Genetic variation in UGT1A1 typical of Gilbert syndrome is associated with unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia in patients receiving tocilizumab.

OBJECTIVE: Tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody to interleukin-6 receptor, was recently approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis. Two patients during clinical development met laboratory, but not clinical, criteria for Hy's law with bilirubin elevations suspected as a result of genetic variation in uridine diphosphoglucose glucuronosyltransferase (UGT1A1) typical of Gilbert syndrome. METHODS: Genotyping of the two cases potentially meeting with Hy's law was performed using commercially available procedures. UGT1A1 single nucleotide polymorphism data were extracted from a genome-wide array database for 1187 patients from tocilizumab trials, and associations of UGT1A1 genotypes with bilirubin elevations were analyzed using logistic regression for associations with baseline and change from baseline in bilirubin levels as continuous variables. RESULTS: Bilirubin elevations were not associated with clinical adverse events. Both patients potentially meeting Hy's law carry homozygous UGT1A1*28 alleles and UGT1A1*60 alleles. UGT1A1*28 and three additional single nucleotide polymorphisms showed odds ratios greater than 25 for associations with elevated bilirubin. The presence of rs6742078 accounted for 32% of the total variance in bilirubin (P=2.2×10). CONCLUSION: Bilirubin increases occurring with tocilizumab appear to be related to anti-inflammatory effects extending to the liver. Thus, in the absence of other signs of hepatic dysfunction, bilirubin elevations after treatment with tocilizumab have a high probability of association with UGT1A1 polymorphism, which should alleviate concerns of serious hepatotoxicity. Our results underscore the value of genotyping in the clinical trial setting to avoid misinterpretations that could lead to terminating development of a promising new agent.

Once-yearly zoledronic acid for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

BACKGROUND: A single infusion of intravenous zoledronic acid decreases bone turnover and improves bone density at 12 months in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. We assessed the effects of annual infusions of zoledronic acid on fracture risk during a 3-year period. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 3889 patients (mean age, 73 years) were randomly assigned to receive a single 15-minute infusion of zoledronic acid (5 mg) and 3876 were assigned to receive placebo at baseline, at 12 months, and at 24 months; the patients were followed until 36 months. Primary end points were new vertebral fracture (in patients not taking concomitant osteoporosis medications) and hip fracture (in all patients). Secondary end points included bone mineral density, bone turnover markers, and safety outcomes. RESULTS: Treatment with zoledronic acid reduced the risk of morphometric vertebral fracture by 70% during a 3-year period, as compared with placebo (3.3% in the zoledronic-acid group vs. 10.9% in the placebo group; relative risk, 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24 to 0.38) and reduced the risk of hip fracture by 41% (1.4% in the zoledronic-acid group vs. 2.5% in the placebo group; hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.83). Nonvertebral fractures, clinical fractures, and clinical vertebral fractures were reduced by 25%, 33%, and 77%, respectively (P<0.001 for all comparisons). Zoledronic acid was also associated with a significant improvement in bone mineral density and bone metabolism markers. Adverse events, including change in renal function, were similar in the two study groups. However, serious atrial fibrillation occurred more frequently in the zoledronic acid group (in 50 vs. 20 patients, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A once-yearly infusion of zoledronic acid during a 3-year period significantly reduced the risk of vertebral, hip, and other fractures. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00049829.)

Development of a clinical workflow tool to enhance the detection of vertebral fractures: accuracy and precision evaluation.

STUDY DESIGN: Image analysis model development. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop a novel clinical workflow tool that uses model-based shape recognition technology to allow efficient, semiautomated detailed annotation of each vertebra between T4 and L4 on plain lateral radiographs. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Identification of prevalent vertebral fractures, especially when not symptomatic, has been problematic despite their importance. There is a recognized need to increase the opportunities to detect vertebral fractures so that clinically beneficial therapeutic interventions can be initiated. METHODS: Radiographs obtained from 165 subjects in the Canadian Multicenter Osteoporosis Study (CaMos) were used to construct a vertebral shape model of the vertebral column from T4 to L4 using a statistical learning technique, as well as to estimate the accuracy and precision of this automated software tool for vertebral shape analysis. Radiographs showing scoliosis greater than 15 degrees were excluded. RESULTS: Vertebral contours defined by 95 points per vertebra, represented by 79,895 points in total, were assessed on 841 individual vertebrae. The mean absolute accuracy error calculated over each vertebra in each test image was 1.06 +/- 1.2 mm. This value corresponded to an average 3.4% of vertebral height. The mean precision error, reflecting interobserver variability, per vertebra of the resulting annotations was 0.61 +/- 0.73 mm. This value corresponded to an average 2.3% of vertebral height. Accuracy and precision error estimates did not differ notably by vertebral level. CONCLUSION: The results of the current study indicate that statistical modeling can provide a robust tool for the accurate and precise semiautomated annotation of vertebral body shape from T4 to L4 in patients who do not have scoliosis greater than 15 degrees . This method may prove useful as a clinical workflow tool to aid the physician in vertebral fracture assessment and might contribute to decision-making about pharmacologic treatment of osteoporosis.

Test-retest reliability of four questionnaires for patients with overactive bladder: the overactive bladder questionnaire (OAB-q), patient perception of bladder condition (PPBC), urgency questionnaire (UQ), and the primary OAB symptom questionnaire (POSQ).

AIMS: This study examined test-retest reliability of four patient-reported outcome measures for patients with overactive bladder (OAB): Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q), Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC), Urgency Questionnaire (UQ), and Primary OAB Symptom Questionnaire (POSQ). METHODS: Patients recruited from urology clinics were scheduled for two visits 2 weeks apart and completed all questionnaires at both visits. A demographic form was completed at Visit 1; and a treatment effect scale was completed at Visit 2. Test-retest reliability was examined among stable patients using intraclass correlations (ICC), Spearman's correlations, paired t-tests, Feldt's statistic, and kappas. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients enrolled (mean age = 66.0 years, 74.5% female), with 46 completing both visits; 35 were classified stable. Statistically significant correlations were present between Visits 1 and 2 (P < 0.05) for all subscales of the OAB-q, UQ, and POSQ. Subscale ICCs were moderate to high (OAB-q > or = 0.83, UQ > or = 0.46, POSQ continuous items > or = 0.68). No significant differences between Visit 1 and 2 were noted, except for the OAB-q symptom bother scale (change of 5.8 points on a 100-point scale). The multi-item subscales of the OAB-q and the UQ demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha > or = 0.83 for all subscales) across both visits. Test-retest reliability of the PPBC was somewhat weaker than the other three measures, but still acceptable for use as a global, single-item outcome measure. CONCLUSIONS: The OAB-q, POSQ, and UQ demonstrated good test-retest reliability, with ICCs roughly equivalent or superior to those previously reported for 7-day micturition diaries. Findings suggest that the four measures examined in this study demonstrate the necessary reproducibility for use as outcome measures for OAB treatments.