ABSTRACT
Infertility, affecting â¼10% of men, is predominantly caused by primary spermatogenic failure (SPGF). We screened likely pathogenic and pathogenic (LP/P) variants in 638 candidate genes for male infertility in 521 individuals presenting idiopathic SPGF and 323 normozoospermic men in the ESTAND cohort. Molecular diagnosis was reached for 64 men with SPGF (12%), with findings in 39 genes (6%). The yield did not differ significantly between the subgroups with azoospermia (20/185, 11%), oligozoospermia (18/181, 10%), and primary cryptorchidism with SPGF (26/155, 17%). Notably, 19 of 64 LP/P variants (30%) identified in 28 subjects represented recurrent findings in this study and/or with other male infertility cohorts. NR5A1 was the most frequently affected gene, with seven LP/P variants in six SPGF-affected men and two normozoospermic men. The link to SPGF was validated for recently proposed candidate genes ACTRT1, ASZ1, GLUD2, GREB1L, LEO1, RBM5, ROS1, and TGIF2LY. Heterozygous truncating variants in BNC1, reported in female infertility, emerged as plausible causes of severe oligozoospermia. Data suggested that several infertile men may present congenital conditions with less pronounced or pleiotropic phenotypes affecting the development and function of the reproductive system. Genes regulating the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis were affected in >30% of subjects with LP/P variants. Six individuals had more than one LP/P variant, including five with two findings from the gene panel. A 4-fold increased prevalence of cancer was observed in men with genetic infertility compared to the general male population (8% vs. 2%; p = 4.4 × 10-3). Expanding genetic testing in andrology will contribute to the multidisciplinary management of SPGF.
Subject(s)
Infertility, Male , Humans , Male , Infertility, Male/genetics , Adult , Exome Sequencing , Steroidogenic Factor 1/genetics , Azoospermia/genetics , Oligospermia/genetics , Mutation , Spermatogenesis/genetics , Cohort StudiesABSTRACT
Although the evolutionary history of the X chromosome indicates its specialization in male fitness, its role in spermatogenesis has largely been unexplored. Currently only three X chromosome genes are considered of moderate-definitive diagnostic value. We aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis of all X chromosome-linked protein-coding genes in 2,354 azoospermic/cryptozoospermic men from four independent cohorts. Genomic data were analyzed and compared with data in normozoospermic control individuals and gnomAD. While updating the clinical significance of known genes, we propose 21 recurrently mutated genes strongly associated with and 34 moderately associated with azoospermia/cryptozoospermia not previously linked to male infertility (novel). The most frequently affected prioritized gene, RBBP7, was found mutated in ten men across all cohorts, and our functional studies in Drosophila support its role in germ stem cell maintenance. Collectively, our study represents a significant step towards the definition of the missing genetic etiology in idiopathic severe spermatogenic failure and significantly reduces the knowledge gap of X-linked genetic causes of azoospermia/cryptozoospermia contributing to the development of future diagnostic gene panels.
Subject(s)
Azoospermia , Infertility, Male , Oligospermia , Azoospermia/genetics , Humans , Infertility, Male/genetics , Male , Spermatogenesis/genetics , X ChromosomeABSTRACT
STUDY QUESTION: Does sperm DNA recover from damage in all men after 2 years from the end of cytotoxic treatments? SUMMARY ANSWER: The current indication of 2 years waiting time for seeking natural pregnancy after cytotoxic treatment may not be adequate for all men, since severe sperm DNA damage is present in a proportion of subjects even after this timeframe. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Data in the literature on sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) in lymphoma patients after cytotoxic treatments are scarce. The largest longitudinal study evaluated paired pre- and post-therapy (up to 24 months) semen samples from 34 patients while one study performed a longer follow-up (36 months) in 10 patients. The median/mean SDF values >24 months after therapy did not show significant differences but the studies did not explore the proportion of patients with severe DNA damage and the analysis was done on frozen-thawed samples. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: In this study, 53 Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and 25 non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) post-pubertal patients were included over a recruitment period of 10 years (2012-2022). Among them, 18 subjects provided paired semen samples for SDF analysis at the three time points. SDF was evaluated in patients before (T0) and after 2 (T2) and 3 years (T3) from the end of, cytotoxic treatments (chemotherapy alone or in combination with radiotherapy). A cohort of 79 healthy, fertile, and normozoospermic men >18 years old served as controls (recruited between 2016 and 2019). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: SDF was evaluated on fresh semen samples (i.e. spermatozoa potentially involved in natural conception) from patients and controls using TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling) assay coupled with flow cytometry. SDF median values were compared between groups: (i) HL and NHL patients versus controls at the three time points; (ii) HL versus NHL patients at baseline; and (iii) patients at T0 versus T2 and T3. Severe DNA damage (SDD) was defined for SDF levels above the 95th percentile of controls (50%) and the proportion of patients with SDD at all time points was established. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: At T0, patients displayed higher median SDF than controls, reaching statistical significance in the NHL group: 40.5% [IQR: 31.3-52.6%] versus 28% [IQR: 22-38%], P < 0.05. Comparing SDF pre-treatment to that post-treatment, HL patients exhibited similar median values at the three time points, whereas NHL showed significantly lower values at T3 compared to T0: 29.2% [IQR: 22-38%] versus 40.5% [IQR: 31.3-52.6%], P < 0.05. The proportion with SDD in the entire cohort at T2 was 11.6% and 13.3% among HL and NHL patients, respectively. At T3, only one in 16 NHL patients presented SDD. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: TUNEL assay requires at least 5 million spermatozoa to be performed; hence, severe oligozoospermic men were not included in the study. Although our cohort represents the largest one in the literature, the relatively small number of patients does not allow us to establish precisely the frequency of SDD at T2 which in our study reached 11-13% of patients. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our data provide further insights into the long-term effects of cytotoxic treatments on the sperm genome. The persistent severe DNA damage after 2 years post-treatment observed in some patients suggests that there is an interindividual variation in restoring DNA integrity. We propose the use of SDF as a biomarker to monitor the treatment-induced genotoxic effects on sperm DNA in order to better personalize pre-conceptional counseling on whether to use fresh or cryopreserved spermatozoa. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by grants from the Istituto Toscano Tumori (ITT), Fondazione Ente Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze, the European Commission-Reproductive Biology Early Research Training (REPROTRAIN). C.K., G.F., V.R., and A.R.-E. belong to COST Action CA20119 (ANDRONET) which is supported by the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (www.cost.eu). The authors declare no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Hodgkin Disease , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Male , Adolescent , Hodgkin Disease/drug therapy , Hodgkin Disease/genetics , Semen , DNA Fragmentation , Spermatogenesis/genetics , Longitudinal Studies , Spermatozoa , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/drug therapy , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/genetics , DNAABSTRACT
Hemochromatosis (HC) is characterized by the progressive accumulation of iron in the body, resulting in organ damage. Endocrine complications are particularly common, especially when the condition manifests in childhood or adolescence, when HC can adversely affect linear growth or pubertal development, with significant repercussions on quality of life even into adulthood. Therefore, a timely and accurate diagnosis of these disorders is mandatory, but sometimes complex for hematologists without endocrinological support. This is a narrative review focused on puberty and growth disorders during infancy and adolescence aiming to offer guidance for diagnosis, treatment, and proper follow-up. Additionally, it aims to highlight gaps in the existing literature and emphasizes the importance of collaboration among specialists, which is essential in the era of precision medicine.
Subject(s)
Growth Disorders , Iron Overload , Humans , Adolescent , Child , Iron Overload/etiology , Growth Disorders/etiology , Growth Disorders/physiopathology , Male , Hemochromatosis/diagnosis , Hemochromatosis/therapy , Female , Gonadal Disorders/etiology , Puberty/physiology , Child, PreschoolABSTRACT
Male infertility is a common condition affecting at least 7% of men worldwide and is often genetic in origin. Using whole exome sequencing, we recently discovered three hemizygous, likely damaging variants in DDB1- and CUL4-associated factor 12-like protein 1 (DCAF12L1) in men with azoospermia. DCAF12L1 is located on the X-chromosome and as identified by single cell sequencing studies, its expression is enriched in human testes and specifically in Sertoli cells and spermatogonia. However, very little is known about the role of DCAF12L1 in spermatogenesis, thus we generated a knockout mouse model to further explore the role of DCAF12L1 in male fertility. Knockout mice were generated using CRISPR/Cas9 technology to remove the entire coding region of Dcaf12l1 and were assessed for fertility over a broad range of ages (2-8 months of age). Despite outstanding genetic evidence in men, loss of DCAF12L1 had no discernible impact on male fertility in mice, as highlighted by breeding trials, histological assessment of the testis and epididymis, daily sperm production and evaluation of sperm motility using computer assisted methods. This disparity is likely due to the parallel evolution, and subsequent divergence, of DCAF12 family members in mice and men or the presence of compounding environmental factors in men.
Subject(s)
Fertility , Infertility, Male , Testis , Animals , Humans , Male , Mice , Factor XII/metabolism , Fertility/genetics , Infertility, Male/genetics , Mice, Knockout , Sperm Motility/genetics , Spermatogenesis/geneticsABSTRACT
Sex hormone concentrations, particularly testosterone, are primary determinants of sex-based differences in athletic and sports performance, and this relationship may inform fair competition and participation for athletes. This article describes the sex-based dichotomy in testosterone and the implications for sex-based differences in individual sports performance, including factors that relate to athletic performance for transgender individuals, and areas of future investigation.
Subject(s)
Athletic Performance , Transgender Persons , Humans , Female , Male , Sex Characteristics , Athletes , TestosteroneABSTRACT
Biomedical science is rapidly developing in terms of more transparency, openness and reproducibility of scientific publications. This is even more important for all studies that are based on results from basic semen examination. Recently two concordant documents have been published: the 6th edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen, and the International Standard ISO 23162:2021. With these tools, we propose that authors should be instructed to follow these laboratory methods in order to publish studies in peer-reviewed journals, preferable by using a checklist as suggested in an Appendix to this article.
Subject(s)
Semen Analysis , Semen , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Semen Analysis/methods , Peer Review , PublishingABSTRACT
The X chromosome is a key player in germ cell development, as has been highlighted for males in previous studies revealing that the mammalian X chromosome is enriched in genes expressed in early spermatogenesis. In this review, we focus on the X chromosome's unique biology as associated with human male infertility. Male infertility is most commonly caused by spermatogenic defects to which X chromosome dosage is closely linked; for example, any supernumerary X chromosome as in Klinefelter syndrome will lead to male infertility. Furthermore, because males normally only have a single X chromosome and because X-linked genetic anomalies are generally only present in a single copy in males, any loss-of-function mutations in single-copy X-chromosomal genes cannot be compensated by a normal allele. These features make X-linked genes particularly attractive for studying male spermatogenic failure. However, to date, only very few genetic causes have been identified as being definitively responsible for male infertility in humans. Although genetic studies of germ cell-enriched X-chromosomal genes in mice suggest a role of certain human orthologs in infertile men, these genes in mice and humans have striking evolutionary differences. Furthermore, the complexity and highly repetitive structure of the X chromosome hinder the mutational analysis of X-linked genes in humans. Therefore, we conclude that additional methodological approaches are urgently warranted to advance our understanding of the genetics of X-linked male infertility.
Subject(s)
Chromosomes, Human, X/genetics , Infertility, Male/genetics , Animals , Genes, X-Linked/genetics , Humans , Male , Mutation/genetics , Spermatogenesis/geneticsABSTRACT
Azoospermia affects 1% of men, and it can be due to: (i) hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction, (ii) primary quantitative spermatogenic disturbances, (iii) urogenital duct obstruction. Known genetic factors contribute to all these categories, and genetic testing is part of the routine diagnostic workup of azoospermic men. The diagnostic yield of genetic tests in azoospermia is different in the different etiological categories, with the highest in Congenital Bilateral Absence of Vas Deferens (90%) and the lowest in Non-Obstructive Azoospermia (NOA) due to primary testicular failure (~30%). Whole-Exome Sequencing allowed the discovery of an increasing number of monogenic defects of NOA with a current list of 38 candidate genes. These genes are of potential clinical relevance for future gene panel-based screening. We classified these genes according to the associated-testicular histology underlying the NOA phenotype. The validation and the discovery of novel NOA genes will radically improve patient management. Interestingly, approximately 37% of candidate genes are shared in human male and female gonadal failure, implying that genetic counselling should be extended also to female family members of NOA patients.
Subject(s)
Azoospermia/diagnosis , Azoospermia/genetics , Genetic Association Studies , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Alleles , Animals , Biomarkers , Chromosome Deletion , Chromosomes, Human, Y , Female , Genetic Testing , Humans , Male , Phenotype , Spermatogenesis/genetics , Exome SequencingABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Azoospermia affects 1% of men and it can be the consequence of spermatogenic maturation arrest (MA). Although the etiology of MA is likely to be of genetic origin, only 13 genes have been reported as recurrent potential causes of MA. METHODS: Exome sequencing in 147 selected MA patients (discovery cohort and two validation cohorts). RESULTS: We found strong evidence for five novel genes likely responsible for MA (ADAD2, TERB1, SHOC1, MSH4, and RAD21L1), for which mouse knockout (KO) models are concordant with the human phenotype. Four of them were validated in the two independent MA cohorts. In addition, nine patients carried pathogenic variants in seven previously reported genes-TEX14, DMRT1, TEX11, SYCE1, MEIOB, MEI1, and STAG3-allowing to upgrade the clinical significance of these genes for diagnostic purposes. Our meiotic studies provide novel insight into the functional consequences of the variants, supporting their pathogenic role. CONCLUSION: Our findings contribute substantially to the development of a pre-testicular sperm extraction (TESE) prognostic gene panel. If properly validated, the genetic diagnosis of complete MA prior to surgical interventions is clinically relevant. Wider implications include the understanding of potential genetic links between nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) and cancer predisposition, and between NOA and premature ovarian failure.
Subject(s)
Azoospermia , Azoospermia/diagnosis , Azoospermia/genetics , Cell Cycle Proteins/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Dissection , Exome/genetics , Humans , Male , Testis , Exome SequencingABSTRACT
PURPOSE: In about 10% of patients affected by Fanconi anemia (FA) the diagnosis is delayed until adulthood, and the presenting symptom in these "occult" FA cases is often a solid cancer and cancer treatment-related toxicity. Highly predictive clinical parameter(s) for diagnosing such an adult-onset cases are missing. METHODS: (1) Exome sequencing (ES), (2) Sanger sequencing of FANCA, (3) diepoxybutane (DEB)-induced chromosome breakage test. RESULTS: ES identified a pathogenic homozygous FANCA variant in a patient affected by Sertoli cell-only syndrome (SCOS) and in his azoospermic brother. Although they had no overt anemia, chromosomal breakage test revealed a reverse somatic mosaicism in the former and a typical FA picture in the latter. In 27 selected SCOS cases, 1 additional patient showing compound heterozygous pathogenic FANCA variants was identified with positive chromosomal breakage test. CONCLUSION: We report an extraordinarily high frequency of FA in a specific subgroup of azoospermic patients (7.1%). The screening for FANCA pathogenic variants in such patients has the potential to identify undiagnosed FA before the appearance of other severe clinical manifestations of the disease. The definition of this high-risk group for "occult" FA, based on specific testis phenotype with mild/borderline hematological alterations, is of unforeseen clinical relevance.
Subject(s)
Azoospermia/genetics , Fanconi Anemia Complementation Group A Protein/genetics , Fanconi Anemia/genetics , Sertoli Cell-Only Syndrome/genetics , Adult , Age of Onset , Azoospermia/blood , Azoospermia/complications , Azoospermia/pathology , Chromosome Breakage , Exome/genetics , Fanconi Anemia/blood , Fanconi Anemia/diagnosis , Fanconi Anemia/pathology , Female , Gene Expression Regulation/genetics , Humans , Male , Mutation , Pedigree , Phenotype , Sertoli Cell-Only Syndrome/blood , Sertoli Cell-Only Syndrome/complications , Sertoli Cell-Only Syndrome/pathology , Testis/metabolism , Testis/pathology , Exome SequencingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although the pathogenic role of metabolically complicated obesity (MCO) in erectile dysfunction (ED), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and male infertility has been widely studied, that of metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) has been poorly investigated. AIM: To assess the role of MHO in the pathogenesis of ED, prediction of MACE, and male reproductive health. METHODS: A consecutive series of 4,945 men (mean age, 50.5 ± 13.5 years) with sexual dysfunction (SD) (cohort 1) and 231 male partners of infertile couples (mean age, 37.9 ± 9.1 years; cohort 2) were studied. A subset of men with SD (n = 1,687) was longitudinally investigated to evaluate MACE. All patients underwent clinical, biochemical, erectile function, and flaccid penile color Doppler ultrasound (PCDU) assessment. Infertile men also underwent scrotal and transrectal ultrasound; semen analysis, including interleukin (IL-) 8; and prostatitis-like symptom assessment. MHO was defined as body mass index >30 kg/m2 with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level >40 mg/dL and absence of diabetes or hypertension. The rest of the obesity sample was defined as MCO. MHO or MCO were compared with the rest of the sample, defined as normal weight (NW) individuals. OUTCOMES: Clinical, biochemical, erectile, and PCDU assessment in MHO, MCO and NW men in both cohorts; longitudinal MACE incidence assessment in cohort 1. RESULTS: In cohort 1, 816 men (16.5%) were obese, 181 (3.7%) were MHO, and 635 (12.8%) were MCO. In cohort 2, 68 men (28.4%) were obese, 19 (8.2%) were MHO, and 49 (21.2%) were MCO. After adjusting for confounders, in both samples, the men with MHO and MCO had lower total testosterone levels and worse PCDU parameters compared with the NW men. However, only MCO men had worse erectile function compared with NW men. In the longitudinal study, both MHO and MCO men independently had a higher incidence of MACE compared with NW men (P < .05 for both). In cohort 2, MHO and MCO men had a larger prostate volume, and MCO men also had higher ultrasound and biochemical (IL-8) features of prostatic inflammation compared with NW men, but no differences in prostatitis-like symptoms or seminal parameters. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: MHO men should be considered at high cardiovascular risk like MCO men and followed-up for erectile dysfunction and prostate abnormalities overtime. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: The study simultaneously examined several endpoints with validated instruments within 2 different male populations, 1 with SD and 1 with infertility. As for limitations, there is no consensus in the scientific community regarding the definition of MHO, and the results are derived from patients with SD or infertility, which could have different characteristics than the general male population. CONCLUSION: MHO is associated with subclinical ED, increased cardiovascular risk, and prostate enlargement. Lotti F, Rastrelli G, Maseroli E, et al. Impact of Metabolically Healthy Obesity in Patients with Andrological Problems. J Sex Med 2019:16;821-832.
Subject(s)
Erectile Dysfunction/etiology , Hypogonadism/etiology , Infertility, Male/etiology , Obesity, Metabolically Benign/complications , Testosterone/deficiency , Body Mass Index , Cohort Studies , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Prostatic Hyperplasia/etiology , Prostatitis/etiology , Scrotum/physiology , Semen AnalysisABSTRACT
Spermatogenesis is a highly complex biological process during which germ cells undergo recurrent rounds of DNA replication and cell division that may predispose to random mutational events. Hence, germ cells are vulnerable to the introduction of a range of de novo mutations, in particular chromosomal aberrations, point mutations and small indels. The main mechanisms through which mutations may occur during spermatogenesis are (i) errors in DNA replication, (ii) inefficient repair of non-replicative DNA damage between cell divisions and (iii) exposure to mutagens during lifetime. Any genetic alteration in the spermatozoa, if not repaired/eliminated, can be passed on to the offspring, potentially leading to malformations, chromosomal anomalies and monogenic diseases. Spontaneous de novo mutations tend to arise and accumulate with a higher frequency during testicular aging. In fact, there is an increased incidence of some chromosomal aberrations and a greater risk of congenital disorders, collectively termed paternal age effect (PAE), in children conceived by fathers with advanced age. PAE disorders are related to well-characterized de novo point mutations leading to a selective advantage on the mutant spermatogonial stem cells that cause a progressive enrichment over time of mutant spermatozoa in the testis.The purpose of this chapter is to provide a summary on the spontaneous genetic alterations that occur during spermatogenesis, focusing on their underlying mechanisms and their consequences in the offspring.
Subject(s)
Adult Germline Stem Cells , Congenital Abnormalities , Mutation , Paternal Age , Spermatogenesis , Congenital Abnormalities/etiology , Congenital Abnormalities/genetics , Humans , Male , Spermatogenesis/genetics , Spermatozoa , TestisSubject(s)
Genetics , Infertility, Male/genetics , Molecular Biology/methods , Spermatogenesis , Humans , MaleABSTRACT
STUDY QUESTION: Does the sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) improve depending on the FSH receptor (FSHR) genotype as assessed by the nonsynonymous polymorphisms rs6166 (p.N680S) after 3 months of recombinant FSH treatment in men with idiopathic infertility? SUMMARY ANSWER: FSH treatment significantly improves sperm DFI only in idiopathic infertile men with the p.N680S homozygous N FSHR. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: FSH, fundamental for spermatogenesis, is empirically used to treat male idiopathic infertility and several studies suggest that DFI could be a candidate predictor of response to FSH treatment, in terms of probability to conceive. Furthermore, it is known that the FSHR single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs6166 (p.N680S) influences ovarian response in women and testicular volume in men. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE AND DURATION: A multicenter, longitudinal, prospective, open-label, two-arm clinical trial was performed. Subjects enrolled were idiopathic infertile men who received 150 IU recombinant human FSH s.c. every other day for 12 weeks and were followed-up for a further 12 weeks after FSH withdrawal. Patients were evaluated at baseline, at the end of treatment and at the end of follow-up. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Eighty-nine men with idiopathic infertility carrier of the FSHR p.N680S homozygous N or S genotype, FSH ≤ 8 IU/l and DFI >15%, were enrolled. A total of 66 patients had DFI analysis completed on at least two visits. DFI was evaluated in one laboratory by TUNEL/PI (propidium iodide) assay coupled to flow cytometry, resolving two different fractions of sperm, namely the 'brighter' and 'dimmer' sperm DFI fractions. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Thirty-eight men (57.6%) were carriers of the p.N680S homozygous N and 28 (42.4%) of the homozygous S FSHR. Sperm concentration/number was highly heterogeneous and both groups included men ranging from severe oligozoospermia to normozoospermia. Total DFI was significantly lower at the end of the study in homozygous carriers of the p.N680S N versus p.N680S S allele (P = 0.008). Total DFI decreased significantly from baseline to the end of the study (P = 0.021) only in carriers of the p.N680S homozygous N polymorphism, and this decrease involved the sperm population containing vital sperm (i.e. brighter sperm) (P = 0.008). The dimmer sperm DFI fraction, including only nonvital sperm, was significantly larger in p.N680S S homozygous patients than in homozygous N men (P = 0.018). Total DFI was inversely related to total sperm number (P = 0.020) and progressive sperm motility (P = 0.014). When patients were further stratified according to sperm concentration (normoozospermic versus oligozoospermic) or -211G>T polymorphism in the FSHB gene (rs10835638) (homozygous G versus others), the significant improvement of sperm DFI in FSHR p.N680S homozygous N men was independent of sperm concentration and associated with the homozygous FSHB -211G>T homozygous G genotype. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The statistical power of the study is 86.9% with alpha error 0.05. This is the first pharmacogenetic study suggesting that FSH treatment induces a significant improvement of total DFI in men carriers of the p.N680S homozygous N FSHR; however, the results need to be confirmed in larger studies using a personalized FSH dosage and treatment duration. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The evaluation of sperm DFI as a surrogate marker of sperm quality, and of the FSHR SNP rs6166 (p.N680S), might be useful to predict the response to FSH treatment in men with idiopathic infertility. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The study was supported by an unrestricted grant to M.S. and H.M.B. from Merck Serono that provided the drug used in the study. MS received additional grants from Merck Serono and IBSA as well as honoraria from Merck Serono. The remaining authors declare that no conflicts of interest are present. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT number 2010-020240-35.
Subject(s)
DNA Fragmentation/drug effects , Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human/pharmacology , Infertility, Male/drug therapy , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Receptors, FSH/genetics , Adult , Alleles , Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human/therapeutic use , Genotype , Humans , Infertility, Male/genetics , Male , Pharmacogenomic Testing , Sperm Motility/drug effects , Spermatogenesis/genetics , Spermatozoa/drug effects , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Male infertility is a multifactorial complex disease with highly heterogeneous phenotypic representation and in at least 15% of cases, this condition is related to known genetic disorders, including both chromosomal and single-gene alterations. In about 40% of primary testicular failure, the etiology remains unknown and a portion of them is likely to be caused by not yet identified genetic anomalies. During the last 10 years, the search for 'hidden' genetic factors was largely unsuccessful in identifying recurrent genetic factors with potential clinical application. The armamentarium of diagnostic tests has been implemented only by the screening for Y chromosome-linked gr/gr deletion in those populations for which consistent data with risk estimate are available. On the other hand, it is clearly demonstrated by both single nucleotide polymorphisms and comparative genomic hybridization arrays, that there is a rare variant burden (especially relevant concerning deletions) in men with impaired spermatogenesis. In the era of next generation sequencing (NGS), we expect to expand our diagnostic skills, since mutations in several hundred genes can potentially lead to infertility and each of them is likely responsible for only a small fraction of cases. In this regard, system biology, which allows revealing possible gene interactions and common biological pathways, will provide an informative tool for NGS data interpretation. Although these novel approaches will certainly help in discovering 'hidden' genetic factors, a more comprehensive picture of the etiopathogenesis of idiopathic male infertility will only be achieved by a parallel investigation of the complex world of gene environmental interaction and epigenetics.
Subject(s)
Epigenomics , Infertility, Male/genetics , Spermatogenesis/genetics , Humans , Male , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Modern society is witnessing a widespread tendency to postpone parenthood due to a number of socioeconomic factors. This ever-increasing trend relates to both women and men and raises many concerns about the risks and consequences lying beneath the natural process of aging. The negative influence of the advanced maternal age has been thoroughly demonstrated, while the paternal age has attracted comparatively less attention. A problematic issue of defining whether advanced paternal age can be considered an independent risk factor, not only for a man's fertility but also for the offspring's health, is represented by the difficulty, linked to reproductive studies, in characterizing the impact of maternal and paternal age, separately. Researchers are now trying to overcome this obstacle by directly analyzing the male germ cell, and emerging data prove this sperm-specific approach to be a valid tool for providing novel insights on the effects of aging on the spermatozoa and, thus, on the reproductive outcome of an aging male. The purpose of this chapter is to summarize most of what is known about the relationship between male aging and changes in the spermatozoa, giving special focus on the events occurring with age at the genomic level.
Subject(s)
Aging/genetics , Genome, Human/physiology , Spermatozoa/metabolism , Aging/metabolism , Animals , Chromosome Aberrations , DNA Damage/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Paternal AgeABSTRACT
Testing for AZoospermia Factor (AZF) deletions of the Y chromosome is a key component of the diagnostic workup of azoospermic and severely oligozoospermic men. This revision of the 2013 European Academy of Andrology (EAA) and EMQN CIC (previously known as the European Molecular Genetics Quality Network) laboratory guidelines summarizes recent clinically relevant advances and provides an update on the results of the external quality assessment program jointly offered by both organizations. A basic multiplex PCR reaction followed by a deletion extension analysis remains the gold-standard methodology to detect and correctly interpret AZF deletions. Recent data have led to an update of the sY84 reverse primer sequence, as well as to a refinement of what were previously considered as interchangeable border markers for AZFa and AZFb deletion breakpoints. More specifically, sY83 and sY143 are no longer recommended for the deletion extension analysis, leaving sY1064 and sY1192, respectively, as first-choice markers. Despite the transition, currently underway in several countries, toward a diagnosis based on certified kits, it should be noted that many of these commercial products are not recommended due to an unnecessarily high number of tested markers, and none of those currently available are, to the best of our knowledge, in accordance with the new first-choice markers for the deletion extension analysis. The gr/gr partial AZFc deletion remains a population-specific risk factor for impaired sperm production and a predisposing factor for testicular germ cell tumors. Testing for this deletion type is, as before, left at the discretion of the diagnostic labs and referring clinicians. Annual participation in an external quality control program is strongly encouraged, as the 22-year experience of the EMQN/EAA scheme clearly demonstrates a steep decline in diagnostic errors and an improvement in reporting practice.
Subject(s)
Andrology , Azoospermia , Infertility, Male , Oligospermia , Sertoli Cell-Only Syndrome , Sex Chromosome Aberrations , Sex Chromosome Disorders of Sex Development , Humans , Male , Semen , Infertility, Male/diagnosis , Infertility, Male/genetics , Infertility, Male/pathology , Azoospermia/diagnosis , Azoospermia/genetics , Azoospermia/pathology , Chromosome Deletion , Oligospermia/diagnosis , Oligospermia/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Y/genetics , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sertoli Cell-Only Syndrome/geneticsABSTRACT
An increasing number of genes are being described in the context of non-syndromic male infertility. Linking the underlying genetic causes of non-syndromic male infertility with clinical data from patients is important to establish new genotype-phenotype correlations. This process can be facilitated by using universal nomenclature, but no standardized vocabulary is available in the field of non-syndromic male infertility. The International Male Infertility Genomics Consortium aimed at filling this gap, providing a standardized vocabulary containing nomenclature based on the Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO). The "HPO tree" was substantially revised compared with the previous version and is based on the clinical work-up of infertile men, including physical examination and hormonal assessment. Some causes of male infertility can already be suspected based on the patient's clinical history, whereas in other instances, a testicular biopsy is needed for diagnosis. We assembled 49 HPO terms that are linked in a logical hierarchy and showed examples of morphological features of spermatozoa and testicular histology of infertile men with identified genetic diagnoses to describe the phenotypes. This work will help to record patients' phenotypes systematically and facilitate communication between geneticists and andrologists. Collaboration across institutions will improve the identification of patients with the same phenotypes, which will promote the discovery of novel genetic causes for non-syndromic male infertility.
Subject(s)
Infertility, Male , Humans , Male , Infertility, Male/diagnosis , Infertility, Male/genetics , Infertility, Male/pathology , Spermatozoa/pathology , Testis/pathology , Phenotype , GenomicsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Obesity negatively impact on the metabolism of sex hormones, leading to reduced testosterone serum levels. However, how the obesity could negatively impact on the overall gonadal function, particularly on male fertility, remained unclear so far. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review evidences regarding the influence of body weight excess on the sperm production. METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted, searching all prospective and retrospective observational studies reporting male subjects older than 18 years old, with body weight excess from overweight to severe obesity were considered. Only studies using the V edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) manual for semen analysis interpretation were considered. No specific interventions were considered. Search was focused on studies comparing overweight/obese to normal weight subjects. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies were considered. Total sperm count and sperm progressive motility were significantly lower in overweight compared to normal weight subjects. Meta-regression analyses demonstrated that patients' age impacted on sperm parameters. Similarly, obese men showed lower sperm concentration, total sperm number, progressive and total motilities, and normal morphology lower than normal weight subjects. Reduced sperm concentration in obese men was influenced by age, smoking habit, varicocele, and total testosterone serum levels at meta-regression analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The male potential fertility is reduced in subjects with increased body weight, compared to normal weight men. The higher was the increased body weight, the worst was the sperm quantity/quality. This result comprehensively included obesity among non-communicable risk factor for male infertility, shedding new lights on the negative impact of increased body weight on overall gonadal function.