Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 115(8): 1807-1812, 2018 02 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29432195

ABSTRACT

The HMG-box protein Capicua (Cic) is a conserved transcriptional repressor that functions downstream of receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signaling pathways in a relatively simple switch: In the absence of signaling, Cic represses RTK-responsive genes by binding to nearly invariant sites in DNA, whereas activation of RTK signaling down-regulates Cic activity, leading to derepression of its targets. This mechanism controls gene expression in both Drosophila and mammals, but whether Cic can also function via other regulatory mechanisms remains unknown. Here, we characterize an RTK-independent role of Cic in regulating spatially restricted expression of Toll/IL-1 signaling targets in Drosophila embryogenesis. We show that Cic represses those targets by binding to suboptimal DNA sites of lower affinity than its known consensus sites. This binding depends on Dorsal/NF-κB, which translocates into the nucleus upon Toll activation and binds next to the Cic sites. As a result, Cic binds to and represses Toll targets only in regions with nuclear Dorsal. These results reveal a mode of Cic regulation unrelated to the well-established RTK/Cic depression axis and implicate cooperative binding in conjunction with low-affinity binding sites as an important mechanism of enhancer regulation. Given that Cic plays a role in many developmental and pathological processes in mammals, our results raise the possibility that some of these Cic functions are independent of RTK regulation and may depend on cofactor-assisted DNA binding.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila/genetics , HMGB Proteins/metabolism , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/metabolism , Repressor Proteins/metabolism , Signal Transduction , Toll-Like Receptors/metabolism , Animals , Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors/genetics , Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors/metabolism , Cell Nucleus/genetics , Cell Nucleus/metabolism , Drosophila/embryology , Drosophila/enzymology , Drosophila/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , HMGB Proteins/genetics , Male , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , Phosphoproteins/genetics , Phosphoproteins/metabolism , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/genetics , Repressor Proteins/genetics , Toll-Like Receptors/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism
2.
Genome Res ; 27(1): 64-74, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27979994

ABSTRACT

Histone modifications are frequently used as markers for enhancer states, but how to interpret enhancer states in the context of embryonic development is not clear. The poised enhancer signature, involving H3K4me1 and low levels of H3K27ac, has been reported to mark inactive enhancers that are poised for future activation. However, future activation is not always observed, and alternative reasons for the widespread occurrence of this enhancer signature have not been investigated. By analyzing enhancers during dorsal-ventral (DV) axis formation in the Drosophila embryo, we find that the poised enhancer signature is specifically generated during patterning in the tissue where the enhancers are not induced, including at enhancers that are known to be repressed by a transcriptional repressor. These results suggest that, rather than serving exclusively as an intermediate step before future activation, the poised enhancer state may be a mark for spatial regulation during tissue patterning. We discuss the possibility that the poised enhancer state is more generally the result of repression by transcriptional repressors.


Subject(s)
Body Patterning/genetics , Embryonic Development/genetics , Enhancer Elements, Genetic/genetics , Transcription, Genetic , Animals , Drosophila/genetics , Drosophila/growth & development , Epigenetic Repression/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Histone Code/genetics , Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics
3.
Elife ; 82019 01 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30681411

ABSTRACT

Loss of sensory hair cells leads to deafness and balance deficiencies. In contrast to mammalian hair cells, zebrafish ear and lateral line hair cells regenerate from poorly characterized support cells. Equally ill-defined is the gene regulatory network underlying the progression of support cells to differentiated hair cells. scRNA-Seq of lateral line organs uncovered five different support cell types, including quiescent and activated stem cells. Ordering of support cells along a developmental trajectory identified self-renewing cells and genes required for hair cell differentiation. scRNA-Seq analyses of fgf3 mutants, in which hair cell regeneration is increased, demonstrates that Fgf and Notch signaling inhibit proliferation of support cells in parallel by inhibiting Wnt signaling. Our scRNA-Seq analyses set the foundation for mechanistic studies of sensory organ regeneration and is crucial for identifying factors to trigger hair cell production in mammals. The data is searchable and publicly accessible via a web-based interface.


Subject(s)
Cell Proliferation , Fibroblast Growth Factors/metabolism , Hair Cells, Auditory/cytology , RNA, Small Cytoplasmic/genetics , Receptors, Notch/metabolism , Signal Transduction , Stem Cells/metabolism , Animals , Zebrafish
4.
Genome Biol ; 17(1): 196, 2016 Sep 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27678375

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Drosophila dorso-ventral (DV) patterning is one of the best-understood regulatory networks to date, and illustrates the fundamental role of enhancers in controlling patterning, cell fate specification, and morphogenesis during development. Histone acetylation such as H3K27ac is an excellent marker for active enhancers, but it is challenging to obtain precise locations for enhancers as the highest levels of this modification flank the enhancer regions. How to best identify tissue-specific enhancers in a developmental system de novo with a minimal set of data is still unclear. RESULTS: Using DV patterning as a test system, we develop a simple and effective method to identify tissue-specific enhancers de novo. We sample a broad set of candidate enhancer regions using data on CREB-binding protein co-factor binding or ATAC-seq chromatin accessibility, and then identify those regions with significant differences in histone acetylation between tissues. This method identifies hundreds of novel DV enhancers and outperforms ChIP-seq data of relevant transcription factors when benchmarked with mRNA expression data and transgenic reporter assays. These DV enhancers allow the de novo discovery of the relevant transcription factor motifs involved in DV patterning and contain additional motifs that are evolutionarily conserved and for which the corresponding transcription factors are expressed in a DV-biased fashion. Finally, we identify novel target genes of the regulatory network, implicating morphogenesis genes as early targets of DV patterning. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, our approach has expanded our knowledge of the DV patterning network even further and is a general method to identify enhancers in any developmental system, including mammalian development.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL