Pressure Building Against the Clock: The Impact of Circadian Misalignment on Blood Pressure.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Misalignment between the endogenous biological timing system and behavioral activities (i.e., sleep/wake, eating, activity) contributes to adverse cardiovascular health. In this review, we discuss the effects of recurring circadian misalignment on blood pressure regulation and the implications for hypertension development. Additionally, we highlight emerging therapeutic approaches designed to mitigate the negative cardiovascular consequences elicited by circadian disruption. RECENT FINDINGS: Circadian misalignment elicited by work schedules that require individuals to be awake during the biological night (i.e., shift work) alters 24-h blood pressure rhythms. Mechanistically, circadian misalignment appears to alter blood pressure via changes in autonomic nervous system balance, variations to sodium retention, dysregulation of endothelial vasodilatory responsiveness, and activation of proinflammatory mechanisms. Recurring circadian misalignment produced by a mismatch in sleep timing on free days vs. work days (i.e., social jetlag) appears to have no direct effects on prevailing blood pressure levels in healthy adults; though, circadian disruptions resulting from social jetlag may increase the risk of hypertension through enhanced sympathetic activation and/or obesity. Furthermore, social jetlag assessment may be a useful metric in shift work populations where the magnitude of circadian misalignment may be greater than in the general population. Circadian misalignment promotes unfavorable changes to 24-h blood pressure rhythms, most notably in shift working populations. While light therapy, melatonin supplementation, and the timing of drug administration may improve cardiovascular outcomes, interventions designed to target the effects of circadian misalignment on blood pressure regulation are warranted.

Circadian alignment, cardiometabolic disease, and sex specific differences in adults with overweight/obesity.

OBJECTIVE: Circadian disruption promotes weight gain and poor health. The extent to which sex plays a role in the relationship between the circadian timing of behaviors and health outcomes in individuals with overweight/obesity is unclear. We investigated the sex-specific associations between circadian alignment and cardiometabolic health markers in females and males with overweight/obesity. METHODS: Thirty volunteers with overweight/obesity (15 female; BMI≥25.1kg/m2) underwent an evening in-laboratory assessment for dim-light melatonin onset (DLMO), body composition via dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, and a fasted blood sample. Circadian alignment was determined as the time difference between DLMO and average sleep onset over 7-days (phase angle), with participants categorized into narrow/wide phase angle groups based on median phase angle split. Due to known differences in metabolic markers between sexes, participants were subdivided based on sex into narrow and wide phase angle groups. RESULTS: Males in the narrow phase angle group had higher android/gynoid body fat distribution, triglycerides, and Metabolic Syndrome risk scores, while females had higher overall body fat percentage, glucose, and resting heart rates (all p<0.04). Furthermore, a narrower phase angle in males was negatively associated with android/gynoid body fat (r=-0.53, p=0.04) and negatively associated with body fat (r=-0.62, p=0.01) and heart rate (r=-0.73, p<0.01) in females. CONCLUSION: Circadian disruption may not only promote a trajectory of weight gain but could also contribute to negative health consequences in a sex-dependent manner in those already with overweight/obesity. These data may have implications for clinical utility in sex-specific sleep and circadian interventions for adults with overweight/obesity.