Influence of aging and gadolinium exposure on T1, T2, and T2*-relaxation in healthy women with an increased risk of breast cancer with and without prior exposure to gadoterate meglumine at 3.0-T brain MR imaging.

OBJECTIVES: We examined the effects of aging and of gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) exposure on MRI measurements in brain nuclei of healthy women. METHODS: This prospective, IRB-approved single-center case-control study enrolled 100 healthy participants of our high-risk screening center for hereditary breast cancer, who had received at least six doses of macrocyclic GBCA (exposed group) or were newly entering the program (GBCA-naïve group). The cutoff "at least six doses" was chosen to be able to include a sufficient number of highly exposed participants. All participants underwent unenhanced 3.0-T brain MRI including quantitative T1, T2, and R2* mapping and T1- and T2-weighted imaging. The relaxation times/signal intensities were derived from region of interest measurements in the brain nuclei performed by a radiologist and a neuroradiologist, both board certified. Statistical analysis was based on descriptive evaluations and uni-/multivariable analyses. RESULTS: The participants (exposed group: 49, control group: 51) were aged 42 ± 9 years. In a multivariable model, age had a clear impact on R2* (p < 0.001-0.012), T2 (p = 0.003-0.048), and T1 relaxation times/signal intensities (p < 0.004-0.046) for the majority of deep brain nuclei, mostly affecting the substantia nigra, globus pallidus (GP), nucleus ruber, thalamus, and dentate nucleus (DN). The effect of prior GBCA administration on T1 relaxation times was statistically significant for the DN, GP, and pons (p = 0.019-0.037). CONCLUSIONS: In a homogeneous group of young to middle-aged healthy females aging had an effect on T2 and R2* relaxation times and former GBCA applications influenced the measured T1 relaxation times. KEY POINTS: The quantitative T1, T2, and R2* relaxation times measured in women at high risk of developing breast cancer showed characteristic bandwidth for all brain nuclei examined at 3.0-T MRI. The effect of participant age had a comparatively strong impact on R2*, T2, and T1 relaxation times for the majority of brain nuclei examined. The effect of prior GBCA administrations on T1 relaxation times rates was comparatively less pronounced, yielding statistically significant results for the dentate nucleus, globus pallidus, and pons. Healthy women with and without previous GBCA-enhanced breast MRI exhibited age-related T2* and T2 relaxation alterations at 3.0 T-brain MRI. T1 relaxation alterations due to prior GBCA administration were comparatively less pronounced.

Assignment of the biological value of solid breast masses based on quantitative evaluations of spectral CT examinations using electron density mapping, Zeffective mapping and iodine mapping.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to asses, in a clinical setting, whether the newly available quantitative evaluation of electron density (ED) in spectral CT examinations of the breast provide information on the biological identity of solid breast masses and whether ED maps yield added value to the diagnostic information of iodine maps and Zeff maps calculated from the same CT image datasets. METHODS: All patients at the University Breast Cancer Center who underwent a clinically indicated Dual Layer Computed Tomography (DLCT) examination for staging of invasive breast cancer from 2018 to 2020 were prospectively included. Iodine concentration maps, Zeff maps and ED maps were automatically reconstructed from the DLCT datasets. Region of interest (ROI) based evaluations in the breast target lesions and in the aorta were performed semi-automatically in identical anatomical positions using dedicated evaluation software. Case-by-case evaluations were carried independently by 2 of 4 radiologists for each examination, respectively. Statistical analysis derived from the ROIs was done by calculating ROC/AUC curves and Youden indices. RESULTS: The evaluations comprised 166 DLCT examinations. In the ED maps the measurements in the breast target lesions yielded Youden cutpoints of 104.0% (reader 1) and 103.8% (reader 2) resulting in AUCs of 0.63 and 0.67 at the empirical cutpoints. The variables "Zeff" and "iodine content" derived from the target lesions showed superior diagnostical results, with a Youden cutpoint of 8.0 mg/ml in the iodine maps and cutpoints of 1.1/1.2 in the Zeff maps the AUCs ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 (p = 0.023 to <0.000). The computational combination of Zeff and ED measurements in the target lesions yielded a slight AUC increase (readers 1: 0.85-0.87; readers 2: 0.84-0.94). The ratios of the measured values in the target lesions normalized to the values measured in the aorta showed comparable results. The AUCs of ED derived from the cutpoints showed inferior results to those derived from the Zeff maps and iodine maps (ED: 0.64 and 0.66 for reader 1 and 2; Zeff: 0.86 for both readers; iodine content: 0.89 and 0.86 for reader 1 and 2, respectively). The computational combination of the ED results and the Zeff measurements did not lead to a clinically relevant diagnostic gain with AUCs ranging from 0.86 to 0.88. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative assessments of Zeff, iodine content and ED all targeting the physical and chemical aspects of iodine uptake in solid breast masses confirmed diagnostically robust cutpoints for the differentiation of benign and malignant findings (Zeff < 7.7, iodine content of <0.8 mg/ml). The evaluations of the ED did not indicate any added diagnostic value beyond the quantitative assessments of Zeff and iodine content. Further research is warranted to develop suitable clinical indications for the use of ED maps.

Evidence-Based and Structured Diagnosis in Breast MRI using the Kaiser Score. / Evidenzbasierte und strukturierte Diagnostik in der MR-Mammografie anhand des Kaiser-Score.

BACKGROUND: Breast MRI is the most sensitive method for the detection of breast cancer and is an integral part of modern breast imaging. On the other hand, interpretation of breast MRI exams is considered challenging due to the complexity of the available information. Clinical decision rules that combine diagnostic criteria in an algorithm can help the radiologist to read breast MRI by supporting objective and largely experience-independent diagnosis. METHOD: Narrative review. In this article, the Kaiser Score (KS) as a clinical decision rule for breast MRI is introduced, its diagnostic criteria are defined, and strategies for clinical decision making using the KS are explained and discussed. RESULTS: The KS is based on machine learning and has been independently validated by international research. It is largely independent of the examination technique that is used. It allows objective differentiation between benign and malignant contrast-enhancing breast MRI findings using diagnostic BI-RADS criteria taken from T2w and dynamic contrast-enhanced T1w images. A flowchart guides the reader in up to three steps to determine a score corresponding to the probability of malignancy that can be used to assign a BI-RADS category. Individual decision making takes the clinical context into account and is illustrated by typical scenarios. KEY POINTS: · The KS as an evidence-based decision rule to objectively distinguish benign from malignant breast lesions is based on information contained in T2w und dynamic contrast-enhanced T1w sequences and is largely independent of specific examination protocols.. · The KS diagnostic criteria are in line with the MRI BI-RADS lexicon. We focused on defining a default category to be applied in the case of equivocal imaging criteria.. · The KS reflects increasing probabilities of malignancy and, together with the clinical context, assists individual decision making.. CITATION FORMAT: · Baltzer PA, Krug KB, Dietzel M. Evidence-Based and Structured Diagnosis in Breast MRI using the Kaiser Score. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; 194: 1216 - 1228.

Possibility to discriminate benign from malignant breast lesions detected on dual-layer spectral CT-evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: Intramammary mass lesions are reportedly present in up to 5.8% of all contrast enhanced CT-examinations of the female chest. We aimed to assess whether their biological relevance can be estimated using spectral CT-datasets. METHODS: In this bicentric retrospective study patients with breast masses visualized on spectral CT-examinations from 07/2017 to 06/2019 were included. Lesions were characterized as malignant or benign based on histology and/or a stable follow-up of >2 years. Conventional CT-images, iodine density-maps, virtual monoenergetic-images (40 keV, 100 keV) and Zeffective-maps were evaluated by two independent readers. Statistical analysis derived from the Regions of interest (ROIs) was done by calculating the Areas under the Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and Youden-indices. RESULTS: 106 breast masses (malignant/benign: 81/25, 76.4%/23.6%) were included. The mean AUCs of the variables "iodine content" (reader 1/2:0.97;0.98), "monoenergetic curve-slope" (0.97;0.96) and "Zeffective" (0.98;0.98) measured in the target lesions (TL) showed superior results compared to those derived from the variable "density" (0.92;0.93) (p < 0.001). The ratios "TL to aorta" calculated for the variables "iodine content", "monoenergetic curve-slope" and "Zeffective" showed superior results compared to normal breast tissue and muscle (p < 0.001). The optimal cutpoint for the "iodine content" in the TL was 0.7-0.9 mg/ml (sensitivity 96.6%, specificity 91.7%). The best diagnostic results were achieved by normalizing the iodine content in the TL to that in the aorta (optimal cutpoint 0.1, sensitivity 95.5%, 98.9%, specificity 91.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary results suggest that spectral CT-datasets might allow to estimate the biological dignity of breast masses detected on clinically indicated chest-examinations.

Image quality of digital direct flat-panel mammography versus an analog screen-film technique using a low-contrast phantom.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to compare the detectability and distinguishability of simulated soft-tissue opacities of 50 variants of an anthropomorphic breast phantom in mammograms acquired with a digital direct flat-panel detector versus an analog system; we also compared the image settings "analog film," "digital film," and "digital monitor." MATERIALS AND METHODS: The studies were performed on digital (Lorad Selenia) and analog (Mammomat 3) mammography systems. Four hundred fifty silicone cubes devised with different randomly distributed columns, holes, or both columns and holes (diameter, 3-7 mm; height, 0.5-4.0 mm) were used as test bodies. One experimental series was performed with a silicone scatter body and one with a silicone and an anthropomorphic ground-meat scatter body. All x-rays were obtained at identical settings and exposures. Four radiologists rated the films and monitor-displayed images independently of each other in randomized order on a standardized electronic questionnaire. RESULTS: The digital monitor technique generally scored better than digital film viewing and analog readings. The McNemar test for multiple paired comparisons mostly yielded a p value of < 0.0005. The smallest volume category counted as the most valid test scenario for all raters, where the percentage of correct positive findings ranged between 30% and 58% (analog technique), 43% and 68% (digital film viewing), and 55% and 66% (monitor viewing). The corresponding accuracy rates were 77-93%, 75-95%, and 81-85%, respectively, with kappa values of 0.2-0.5 (analog) and 0.3-0.6 (digital) for comparing the gold standard with raters' evaluations. CONCLUSION: Digital flat-panel mammography is superior to the analog screen-film method for the detection of simulated opacities.

Image quality of digital direct flat-panel mammography versus an analog screen-film technique using a phantom model.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to compare the detection and distinguishability of microcalcifications on mammograms obtained with a digital direct flat-panel detector versus an analog system using an anthropomorphic breast phantom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Studies were performed with a digital mammography system (Selenia) and an analog mammography system (Mammomat 3). Sixty-five transparent films were used as test specimens. Randomly distributed round and heterogeneous silicate particles (diameter, 100-1,400 microm) and an anthropomorphic scatter body were applied to the films. All radiographs were taken at identical settings and exposures. Six radiologists rated the films and monitor-displayed images independently of each other in random order on a standardized electronic questionnaire. RESULTS: Interpretations based on monitor reading produced superior results over those based on digital image reading and analog film reading. In 41.1% (95% CI, 38.7-43.5%) of all the monitor readings, 20.2% (18.2-22.2%) of all digital images, and 19.6% (17.6-21.6%) of all analog films, the number of detectable microcalcifications agreed with the gold standard method. The diameter of visible microcalcifications was interpreted correctly in 35.6% (33.2-38.0%) of monitor readings, 19.0% (17.1-21.0%) of digital images, and 21.0% (18.9-23.0%) of analog films; and microcalcification shape was interpreted correctly in 53.8% (51.4-56.3%) of monitor readings, 28.2% (26.0-30.4%) of digital images, and 28.3% (26.0-30.5%) of analog films. Microcalcification number and size were underestimated more frequently than overestimated. Regardless of display medium, accuracy increased proportionately with the diameter of the simulated microcalcifications for all evaluation variables. CONCLUSION: Digital flat-panel mammography is superior to the analog screen-film method for the detection and morphologic characterization of microcalcifications larger than 200 microm in diameter when the display medium is a monitor.

Focal Breast Lesions in Clinical CT Examinations of the Chest: A Retrospective Analysis.

Purpose Based on radiological reports, the percentage of breast cancers visualized as incidental findings in routine CT examinations is estimated at ≤ 2 %. In view of the rising number of CT examinations and the high prevalence of breast cancer, it was the goal of the present study to verify the frequency and image morphology of false-negative senological CT findings. Materials and Methods All first contrast-enhanced CT examinations of the chest in adult female patients carried out in 2012 were retrospectively included. A senior radiologist systematically assessed the presence of breast lesions on all CT images using the BI-RADS system. All BI-RADS ≥ 3 notations were evaluated by a second senior radiologist. A consensus was obtained in case of differing BI-RADS assessments. Reference diagnoses were elaborated based on all available clinical, radiological and pathological data. The findings of the CT reports were classified according to the BI-RADS system and were compared with the retrospective consensus findings as well as with the reference diagnoses. Results The range of indications comprised a broad spectrum including staging and follow-up examinations of solid tumors/lymphoma (N = 701, 59.9 %) and vascular (190, 16.2 %), inflammatory (48, 4.1 %) and pulmonologic (22, 1.9 %) issues. BI-RADS 1/2 classifications were present in 92.5 % and BI-RADS 6 classifications were assessed in 1.7 % of the 1170 included examinations. 68 patients (5.8 %) had at least one lesion retrospectively classified as BI-RADS 3 - 5. The histological potential was known in 57 of these lesions as benign (46, 3.9 %) or malignant (11, 0.9 %). 13 BI-RADS 4/5 consensus assessments (1.1 %) were false-positive. 2 of the 10 lesions classified as being malignant based on the further clinical and radiological course were not mentioned in the written CT reports (0.2 %). Both false-negative CT reports were therapeutically and prognostically irrelevant. Conclusion The relative frequency of BI-RADS 3 - 5 findings was 5.8 %. It reflects the situation encountered in clinical imaging for primarily non-senologic questions and therefore differs from what would be expected in a dedicated screening program. The rates of known false-positive BI-RADS 4/5 findings in the retrospective evaluations (1.1 %) and of false-negative findings in the written CT reports (0.2 %) reflect the different diagnostic approaches of image-based senological screening and radiological examinations indicated in order to solve clinical problems not primarily concerning the breast region. Statements regarding the prevalence of clinically occult breast cancers can only be made with caution in the presented, highly selective group of patients due to the often incomplete visualization of breast tissue and the retrospective approach. Key points · Intramammary mass and non-mass lesions needing clarification may be present in up to 5.8 % of all contrast enhanced CT-examinations of the female chest.. · Irregular forms, unscharp/spiculated margins, inhomogeneous matrices and a pronounced contrast medium enhancement point towards a malignant genesis of an intramammary mass or non-mass lesion.. · The results of the study highlight the importance of paying systematical and targeted attention on senological additional findings in CT-examinations of the chest also in other clinical settings than that of the included patients in a clinic with oncological main focus.. Zitierweise · Krug KB, Houbois C, Grinstein O et al. Focal Breast Lesions in Clinical CT Examinations of the Chest: A Retrospective Analysis. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2017; 189: 977 - 988.

Comparison of the Detection Rate of Simulated Microcalcifications in Full-Field Digital Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Synthetically Reconstructed 2-Dimensional Images Performed With 2 Different Digital X-ray Mammography Systems.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the microcalcification detectability in an anthropomorphic phantom model regarding number, size, and shape in full-field digital mammography (FFDM), synthetically reconstructed 2-dimensional (Synthetic-2D) images, and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) performed with 2 different x-ray mammography systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Simulated microcalcifications of different numbers (0 to >39), sizes (diameter, 100-800 µm), and shapes (round vs heterogeneous) were scattered by random distribution on 50 film phantoms each divided in 4 quadrants. The FFDM and DBT x-rays were taken from each of these 50 films with both x-ray mammography systems (SenoClaire; GE Healthcare, Selenia Dimensions, Hologic) using an anthropomorphic scattering body and automatic exposure control. The resulting exposure factors were similar to a clinical setting. The synthetically reconstructed 2D images were generated automatically on both systems. All FFDM, Synthetic-2D, and DBT images were interpreted in randomized order and independently of each other by 6 radiologists using a structured questionnaire. RESULTS: The number categories of simulated microcalcifications were correctly evaluated in 55.3% of instances (quadrant by reader) in FFDM, 50.9% in the Synthetic-2D views, and 59.5% in DBT, summarized for 200 quadrants per reader for each Device A and B, respectively. Full-field digital mammography was superior to Synthetic-2D (mean difference, 4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2%-7%; P < 0.001), and DBT was superior to both FFDM (mean difference, 4%; 95% CI, 2%-7%; P = 0.002) and Synthetic-2D (mean difference, 9%; 95% CI, 6%-11%; P < 0.001). This trend was consistent in all subgroup analyses. The number of the smallest microcalcifications (100-399 µm) was correctly evaluated in 25.2% of the FFDM, in 14.2% for Synthetic-2D, and in 28.3% of the DBT images. Underestimations of the number of simulated microcalcifications were more common than overestimations. Regarding the size categories of simulated microcalcifications, the rates of correct assessments were in 45.4% of instances in FFDM, 39.9% in the Synthetic-2D views, and 43.6% in DBT, summarized for 200 quadrants per reader and both imaging devices. CONCLUSIONS: In the presented in vitro environment using an anthropomorphic phantom model, standard full-field digital x-ray mammography was superior to synthetically reconstructed 2-dimensional images in the detection of simulated microcalcifications. In view of these results, it is questionable whether Synthetic-2D images can replace FFDM in clinical examinations at the present time. Further investigations are needed to assess the clinical impact of the in vitro results.

Impact of clinical and lesion characteristics on the results of MR-guided wire localizations of the breast using an open 1.0-T MRI system.

PURPOSE: Preoperative magnetic resonance (MR)-guided wire localizations are warranted in patients with suspicious focal breast lesions on MR mammographic findings without equivalent in x-ray mammography and ultrasonography. The study was performed to assess the impact of clinical parameters, tumor size, and target localization on the procedural characteristics in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided wire localizations of breast lesions using an open 1.0-T open MR system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The clinical, radiological, and histological characteristics of all 347 patients and all 394 interventional procedures performed in a 6-year interval were extracted from the clinical files. Two board-certified senior radiologists evaluated the impact of target localization and the size on the interventional results in the available 302 image data sets. Patient characteristics, lesion characteristics, and interventional results were statistically correlated in subgroup analyses. RESULTS: A total of 387 of the 394 MR-guided wire localizations (98.2%) were technically successful. In 7 cases (2.3%), the intervention was aborted because the suspicious finding of the diagnostic MR mammography could not be visualized during the intervention. Minor complications occurred in 13 interventions (3.3%). The histological workup of the operative specimen showed benign results in 226 of the 394 interventions (57.4%) and malignant findings in 154 wire localizations (39.1%). The mean (SD) length of the interventional procedure time defined as the time interval between the start of the first and of the last MRI sequence as documented in the electronic MRI data sets was 24.6 (8.4) minutes. Patient age, medical history, and the anticipated risk for developing breast cancer and a simultaneous known carcinoma did not affect the technical success and complication rates and the interventional procedure time. A total of 60 targets (19.5%) were located in the retromamillary zone, 89 targets (28.9%) in the peripheral zone, and 1 target (0.3%) near the chest wall. The maximum diameter was 1 to 5 mm in 64 lesions (21.2%), 6 to 10 mm in 136 lesions (45.0%), 11 to 15 mm in 56 lesions (18.6%), and 16 mm or greater in 46 lesions (15.2%). A total of 23 of the 100 histologically proven invasive carcinomas had a maximum MRI diameter of 1 to 5 mm (23.0%) and 38 (38.0%) of 6 to 10 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance-guided wire localizations of suspicious breast lesions using an open high-field MR system are a clinically safe and feasible method even in small target lesions and anatomical regions that are usually considered difficult to access.

Image quality of digital direct flat-panel mammography versus an indirect small-field CCD technique using a high-contrast phantom.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the detection of microcalcifications on mammograms of an anthropomorphic breast phantom acquired by a direct digital flat-panel detector mammography system (FPM) versus a stereotactic breast biopsy system utilizing CCD (charge-coupled device) technology with either a 1024 or 512 acquisition matrix (1024 CCD and 512 CCD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Randomly distributed silica beads (diameter 100-1400 µm) and anthropomorphic scatter bodies were applied to 48 transparent films. The test specimens were radiographed on a direct digital FPM and by the indirect 1024 CCD and 512 CCD techniques. Four radiologists rated the monitor-displayed images independently of each other in random order. RESULTS: The rate of correct positive readings for the "number of detectable microcalcifications" for silica beads of 100-199 µm in diameter was 54.2%, 50.0% and 45.8% by FPM, 1024 CCD and 512 CCD, respectively. The inter-rater variability was most pronounced for silica beads of 100-199 µm in diameter. The greatest agreement with the gold standard was observed for beads >400 µm in diameter across all methods. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic spot images taken by 1024 matrix CCD technique are diagnostically equivalent to direct digital flat-panel mammograms for visualizing simulated microcalcifications >400 µm in diameter.