Antithrombotic Usage, Including Three-Year Outcomes With Dabigatran and Vitamin K Antagonists for Atrial Fibrillation, in Eastern Europe: A Descriptive Analysis From Phase 3 of the GLORIA-AF Registry.

BACKGROUND: Global Registry on Long-Term Oral Antithrombotic Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (GLORIA-AF) is a prospective registry of outcomes from patients with newly diagnosed AF at risk of stroke. In the propensity score (PS)-matched global population of phase 3 GLORIA-AF, at 3 years, dabigatran-treated patients experienced reduced risk for major bleeding, and similar risk for stroke and myocardial infarction, compared with vitamin K antagonist (VKA)-treated patients. STUDY QUESTION: Do patients in Eastern Europe benefit from treatment with dabigatran versus VKA? STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive analysis, without PS matching. To contextualize the Eastern Europe results of GLORIA-AF phase 3, we also descriptively analyzed the global population without PS matching. Consecutive patients with newly diagnosed AF and CHA2DS2-VASc-score ≥1 were enrolled until December 2016 in 38 countries (9 in Eastern Europe). MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: Three-year outcomes with dabigatran and VKA. RESULTS: In Eastern Europe, 1341 patients were eligible (6% of patients globally), and incidence rates (per 100 patient-years) for the following outcomes were numerically lower with dabigatran (N = 498) versus VKA (N = 466): major bleeding (0.26 vs. 0.90), all-cause death (2.04 vs. 3.50), and a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, life-threatening bleeding, and vascular death (1.37 vs. 1.92); stroke was comparable (0.51 vs. 0.50). All incidence rates were numerically lower in Eastern Europe versus the global population for both treatments. Chronic concomitant use of high bleeding risk medications (eg, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories) was lower in Eastern Europe (dabigatran 3.8%, VKA 9.3%) than globally (dabigatran 14.8%, VKA 20.6%) and persistence with dabigatran was higher in Eastern Europe (76%) than globally (64%). CONCLUSIONS: Dabigatran was associated with numerically reduced major bleeding, all-cause death, and cardiovascular (CV) composite, with comparable risk of stroke versus VKA, in Eastern Europe. Limitations of this descriptive analysis include few CV events (n = 11 for stroke, in the dabigatran and VKA groups combined) and a lack of statistical analysis and PS matching, which precludes definitive conclusions; however, the CV outcomes in Eastern Europe were consistent with the beneficial impact of dabigatran versus VKA in the statistically analyzed global population with PS matching.

Total plasma sulfide in congestive heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Hydrogen sulfide (H(2)S) has emerged as a third gaseous transmitter in mammals. In animal models of heart failure, treatment with an H(2)S donor can protect the heart against adverse remodeling and attenuate cardiac dysfunction. The aim was to determine total plasma sulfide in patients with congestive heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Total plasma sulfide was determined in 57 patients on admission to an outpatient clinic or cardiology department. Total plasma sulfide concentrations in these patients was lower compared with a control group (5.32 [2.22, 8.00] µM vs. 8.5 [6.00, 14.00] µM; P = .05). Total plasma sulfide decreased significantly across the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classes (II, 5.84 [4.33, 8.00] µM vs. III, 4.67 [4.00, 7.17] µM vs. IV, 2.67 [2.22, 4.31] µM; P = .001). The total plasma sulfide negatively correlated with pro-BNP (R(2) cubic, 0.692; P = .001) and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (R(2) cubic, 0.569; P = .001). The receiver operating characteristic analysis of the area under the curve for total plasma sulfide as a predictor of mortality was 0.904 (95% CI, 0.822-0.987; P = .001), and of rehospitalization was 0.779 (95% CI, 0.650-0.908; P = .001). Total plasma sulfide was a univariate predictor of mortality (odds ratio, 0.245; 95% CI, 0.108-0.555; P = .001). CONCLUSION: Total plasma sulfide is negatively related to severity of congestive heart failure: it is lowest in NYHA Class IV and in patients with high pro-BNP and high pulmonary artery pressure. Low total plasma sulfide predicts a higher mortality rate.

Analgesic treatment and predictors of satisfaction with analgesia in patients with acute undifferentiated abdominal pain.

UNLABELLED: The objectives of this prospective, observational cohort study were to examine current practice of analgesia in adults with acute abdominal pain presenting to emergency department (ED), to assess patient-physician agreement on pain severity, and to measure patients' satisfaction with pain management. METHODS: Emergency room nurse assessed initial patient's and physician's ranking on a 0-100mm visual analogue scale (VAS) as well as patient's VAS rankings 5min, 15min, and 60min after starting treatment for pain, and on discharge. In patients who received no therapy VAS scores were assessed 5min, 15min, and 60min after initial examination, and on discharge. Patient's satisfaction with pain management on discharge from ED was assessed using a four-point categorical scale in which 1=completely unsatisfied, 2=mostly unsatisfied, 3=mostly satisfied, and 4=completely satisfied. RESULTS: A total of 185 patients were enrolled. Patients' mean initial VAS was higher than physicians' (76+/-20mm, vs. 59+/-20mm, p<0.001). Physician's VAS > or = 60mm was the sole independent predictor of receiving analgesic therapy (p<0.001). On discharge from ED, 111 patients (60%) were predominantly satisfied with analgesia (satisfaction score > or = 3). Drug titration (p=0.026) and decrease in VAS score > or = 20mm between initial and discharge score (p<0.001) independently predicted patients' satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with acute abdominal pain rated pain significantly higher than physicians who's pain estimation in turn tailored analgesia. Only 60% of patients were satisfied with analgesia. Analgesic drug titration and a decrease of > or = 20mm on VAS predicted patients' satisfaction.

Accidental cannabis poisoning in the elderly.

There are two main varieties of Cannabis sativa plant, namely, hemp which is cultivated for fiber and seeds and contains low amounts of psychoactive cannabinoids and the other which is cultivated for the drug cannabis or marijuana. Increasing popularity of hemp food products and alleged beneficial effects of cannabinoids in the drug variety of cannabis might lead to confusion in the lay population and unintentional ingestion of marijuana, as described in this case report. During a workshop on the use of hemp for medicinal purposes, there was a degustation of various hemp food products including also cookies that were brought by one of the attendees. Approximately 1 h after ingestion of cookies, people experienced nausea and vomiting, dizziness, sleepiness and difficulty walking. Twelve people were referred to emergency department, where two were admitted to intensive care because of central nervous system depression. They were all managed with supportive measures and were discharged home without health-related consequences.

General public awareness of heart failure: results of questionnaire survey during Heart Failure Awareness Day 2011.

INTRODUCTION: General public views about heart failure (HF) alone and in comparison with other chronic conditions are largely unknown; thus we conducted this survey to evaluate general public awareness about HF and HF disease burden relative to common chronic disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey during European Heart Failure Awareness Day 2011. People visiting the stands and other activities in 12 Slovenian cities were invited to complete a 14-item questionnaire. RESULTS: The analysis included 850 subjects (age 56 ±15 years, 44% men, 55% completed secondary education or higher). Overall, 83% reported to have heard about HF, 58% knew someone with HF, and 35% believed that HF is a normal consequence of ageing. When compared to other chronic diseases, HF was perceived as less important than cancer, myocardial infarction, stroke and diabetes with only 6%, 12%, 7%, and 5% of subjects ranking HF as number 1 in terms of prevalence, cost, quality of life, and survival. A typical patient with HF symptoms was recognized by 30%, which was comparable to the description of myocardial ischemia (33%) and stroke (39%). Primary care physicians (53%) or specialists (52%) would be primary sources of information about HF. If experiencing HF, 83% would prefer their care to be focused on quality of life rather than on survival (14%). CONCLUSIONS: Many participants reported to have heard about heart failure but the knowledge was poor and with several misbeliefs. Heart failure was perceived as less important than several other chronic diseases, where cancer appears as a main concern among the general public.

Differences between bisoprolol and carvedilol in patients with chronic heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) frequently coexists in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and is a key factor for beta blocker underprescription and underdosing. This study compared effects of bisoprolol and carvedilol in patients with both conditions. METHODS: This was a randomized open-label study, of bisoprolol and carvedilol during initiation and uptitration to target or maximal tolerated dose. Pulmonary function testing, 12-lead electrocardiogram, and N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide were measured at baseline and follow-up. RESULTS: We randomized 63 elderly patients (73 ± 9 years, 81% men, left ventricular ejection fraction 33 ± 7%) with mild to moderate CHF (54% New York Heart Assocation class II) and moderate to severe COPD (76% Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage 2). Target dose was tolerated by 31 (49%) patients and 19 (30%) patients experienced adverse events during follow-up (19% bisoprolol, 42% carvedilol, p = 0.045). Study medication had to be withdrawn in 8 (13%) patients (bisoprolol: 2 due to hypotension, 1 due to bradycardia; carvedilol: 2 due to hypotension and 1 due to wheezing, dyspnoea, and oedema, respectively). Forced expiratory volume in 1(st) second significantly increased in bisoprolol (1561 ± 414 ml to 1698 ± 519 ml, p = 0.046) but not carvedilol (1704 ± 484 to 1734 ± 548, p = 0.44) group. Both agents reduced heart rate (bisoprolol: 75 ± 14 to 68 ± 10, p = 0.007; carvedilol 78 ± 14 to 72 ± 12, p = 0.016) and had no effect on N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide. CONCLUSIONS: Beta blockers frequently caused adverse events, and thus 49% of patients could tolerate the target dose. Bisoprolol induced demonstrable improvement in pulmonary function and caused less adverse events.