical lung biopsy; because of lack of evidence, no recommendation was made for or against performing transbronchial lung biopsy or lung cryobiopsy. In contrast, for patients with newly detected ILD who have a high-resolution computed tomography scan pattern of UIP, strong recommendations were made against performing surgical lung biopsy, transbronchial lung biopsy, and lung cryobiopsy, and a conditional recommendation was made against performing BAL. Additional recommendations included a conditional recommendation for multidisciplinary discussion and a strong recommendation against measurement of serum biomarkers for the sole purpose of distinguishing IPF from other ILDs. CONCLUSIONS: The guideline panel provided recommendations related to the diagnosis of IPF.


Subject(s)
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis/diagnosis , Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis/pathology , Biopsy , Europe , Humans , Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis/diagnostic imaging , Japan , Latin America , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Lung/pathology , Societies, Medical , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , United States
14.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 193(9): e37-54, 2016 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27128710

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mild obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent disorder in adults; however, whether mild OSA has significant neurocognitive and cardiovascular complications is uncertain. OBJECTIVES: The specific goals of this Research Statement are to appraise the evidence regarding whether long-term adverse neurocognitive and cardiovascular outcomes are attributable to mild OSA in adults, evaluate whether or not treatment of mild OSA is effective at preventing or reducing these adverse neurocognitive and cardiovascular outcomes, delineate the key research gaps, and provide direction for future research agendas. METHODS: Literature searches from multiple reference databases were performed using medical subject headings and text words for OSA in adults as well as by hand searches. Pragmatic systematic reviews of the relevant body of evidence were performed. RESULTS: Studies were incongruent in their definitions of "mild" OSA. Data were inconsistent regarding the relationship between mild OSA and daytime sleepiness. However, treatment of mild OSA may improve sleepiness in patients who are sleepy at baseline and improve quality of life. There is limited or inconsistent evidence pertaining to the impact of therapy of mild OSA on neurocognition, mood, vehicle accidents, cardiovascular events, stroke, and arrhythmias. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence that treatment of mild OSA in individuals who demonstrate subjective sleepiness may be beneficial. Treatment may also improve quality of life. Future research agendas should focus on clarifying the effect of mild OSA and impact of effective treatment on other neurocognitive and cardiovascular endpoints as detailed in the document.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/complications , Neurocognitive Disorders/complications , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/complications , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/physiopathology , Adult , Cardiovascular Diseases/physiopathology , Humans , Neurocognitive Disorders/physiopathology , Societies , Treatment Outcome , United States
15.
Clin Infect Dis ; 63(5): e61-e111, 2016 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27418577

ABSTRACT

It is important to realize that guidelines cannot always account for individual variation among patients. They are not intended to supplant physician judgment with respect to particular patients or special clinical situations. IDSA considers adherence to these guidelines to be voluntary, with the ultimate determination regarding their application to be made by the physician in the light of each patient's individual circumstances.These guidelines are intended for use by healthcare professionals who care for patients at risk for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), including specialists in infectious diseases, pulmonary diseases, critical care, and surgeons, anesthesiologists, hospitalists, and any clinicians and healthcare providers caring for hospitalized patients with nosocomial pneumonia. The panel's recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of HAP and VAP are based upon evidence derived from topic-specific systematic literature reviews.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/diagnosis , Cross Infection/therapy , Pneumonia, Bacterial/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Bacterial/therapy , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/therapy , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteriological Techniques , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Humans , United States
16.
Clin Infect Dis ; 63(5): 575-82, 2016 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27521441

ABSTRACT

It is important to realize that guidelines cannot always account for individual variation among patients. They are not intended to supplant physician judgment with respect to particular patients or special clinical situations. IDSA considers adherence to these guidelines to be voluntary, with the ultimate determination regarding their application to be made by the physician in the light of each patient's individual circumstances.These guidelines are intended for use by healthcare professionals who care for patients at risk for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), including specialists in infectious diseases, pulmonary diseases, critical care, and surgeons, anesthesiologists, hospitalists, and any clinicians and healthcare providers caring for hospitalized patients with nosocomial pneumonia. The panel's recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of HAP and VAP are based upon evidence derived from topic-specific systematic literature reviews.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/diagnosis , Cross Infection/therapy , Pneumonia, Bacterial/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Bacterial/therapy , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/therapy , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteriological Techniques , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , United States
18.
Ann Am Thorac Soc ; 21(1): 136-150, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37027538

ABSTRACT

Rationale: The American Thoracic Society convened an international, multidisciplinary panel to develop clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). Objective: To conduct a systematic review and evaluate the literature to determine whether patients with SSc-ILD should be treated with mycophenolate. Methods: A literature search was conducted across the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases through June 2022 for studies using mycophenolate to treat patients with SSc-ILD. Mortality, disease progression, quality of life, and adverse event data were extracted, and meta-analyses were performed when possible. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group method was used to assess the quality of evidence. Results: The literature review resulted in seven studies fitting the inclusion criteria. The systematic review and meta-analyses revealed changes in forced vital capacity % predicted (mean difference [MD], 5.4%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 3.3%, 7.5%), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide % predicted (MD, 4.64%; 95% CI: 0.54%, 8.74%), and breathlessness score (MD, 1.99; 95% CI: 0.36, 3.62) favored mycophenolate over placebo. The risk of anemia (relative risk [RR], 2.3; 95% CI: 1.2, 71.4) was higher with mycophenolate. There were no significant differences between mycophenolate and cyclophosphamide, except risk of premature discontinuation (RR, 0.6; 95% CI: 0.4, 0.9), and leukopenia (RR, 0.1; 95% CI: 0.05, 0.4) favored mycophenolate. The quality of evidence was moderate to very low per GRADE. Conclusions: Mycophenolate use in patients with SSc-ILD is associated with statistically significant improvements in disease progression and quality-of-life measures compared with placebo. There were no differences in mortality, disease progression, or quality of life compared with cyclophosphamide, but there were fewer adverse events. The quality of evidence is very low.


Subject(s)
Lung Diseases, Interstitial , Scleroderma, Systemic , Humans , Quality of Life , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/etiology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/complications , Mycophenolic Acid/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Lung , Disease Progression
19.
Ann Am Thorac Soc ; 21(1): 122-135, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37772975

ABSTRACT

Background: The American Thoracic Society convened an international, multidisciplinary panel to develop clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). Objective: To conduct a systematic review and evaluate the literature to determine whether patients with SSc-ILD should be treated with cyclophosphamide. Data Sources: A literature search was conducted across the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases through June 2022 for studies using cyclophosphamide to treat patients with SSc-ILD. Data Extraction: Mortality, disease progression, quality of life, and adverse event data were extracted, and meta-analyses were performed when possible. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group method was used to assess the quality of evidence. Synthesis: Five studies were included; two randomized controlled trials compared cyclophosphamide versus placebo, and one randomized controlled trial and two retrospective case-control studies compared cyclophosphamide versus mycophenolate. Compared with placebo, there was a 2.83% reduction in the decline at 12 months for forced vital capacity (FVC) % predicted using cyclophosphamide (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-4.87; low evidence). There were improvements in breathlessness (Transition Dyspnea Index mean difference [MD], 2.90; 95% CI, 1.94-3.86; minimum clinically important difference, 1; moderate evidence) and disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index MD, -0.16; 95% CI, -0.28 to -0.04; minimum clinically important difference, -0.14; moderate evidence). There were increased risks of leukopenia and constitutional symptoms using cyclophosphamide, but no difference in mortality. When cyclophosphamide was compared with mycophenolate, there were differences in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide % predicted favoring mycophenolate at 6 months (MD, -3.67%; 95% CI, -6.3% to -1.1% unadjusted; MD, -4.88%; 95% CI, -7.3% to -2.5% adjusted for alveolar volume; moderate evidence), 12 months (MD, -5.90%; 95% CI, -8.4% to -3.4% adjusted for alveolar volume; moderate evidence), and 18 months (MD, -3.26%; 95% CI, -6.1% to -0.4%; moderate evidence), but not at 24 months. There were no differences in FVC % predicted, mortality, or quality-of-life outcomes, but participants were more likely to prematurely discontinue cyclophosphamide compared with mycophenolate (relative risk, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.10-2.63; high-certainty evidence). Conclusions: A review of the published evidence shows that cyclophosphamide is effective in SSc-ILD compared with placebo, with an increased risk of side effects. However, mycophenolate may be equivocal or better than cyclophosphamide. Clinicians and patients should weigh the potential benefits and risks with respect to individual patient circumstances and preferences.


Subject(s)
Lung Diseases, Interstitial , Scleroderma, Systemic , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Quality of Life , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/etiology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/complications , Dyspnea/drug therapy , Scleroderma, Systemic/complications , Scleroderma, Systemic/drug therapy
20.
Ann Am Thorac Soc ; 21(2): 317-327, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37772987

ABSTRACT

Background: The American Thoracic Society convened an international, multidisciplinary panel to develop clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). Objective: To conduct a systematic review and evaluate the literature to determine whether patients with SSc-ILD should be treated with rituximab. Data Sources: A literature search was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases through June 2022 for studies using rituximab to treat patients with SSc-ILD. Data Extraction: Disease progression, quality of life, mortality, and adverse event data were extracted. The intervention was rituximab. The standard-of-care comparator group was decided a priori by consensus of the panel as either placebo or mycophenolate. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group approach was used to assess the quality of evidence. Synthesis: Three relevant studies were selected. Rituximab significantly improved the forced vital capacity % predicted (mean difference, 3.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 5.90) and the modified Rodnan Skin Score (mean difference, -7.01; 95% CI, 11.46 to -2.56) at 24-48 weeks. Conclusions: Rituximab use in patients with SSc-ILD is associated with stabilization of lung function. The quality of evidence for study outcomes was considered to be very low, as defined by the GRADE approach. Additional research on treatment with rituximab is imperative.


Subject(s)
Lung Diseases, Interstitial , Scleroderma, Systemic , Humans , Rituximab/therapeutic use , Rituximab/adverse effects , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/etiology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/complications , Quality of Life , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Scleroderma, Systemic/drug therapy , Lung
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL