A European multicenter outcome study on the different perioperative airway management policies following midface surgery in syndromic craniosynostosis: a proposal for a Standard Operating Procedure.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative airway management following midface advancements in children with Apert and Crouzon/Pfeiffer syndrome can be challenging, and protocols often differ. This study examined airway management following midface advancements and postoperative respiratory complications. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was performed to obtain information about the timing of extubation, perioperative airway management, and respiratory complications after monobloc / le Fort III procedures. RESULTS: Ultimately, 275 patients (129 monobloc and 146 Le Fort III) were included; 62 received immediate extubation and 162 delayed extubation; 42 had long-term tracheostomies and nine perioperative short-term tracheostomies. Short-term tracheostomies were in most centers reserved for selected cases. Patients with delayed extubation remained intubated for three days (IQR 2 - 5). The rate of no or only oxygen support after extubation was comparable between patients with immediate and delayed extubation, 58/62 (94%) and 137/162 (85%) patients, respectively. However, patients with immediate extubation developed less postoperative pneumonia than those with delayed, 0/62 (0%) versus 24/161 (15%) (P = 0.001), respectively. Immediate extubation also appeared safe in moderate/severe OSA since 19/20 (95%) required either no or only oxygen support after extubation. The odds of developing intubation-related complications increased by 21% with every extra day of intubation. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate extubation following midface advancements was found to be a safe option, as it was not associated with respiratory insufficiency but did lead to fewer complications. Immediate extubation should be considered routine management in patients with no/mild OSA and should be the aim in moderate/severe OSA after careful assessment.

[Effectiveness of resuscitation delivered by Polish paramedics]. / Ocena skutecznosci dzialan resuscytacyjnych wykonywanych przez polskich ratowników.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and skills in BLS and use of automatic external defibrillators (AED) by paramedics from units of the National Fire and Rescue System. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-eight rescuers participated in the study. They included both volunteers and professionals, and were recruited from 40 different rescue organizations. The results were evaluated by experienced physicians, nurses and paramedics, all holders of ALS and BLS-AED instructor diplomas. The following skills were evaluated: initial assessment, ventilation, chest compression, and use of the AED. The quality of the BLS-AED was rated against the professional experience of the rescuers, and the frequency of repetition training. RESULTS: Although theoretical background was rated good, 45% of participants omitted assessment of consciousness. Airway patency and respiration were properly assessed by 82.5% and 72.5% of paramedics respectively, but only 20% could provide adequate rescue breaths to the phantom victims. Circulation was correctly assessed by 65% of participants, but once again, only 34.4% of paramedics could provide adequate chest compression. The results correlated positively with professional experience, based on the number of rescue missions (0-250, mean 4.3, median 1). DISCUSSION: The results proved that despite adequate theoretical knowledge, practical skills of paramedics were poor, due to the inadequate time devoted to practical training and the lack of certificate courses.