A new era in electroencephalographic monitoring? Subscalp devices for ultra-long-term recordings.

Inaccurate subjective seizure counting poses treatment and diagnostic challenges and thus suboptimal quality in epilepsy management. The limitations of existing hospital- and home-based monitoring solutions are motivating the development of minimally invasive, subscalp, implantable electroencephalography (EEG) systems with accompanying cloud-based software. This new generation of ultra-long-term brain monitoring systems is setting expectations for a sea change in the field of clinical epilepsy. From definitive diagnoses and reliable seizure logs to treatment optimization and presurgical seizure foci localization, the clinical need for continuous monitoring of brain electrophysiological activity in epilepsy patients is evident. This paper presents the converging solutions developed independently by researchers and organizations working at the forefront of next generation EEG monitoring. The immediate value of these devices is discussed as well as the potential drivers and hurdles to adoption. Additionally, this paper discusses what the expected value of ultra-long-term EEG data might be in the future with respect to alarms for especially focal seizures, seizure forecasting, and treatment personalization.

Designing next-generation subscalp devices for seizure monitoring: A systematic review and meta-analysis of established extracranial hardware.

Implantable brain recording and stimulation devices apply to a broad spectrum of conditions, such as epilepsy, movement disorders and depression. For long-term monitoring and neuromodulation in epilepsy patients, future extracranial subscalp implants may offer a promising, less-invasive alternative to intracranial neurotechnologies. To inform the design and assess the safety profile of such next-generation devices, we estimated extracranial complication rates of deep brain stimulation (DBS), cranial peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS) and existing subscalp EEG devices (sqEEG), as proxy for future implants. Pubmed was searched systematically for DBS, PNS, RNS and sqEEG studies from 2000 to February 2024 (48 publications, 7329 patients). We identified seven categories of extracranial adverse events: infection, non-infectious cutaneous complications, lead migration, lead fracture, hardware malfunction, pain and hemato-seroma. We used cohort sizes, demographics and industry funding as metrics to assess risks of bias. An inverse variance heterogeneity model was used for pooled and subgroup meta-analysis. The pooled incidence of extracranial complications reached 14.0%, with infections (4.6%, CI 95% [3.2 - 6.2]), surgical site pain (3.2%, [0.6 - 6.4]) and lead migration (2.6%, [1.0 - 4.4]) as leading causes. Subgroup analysis showed a particularly high incidence of persisting pain following PNS (12.0%, [6.8 - 17.9]) and sqEEG (23.9%, [12.7 - 37.2]) implantation. High rates of lead migration (12.4%, [6.4 - 19.3]) were also identified in the PNS subgroup. Complication analysis of DBS, PNS, RNS and sqEEG studies provides a significant opportunity to optimize the safety profile of future implantable subscalp devices for chronic EEG monitoring. Developing such promising technologies must address the risks of infection, surgical site pain, lead migration and skin erosion. A thin and robust design, coupled to a lead-anchoring system, shall enhance the durability and utility of next-generation subscalp implants for long-term EEG monitoring and neuromodulation.

Feasibility, Safety, and Performance of Full-Head Subscalp EEG Using Minimally Invasive Electrode Implantation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Current practice in clinical neurophysiology is limited to short recordings with conventional EEG (days) that fail to capture a range of brain (dys)functions at longer timescales (months). The future ability to optimally manage chronic brain disorders, such as epilepsy, hinges upon finding methods to monitor electrical brain activity in daily life. We developed a device for full-head subscalp EEG (Epios) and tested here the feasibility to safely insert the electrode leads beneath the scalp by a minimally invasive technique (primary outcome). As secondary outcome, we verified the noninferiority of subscalp EEG in measuring physiologic brain oscillations and pathologic discharges compared with scalp EEG, the established standard of care. METHODS: Eight participants with pharmacoresistant epilepsy undergoing intracranial EEG received in the same surgery subscalp electrodes tunneled between the scalp and the skull with custom-made tools. Postoperative safety was monitored on an inpatient ward for up to 9 days. Sleep-wake, ictal, and interictal EEG signals from subscalp, scalp, and intracranial electrodes were compared quantitatively using windowed multitaper transforms and spectral coherence. Noninferiority was tested for pairs of neighboring subscalp and scalp electrodes with a Bland-Altman analysis for measurement bias and calculation of the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: As primary outcome, up to 28 subscalp electrodes could be safely placed over the entire head through 1-cm scalp incisions in a ∼1-hour procedure. Five of 10 observed perioperative adverse events were linked to the investigational procedure, but none were serious, and all resolved. As a secondary outcome, subscalp electrodes advantageously recorded EEG percutaneously without requiring any maintenance and were noninferior to scalp electrodes for measuring (1) variably strong, stage-specific brain oscillations (alpha in wake, delta, sigma, and beta in sleep) and (2) interictal spikes peak-potentials and ictal signals coherent with seizure propagation in different brain regions (ICC >0.8 and absence of bias). DISCUSSION: Recording full-head subscalp EEG for localization and monitoring purposes is feasible up to 9 days in humans using minimally invasive techniques and noninferior to the current standard of care. A longer prospective ambulatory study of the full system will be necessary to establish the safety and utility of this innovative approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04796597.

A randomized, blinded study of photobiomodulation in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease showed no preventive effect.

Photobiomodulation (PBM), the process of exposing tissue to red or near-infrared light, has become a topic of great interest as a therapy for diverse pathologies, including neurodegenerative disorders. Here, we aimed to evaluate the potential beneficial effect of PBM on Alzheimer's disease (AD) using behavioral and histological readouts from a well-established transgenic murine AD model (5xFAD mice) in a randomized and fully blinded long-term in-vivo study following GLP (Good Laboratory Practices) guidelines. The heads of the mice were illuminated with no (sham), low or high power 810 nm light, three times a week for 5 months from the first to the sixth month of life corresponding to the prodromal phase of the pathology. The results showed that there were no significant differences between the groups in behavioral tests, including the Morris water maze, novel object recognition, and Y-maze. Similarly, histological analyses showed no differences in amyloid load, neuronal loss or microglial response. In conclusion, under the conditions of our experiment, we were unable to demonstrate any therapeutic effect of PBM for AD. This study calls for further evidence and caution when considering PBM as an effective treatment for AD.