Chemotherapy switch for nonresponse or progression on neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patients with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma who do not respond to neoadjuvant therapy present a challenge. We sought to define the characteristics and outcomes of those patients to guide clinical practice. METHODS: Patients included were those without evidence of biochemical or radiographic response and no evidence of distant progression at the first reassessment after initiation of therapy. RESULTS: Of the 45 patients in the cohort, 23 (51.1%) proceeded to surgical exploration with all but one of those undergoing resection. The median overall survival of the study cohort was 28.6 and 48.6 months in those who underwent resection. A total of 13 patients (28.9%) underwent chemotherapy switch (CS) during their course of neoadjuvant therapy. The CS cohort demonstrated higher rates of radiologic progression (25% vs. 10%, p = 0.329), new or worse vascular involvement (58.3% vs. 30%, p = 0.082), and CA 19-9 increase (30.8% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.209) at initial re-staging. Despite this, overall survival was similar between the two groups (20.7 vs. 28.7 months, p = 0.674). CONCLUSION: Non-responders to first-line neoadjuvant therapy have poor rates of curative-intent resection. However, resection should be undertaken when feasible. CS may be considered in patients who do not respond to first-line chemotherapy.

Relevance of Subcarinal Lymph Node Dissection for Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Reported rates of subcarinal lymph node (LN) metastases for esophageal carcinoma vary from 20% to 25% and the relevance of subcarinal lymph node dissection (LND) for gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma is poorly defined. This study aimed to evaluate rates of subcarinal LN metastasis in GEJ carcinoma and determine their prognostic significance. METHODS: Patients with GEJ adenocarcinoma undergoing robotic minimally invasive esophagectomy from 2019 to 2021 were retrospectively assessed within a prospectively maintained database. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were examined with attention to subcarinal LND and LN metastases. RESULTS: Among 53 consecutive patients, the median age was 62, 83.0% were male, and all had Siewert type I/II tumors (49.1% and 50.9%, respectively). Most patients (79.2%) received neoadjuvant therapy. Three patients had subcarinal LN metastases (5.7%) and all had Siewert type I tumors. Two had clinical evidence of LN metastases preoperatively and all three additionally had non-subcarinal nodal disease. A greater proportion of patients with subcarinal LN disease had more advanced (T3) tumors compared to patients without subcarinal metastases (100.0% versus 26.0%; P = 0.025). No patient with subcarinal nodal metastases remained disease free at 3 y after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In this consecutive series of patients with GEJ adenocarcinoma undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy, subcarinal LN metastases were found only in patients with type I tumors and were noted in just 5.7% of patients, which is lower than historical controls. Subcarinal nodal disease was associated with more advanced primary tumors. Further study is warranted to determine the relevance of routine subcarinal LND, especially for type 2 tumors.

The anticancer effect of statins in obese esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: In addition to treating hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis, statins have demonstrated anti-inflammatory and antitumor activity in various cancers. We evaluate this effect in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy. METHODS: Esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center between March 2007 and December 2015 were included. Association between presurgery statin use and relevant variables with overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was analyzed using Cox hazards. Survival analyses were independently performed for body mass index (BMI)-based subgroups. RESULTS: There was no significant association between statin use and outcomes overall. However, in subgroup analysis, there was significant association between statin use and outcomes in patients with BMI ≥ 30. Multivariable analysis in obese patients demonstrated the association of statins with improved OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.46, p = 0.025), DSS (HR: 0.39, p = 0.015), and RFS (HR: 0.38, p = 0.022). The only other variable significantly associated with all three outcome measures was stage. CONCLUSIONS: Statin use is associated with improved OS, DSS, and RFS of obese patients in resected esophageal cancer. BMI could be investigated as a biomarker for adjunctive statin use in future studies.

Robotic versus thoraco-laparoscopic minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, a matched-pair single-center cohort analysis.

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is becoming more widespread with a documented improvement in postoperative morbidity based on level I evidence. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal MIE approach, conventional thoracoscopy/laparoscopy vs robotics as well as the ideal anastomotic technique. All patients who underwent MIE via an Ivor Lewis approach with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis were included. The thoracoscopy-laparoscopy (TL) group was compared to the robotic group with respect to perioperative outcomes using the entire cohorts and after 1:1 propensity score matching. Comparisons were made using the Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests. Between July 2013 and November 2020, 72 TL and 67 robotic Ivor Lewis MIE were performed. After comparing the two unadjusted cohorts and 51 propensity matched pairs, there was a decrease in Clavien-Dindo Grade 2 or above complications in the robotic vs TL group (59.7% vs 41.8% [P = 0.042], (62.7% vs 39.2% [P = 0.029]), respectively. In both analyses, there was a reduction in hospital length of stay (median of 8 vs 7 days, P < 0.001) and a trend toward less anastomotic leaks in the robotic group (Unadjusted: 12.5 vs 3% [P = 0.057], Propensity-matched analysis: 13.7% vs 3.9% [P = 0.16]), respectively. A clinically significant decrease in overall morbidity, cardiac complications and hospital length of stay was observed in the robotic Ivor Lewis cohort when compared with the TL group at a high volume MIE program. Side-to-side stapled thoracic anastomoses utilizing a robotic platform provides the best outcomes in this single institution experience.

Acute gastric conduit dilation after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a 10-year experience.

Despite decreasing overall morbidity with minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), conduit functional outcomes related to delayed emptying remain challenging, especially in the immediate postoperative setting. Yet, this problem has not been described well in the literature. Utilizing a single institutional prospective database, 254 patients who underwent MIEs between 2012 and 2020 were identified. Gastric conduit dilation was defined as a conduit occupying >40% of the hemithorax on the postoperative chest X-ray. Sixty-seven patients (26.4%) demonstrated acute conduit dilation. There was a higher incidence of conduit dilation in the patients who underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy compared to those with a neck anastomosis (67.2% vs. 47.1%; P = 0.03). Patients with dilated conduits required more esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGD) (P < 0.001), conduit-related reoperations within 180 days (P < 0.001), and 90-day readmissions (P = 0.01). Furthermore, in 37 patients (25.5%) undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, we returned to the abdomen after intrathoracic anastomosis to reduce redundant conduit and pexy the conduit to the crura. While conduit dilation rates were similar, those who had intraabdominal gastropexy required EGD significantly less and trended toward a lower incidence of conduit-related reoperations (5.6% vs. 2.7%). Multivariable analysis also demonstrated that conduit dilation was an independent predictor for delayed gastric conduit emptying symptoms, EGD within 90 days, conduit-related reoperation within 180 days, and 30-day as well as 90-day readmission. Patients undergoing MIE with acute gastric conduit dilation require more endoscopic interventions and reoperations.

Robotic Enucleation of a Large Gastroesophageal Junction Leiomyoma.

In this multimedia article, we demonstrate transabdominal robotic enucleation of a large, multilobulated leiomyoma at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). The robotic platform provides stereoscopic visualization and wristed motion, which improved ease of an organ-sparing resection in a challenging anatomic location. Alternative minimally invasive approaches to tumors in this location have been reported including endoscopic, endoscopic with laparoscopic assistance, laparoscopic, and thoracoscopic approaches, with choice of approach dependent upon the location and configuration of the tumor Milito et al. in J Gastrointest Surg 24:499-504, 2020;Li et al. in Dis Esophagus. 22:185-189, 2009;Armstrong et al. in Am Surg. 79:968-972, 2013;Kent et al. in J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 134:176-181, 2007.

Prognostic Significance of Complete Pathologic Response Obtained with Chemotherapy Versus Chemoradiotherapy in Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have compared the survival advantage of complete pathologic response (cPR) achieved through neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in gastric adenocarcinoma. Our study utilizes a large national cancer database to address this question. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients with clinical stage I to III gastric adenocarcinoma from 2004 to 2013 who received nCT or nCRT. Patients who achieved cPR were selected. Associations were evaluated using Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests. Survival information was summarized using standard Kaplan-Meier methods, where estimates of the median and 5-year survival rates were estimated with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: A total of 413 patients who had cPR were identified. Eighty-four patients received nCT and 329 patients received nCRT. Patients in the nCRT group had higher clinical stage (88.4% vs. 75.0%) and more proximal location of tumors (95.4% vs. 45.2%). The nCT group (n = 84) had a 94% 5-year survival rate, while the nCRT group's (n = 329) rate was 60% (p < 0.001). On Cox regression modeling using a propensity-weighted approach, nCT treatment was an independent predictor of improved overall survival (nCRT vs. nCT; HR 10.44, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of nCT leads to a significant increase in overall survival in patients when compared with nCRT for those who achieved cPR in gastric adenocarcinoma. While this study is limited in identifying the cause for this difference in overall survival, this important finding nonetheless requires further investigation and should be considered in the development of future gastric cancer trials.

Association of same-day discharge with hospital readmission after pediatric thyroidectomy.

BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated that same-day discharge (SDD) following thyroid resection is safe and feasible in adults but there are no similar studies in the pediatric age group. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of SDD on 30-day readmission rates following thyroid surgery in pediatric patients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric database to evaluate 30-day readmission rates among patients < 19 years of age who underwent thyroid resection between 2012 and 2017. Patients excluded were those discharged more than 2 days after surgery. The main exposure variable was SDD and the primary outcome was 30-day readmission. Secondary outcomes included wound complications, unplanned reoperation and death. Patient characteristics were compared using chi-squared testing and odds ratios for readmission were calculated using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 1125 patients (79% female, median age 15 years), 122 (11%) were discharged on the day of surgery. Total or near-total thyroidectomy represented the majority of operations (714, 63.5%) and patients undergoing these operations were less likely to be discharged on the same day as surgery compared to those undergoing thyroid lobectomy (4.3 vs. 22.1%, P < 0.001). Twenty-nine patients were readmitted within 30 days (3 in the same day group, 26 in the later group). There was no difference in the odds of readmission between the two groups (adjusted odds ratio in SDD compared to later discharge 1.04 [95% CI 0.29-3.75, P = 0.96; readmission rate, 2.46 vs. 2.59%). Wound complications were reported in two patients, both in the later discharge group. CONCLUSION: Same-day discharge in pediatric patients undergoing thyroidectomy is not associated with an increase in 30-day readmissions or wound complications when compared to patients discharged 1 or 2 days after surgery. In selected patients, SDD may be an appropriate alternative to traditional overnight stay.

Technique for Robotic Transhiatal Esophagectomy.

Minimally invasive esophagectomy is increasing performed for cancers of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. This video demonstrates the setup and key steps for a robotic transhiatal esophagectomy with a cervical anastomosis.

Risk-stratified analysis of pasireotide for patients undergoing pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pasireotide was shown in a randomized trial to decrease the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). However, retrospective series from other centers have failed to confirm these results. METHODS: Patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy between January 2014 and February 2019 were included. Patients treated after November 2016 routinely received pasireotide and were compared to a retrospective cohort. Multivariate analysis was performed for the outcome of clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF), with stratification by fistula risk score (FRS). RESULTS: Ninety-nine of 300 patients received pasireotide. The distribution of high, intermediate, low, and negligible risk patients by FRS was comparable (P = .487). There were similar rates of CR-POPF (19.2% pasireotide vs 14.9% control, P = .347) and percutaneous drainage (12.1% vs 10.0%, P = .567), with greater median number of drain days in the pasireotide group (6 vs 4 days, P < .001). Multivariate modeling for CR-POPF showed no correlation with operation or pasireotide use. Adjustment with propensity weighted models for high (OR, 1.02, 95% CI, 0.45-2.29) and intermediate (OR, 1.02, CI, 0.57-1.81) risk groups showed no correlation of pasireotide with reduction in CR-POPF. CONCLUSIONS: Pasireotide administration after pancreatectomy was not associated with a decrease in CR-POPF, even when patients were stratified by FRS.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Noncolorectal Surgery?: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Major Abdominal Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols across noncolorectal abdominal surgical procedures. BACKGROUND: ERAS programs have been studied extensively in colorectal surgery and adopted at many centers. Several studies testing such protocols have shown promising results in improving postoperative outcomes across various surgical procedures. However, surgeons performing major abdominal procedures have been slower to adopt these ERAS protocols. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using "enhanced recovery after surgery" or "fast track" as search terms and excluded studies of colorectal procedures. Primary endpoints for the meta-analysis include length of stay (LOS) and complication rate. Secondary endpoints were time to first flatus, readmission rate, and costs. RESULTS: A total of 39 studies (6511 patients) met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Among them 14 studies were randomized trials, and the remaining 25 studies were cohort studies. Meta-analysis showed a decrease in LOS of 2.5 days (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.8-3.2, P < 0.001) and a complication rate of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.56-0.86, P = 0.001) for patient treated in ERAS programs. There was also a significant reduction in time to first flatus of 0.8 days (95% CI: 0.4-1.1, P < 0.001) and cost reduction of $5109.10 (95% CI: $4365.80-$5852.40, P < 0.001). There was no significant increase in readmission rate (OR 1.03, 95% CI: 0.84-1.26, P = 0.80) in our analysis. CONCLUSIONS: ERAS protocols decreased length of stay and cost by not increasing complications or readmission rates. This study adds to the evidence that ERAS protocols are safe to implement and are beneficial to surgical patients and the healthcare system across multiple abdominal procedures.

The first postesophagectomy chest X-ray predicts respiratory failure and the need for tracheostomy.

BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy is a major surgical procedure associated with high rates of morbidity. The purpose of this study was to determine if the immediate first postesophagectomy chest X-ray (pCXR) is associated with morbidity or mortality. METHODS: This was a single-institution analysis of patients undergoing esophagectomy, 2005-2015. A pCXR was routinely performed. A pCXR score was developed based on the number of objective abnormal findings. A statistical analysis was performed using patient/tumor variables and the pCXR score to derive adjusted odds ratios (ORs) on short-term outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-two patients had pCXRs. Scores ranged from 0 (normal) to 4 depending on the number of abnormalities, with a mean score of 1.6. The mean patient age was 60.7 y. Within the cohort, 92.9% had adenocarcinoma, 39.6% had T3/T4 tumors, and 48.4% were node positive. Open surgeries were performed in 51.6%, and 74.2% had chest anastomoses. The 30- and 90-d mortality rates were 2.2% and 3.9%, respectively. Increasing pCXR scores were associated with increased risk of prolonged intubation (OR: 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21-2.36, P = 0.002) and tracheostomy (OR: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.08-4.16, P = 0.029). Multivariable analysis adjusting for age, comorbidities and performance status, histology, pathologic stage, surgical approach, and operative time confirmed a statistically significant association with the pCXR score and respiratory failure requiring tracheostomy (OR: 2.13, 95% CI: 1.03-4.39, P = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to show an association between the first pCXR and respiratory failure, providing new evidence that the first pCXR has important implications for pulmonary care after esophagectomy.

Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for gastric neoplasms.

BACKGROUND: For cancers of the distal gastroesophageal junction or the proximal stomach, proximal gastrectomy can be performed. It is associated with several perioperative benefits compared with total gastrectomy. The use of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) has become an increasingly popular approach for select tumors. METHODS: We describe our method of LPG, including the preoperative work-up, illustrated depictions of the key steps of the surgery, and our postoperative pathway. RESULTS: A total of 6 patients underwent LPG between July, 2013 to June, 2017. Five patients had early-stage adenocarcinoma, and 1 patient had a gastrointestinal stromal tumor. The median age of the cohort was 70, and each patient had significant comorbidities. Conversion to open was required for 1 patient. All patients had negative final margins and an adequate lymph node dissection (median number of nodes examined was 15, range 12-22). The median postoperative length of stay was 7 days (range 4-7). Two patients developed anastomotic strictures requiring intervention, and 1 patient experienced significant reflux. At a median follow-up of 11 months, there was 1 recurrence. Three patients were alive without evidence of disease, and 2 patients died from other causes. CONCLUSIONS: For carefully selected patients, LPG is a safe and reasonable alternative to total gastrectomy, which is associated with similar oncologic outcomes and low morbidity.

Does neoadjuvant/perioperative chemotherapy improve overall survival for T2N0 gastric adenocarcinoma?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether neoadjuvant and/or perioperative chemotherapy (NAC) has an overall survival (OS) benefit for patients with T2N0 gastric adenocarcinoma. STUDY DESIGN: We performed retrospective analyses using the National Cancer Data Base, 2004-2013. Patients with T2N0 gastric adenocarcinoma were divided into two treatment groups: (1) NAC plus surgery (NA + S) and (2) surgery alone (S). RESULTS: Of 1,704 patients included, 277 (16.3%) received NAC, and 1,427 (83.7%) were treated with surgery alone. Patients in the NA + S group were more likely to be younger, have fewer comorbidities, and have larger tumors located in the proximal stomach. Although in an unadjusted analysis of OS, the NA + S group had improved survival compared to the S group (HR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.99, P < 0.0001), this was not maintained in a propensity adjusted analysis (HR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.68-1.18, P = 0.42). Similarly, propensity adjusted analyses accounting for potential bias from clinical misstaging or treatment effect from NAC did not show any OS benefit from NAC. CONCLUSION: Based on the largest cohort of clinically staged T2N0 gastric adenocarcinoma, there was no OS benefit derived from NAC compared to surgery alone. For select patients with reliable preoperative staging, NAC may be omitted.

Effectiveness of Repeat 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Computerized Tomography (PET-CT) Scan in Identifying Interval Metastases for Patients with Esophageal Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: An 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computerized tomography (PET-CT) scan is performed after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) to restage esophageal cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine the ability of PET-CT to accurately identify interval metastatic disease following nCRT. METHODS: This was a single-institution retrospective review (January 2005-February 2012) of patients with esophageal cancer treated with nCRT who underwent pre- and post-nCRT PET-CT. RESULTS: A total of 283 patients were treated with nCRT, of whom 258 (91.2%) had both a pre- and post-nCRT PET-CT. On the post-nCRT PET-CT, 64 patients (24.8%) had interval findings concerning for metastatic disease. Of these patients, only 10 (15.6%) had true-positive findings of metastatic disease (six biopsy proven). The sites of interval metastases included bone (4), liver (3), peritoneum (1), mediastinal lymph nodes (1), and cervical lymph nodes (1). The positive predictive value of post-nCRT PET-CT for interval metastases was 15.6% (10/64), and the yield for detecting metastases since the pre-nCRT PET-CT was 3.9% (10/258). The work-up of the 54 patients (20.9% of the initial starting group) with false-positive post-nCRT findings included biopsy (24.6%) and immediate additional imaging (45.2%). A total of 208 patients proceeded with surgery: 163 (78.4%) had no new findings on post-nCRT PET-CT, and 45 (21.6%) had new false-positive findings. False-positive sites mainly included the lung (15) and liver (14). CONCLUSIONS: The yield of post-nCRT PET-CT for the detection of new metastatic disease was 3.9%. Post-nCRT PET-CT often leads to a high proportion of false positives and subsequent investigational work-up.

Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Utilizing a Stapled Side-to-Side Anastomosis is Safe in the Western Patient Population.

BACKGROUND: There has been an increased utilization of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in an effort to reduce morbidity, decrease length of stay, and improve quality of life. However, there are limited large series of patients undergoing MIE from the United States and no standardized approach. We reviewed our experience with MIE utilizing a stapled side-to-side anastomosis during a 7.5-year period. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of prospectively maintained databases for patients undergoing planned esophagectomy were reviewed from 2007 to 2015. Esophagogastric anastomoses were performed via a 6-cm linear stapled side-to-side method. Demographics, comorbidities, surgical approach, pathology data, and postoperative morbidities were recorded and reviewed. RESULTS: A MIE was attempted in 303 of 315 (96 %) patients, and a total minimally invasive approach was completed in 293 of 315 (93 %) patients. Location of anastomosis was predominantly in the neck, with 244 patients (77.5 %) undergoing a total minimally invasive McKeown approach (n = 231). A total, minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis was completed in 60 patients (19.1 %). Anastomotic leak was identified in 24 patients (7.6 %). Rates of anastomotic leak were 4.4 % for Ivor-Lewis and 8.5 % for McKeown resection. Median length of stay was 8 days, and in-hospital mortality occurred in only three patients (n = 1 %). Ninety-day follow-up demonstrated a 4.1 % stricture rate requiring dilatation. CONCLUSIONS: In the Western patient population, MIE utilizing a 6-cm stapled side-to-side anastomosis is associated with low rates of anastomotic leak, stricture, and mortality.

Total laparoscopic resection for advanced gastric cancer is safe and feasible in the Western population.

BACKGROUND: There is debate surrounding the use of laparoscopic resection for advanced gastric cancer in the Western population. Here we aim to assess the feasibility and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy in consecutive patients in a Western population. METHODS: From 2012 to 2014, retrospective review of 28 patients with clinically staged advanced gastric cancer (≥T3 or ≥N1) treated with laparoscopic resection. RESULTS: Sixty-one percentage of patients were male. Median age was 67 years (range 35-86). Median BMI was 26.5 (range 19.4-46.1). Resection types were proximal (n = 2), distal (n = 14), and total (n = 12). Twenty-six (93 %) patients underwent D2 lymphadenectomy. Four patients underwent conversion to open. Median blood loss was 125 mL (range 30-300). Median LOS was 7 days (range 4-16). Of postoperative complications, five were minor: arrhythmia (n = 1), surgical site infection (n = 3), in-hospital fall (n = 1); and four were major (intra-abdominal abscess, stricture, PE, and anastomotic bleed). T stages were Tx (n = 1), T2 (n = 3), T3 (n = 18), and T4 (n = 6). N stages were N0 (n = 4), N1 (n = 8), N2 (n = 1), and N3 (n = 15). Median tumor size was 5.8 cm (range 0-9.5). Median lymph node yield was 22 (range 6-53). All margins were negative. Median follow-up was 12.8 months (range 2-27). Six patients have died of progressive disease. CONCLUSION: Following total laparoscopic resection for advanced gastric cancer, oncologic endpoints, postoperative course, and early cancer-specific follow-up are excellent. The results demonstrated here support the routine use of these techniques in the Western patient population.

Pancreatic cancer metastatic to a limited number of lymph nodes has no impact on outcome.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the association of the extent of metastatic lymph node involvement with survival in pancreatic cancer. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 1999-2011. RESULTS: 165 patients were identified and divided into 3 groups based on the number of positive lymph nodes - 0 (group A), 1-2 (B), >3 (C). Each group had 55 patients. Those in group C were more likely to have a higher T stage, poorly differentiated grade, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), higher mean intraoperative blood loss, positive margins, tumor location involving the uncinate process, and a higher likelihood of undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy. Median overall survival (OS) for group A, B and C was 25.5 months (mo), 21 mo and 12.3 mo, respectively (p < 0.001). No survival difference was noted for survival between groups A and B (p = 0.86). The ratio of involved lymph nodes <0.2 was predictive of improved survival (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Resected pancreatic cancer patients with only 1-2 positive lymph nodes or less than 20% involvement have a similar prognosis to patients without nodal disease. Current staging should consider stratification based on the extent of nodal involvement.

Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy with Cervical Anastomosis.

This video demonstrates our technique for a minimally invasive esophagectomy with side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. This technique is routinely utilized in most patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal or gastroesophageal junction malignancy, excluding type III gastroesophageal junction tumors. Absolute contraindications include significant tumor involvement of the fundus which may necessitate an intrathoracic anastomosis. Relative contraindications include poor pulmonary function or prior extensive surgical history that may either preclude surgery altogether or prevent the ability of the conduit from reaching the cervical region, or could preclude utilization of a minimally invasive approach. We have not found large body habitus to be an absolute contraindication for this approach. The technique involves thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus, laparoscopic dissection of the stomach and creation of gastric conduit, and creation of a 6 cm side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. The pylorus is treated with a botox injection; routine pyloroplasty is not performed. In our experience, this technique is safe, oncologically appropriate, and provides excellent functional results.