A Growing Divide? Social Determinants of the Use of Nonoperative Management of Rectal Cancer and Its Impact on Survival.

INTRODUCTION: Nonoperative management (NOM) of locally advanced rectal cancer was described as early as 2004. Initial national data demonstrated increase in utilization of NOM from 1998 to 2010, but newer national utilization data are not available. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database to assess utilization and 5-y overall survival (OS) of NOM of locally advanced rectal cancer. All patients had American Joint Committee on Cancer stage 2 or 3 rectal cancer, were over 40 y old, received both chemotherapy and radiation therapy, and were not being treated with palliative intent. RESULTS: 74,780 patients were analyzed. 64,540 (86.2%) underwent a definitive resection, 10,330 (13.8%) had NOM. Utilization of NOM steadily increased from 11.3% in 2010 to 18.6% in 2018. Multivariate regression identified the highest predictors of utilization of NOM to be uninsured status, government insurance, Black race, and treatment at a community cancer center. Multivariate regression identified NOM as the highest hazard for mortality (hazard ratio = 2.286, confidence interval 2.209-2.366). After propensity score matching, the mean estimated 5-y OS was 52.0% for those managed operatively compared to 39.8% for those managed nonoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: From 2004 to 2018, the utilization of NOM of locally advanced rectal cancer significantly increased. However, there was a significant discrepancy in OS in comparison to surgical resection for these patients. Further study is needed to determine the long-term oncologic safety of NOM.

How Soon Should Patients With Colon Cancer Undergo Definitive Resection?

BACKGROUND: Timing of surgery has been shown to affect outcomes in many forms of cancer, but definitive national data do not exist to determine the effect of time to surgery on survival in colon cancer. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether a delay in definitive surgery in colon cancer significantly affects survival. DATA SOURCES: A retrospective cohort study using 2 independent population-based databases, The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare-linked database and the National Cancer Database, was performed. STUDY SELECTION: All patients had American Joint Committee on Cancer stage 1 through 3 colon cancer. Patients were more than 18 years of age in the National Cancer Database cohort and older than 66 years of age in the Medicare cohort. Patients had a minimum of 3 years of follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome was overall survival as a function of time between diagnosis and surgery in 4 intervals (1-2, 3-4, 5-6, >6 weeks). RESULTS: The Medicare cohort demonstrated an adjusted 5-year survival of 8% to 14% higher in patients with a surgical delay between 3 and 6 weeks, with significantly lower hazard ratios in that interval. The National Cancer Database cohort demonstrated an adjusted 5-year survival of 9% to 16% higher in patients with surgery 3 to 6 weeks after diagnosis, with comparatively similar improvements in survival hazard. LIMITATIONS: Because this was a retrospective study of administrative databases, with Medicare data limited to billing data, the causality of outcomes must be interpreted with caution. CONCLUSIONS: The ideal timing of definitive resection in colon cancer is between 3 and 6 weeks after initial diagnosis. All efforts should be made for patients to obtain definitive surgery within this interval to achieve a modest but significant improvement in overall survival. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B76. ¿CUÁNDO DEBEN SOMETERSE LOS PACIENTES CON CÁNCER DE COLON A UNA RESECCIÓN DEFINITIVA?: Se ha demostrado que el momento de la cirugía afecta los resultados en muchas formas de cáncer, pero no existen datos nacionales definitivos para determinar el efecto del tiempo hasta la cirugía en la supervivencia en el cáncer de colon.Determinar si un retraso en la cirugía definitiva en el cáncer de colon afecta significativamente la supervivencia.Un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo que utiliza dos bases de datos independientes basadas en la población; Se realizó la base de datos vinculada a la vigilancia, la epidemiología y los resultados finales y la base de datos nacional del cáncer.Pacientes con cáncer de colon en estadíos 1 a 3 del Comité Estadounidense Conjunto sobre el Cáncer. Los pacientes tenían más de 18 años en la cohorte de la National Cancer Database y más de 66 años en la cohorte de Medicare. Los pacientes tuvieron un mínimo de 3 años de seguimiento.El resultado principal fue la supervivencia general en función del tiempo entre el diagnóstico y la cirugía en 4 intervalos (1-2, 3-4, 5-6, y mas de 6 semanas).La cohorte de Medicare demostró una supervivencia ajustada de 5 años de 8 a 14% más en pacientes con un retraso quirúrgico entre 3 a 6 semanas, con razones de riesgo significativamente más bajas en ese intervalo. La cohorte de la National Cancer Database demostró una supervivencia ajustada a 5 años de 9 a 16% más en pacientes con cirugía de 3 a 6 semanas después del diagnóstico, con mejoras comparativamente similares en el riesgo de supervivencia.Dado que este fue un estudio retrospectivo de bases de datos administrativas, con datos de Medicare limitados a datos de facturación, la causalidad de los resultados debe interpretarse con precaución.El momento ideal para la resección definitiva en el cáncer de colon es entre tres y seis semanas después del diagnóstico inicial. Se deben hacer todos los esfuerzos para que los pacientes obtengan una cirugía definitiva dentro de este intervalo para lograr una mejora modesta pero significativa en la supervivencia general. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B76.

Considerations and Changes in the Evaluation, Management, and Outcomes in the Management of Diverticular Disease: The Diagnosis, Pathology, and Treatment of Diverticular Colitis.

Diverticular colitis, also known as segmental colitis associated with diverticulosis, is a colonic inflammatory disorder on the spectrum of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The disease consists of macroscopic and microscopic inflammation affecting inter-diverticular mucosa, sparing peri-diverticular mucosa, with inflammation confined to the descending and sigmoid colon. The disease likely arises from the altered immune response of an individual, genetically susceptible to the IBD spectrum of diseases. Patients with segmental colitis associated with diverticulosis (SCAD) are typically older, and likely represent a subgroup of IBD-susceptible patients who lacked an environmental trigger until that point in their life. Most patients remain in remission with initial treatments of mesalamine or topical steroids, and maintenance mesalamine afterwards. Only the most severe form of the disease necessitates immunomodulatory therapy and the consideration of surgery.

Condyloma Acuminatum, Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia, and Anal Cancer in the Setting of HIV: Do We Really Understand the Risk?

BACKGROUND: The gold standard for surveillance of patients with anal lesions is unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to stratify patients for risk of progression of disease and to determine appropriate intervals for surveillance of patients with anal disease. DESIGN: This was a retrospective chart review for patients treated for anal lesions between 2007 and 2014. Only patients with ≥1 year of follow-up from index evaluation, pathology, documented physical examination, and anoscopy findings were included for analysis. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at an urban university hospital. PATIENTS: HIV-positive patients with anal lesions treated with excision and fulguration were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recurrence of anal lesions, progression of disease, and progression to cancer were measured. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 41.6 years, and mean follow-up was 38.6 months (range, 11.0-106.0 mo). On initial pathology, 8 patients (8.8%) had a diagnosis of condyloma acuminatum without dysplasia, 20 patients (22%) had anal intraepithelial neoplasia I, 32 (35.2%) had anal intraepithelial neoplasia II, and 31 (34.1%) had anal intraepithelial neoplasia III. Sixty-nine patients (75.8%) had repeat procedures. Seven (87.5%) of 8 patients with condyloma and 6 (30%) of 20 patients with anal intraepithelial neoplasia I progressed to high-grade lesions. Five (15.6%) of 32 patients progressed from anal intraepithelial neoplasia II to III, and 2 patients with anal intraepithelial neoplasia III (6.5%) developed squamous cell carcinoma (2.3% for the entire cohort). LIMITATIONS: This was a single institution study. High-resolution anoscopy was not used. CONCLUSIONS: All of the HIV-positive patients with condyloma or anal intraepithelial neoplasia, regardless of the presence of dysplasia, should be surveyed at equivalent 3-month time intervals, because their risk of progression of disease is high. Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A389.

Racial Disparities and the Effect of County Level Income on the Incidence and Survival of Young Men with Anal Cancer.

Purpose: Prior studies have identified a racial disparity in incidence and survival of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) in the young African American male population. We aim to determine whether racial disparities are independent of income and urban location. Methods: The National Cancer Institute's Surveillance of Epidemiology and End Results database was queried for data on patients with SCCA for the years of 2000-2013. Cox regression was used to determine the effect of race, county median family income, rural-urban continuum, and stage of disease on overall survival. Results: The incidence rate of SCCA was significantly higher in black men <50 years old than in white men. Black race had a hazard ratio of 1.55 (confidence interval [CI] 1.33-1.81) when controlling for age, stage, income, and urban-rural status. Each $10,000 increase in county median family income was protective with a hazard ratio of 0.90 (CI 0.86-0.94). Residence in a metropolitan area did not significantly affect survival. Conclusions: The lower survival of black men <50 years old with SCCA is independent of income, urban location, and stage of disease. Further efforts are needed to target this at-risk population and the authors suggest wide application of previously validated screening programs for anal dysplasia.

Are Prophylactic Antibiotic Agents Indicated in Anorectal Surgery for Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus?

BACKGROUND: With increased survival among patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), surgeons have been seeing more cases of anal dysplasia and cancer. There is, however, no data on the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) in HIV-positive patients undergoing elective anorectal procedures, nor on the administration of prophylactic antibiotic agents. We reviewed a HIV-positive population that has undergone elective anorectal biopsy of areas of dysplasia observed on office anoscopy to assess the need for antibiotic prophylaxis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of all HIV-positive patients seen as outpatients in the Colorectal Surgery Division from 2007-2016. Demographics, dates of surgery and follow-up, antibiotic prophylaxis, and pre-operative CD4 count and HIV viral load were recorded for 229 patients. Post-operative examination notes were reviewed to determine the presence of SSIs. The proportion of patients who received prophylaxis was assessed and the SSI rate was calculated. RESULTS: Surgical site infections occurred in 2 of 237 (0.8%) cases without antibiotic prophylaxis and in none of the 38 cases with prophylaxis. This infection rate was found to be lower than that of the general surgery population, with no statistical difference from hemorrhoidectomy patients without HIV. One SSI occurred in a 51-year-old male with a pre-operative CD4 count of 612 per microliter and viral load of zero. Another occurred in a 57-year-old female with an unknown CD4 count and viral load. A χ2 analysis showed the incidence of SSIs in the groups with and without prophylaxis was not significantly different (p = 0.563). CONCLUSION: Surgical site infection rates in HIV-positive patients undergoing biopsies for anal dysplasia were similar to patients without HIV undergoing similar minor anorectal procedures, and no difference was noted in the rate of SSI with the administration of prophylactic antibiotic agents. We do not recommend routine use of prophylactic antibiotic agents in this population.

Applications of asymmetric hydrosilylations mediated by catalytic (DTBM-SEGPHOS)CuH.

[reaction: see text] Several aryl ketone precursors useful in the synthesis of known physiologically active compounds have been reduced to the corresponding nonracemic alcohols. The previously reported combination of a catalytic quantity of (R)-(-)-DTBM-SEGPHOS-ligated CuH and stoichiometric PMHS is shown to be very effective in these asymmetric hydrosilylations.

Repair of nonmalignant postlaryngectomy pharyngotracheal fistula.

The repair of nonmalignant postlaryngectomy pharyngotracheal fistulae is not commonly encountered in medical literature. This rare complication can occur years after laryngectomy for cancer and reconstruction of a neopharynx, and is often associated with adjuvant radiation to the area, making the choice of method for surgical repair critical for success. Optimally, a pedicled myofascial flap from the pectoralis major muscle, from outside the field of radiation, is used to reinforce the repair of the fistula. We present 2 rare cases.