Mass Balance, Metabolic Pathways, Absolute Bioavailability, And Pharmacokinetics of Giredestrant In Healthy Subjects.

Giredestrant is a potent and selective small molecule estrogen receptor degrader. The objectives of this study were to assess the absolute bioavailability (aBA) of giredestrant and to determine the mass balance, routes of elimination and metabolite profile of [14C]giredestrant. In Part 1 (mass balance), a single 30.8 mg oral dose of [14C]giredestrant (105 µCi) was administered to women of non-childbearing potential (WNCBP, n = 6). The mean recovery of total radioactivity (TR) in excreta was 77.0%, with 68.0% of the dose excreted in feces and 9.04% excreted in urine over a 42-day sample collection period. The majority of the circulating radioactivity (56.8%) in plasma was associated with giredestrant. Giredestrant was extensively metabolized with giredestrant representing only 20.0% and 1.90% of the dose in feces and urine, respectively. All metabolites in feces resulted from oxidative metabolism and represented 44.7% of the dose. In Part 2 (absolute bioavailability, aBA), WNCBP (n = 10) received an oral (30 mg capsule) or intravenous (30 mg solution) dose of giredestrant. The aBA of giredestrant after oral administration was 58.7%. Following the intravenous dose, giredestrant had a plasma clearance and volume of distribution of 5.31 L/h and 266 L, respectively. In summary, giredestrant was well tolerated, rapidly absorbed, and showed moderate oral bioavailability with low recovery of the dose as parent drug in excreta. Oxidative metabolism followed by excretion in feces was identified as the major route of elimination of giredestrant. Significance Statement This study provides definitive insight into the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of giredestrant in humans. The results show that giredestrant exhibits low clearance, high volume of distribution, and moderate oral bioavailability in humans. In addition, the data show that oxidative metabolism followed by excretion in feces is the primary elimination route of giredestrant in humans. These results will be used to further inform the clinical development of giredestrant.

The Absolute Bioavailability and Absorption, Metabolism, and Excretion of Ipatasertib, a Potent and Highly Selective Protein Kinase B (Akt) Inhibitor.

Ipatasertib (GDC-0068) is a potent, highly selective, small-molecule inhibitor of protein kinase B (Akt) being developed by Genentech/Roche as a single agent and in combination with other therapies for the treatment of cancers. To fully understand the absorption, metabolism, and excretion of ipatasertib in humans, an open-label study using 14C-radiolabeled ipatasertib was completed to characterize the absolute bioavailability (period 1) and mass balance and metabolite profiling (period 2). In period 1, subjects were administered a 200 mg oral dose of ipatasertib followed by an 80 µg (800 nCi) intravenous dose of [14C]-ipatasertib. In period 2, subjects received a single oral dose containing approximately 200 mg (100 µCi) [14C]-ipatasertib. In an integrated analytical strategy, accelerator mass spectrometry was applied to measure the 14C microtracer intravenous pharmacokinetics in period 1 and fully profile plasma radioactivity in period 2. The systemic plasma clearance and steady-state volume of distribution were 98.8 L/h and 2530 L, respectively. The terminal half-lives after oral and intravenous administrations were similar (26.7 and 27.4 hours, respectively) and absolute bioavailability of ipatasertib was 34.0%. After a single oral dose of [14C]-ipatasertib, 88.3% of the administered radioactivity was recovered with approximately 69.0% and 19.3% in feces and urine, respectively. Radioactivity in feces and urine was predominantly metabolites with 24.4% and 8.26% of dose as unchanged parent, respectively; indicating that ipatasertib had been extensively absorbed and hepatic metabolism was the major route of clearance. The major metabolic pathway was N-dealkylation mediated by CYP3A, and minor pathways were oxidative by cytochromes P450 and aldehyde oxidase. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The study provided definitive information regarding the absolute bioavailability and the absorption, metabolism, and excretion pathways of ipatasertib, a potent, novel, and highly selective small-molecule inhibitor of protein kinase B (Akt). An ultrasensitive radioactive counting method, accelerator mass spectrometry was successfully applied for 14C-microtracer absolute bioavailability determination and plasma metabolite profiling.

A phase I, randomized, ascending-dose study to assess safety, pharmacokinetics, and activity of GDC-8264, a RIP1 inhibitor, in healthy volunteers.

Receptor-interacting protein 1 (RIP1) is a key regulator of multiple signaling pathways that mediate inflammatory responses and cell death. RIP1 kinase activity mediates apoptosis and necroptosis induced by tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, Toll-like receptors, and ischemic tissue damage. RIP1 has been implicated in several human pathologies and consequently, RIP1 inhibition may represent a therapeutic approach for diseases dependent on RIP1-mediated inflammation and cell death. GDC-8264 is a potent, selective, and reversible small molecule inhibitor of RIP1 kinase activity. This phase I, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial examined safety, pharmacokinetics (PKs), and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of single- (5-225 mg) and multiple- (50 and 100 mg once daily, up to 14 days) ascending oral doses of GDC-8264 in healthy volunteers, and also tested the effect of food on the PKs of GDC-8264. All adverse events in GDC-8264-treated subjects in both stages were mild. GDC-8264 exhibited dose-proportional increases in systemic exposure; the mean terminal half-life ranged from 10-13 h, with limited accumulation on multiple dosing (accumulation ratio [AR] ~ 1.4); GDC-8264 had minimal renal excretion at all doses. A high-fat meal had no significant effect on the PKs of GDC-8264. In an ex vivo stimulation assay of whole blood, GDC-8264 rapidly and completely inhibited release of CCL4, a downstream marker of RIP1 pathway activation, indicating a potent pharmacological effect. Based on PK-PD modeling, the GDC-8264 half-maximal inhibitory concentration for the inhibition of CCL4 release was estimated to be 0.58 ng/mL. The favorable safety, PKs, and PDs of GDC-8264 support its further development for treatment of RIP1-driven diseases.

Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of vernakalant hydrochloride injection (RSD1235) in atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter.

Vernakalant hydrochloride is a novel, relatively atrial-selective antiarrhythmic agent that rapidly converts atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm (SR). This analysis integrates pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety data from 5 clinical trials of patients with AF or atrial flutter (AFL). Patients were initially given a 10-min intravenous (IV) infusion of vernakalant 3 mg/kg or placebo. If SR was not evident after a 15-min observation, then a second 10-min IV infusion of vernakalant 2 mg/kg or placebo was given. Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models were constructed for QT interval prolongation corrected for heart rate by Fridericia's formula (QTcF) and for changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP). The exposure-response relationships for QTcF and SBP were best described by sigmoidal maximum-effect (E (max)) models. For QTcF, the model was characterized by a typical E (max) of 20.3 ms, and by a vernakalant median effective concentration dependent (EC50) on conversion status (4,222 ng/ml for patients converting to SR and 2,276 ng/ml for those remaining in AF/AFL). For SBP, the model was characterized by E (max) of 3.05 mmHg and EC50 of 1,141 ng/ml. Risk of hypotension (SBP <90 mmHg) was primarily associated with low baseline SBP and to a smaller extent with a history of congestive heart failure (CHF); plasma vernakalant concentrations showed a small contribution to the risk of hypotension (relative risk = 1.4 at 4,000 ng/ml), which may be significant with a baseline SBP of <105 mmHg. These results show that vernakalant had a smaller effect on QTcF in patients who demonstrated conversion to SR than those remaining in AF or AFL, and it had a relatively small effect on SBP.

Results of a Dose-Finding Phase 1b Study of Subcutaneous Atezolizumab in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Intravenous (IV) atezolizumab is approved for non-small cell lung and other cancers. Subcutaneous (SC) atezolizumab coformulated with recombinant human hyaluronidase, a permeation enhancer for SC dispersion and absorption, is being developed to improve treatment options, reduce burden, and increase efficiency for patients and practitioners. IMscin001 (NCT03735121), a 2-part, open-label, global, multicenter, phase 1b/3 study, is evaluating the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and efficacy of SC atezolizumab. The part 1 (phase 1b) objective was determination of an SC atezolizumab dose yielding a serum trough concentration (Ctrough ) comparable with IV. Patients enrolled in 3 cohorts received SC atezolizumab 1800 mg (thigh) once (cohort 1), 1200 mg (thigh) every 2 weeks for 3 cycles (cohort 2), or 1800 mg (abdomen) every 3 weeks cycle 1, then cycles 2 and 3 (thigh) every 3 weeks (cohort 3). In subsequent cycles, IV atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 weeks was administered until loss of clinical benefit. SC atezolizumab 1800 mg every 3 weeks and 1200 mg every 2 weeks provided similar Ctrough and area under the curve values in cycle 1 to the corresponding IV atezolizumab reference, was well tolerated, and exhibited a safety profile consistent with the established IV formulation. Exposure following SC injection in the abdomen was lower (20%, 28%, and 27% for Ctrough , maximum concentration, and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to day 21, respectively) than in the thigh. Part 1 SC and IV PK data were analyzed using a population PK modeling approach, followed by simulations. Part 2 (phase 3) will now be initiated to demonstrate that SC atezolizumab PK exposure is not lower than that of IV.

Geographical Variability in Paromomycin Pharmacokinetics Does Not Explain Efficacy Differences between Eastern African and Indian Visceral Leishmaniasis Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Intramuscular paromomycin monotherapy to treat visceral leishmaniasis (VL) has been shown to be effective for Indian patients, while a similar regimen resulted in lower efficacy in Eastern Africa, which could be related to differences in paromomycin pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic data were available from two randomized controlled trials in VL patients from Eastern Africa and India. African patients received intramuscular paromomycin monotherapy (20 mg/kg for 21 days) or combination therapy (15 mg/kg for 17 days) with sodium stibogluconate. Indian patients received paromomycin monotherapy (15 mg/kg for 21 days). A population pharmacokinetic model was developed for paromomycin in Eastern African and Indian VL patients. RESULTS: Seventy-four African patients (388 observations) and 528 Indian patients (1321 observations) were included in this pharmacokinetic analysis. A one-compartment model with first-order kinetics of absorption and elimination best described paromomycin in plasma. Bioavailability (relative standard error) was 1.17 (5.18%) times higher in Kenyan and Sudanese patients, and 2.46 (24.5%) times higher in Ethiopian patients, compared with Indian patients. Ethiopian patients had an approximately fourfold slower absorption rate constant of 0.446 h-1 (18.2%). Area under the plasma concentration-time curve for 24 h at steady-state (AUCτ,SS) for 15 mg/kg/day (median [interquartile range]) was higher in Kenya and Sudan (172.7 µg·h/mL [145.9-214.3]) and Ethiopia (230.1 µg·h/mL [146.3-591.2]) compared with India (97.26 µg·h/mL [80.83-123.4]). CONCLUSION: The developed model provides detailed insight into the pharmacokinetic differences among Eastern African countries and India, however the resulting differences in paromomycin exposure do not seem to explain the geographical differences in paromomycin efficacy in the treatment of VL patients.

Phase I study of valspodar (PSC-833) with mitoxantrone and etoposide in refractory and relapsed pediatric acute leukemia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: Valspodar, a non-immunosuppressive analog of cylosporine, is a potent P-glycoprotein (MDR1) inhibitor. As MDR1-mediated efflux of chemotherapeutic agents from leukemic blasts may contribute to drug resistance, a phase 1 study of valspodar combined with mitoxantrone and etoposide in pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory leukemias was performed. PROCEDURE: Patients received a valspodar-loading dose (2 mg/kg) followed by a 5-day continuous valspodar infusion (8, 10, 12.5, or 15 mg/kg/day) combined with lower than standard doses of mitoxantrone and etoposide. The valspodar dose was escalated using a standard 3 + 3 phase I design. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were evaluable for toxicity and 20 for response. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of valspodar was 12.5 mg/kg/day, combined with 50% dose-reduced mitoxantrone and etoposide. The clearance of mitoxantrone and etoposide was decreased by 64% and 60%, respectively, when combined with valspodar. Dose-limiting toxicities included stomatitis, ataxia, and bone marrow aplasia. Three of 11 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) had complete responses while no patient with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) had an objective response. In vitro studies demonstrated P-glycoprotein expression on the blasts of 5 of 14 patients, although only 1 had inhibition of rhodamine efflux by valspodar. CONCLUSIONS: While this regimen was tolerable, responses in this heavily pretreated population were limited to a subset of patients with ALL.

Bayesian Population Model of the Pharmacokinetics of Venetoclax in Combination with Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Results from the Phase III MURANO Study.

BACKGROUND: Venetoclax is a selective B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitor approved for use as monotherapy or with rituximab in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The objectives of the current analysis of observed data from adult patients randomized to venetoclax-rituximab in the phase III MURANO study were to characterize venetoclax pharmacokinetics (PKs) using a Bayesian approach, evaluate whether a previously developed population PK model for venetoclax can describe the PKs of venetoclax when administered with rituximab, and to determine post hoc estimates of PK parameters for the exposure-response analysis. METHODS: Parameter estimates and uncertainty estimated by a population PK model were used as priors. Additional covariate effects (CLL risk status, geographic region, and 17p deletion [del(17p)] status) were added to the model. The updated model was used to describe venetoclax PKs after repeated dosing in combination with rituximab, and to determine post hoc estimates of PK parameters for exposure-response analysis. RESULTS: The PK analysis included 600 quantifiable venetoclax PK samples from 182 patients in the MURANO study. Model evaluation using standard diagnostic plots, visual predictive checks, and normalized prediction distribution error plots indicated no model deficiencies. There was no significant relationship between venetoclax apparent clearance (CL/F) and bodyweight, age, sex, mild and moderate hepatic and renal impairment, or coadministration of weak cytochrome P450 3A inhibitors. The chromosomal abnormality del(17p) and CLL risk status had no apparent effect on the PKs of venetoclax. A minimal increase in venetoclax CL/F (approximately 7%) was observed after coadministration with rituximab. CL/F was 30% lower in patients from Central and Eastern Europe (n = 60) or Asia (n = 4) compared with other regions (95% confidence interval [CI] 21-39%). Apparent central volume of distribution was 30% lower (95% CI 22-38%) in females (n = 56) compared with males (n = 126). No clinically significant impact of region or sex was observed on key safety and efficacy outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The Bayesian model successfully characterized venetoclax PKs over time and confirmed key covariates affecting PKs in the MURANO study. The model was deemed appropriate for further use in simulations and for generating individual patient PK parameters for subsequent exposure-response evaluation.

Evaluation of population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response relationship with coadministration of amlodipine besylate and olmesartan medoxomil.

Population pharmacokinetic models for amlodipine and olmesartan were developed using data collected from 4 phase I studies in healthy volunteers and 1 phase III study in subjects with mild to severe hypertension. A 2-compartment and a 1-compartment model best described the pharmacokinetics of olmesartan and amlodipine, respectively; both agents were characterized by first-order elimination/absorption and an absorption time lag. The analysis shows that neither agent had a clinically significant impact on the clearance of the other. The impact of covariates on the clearance of olmesartan and amlodipine was similar after coadministration of amlodipine besylate and olmesartan medoxomil as separate entities or as a fixed-dose combination compared with monotherapy. The effect of exposure to amlodipine and olmesartan on the change in trough seated diastolic blood pressure was best described by linear and maximum effect (E(max)) models, respectively. Black race was the most important covariate in the exposure-response model, decreasing the maximal possible effect of olmesartan on blood pressure while increasing the effect of amlodipine, without influencing pharmacokinetic parameters. The drug effect of combination therapy was defined on the basis of exposure to both compounds and was greater than the effect of monotherapy with either agent.

A mechanistic model for the sex-specific response to nalbuphine and naloxone in postoperative pain.

We develop a mechanistic model for post-operative pain and apply it to describe the pharmacodynamic effects of the kappa-opioids nalbuphine and naloxone administered either alone or in combination in patients after surgical removal of one or more madibular third molar teeth. Data were obtained from 6 clinical studies in which a total of 304 patients were intravenously administered single doses of 2.5, 5, 10 or 20 mg of nalbuphine. Some groups also received 0.2 or 0.4 mg of naloxone. A total of 3,040 Visual analog scale (VAS) pain ratings were recorded at 20 min intervals for 3 h after drug administration. We used a two-site indirect action model to describe early and late pain and to incorporate the effect of nalbuphine and naloxone on pain over time. A mixed effects statistical model was used to account for inter- and intra-individual variability. Our model estimated the population average baseline pain score in men to be lower than that in women (68 vs. 76 mm on the 100 mm VAS scale). The model confirmed a late increase in pain (anti-analgesia) and estimated the lag time for the start of anti-analgesia to be 73 min after study drug administration. The maximum early phase pain score is 81.6 mm while the maximum anti-analgesia is 16.1 mm. The nalbuphine dose required to reduce early pain by 50% (ED(50)) was estimated to be 5.85 mg and the naloxone dose required to reduce late phase pain by 50% was estimated to be 0.5 mg. The model confirmed the results from conventional statistical analyses performed previously on individual studies.

Paradoxical urinary phenytoin metabolite (S)/(R) ratios in CYP2C19*1/*2 patients.

Phenytoin (PHT) is primarily metabolized to 5-(4'-hydroxyphenyl)-5-phenylhydantoin (p-HPPH), accounting for 67-88% of an administered dose in humans. p-HPPH is formed by the cytochrome (CYP) 450 enzymes CYP2C9 and CYP2C19, then glucuronidated and excreted into the urine. CYP2C9 catalyses the prochiral formation of (R) and (S)-p-HPPH, and is approximately 40 times more stereoselective towards the formation of the (S) isomer whereas CYP2C19 is not stereoselective. Because of differential stereoselectivity, polymorphisms in the genes can alter the (S)/(R)-p-HPPH ratios. Genotyping for CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 was accomplished by a Taqman based assay. Twelve and twenty-four hour urine samples were collected from 45 epilepsy patients taking PHT under steady-state conditions and (S)/(R) ratios of p-HPPH were determined by chiral HPLC separation. The mean urinary (S)/(R) ratio in the 12-24h urine collection in subjects homozygous for CYP2C9*1/*1, CYP2C19*1/*1 was 24.2+/-3.1(n=21), whereas ratios in CYP2C9*1/*2 and CYP2C9*1/*3 subjects, were 11.1+/-3.3(n=7) and 2.7+/-0.6(n=2), respectively. One CYP2C9*2/*3 patient had a ratio of 2.1. Unexpectedly, CYP2C9*1/*1, CYP2C19*1/*2 subjects had a mean (S)/(R) ratio as low as 12.9+/-1.7(n=12). Our results are generally consistent with single dose PHT studies. However, the (S)/(R)-p-HPPH ratios for the CYP2C9*1/*1, CYP2C19*1/*2 subjects, expected to be in the range of 30-40, were only 12.9, suggesting some undetected linkage disequilibrium between CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 genes that could affect PHT elimination. Furthermore, our study suggests that measurement of urine ratios cannot be used as a marker for genotype determination.

Morphine stimulates angiogenesis by activating proangiogenic and survival-promoting signaling and promotes breast tumor growth.

Morphine is used to treat pain in several medical conditions including cancer. Here we show that morphine, in a concentration typical of that observed in patients' blood, stimulates human microvascular endothelial cell proliferation and angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. It does so by activating mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase phosphorylation via Gi/Go-coupled G protein receptors and nitric oxide in these microvascular endothelial cells. Other contributing effects of morphine include activation of the survival signal PKB/Akt, inhibition of apoptosis, and promotion of cell cycle progression by increasing cyclin D1. Consistent with these effects, morphine in clinically relevant doses promotes tumor neovascularization in a human breast tumor xenograft model in mice leading to increased tumor progression. These results indicate that clinical use of morphine could potentially be harmful in patients with angiogenesis-dependent cancers.

Population pharmacokinetic model for a novel oral hypoglycemic formed in vivo: comparing the use of active metabolite data alone versus using data of upstream and downstream metabolites.

The purpose of this analysis was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for CS-917, an oral hypoglycemic prodrug, and its 3 metabolites. The population pharmacokinetic model was used to predict exposure of the active moiety R-125338 and thus to identify potential CS-917 dosage reduction criteria. The dataset included 6 phase I and IIa studies in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The pharmacokinetic profile of CS-917 and its metabolites was described by a series of linked 1- and 2-compartmental models. Simulations showed that moderate renal impairment has a clinically significant impact on exposure to R-125338. A separate population pharmacokinetic analysis of R-125338 alone revealed similar results. In conclusion, a population pharmacokinetic model fit to the active moiety alone yielded similar predictions and substantially reduced the analysis time compared to the more complex model developed for CS-917 and its metabolites. Increased exposure to R-125338 in the presence of moderate renal impairment may be an important consideration for dose selection.

Improving data reliability using a non-compliance detection method versus using pharmacokinetic criteria.

Data from clinical trials present numerous problems for the data analyst. These include non-compliance with the prescribed dosing regimen and inaccurate recollection of dosing history by patients as well as mistakes in recording data. Several methods have been proposed to address these issues. One such technique by Lu et al. (Selecting reliable pharmacokinetic data for explanatory analyses of clinical trials in the presence of possible noncompliance. J. Pharmacokinet. Pharmacodyn. 28:343-362 (2001)) identifies occasions in pharmacokinetic (PK) data where the preceding dosing history is likely to be unreliable. We used this method, implemented in the software program NONMEM (beta) VI, to clean a dataset containing indinavir (IDV) plasma concentrations from HIV-1 infected patients. The data was also cleaned by inspection in Microsoft Excel using clinical PK criteria. A one-compartment model with first order absorption and elimination was fit to both sets of cleaned data. IDV population PK parameters obtained from these analyses were similar to those reported previously. It is established that IDV nephrotoxicity is related to high IDV exposure. However, no relationships were found between any PK parameters and nephrotoxicity in the "compliance cleaned" dataset. In the "PK cleaned" dataset, the oral clearance and apparent volume were lower by 9.1% and 6.6%, respectively in patients with any type of nephrotoxicity and the maximum IDV concentration (C(max)) was 12.1% higher. In patients suffering from nephrolithiasis in particular, C(max) was 15.5% higher. Accordingly, the use of the non-compliance detection method did not improve the reliability of our dataset over the usual method of applying clinical criteria. In fact, analyses on the compliance-cleaned dataset missed some exposure-toxicity relationships. Thus, automated methods must be tested rigorously with 'real life' datasets, used with caution, and always in conjunction with clinical reasoning to avoid overlooking a signal in noisy data.