ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Few objective measures are available for assessing the success of facial rejuvenation after face lift surgery. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) may be used for this type of measurement. The purpose of this investigation is to use artificial intelligence (AI) via CNNs to objectively classify patient photos by age before and after aesthetic surgery. Uniquely, men and patients undergoing deep plane face lifts were included. METHODS: A CNN (FaceX) was used for facial age recognition and age estimation. Patient photos were analyzed preoperatively, and at three (PO1) and 12 months (PO2) postoperatively. The study population included male and female patients who underwent facial rejuvenation at our institution from 2017 to 2021. Patient photos were collected with the same camera, distance, and lighting. RESULTS: 226 patients were analyzed with a mean true age of 62.2 (SD 6.7) years. The AI estimated the mean preoperative age to be 64.7 (SD 10.4) years. The AI was 96.0 % accurate. Across all subjects, a 3.5-year, 5 % reduction in age (p ≤ 0.001) was attributed at PO1, and a 1.7 year, 3 % age reduction (p = 0.034) at PO2. No single ancillary procedure or technique conferred more benefit than others. The 15 males had a 2.0 year, 4 % age reduction (p = 0.06) at PO1. CONCLUSION: AI can be used to objectively measure the success of facelift surgery and compare outcomes among rhytidectomy techniques. Additionally, multiple, different approaches were effective with no single approach being superior. As AI continues to rapidly advance, more accurate models may be developed for multiple applications in facial plastic surgery.
Subject(s)
Plastic Surgery Procedures , Rhytidoplasty , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Artificial Intelligence , Rejuvenation , Rhytidoplasty/methods , EstheticsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To investigate the association between great auricular nerve (GAN) sacrifice during parotidectomy and postoperative sensory disturbance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent parotidectomy between November 2016 and May 2020 at a single academic institution were included in this retrospective chart review. Operative notes were reviewed to determine incidence of GAN sacrifice. Prevalence of patient-reported sensory complaints in the GAN distribution and time to spontaneous resolution of symptoms were assessed. RESULTS: Of 305 parotidectomy patients, 111 (36.4%) endorsed complaints of postoperative sensory disturbances in the GAN distribution typically characterized by numbness or shooting pains. GAN sacrifice was present in 9 (8.1%) of 111 patients who experienced sensory disturbances compared to 9 (4.6%) who reported no sensory disturbances (p > 0.05). Twenty-five patients (32.5%) experienced spontaneous resolution of symptoms at their most recent follow-up at a mean of 6.2 months after onset of symptoms. Of those that experienced a sensory disturbance, GAN preservation was not significantly associated with likelihood of spontaneous recovery (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We report the largest series to date of post-operative sensory disturbance in parotidectomy patients as it relates to intraoperative GAN sacrifice. Although the relationship between GAN sacrifice and the incidence of postoperative sensory disturbance and its subsequent resolution were not significant, we continue to advocate for GAN preservation to reduce incidence of postoperative sensory disturbances.
Subject(s)
Parotid Gland , Parotid Neoplasms , Humans , Hypesthesia , Parotid Gland/innervation , Parotid Gland/surgery , Parotid Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Sensation Disorders/epidemiology , Sensation Disorders/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Reconstruction after parotidectomy can include fat grafting, which allows for symmetry, but grafts have demonstrated volume loss over time. OBJECTIVES: To provide quantitative evidence for the rate of volume loss of fat grafts. METHODS: Patients who received parotidectomy with fat graft reconstruction at a single institution from August 2016 to October 2020 were identified. Relationships between clinical factors and the logarithmic rate of fat graft volume loss were analyzed. RESULTS: Twelve patients received parotidectomy, fat graft reconstruction, and underwent a postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. Rate of fat graft volume loss was a mean of 1.8% per month (standard deviation [SD]: 2.1% per month). Total parotid fat graft volume loss was a mean of 57.4% (SD: 67.5%). The mean follow-up time was 35.5 months (range: 9-89.8 months). Correlations between body mass index (BMI), history of smoking, and history of alcohol consumption and logarithmic rates of fat graft volume loss were increased but not significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Fat grafts have the potential of 60% volume loss at approximately 1 year. If there is clinical suspicion that patients will require adjuvant radiation or have clinical factors such as a smoking or alcohol-use history, volume requirements may be even greater to maintain adequate parotid volume for aesthetic purposes.
Subject(s)
Plastic Surgery Procedures , Esthetics, Dental , Humans , Parotid Gland/diagnostic imaging , Parotid Gland/surgery , Postoperative Period , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
The ultrasonic bone aspirator (UBA) allows for precision and provides ease of use in multiple steps of cosmetic and functional rhinoplasties. Its use has previously been described; however, since the publication of many studies the UBA has been improved and its applications for rhinoplasty have been modified and expanded. Both bony and cartilaginous modifications to the nose can be aided with the use of the UBA. From our experience, patient results have subjectively been found to be more acceptable, if not better, than with the use of other rhinoplasty instruments.
Subject(s)
Rhinoplasty , Ultrasonic Therapy , Cartilage/transplantation , Humans , Nose/surgery , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine how current temporomandibular joint (TMJ) reconstruction methods affect functional outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective review from January 2006 to July 2017 at a single tertiary care center. All patients who underwent mandibulectomy with subsequent reconstruction with vascularized free tissue were included in the study. Condylar segments were reconstructed with vascularized free tissue flap in conjunction with autologous tissue or allograft in the joint space. Preoperative, 3â¯month, 1â¯year, and 2â¯year postoperative records were assessed for trismus, need for tube feeds, and Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS). RESULTS: Joint space was reconstructed with autologous tissue (nâ¯=â¯10), allograft (nâ¯=â¯15) or both (nâ¯=â¯9). At three months, FOIS scores significantly decreased from 5.4 preoperatively to 4.8 post operatively (Pâ¯=â¯.024) and need for tube feeds significantly increased from 15.8% preoperatively to 35.1% (Pâ¯≤0.027). Trismus significantly decreased from 63.2% to 27% (Pâ¯=â¯.006). At one-year, there were no significant changes in functional status compared to pre-operative state. Patients who had previous RT had significantly worse FOIS scores preoperatively (pâ¯=â¯.002), at three months (pâ¯<â¯.001), one year (pâ¯<â¯.001), and two years (pâ¯=â¯.008). There was no significant difference in postoperative functional status of patients based on the method of TMJ reconstruction. CONCLUSION: Reconstruction of the TMJ with vascularized free tissue is a viable option and yields acceptable long-term outcomes. While functional status may improve or worsen in the immediate postoperative period, long term results mirror preoperative function. Preoperative trismus will likely improve. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3; Retrospective Comparative Study.
Subject(s)
Bone Transplantation/methods , Mandibular Osteotomy/methods , Mouth Neoplasms/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Surgical Flaps/transplantation , Temporomandibular Joint/surgery , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Recovery of Function , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Statistics, Nonparametric , Tertiary Care Centers , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The objective of the study was to evaluate the clinical safety of endoscopic browlift alone or in combination with blepharoplasty as a treatment for the aging face. This is a retrospective comparative study from 2007 to 2016 at a single tertiary care center. A consecutive sample of patients undergoing surgery for aging of the upper face was included in the study. Surgeries deemed to be inclusive were endoscopic browlift, upper blepharoplasty, and lower blepharoplasty. In total, 46 patients undergoing endoscopic browlift with concurrent blepharoplasty were included. Patient demographics, past medical history, follow-up, and any complications related to their surgery were studied up to 90 months postoperatively. Combination of endoscopic browlift with blepharoplasty did not increase the risk of complications on univariate analysis (p = 0.735). There were no differences in complication rates on univariate analysis of patients with a smoking history, diabetes, or autoimmune disease (p = 0.111, p = 0.575, p > 0.999, respectively). Furthermore, there was no difference between groups in complication rates, smoking history, diabetes, or autoimmune disease (p = 0.735, p = 0.181, p = 0.310, p = 0.218, respectively). Smoking had an insignificant increased risk of complication as compared with nonsmokers on multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR] = 4.526; p = 0.073). Increasing age was slightly associated with fewer complications on multivariate analysis in this patient cohort (OR = 0.939; p = 0.048). By combining endoscopic browlift with a concomitant blepharoplasty, the goals of the patient and the standards of the surgeon can be effectively and safely achieved. Analysis of complications from 46 combined cases at our institution asserts that this is a safe operation. Smoking status was the only observed predictor for postoperative complications. This was a level of evidence 3, retrospective comparative study.
Subject(s)
Blepharoplasty , Rhytidoplasty , Blepharoplasty/adverse effects , Eyebrows , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Rhytidoplasty/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Esophageal defects can result from primary pathologies such as malignancy or stricture, or secondary ones such as perforation due to trauma or iatrogenic injury. Techniques, management, and outcomes of reconstruction in this setting are poorly understood. Herein, we aim to highlight surgical outcomes in patients undergoing local and free flap reconstruction of esophageal defects in the setting of an intact larynx. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients who underwent esophageal reconstruction with an intact larynx between 2009 and 2022 at our institution was performed. RESULTS: Ten patients met inclusion criteria. Esophageal reconstruction was performed for extruded spinal hardware (n = 8), and esophageal stricture (n = 2). Four patients underwent reconstruction with free tissue transfer, and six with local pedicled flaps. There were no cases of flap failure, esophageal fistula, hematoma, or wound dehiscence. One patient had post-operative bleeding requiring return to the operating room. Three patients had a postoperative wound infection, two of whom required washout. There were no unplanned 30-day readmissions. At three months after operation, all patients who were not tube feed-dependent prior to surgery returned to oral intake. Of the four patients who were tube feed-dependent preoperatively, three were tolerating oral intake at nine months postoperatively. Nine patients (90%) had stable flexible laryngoscopy exams pre- and postoperatively with no voice changes. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction of esophageal defects in the setting of an intact larynx can be challenging. In this series, surgical intervention with free tissue transfer and local pedicled flaps was effective in returning patients to oral intake with low long-term morbidity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:1227-1233, 2024.
Subject(s)
Free Tissue Flaps , Larynx , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Humans , Surgical Flaps/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/adverse effects , Esophagus/surgery , Surgical Wound Infection , Larynx/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Free Tissue Flaps/surgeryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To identify practices in microvascular techniques in routine and challenging scenarios. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: A national survey addressing practices related to microvascular free flap reconstruction was distributed to AHNS members between October and November 2021. RESULTS: The respondents encompassed 95 microvascular surgeons. Median years of practice was 6 (interquartile range, 2-13) and median flaps per year was 35 (22-50). Common practices in arterial anastomosis included limited cleaning of artery (84.2%), use of a double approximating clamp (64.2%), and use of interrupted suture (88.4%). Common practices in venous anastomosis included limited cleaning (89.5%), downsizing the coupler (53.7%), and coupling to two independent venous systems (47.4%). In arterial anastomosis, respondents felt that kinking (50.5%) and tension (24.2%) were the riskiest challenges. Kinking was handled by loose sutures or native tissue/dissolvable biomaterial to orient pedicle. Excess tension was handled by additional dissection. With regards to associated practices, most surgeons perform anastomosis after partial inset (52.6%), give aspirin immediately postoperatively (66.3%), reserve transfusion for hemodynamic instability (69.5%), and utilize intraoperative pressors when needed (72.6%). More senior surgeons reported placing more suture to address leaks (p = 0.004) and perform end to side anastomosis on larger vein in case of venous mismatch (p = 0.012). In cases of tension, higher volume surgeons perform more extensive dissection (p = 0.035) and end to side coupling (p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: This survey of AHNS members indicates patterns of microvascular techniques in routine and challenging scenarios. There exists a variation in approaches amongst surgeons based on volume and practice length. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 Laryngoscope, 134:1265-1277, 2024.
Subject(s)
Free Tissue Flaps , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Surgical Flaps/blood supply , Vascular Surgical Procedures , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , Microsurgery , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Background: ChatGPT and Google Bard™ are popular artificial intelligence chatbots with utility for patients, including those undergoing aesthetic facial plastic surgery. Objective: To compare the accuracy and readability of chatbot-generated responses to patient education questions regarding aesthetic facial plastic surgery using a response accuracy scale and readability testing. Method: ChatGPT and Google Bard™ were asked 28 identical questions using four prompts: none, patient friendly, eighth-grade level, and references. Accuracy was assessed using Global Quality Scale (range: 1-5). Flesch-Kincaid grade level was calculated, and chatbot-provided references were analyzed for veracity. Results: Although 59.8% of responses were good quality (Global Quality Scale ≥4), ChatGPT generated more accurate responses than Google Bard™ on patient-friendly prompting (p < 0.001). Google Bard™ responses were of a significantly lower grade level than ChatGPT for all prompts (p < 0.05). Despite eighth-grade prompting, response grade level for both chatbots was high: ChatGPT (10.5 ± 1.8) and Google Bard™ (9.6 ± 1.3). Prompting for references yielded 108/108 of chatbot-generated references. Forty-one (38.0%) citations were legitimate. Twenty (18.5%) provided accurately reported information from the reference. Conclusion: Although ChatGPT produced more accurate responses and at a higher education level than Google Bard™, both chatbots provided responses above recommended grade levels for patients and failed to provide accurate references.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction (HNFFR) may have significant change to their baseline functional status requiring inpatient rehabilitation (IPR) after discharge. We sought to identify patient/procedure characteristics predictive of discharge destination. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective HNFFR between July 2017 and July 2022 were reviewed for discharge destination. Those discharged to IPR versus home were compared across patient/procedure characteristics and physical/occupational therapy metrics. Significance was assessed via bivariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Of the 531 patients, 102 (19.2%) required IPR postoperatively. Patients discharged to IPR versus home were significantly older (70.1 [11.6] vs. 64.1 [13.1] years; p < 0.001) and more likely to lack family assistance (26.5% vs. 8.6%; p < 0.001), require baseline assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs) (31.4% vs. 9.8%; p < 0.001), have baseline cognitive dysfunction (15.7% vs. 6.1%; p = 0.001), were more likely to have neoplasm as the surgical indication for HNFFR (89.2% vs. 80.0%; p = 0.033) and more likely to have a tracheostomy postop (62.7% vs. 51.7%), and had a significantly longer length of stay (11.2 [8.0] vs. 6.8 [8.3] days; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in gender, donor site, use of tube feeds, and use of assistive devices between the two groups. Following logistic regression, the strongest predictors of discharge to IPR include lack of family assistance (OR = 3.8; p < 0.001) and baseline assistance for ADLs (OR = 4.0, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Certain patient factors predict the need for discharge to rehab after HNFFR. Perioperative identification of these factors may facilitate patient counseling and discharge planning with potential to reduce hospital length of stay and further optimize patient care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III Laryngoscope, 134:2721-2725, 2024.
Subject(s)
Free Tissue Flaps , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Patient Discharge , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Humans , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Retrospective Studies , Activities of Daily Living , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To examine the etiology, surgical extent and techniques, complications, and outcomes of microvascular free flaps (MFF) in the reconstruction of orbitocraniofacial defects. DESIGN: A retrospective, institutional review board approved study was performed of all patients undergoing MFF to repair orbitocraniofacial defects over 51 months. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-eight patients undergoing MFF to repair orbitocraniofacial defects were included. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Variables analyzed included demographics, etiology, resection area(s), donor site, flap size, duration of surgery, complications, length of hospital stay, flap survival, and mortality. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients underwent 61 MFFs from June 2007 to September 2011. The majority of patients were white (79.3%) and male (72.4%). The mean age was 64.1 years. The most common etiology was intraorbital and skull base extension of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (29.3%) followed by sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (13.8%). Dura and/or brain were exposed in 44.8% of cases. MFFs were harvested from the anteriolateral thigh in 71.4% of cases with a 180.9 cm(2) mean flap area. The mean length of hospital stay was 15.3 days and mean length of surgical time was 11 h and 17 min. CONCLUSIONS: Complex orbitocraniofacial defects require a multi-disciplinary team skilled in surgical extirpation and advanced reconstructive techniques. MFF should be considered in the management of large defects, especially when there is dura or brain exposure. Intensive postoperative monitoring is indicated for both systemic and flap-related complications. MMFs provide excellent coverage of large areas of exposed critical skull base structures, including dura and brain, and may allow for earlier adjuvant treatment.
Subject(s)
Facial Neoplasms/surgery , Free Tissue Flaps , Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures , Orbital Neoplasms/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Free Tissue Flaps/blood supply , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Orbital defects have a profound impact on orbital function and symmetry of the face and are difficult to reconstruct given the complexity of this area. The paramedian forehead flap (PMFF) has not been well studied in reconstruction of orbital defects. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients who underwent reconstruction of periorbital defects with PMFF between 2016 and 2021. Variables were ocular adnexal asymmetry, functional outcomes, and orbital complications. RESULTS: Eighteen patients met inclusion criteria. Mean defect size was 11.1 ± 7.5 cm. The most common subsite involved was medial canthus in 88.9% of patients. There was no statistically significant difference between mean medial canthus to midline ratio and mean medial brow to midline ratio when compared to the assumed normal of 1. The medial canthus to pupil ratio and medial canthus to lateral canthus ratio had a statistically significant mean difference from 1.0 (p = 0.003 for both). In 22.2% of patients, the orbit was functional with impairment; the remaining had no impairment. Surgical sequelae occurred in 12/18 (66.7%) of patients, most commonly epiphora in 9/18 (50%) of patients, and ectropion in 5/18 (27.7%). CONCLUSION: The PMFF is feasible for medial periorbital reconstruction with acceptable functional and symmetrical outcomes and low morbidity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 133:2584-2589, 2023.
Subject(s)
Plastic Surgery Procedures , Surgical Flaps , Humans , Surgical Flaps/surgery , Forehead/surgery , Face/surgery , Eyelids/surgeryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the difference in recovery when comparing total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) to inhalational gas anesthesia in patients receiving rhinoplasty. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Postoperative anesthesia care unit (PACU). METHODS: Patients who received a functional or cosmetic rhinoplasty at a single academic institution between April 2017 and November 2020 were included. Inhalational gas anesthesia was in the form of sevoflurane. Phase I recovery time, which was defined as the time it took a patient to reach ≥9/10 on the Aldrete scoring system was recorded, as well as the usage of pain medication in the PACU. The postoperative course and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were also collected. RESULTS: Two hundred and two patients were identified with 149 (73.76%) who received TIVA and 53 (26.24%) who received sevoflurane. For the patients who received TIVA, the average recovery time was 101.44 minutes (standard deviation [SD]: 34.64) compared to an average recovery time of 121.09 minutes (SD: 50.19) for patients who received sevoflurane leading to a difference of 19.65 minutes (p = 0.002). Patients who received TIVA experienced less PONV (p = 0.001). There were no differences in the postoperative course including surgical or anesthesia complications, postoperative complications, hospital or Emergency Department admissions, or administration of pain medication (p > 0.05 for all). CONCLUSION: When utilizing TIVA over inhalational anesthesia, patients undergoing rhinoplasty had significantly increased benefits in terms of reduced phase I recovery times and decreased incidence of PONV. TIVA was demonstrated to be a safe and efficacious method of anesthesia for this patient population.
Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , Propofol , Rhinoplasty , Humans , Sevoflurane , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/epidemiology , Anesthetics, Intravenous , Anesthesia, Intravenous/methods , Anesthesia, General , PainABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: For difficult or rare procedures, simulation offers an opportunity to provide education and training. In developing an adequate model to utilize in simulation, 3D printing has emerged as a useful technology to provide detailed, accessible, and high-fidelity models. Nasal osteotomy is an essential step in many rhinoplasty surgeries, yet it can be challenging to perform and difficult to receive adequate exposure to this nuanced portion of the procedure. As it currently stands, there are limited opportunities to practice nasal osteotomy due to the reliance on cadaveric bones, which are expensive, difficult to obtain, and require appropriate facilities and personnel. While previous designs have been developed, these models leave room for improvement in printing efficiency, cost, and material performance. This manuscript aims to describe the methodology for the design of an updated nasal osteotomy training model derived from anatomic data and optimized for printability, usability, and fidelity. Additionally, an analysis of multiple commercially available 3D printing materials and technologies was conducted to determine which offered superior equivalency to bone. METHODS: This model was updated from a first-generation model previously described to include a more usable base and form, reduce irrelevant structures, and optimize geometry for 3D printing, while maintaining the nasal bones with added stabilizers essential for function and fidelity. For the material comparison, this updated model was printed in five materials: Ultimaker Polylactic Acid, 3D Printlife ALGA, 3DXTECH SimuBone, FibreTuff, and FormLabs Durable V2. Facial plastic surgeons tested the models in a blinded, randomized fashion and completed surveys assessing tactile feedback, audio feedback, material limitation, and overall value. RESULTS: A model optimizing printability while maintaining quality in the area of interest was developed. In the material comparison, SimuBone emerged as the top choice amongst the evaluating physicians in an experience-based subjective comparison to human bone during a simulated osteotomy procedure using the updated model. CONCLUSION: The updated midface model that was user-centered, low-cost, and printable was designed. In material testing, Simubone was rated above other materials to have a more realistic feel.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the content and patient educational quality of YouTube videos on facelift surgery for facial rejuvenation. This study investigated the relationship between education quality compared to video content, video metrics, and popularity. METHODS: Two hundred videos were identified across 4 search terms: "facelift surgery," "facelift surgery what to expect," "facelift surgery patient education," and "what is facelift surgery." Unrelated videos, operating room recordings, medical professional lectures, non-English, non-audio, and testimonials were excluded from review. Video quality was assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS) (range: 1-5), modified DISCERN score (range: 5-25), and JAMA Benchmark Criteria (range: 0-4). Secondary outcomes included upload source, video metrics (views, likes, dislikes, duration, days since upload, comments), and Video Power Indexto measure popularity. The first 10 comments on videos were characterized as positive, neutral, or negative. RESULTS: One hundred forty-three videos were excluded (43 did not meet criteria, 100 duplicates), and 57 videos were included. Fifty-five videos (96.5%) were uploaded by private medical practices. Overall video quality was poor across all 3 scoring systems: GQS (2.92 ± 1.14), modified DISCERN (13.03 ± 3.64), and JAMA Benchmark Criteria (1.78 ± 0.52). Popularity positively correlated with JAMA Benchmark Criteria (R = .49, P < .05) but did not correlate with other quality criteria. CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing facelift surgery, there are limited educational videos on YouTube with few videos detailing indications, alternatives, complications, and the postoperative course. YouTube is a growing resource for patient education and opportunities exist for medical institutions to produce higher-quality videos for prospective patients.
Subject(s)
Rhytidoplasty , Social Media , Humans , Prospective Studies , Rejuvenation , Face , Video Recording , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
Nasal osteotomy is one of the most challenging steps of rhinoplasty. Lack of hands-on training and confidence with this procedure adds to the complexity for learners and trainees. As three-dimensional (3D) printing becomes increasingly accessible, simulation on 3D printed models has the potential to address this educational need in a safe, reproducible, and clinically realistic manner. The simulation session described in this communication, which utilized our low-cost, 3D-printed nasal osteotomy ($12.37) task trainer, produced both educational and confidence benefits for trainees. Here we describe the design, organization, curriculum, and pilot data for a 3D-printed nasal osteotomy task trainer for the simulation of endonasal and percutaneous nasal osteotomy.
Subject(s)
Rhinoplasty , Humans , Rhinoplasty/methods , Nose , Osteotomy/methods , Face , Printing, Three-Dimensional , Models, AnatomicABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: To determine if there is a recovery time difference between patients with and without obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) when using total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) compared to volatile gas inhalational anesthesia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: OSA and Non-OSA patients were identified at a tertiary institution between January 2019 and November 2020. Non-OSA patients were defined as those who have not been formerly diagnosed with OSA. A modified STOP-BANG score (MSBS) was performed to screen Non-OSA patients for OSA. Recovery was measured by Phase I recovery time, or time it took a patient to reach ≥9/10 on the Aldrete scoring system. RESULTS: A total of 334 patients were included with 142 in the OSA cohort (59 TIVA, 83 inhalational anesthesia) and 192 in the Non-OSA cohort (119 TIVA, 73 inhalational anesthesia). In OSA patients, there was a 41.29-minute recovery time reduction when using TIVA versus sevoflurane (P < .0001). Non-OSA patients recovered faster than OSA patients when undergoing inhalational anesthesia by 46.76 minutes and TIVA by 18.58 minutes (P < .0001 and P = .0907, respectively). Non-OSA patients with a MSBS < 3 and ≥3 had a shorter recovery time compared to OSA patients when both underwent sevoflurane anesthesia (57.27 minutes, P < .0001 and 56.23 minutes, P = .040, respectively). Non-OSA patients with a MSBS of <3 had a decrease in recovery time of 26.68 minutes when compared to OSA patients who underwent TIVA (P = .0004). CONCLUSIONS: When utilizing TIVA over inhalational anesthesia, patients with OSA have significantly increased benefit in terms of reduced Phase I recovery times as compared to Non-OSA patients.
Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , Propofol , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , Humans , Sevoflurane , Anesthetics, Intravenous , Anesthesia, Intravenous , Anesthesia, General , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosisABSTRACT
Background: The treatment of facial nerve synkinesis remains complex and variable. Objective: To compare oral, palpebral fissure, and brow symmetry among surgical and nonsurgical interventions in patients with facial synkinesis. Methods: Patients with facial nerve synkinesis at a single tertiary care center between 2008 and 2022 were analyzed before and after interventions using Emotrics software. Symmetry was compared among treatment combination groups (chemodenervation and rehabilitation [CR] vs. chemodenervation and surgery [CS] vs. chemodenervation, surgery, and rehabilitation [CSR]) and among surgical intervention groups (selective neurectomy [SN] vs. selective neurectomy with facelift [SnFa] vs. no surgery). Results: Of the 29 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 72.4% were female and the median age was 60.6 years (interquartile range 49.9-67.6). The median follow-up was 32.6 months; patients who received surgery had a greater follow-up time (57.4 months vs. 26.5 months, p = 0.045). The use of a trimodal approach (CSR) was associated with improved symmetry versus CR for smile angle (p = 0.021). Among surgical interventions, the greatest improvement in palpebral fissure symmetry was in patients who received SN versus no surgery (p = 0.039); the greatest improvement in smile angle was in patients who received SnFa versus no surgery (p = 0.008). Conclusion: We recommend a comprehensive approach to the management of facial synkinesis consisting of chemodenervation, rehabilitation, and surgery tailored to each patient's needs.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: First bite syndrome (FBS) is a rare but potentially debilitating complication observed after surgery involving the upper cervical region. Patients classically complain of severe facial pain in the ipsilateral parotid region with the first few bites of a meal. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to shed light on the incidence and potential risk factors of FBS, including a series of cases depicting FBS observed after parotidectomy. METHODS: Retrospective review of 419 patients who underwent parotidectomy at a single tertiary care facility between December 2016 and June 2020. RESULTS: With a mean follow-up time of 16.5 months, 8 (2%) patients were documented to have symptoms of FBS after parotid gland surgery. Six of these patients underwent partial parotidectomy by dissection of the deep lobe of the parotid (DLP). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing dissection of the DLP are particularly at risk for the development of FBS. All patients should be appropriately counseled during informed consent discussions, especially in high-risk cases.
Subject(s)
Mastication , Parotid Neoplasms , Humans , Parotid Gland/surgery , Parotid Region , Syndrome , Retrospective Studies , Facial Pain , Parotid Neoplasms/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: With the global COVID-19 pandemic, nasopharyngeal swabbing has become commonplace and can occasionally cause discomfort, tearing, and anxiety. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether using a neural distraction device during nasopharyngeal swabbing can mitigate patient discomfort. METHODS: Participants were randomized into nasal swab with vibration first (treatment-control or Tc) or nasal swab without vibration first (control-treatment or Ct). Then the swab was repeated with the opposite technique. The vibration device was used to stimulate the infraorbital nerve at the midpupillary line, while a nasopharyngeal swab was performed according to CDC protocol. After each swab, participants filled out a survey to assess pain, discomfort, and tearing. This procedure was replicated on the contralateral nostril for a total of 4 swabs and 4 surveys. RESULTS: Thirty-four subjects were included in the analysis. In the Ct group, there was a median 1.0-point decrease in pain with the use of vibration (95% CI [-1.8, -0.3], P = 0.0117), 2.5-point decrease (95% CI [-3.0, -0.8], P = 00039) in discomfort, and a 1.0-point decrease (95% CI [-2.6, -0.2] P = 0.0303) in tearing when the vibratory device was used. In the Tc group, there was a median 2.0-point decrease in pain with vibration (95% CI [ -2.7, -1.1], P < 0.0001), 2.3-point decrease in discomfort (95% CI [-3.1, -1.5], P < 0.0001), and a 1.5-point decrease in tearing (95% CI [-2.5, -0.5], P = 0.0037) when vibration was used. CONCLUSION: Vibratory stimulation of the infraorbital nerve is safe and effectively reduced pain, discomfort, and tearing during nasopharyngeal swab. Vibration is a reasonable option to minimize patient discomfort during COVID-19 or other microbiological testing.