Precise highlighting of the pancreas by semantic segmentation during robot-assisted gastrectomy: visual assistance with artificial intelligence for surgeons.

BACKGROUND: A postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a critical complication of radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer, mainly because surgeons occasionally misrecognize the pancreas and fat during lymphadenectomy. Therefore, this study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) system capable of identifying and highlighting the pancreas during robot-assisted gastrectomy. METHODS: A pancreas recognition algorithm was developed using HRNet, with 926 training images and 232 validation images extracted from 62 scenes of robot-assisted gastrectomy videos. During quantitative evaluation, the precision, recall, intersection over union (IoU), and Dice coefficients were calculated based on the surgeons' ground truth and the AI-inferred image from 80 test images. During the qualitative evaluation, 10 surgeons answered two questions related to sensitivity and similarity for assessing clinical usefulness. RESULTS: The precision, recall, IoU, and Dice coefficients were 0.70, 0.59, 0.46, and 0.61, respectively. Regarding sensitivity, the average score for pancreas recognition by AI was 4.18 out of 5 points (1 = lowest recognition [less than 50%]; 5 = highest recognition [more than 90%]). Regarding similarity, only 54% of the AI-inferred images were correctly differentiated from the ground truth. CONCLUSIONS: Our surgical AI system precisely highlighted the pancreas during robot-assisted gastrectomy at a level that was convincing to surgeons. This technology may prevent misrecognition of the pancreas by surgeons, thus leading to fewer POPFs.

Proposal for T3 classification of esophagogastric junction carcinoma based on the interconnection of extramural anatomical structures.

Classification of extramural invasion of esophagogastric junction carcinoma (EGJC) is not yet established. The anatomy surrounding the EGJ alters between the mediastinum and the abdominal cavity. This review proposed a T3 classification of EGJC based on anatomical continuity. Analysis of endoscopic ultrasound images, review of intraoperative images, and detailed observation of surgical specimens were followed by a review of the literature. In the EGJ, the muscularis propria of the esophagus is enclosed in mediastinal adipose tissue called the adventitia, which is surrounded by the diaphragmatic crus and contains the paraesophageal lymph nodes (LNs). After passing through the esophageal hiatus along with the vagus nerves and blood vessels, the adventitia joins the adipose tissue containing the paracardial LNs, which is covered by the peritoneum, and then further divides into the lesser and greater omentum. The connective tissue outside the muscularis propria of the stomach, including the adipose tissue of the omentum, is called the subserosa. According to the TNM classification, T3 esophageal and gastric cancer is defined as invasion of the adventitia and subserosa, respectively. Given that the adventitia is anatomically continuous with the subserosa, T3 tumors of the EGJ can be described as those that extend through the muscularis propria but do not invade the peritoneum or diaphragmatic crus. We propose classifying T3 EGJC as "tumor extends through muscularis propria" rather than using the separate terms "adventitia" and "submucosa". T4 could be "tumor perforates serosa or invades adjacent structures", as per the current gastric cancer classification.

Marked improvement of severe reflux esophagitis following proximal gastrectomy with esophagogastrostomy by the right gastroepiploic vessels-preserving antrectomy and Roux-en-Y biliary diversion.

Duodenogastroesophageal reflux (DGER) following esophagectomy or gastrectomy can cause severe esophagitis, which impairs patients' quality of life and increases the risk of esophageal carcinogenesis. It is sometimes resistant to medical treatment, and surgical treatment is considered effective in such cases. However, an optimal operative procedure for medical treatment-resistant reflux esophagitis (RE) after proximal gastrectomy (PG) with esophagogastrostomy (EG) has not yet been established. We performed the right gastroepiploic vessels-preserving antrectomy and Roux-en-Y biliary diversion in a 70-year-old man with medical treatment-resistant severe esophagitis caused by DGER following PG with EG for esophagogastric junction cancer. The postoperative course was uneventful, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed on the 19th postoperative day showed marked improvement in the esophageal erosions. The patient reported symptomatic relief. The right gastroepiploic vessels-preserving antrectomy and Roux-en-Y biliary diversion were considered safe and feasible for medical treatment-resistant RE following PG with EG.

History of the lymph node numbering system in the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma since 1962.

The Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma was established by the Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer in 1962. The latest 15th edition was published in 2017. One of its main features is that lymph nodes are numbered as stations. The number of groups has increased from 16 to 36 in 55 years. Seven groups (nos. 1, 2, 5, 7, 9, 10, and 15) were retained from the original classification. Nine groups (nos. 3, 4, 6, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 16) were sub-divided into two or more groups. Furthermore, seven groups (nos. 17, 18, 19, 20, 110, 111, and 112) were added in the 6th, 11th, and 12th editions. This numbering system helps surgeons recognize the exact lymph nodes that need to be dissected. However, the numbering system has become extremely complicated. It is necessary to organize the historical background of each lymph node station and share the definitions clearly. This review focuses on nine anatomical zones around the stomach and summarizes the history of lymph node stations in the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma. Lymph node stations will continue to be modified in the future, and the historical background may be useful in future revisions.

Gastric equivalent of the 'Holy Plane' to standardize the surgical concept of stomach cancer to mesogastric excision: updating Jamieson and Dobson's historic schema.

BACKGROUND: Surgery for curable gastric cancer has historically involved dissection of lymph nodes, depending on the risk of metastasis. By establishing the concept of mesogastric excision (MGE), we aim to make this approach compatible with that for colorectal cancer, where the standard is excision of the mesentery. METHODS: Current advances in molecular embryology, visceral anatomy, and surgical techniques were integrated to update Jamieson and Dobson's schema, a historical reference for the mesogastrium. RESULTS: The mesogastrium develops with a three-dimensional movement, involving multiple fusions with surrounding structures (retroperitoneum or other mesenteries) and imbedding parenchymal organs (pancreas, liver, and spleen) that grow within the mesentery. Meanwhile, the fusion fascia and the investing fascia interface with adjacent structures of different embryological origin, which we consider to be equivalent to the 'Holy Plane' in rectal surgery emphasized by Heald in the concept of total mesorectal excision. Dissecting these fasciae allows for oncologic MGE, consisting of removing lymph node-containing mesenteric adipose tissue with an intact fascial package. MGE is theoretically compatible with its colorectal counterpart, although complete removal of the mesogastrium is not possible due to the need to spare imbedded vital organs. The celiac axis is treated as the central artery of the mesogastrium, but is peripherally ligated by tributaries flowing into the stomach to feed the spared organs. CONCLUSION: The obscure contour of the mesogastrium can be clarified by thinking of it as the gastric equivalent of the 'Holy Plane'. MGE could be a standard concept for surgical treatment of stomach cancer.

Anastomosis behind the sternoclavicular joint is associated with increased incidence of anastomotic stenosis in retrosternal reconstruction with a gastric conduit after esophagectomy.

Anastomotic stenosis after esophagectomy is a major cause of long-term morbidity because it leads to poor dietary intake and malnutrition that markedly reduces the quality of life. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that anastomosis behind the sternoclavicular (SC) joint in retrosternal reconstruction is associated with an increased risk of anastomotic stenosis compared with anastomosis deviated from the joint. Among 226 patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between April 2010 and March 2019, we selected 114 patients who underwent retrosternal reconstruction using a gastric conduit for this study. They were classified into two groups according to the location of the anastomosis as determined by axial sections on postoperative computed tomography scans: anastomosis located behind the SC joint (Group B; n = 71) and anastomosis deviated from the joint (Group D; n = 43). The primary endpoint was the difference in the incidence of anastomotic stenosis between the two groups. Whether the occurrence of anastomotic leak affected the likelihood of anastomotic stenosis was also investigated. The incidence of anastomotic stenosis was significantly higher in Group B than in Group D (71.8% [n = 51] vs. 18.6% [n = 8]; P < 0.0001). The incidence of stenosis in patients who developed an anastomotic leak was significantly higher in Group B than in Group D (88.0% vs. 41.7%; P = 0.0057), although the findings were similar in patients who did not develop anastomotic leak (63.0% and 9.7%, respectively; P < 0.0001). We conclude that anastomosis located behind the SC joint in retrosternal reconstruction with a gastric conduit after esophagectomy is associated with an increased risk of anastomotic stenosis regardless of the development of anastomotic leak.

Laparoscopic Suprapancreatic Lymph Node Dissection Using a Systematic Mesogastric Excision Concept for Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal cancer surgery requires en bloc removal of the primary tumor and organ-specific mesentery1,2. However, this surgical concept for gastric cancer has not yet been applied because of the morphological complexity of the mesenteries of the stomach. Lymph node dissection in gastric cancer surgery can be roughly performed into three regions: lesser curvature, grater curvature, and suprapancreatic region. In this video, we introduced laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in the suprapancreatic region using a systematic mesogastric excision (SME), which has been reported as a concept to perform en bloc resection3. METHODS: This procedure was divided into three steps. First, mesenterization of the mesogastrium was performed by dissecting the embryological planes, and the mesogastrium was dissected from the retroperitoneal surface (Fig. 1a). Second, soft tissue, including the lymph node, was separated from the pancreas and the splenic artery by tracing the inner dissectable layer (Fig. 1b). Finally, the tumor-specific mesentery was transected according to the extent of the lymphadenectomy (Fig. 1c).Fig. 1Intraoperative findings during the stepwise procedure in dissecting the lymph node in the suprapancreatic region. The red broken line indicates the surgical outline. a The mesogastrium is dissected from the retroperitoneal tissue. b The mesogastrium is separated from the pancreas and splenic artery. c The mesogastric transection line is determined on the basis of the extent of the lymphadenectomy. Inf. phrenic a. inferior phrenic artery; PGA posterior gastric artery; Post. epiploic a. posterior epiploic artery; RV renal vein; SA splenic artery; SV splenic vein RESULTS: Between January 2017 and December 2017, six patients underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy using SME. The median time required to complete the suprapancreatic lymphadenectomy was 48 min. No patient underwent conversion to open surgery or experienced intraoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that this laparoscopic suprapancreatic lymphadenectomy using SME takes advantage of the surgical anatomy and achieves en bloc removal of the primary tumor and gastric mesentery. This series is a proof of concept that this procedure can be performed in a timely manner and is feasible.

True esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: background of its definition and current surgical trends.

The definition of true esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma and its surgical treatment are debatable. We review the basis for the current definition and the Japanese surgical strategy in managing true EGJ adenocarcinoma. The Siewert classification is a well-known anatomical classification system for EGJ adenocarcinomas: type II tumors in the region 1 cm above and 2 cm below the EGJ are described as "true carcinoma of the cardia". Coincidentally, this range matches gastric cardiac gland distribution. Conversely, Nishi's classification is generally used to describe EGJ carcinomas, defined as tumors with the center located within 2 cm above and 2 cm below the EGJ, regardless of their histological subtype. This range coincides with the extent of the lower esophageal sphincter combined with gastric cardiac gland distribution. The current Japanese surgical strategy focuses on the tumor range from the EGJ to the esophagus and stomach. According to previous studies, the strategy can be roughly classified into three types. The optimal surgical procedure for true EGJ adenocarcinoma is controversial. However, an ongoing Japanese nationwide prospective trial will help confirm the appropriate standard surgery, including the optimal extent of lymph node dissection.

Revisiting the infracardiac bursa using multimodal methods: topographic anatomy for surgery of the esophagogastric junction.

In embryology, the infracardiac bursa (ICB) is a well-known derivative separated from the omental bursa. During surgeries around the esophagogastric junction (EGJ), surgeons often encounter a closed space considered to be equivalent to the ICB, but the macroscopic anatomy in adults is hardly known. This study aimed to revisit the ICB using multimodal methods to show its development from the embryonic to adult stage and clarify its persistence and topographic anatomy. Histological sections of 79 embryos from Carnegie stage (CS) 16 to 23 and magnetic resonance (MR) images of 39 fetuses were examined to study the embryological development of the ICB. Horizontal sections around the EGJ obtained from three adult cadavers were examined to determine the topographic anatomy and histology of the ICB. Further, 32 laparoscopic surgical videos before (n = 16) and after (n = 16) the start of this study were reviewed to confirm its remaining rate and topographic anatomy in surgery. The ICB was formed in 1 out of 10 CS17 samples, and in 8 out of 10 CS18 samples. Further, it was observed in all CS19-23 except one CS23 sample and in 25 (64%) out of 39 fetus samples. Three-dimensional reconstructed MR images of fetuses revealed that the ICB was located at the right alongside the esophagus and the cranial side of the diaphragmatic crus. In one adult cadaver, the caudal end of the ICB arose from the level of the esophageal hiatus and the cranial end reached up to the level of the pericardium. The inner surface cells of the space consisted of the mesothelium. In laparoscopic surgery, the ICB was identified in only 11 (69%) out of 16 surgeries before. However, subsequently we were able to identify the ICB reproducibly in 15 (94%) out of 16 surgeries. Thus, the ICB is the structure commonly remaining in almost all adults as a closed space located at the right alongside the esophagus and the cranial side of the diaphragmatic crus. It may be available as a useful landmark in surgery of the EGJ.

Laparoscopic modified lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer surgery using systematic mesogastric excision: a novel technique based on a concept.

PURPOSE: Radical surgery for gastrointestinal cancer involves en bloc removal of the primary tumor and organ-specific mesenteries. However, the surgical concept and technique for lymphadenectomy during gastric cancer surgery remain unclear. We examined a novel technique for laparoscopic modified lymphadenectomy during gastric cancer surgery involving systematic mesogastric excision (SME) and focused on the topographic anatomy, surgical technique, and specimens. METHODS: Our surgical technique involved the following: mesenterization by dissociating embryological planes, separating fat tissue containing lymph nodes from the pancreas and its associated vessels by tracing the intramesenteric dissectable layers, and dissecting the lymph node that is dependent on the D1+ criteria. RESULTS: Between October 2011 and September 2016, 227 patients underwent laparoscopic D1+ gastrectomy using SME. Of these, total gastrectomy was performed in 47 cases and distal gastrectomy was performed in 180 cases. The median operative time was 303 min (range, 201-722 min), and estimated blood loss was 50 mL (range, 0-550 mL). The median number of harvested lymph nodes was 54 (range, 18-163). There was no conversion to open surgery. CONCLUSIONS: SME was adapted for modified gastrectomy and is considered safe. Modified lymphadenectomy during gastrectomy is determined by the resection margin of the mesogastrium.

[A Case of Stage IV Gastric Cancer Which Showed Pathological Complete Response after Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy].

We report a case of Stage IV gastric cancer showing pathological complete response(pCR)after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy( NAC)using S-1 and oxaliplatin(SOX).A woman 73-year-old was diagnosed as harming type 3 Stage IV gastric cancer with para-aortic lymph node(PAN)metastasis.She underwent 4 courses of NAC with SOX regimen.After the treatment, both the primary tumor and the metastatic PAN decreased in size remarkably.She underwent distal gastrectomy with D2 plus PAN dissection with curative intent.Pathological diagnosis revealed complete disappearance of cancer cells in both the primary lesion of the stomach and all dissected lymph nodes, confirming pCR.She is alive without recurrence 4 months after surgery.

Lymphadenectomy along the infrapyloric artery may be dispensable when performing pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early middle-third gastric cancer.

This study investigated the incidence of gastric cancer metastasis to the lymph nodes along the infrapyloric artery (IPA), namely no. 6i, by reviewing our medical records of 348 patients who underwent complete no. 6 dissection. Metastasis to these nodes was observed in 11 (3.2 %) patients. In these patients, one huge tumor was located in the middle third and ten including two early tumors were located in the lower third; the metastasis rate in early lower-third tumors was 2.1 % and reached 19.5 % in advanced tumors. In contrast, no early middle-third gastric cancers had no. 6i metastasis. The median diameter of 6i-positive tumors was 62 (range 18-115) mm, and the distance from the distal tumor border to the pyloric ring was no more than 44 mm. Lymphadenectomy along the IPA is important for treating gastric cancer invading the antrum, but may be dispensable when performing pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early middle-third cancer.

Treatment strategy for successful conversion surgery in clinical stage IVB gastric cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Recent advances in chemotherapy have resulted in successful conversion surgery (CS) for clinical stage (cStage) IVB gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to evaluate the success rate of CS in clinical practice and determine optimal treatment strategies. METHODS: Totally, 166 patients with cStage IVB gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, who underwent chemotherapy at Hyogo Medical University Hospital between January 2017 and June 2022, were included. CS was performed after confirming tumor to be M0 based on imaging and/or staging laparoscopy, except for resectable liver metastases. Preoperative chemotherapy was continued for at least 6 months provided that adverse events were manageable. RESULTS: Of 125 eligible patients, 23 were treated with CS, achieving a conversion rate of 18.4% and an R0 resection rate of 91.3%. The median duration of preoperative chemotherapy was 8.5 months; the median number of cycles was eight. The highest conversion rate was observed in patients receiving first-line treatment (14.4%), followed by those receiving second and third lines (5.8% and 2.3%, respectively). The median survival time in patients who received CS was significantly longer than that in patients who continued chemotherapy alone (56.7 versus 16 months, respectively, P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the 3-year overall survival between the patients who achieved CS after first-line treatment (63.2%, n = 18) and those who achieved CS after second- or third-line treatment (66.7%, n = 5). CONCLUSION: Consistent chemotherapy strategies could lead to successful CS and improved prognosis in a greater number of patients with cStage IVB GC, regardless of line of treatment.

Topographic anatomy and laparoscopic technique for dissection of no. 6 infrapyloric lymph nodes in gastric cancer surgery.

We focused on the embryology and topographic anatomy of the infrapyloric lymph region, which is frequently involved in node metastases but technically complicated for dissection in gastric cancer surgery. Gastrointestinal organs possess their own mesenteries composed of double layers of peritoneum that enclose the intermediate adipose layer providing pathways for vessels, nerves, and lymphatic channels. The frontal layer of the mesoduodenum, in which no. 6 infrapyloric nodes lie, directly faces the pancreas and during gestation is overlain by the greater omentum and transverse mesocolon through the membranous connective tissue called the fusion fascia. Therefore, we performed no. 6 node dissection using the following process: (1) we traced out the mesoduodenum by detachment of the greater omentum and transverse mesocolon; (2) we transected the fusion fascia and (3) removed the adipose layer on the anterior face of the pancreas with its included lymph nodes together with the right gastroepiploic and infrapyloric vessels. The described technique is feasible and in keeping with the anatomical logic for oncologically reliable dissection of no. 6 infrapyloric nodes.

Transhiatal lower mediastinal lymph node dissection for esophagogastric junction carcinoma by interconnecting four body cavities.

BACKGROUND: Due to the limited number of landmark structures, it is difficult to standardize the surgical procedures for advanced esophagogastric junction cancer such as Ivor Lewis esophagectomy that require transhiatal lower mediastinal lymph node dissection (TH-LMND). We demonstrate an easily reproducible procedure for TH-LMND, wherein four body cavities, namely, the abdominal cavity, infracardiac bursa (ICB), and left and right thoracic cavities are interconnected. METHODS: First, the dissection between the right crus and the esophagus was used to connect the abdominal cavity to the ICB - a lower mediastinal cavity separated from the omental bursa during embryonic development [1,2]. Second, the right thoracic cavity was opened with the shortest distance by dissecting the cranial side of the ICB. The right pulmonary ligament was dissected from the right lung. Third, the dissection to the contralateral side while exposing the aorta and the pericardium connected the left and right thoracic cavities. Then, the left pulmonary ligament was dissected from the left lung. The dissected tissues, including the lymph nodes, were subsequently peeled from the esophagus. RESULTS: Between April 2018 and August 2021, 14 patients underwent laparoscopic or robotic TH-LMND via the procedure above. The median time required to complete the dissection was 75 min. None of the procedures were converted to open surgery, and none of the patients experienced intraoperative complications such as pericardial injury, lung injury, or massive bleeding. CONCLUSION: The surgical concept of interconnecting four body cavities made the procedure more accessible and reproducible while achieving en bloc TH-LMND.

Potential advantages of robotic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective comparative cohort study.

Laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is a highly technical surgery that can lead to postoperative complications. Whether the recently introduced robotic surgery overcomes the drawbacks of laparoscopic surgery in total gastrectomy remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the potential benefits of robotic total gastrectomy (RTG) and compare the short-term outcomes of RTG and LTG. We retrospectively analyzed 56 patients with primary gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer who underwent RTG or LTG between June 2017 and July 2021. The groups were compared in terms of operative outcomes and postoperative complications. Potential risk factors associated with postoperative complications were assessed by performing multivariable analysis using logistic regression models via the exact method. Operation time was significantly longer, and postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the robotic group (550 vs. 466 min, P < 0.001; 13 vs. 18 days, P = 0.013, respectively). The incidence of overall postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II was 18.5% and 24.1% in the RTG and LTG groups, respectively. Pancreatic fistulas were not observed, but other local complications were observed in 0% and 17.2% of the RTG and LTG groups, respectively (P = 0.052). In the multivariable analysis, the independent risk factors for local complications were laparoscopic surgery (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 8.542 [1.065-∞], P = 0.045) and esophagogastric junction cancer (16.646 [2.559-∞], P = 0.005). Compared with LTG, RTG was associated with fewer local complications (mainly anastomotic leakage), especially in cases of esophagogastric junction cancer with high anastomotic sites.

Clinical outcomes of proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A comparison between the double-flap technique and jejunal interposition.

BACKGROUND: The optimal reconstruction method after proximal gastrectomy (PG) has been debatable. Recent reports have shown that the double-flap technique (DFT) provides good outcomes in terms of postoperative nutritional status and quality of life. However, no study has compared the clinical outcomes of the DFT with other reconstruction methods. Here, we evaluated and compared the clinical outcomes between the DFT and jejunal interposition (JI) after PG for gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 34 consecutive patients who had undergone PG for upper third gastric cancer between January 2011 and October 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. The main factors investigated were surgical outcomes, postoperative nutritional status, symptoms, and endoscopic findings 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled (DFT, 14; JI, 20). The operation time was similar between the two techniques (228 and 246 minutes for DFT and JI, respectively, P = 0.377), as were the rates of anastomotic complications (7% and 0% for DFT and JI, respectively, P = 0.412). Body weight loss was significantly lower in the DFT group than in the JI group (-8.1% vs -16.1%, P = 0.001). Total protein and albumin levels were higher in the DFT group than in the JI group (0% vs -2.9%, P = 0.053, and -0.3% vs -6.1%, P = 0.077, respectively). One patient in the DFT group and no patients in the JI group experienced reflux esophagitis (≥ grade B) (P = 0.393). Anastomotic strictures were not observed as postoperative complications in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical outcomes revealed that the DFT was safe and feasible, similar to JI. In terms of controlling postoperative body weight loss, the DFT is a better reconstruction technique than JI after PG.

Successful revision surgery for very late-onset stomal obstruction following Gomez gastroplasty: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Gomez gastroplasty, which was developed in the 1970s as one of the gastric restrictive surgeries for severe obesity, partitions the stomach using a stapler from the lesser towards the greater curvature at the upper gastric body, leaving a small channel. This procedure is no longer performed due to poor outcomes, but surgeons can encounter late-onset complications even decades after the surgery. Here, we report a case of very late-onset stomal obstruction following Gomez gastroplasty which was successfully treated by revision surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: A 58-year-old man was referred to our institution with sudden-onset nausea and vomiting. He underwent weight loss surgery in the USA in 1979, but the details of the surgery were unclear. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy demonstrated a stoma at the greater curvature of the upper gastric body, and fluoroscopy showed retention of contrast medium in the fundus and poor outflow through the stoma. Abdominal computed tomography revealed a staple line partitioning the stomach. Considering these preoperative investigation findings and the period during which the surgery was performed, the patient was diagnosed with very late-onset stomal obstruction following Gomez gastroplasty. Supporting the preoperative diagnosis, the surgical findings revealed a staple line extending from the lesser towards the greater curvature of the upper gastric body and a channel reinforced by a running seromuscular suture on the greater curvature. Moreover, gastric torsion caused by the enlarged proximal gastric pouch was found. Re-gastroplasty involving wedge resection of the original channel was performed followed by construction of a new channel. Postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient no longer had symptoms of stomal obstruction after revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Re-gastroplasty was safe and feasible for very late-onset stomal obstruction following Gomez gastroplasty. Accurate preoperative diagnosis based on the patient's interview and the investigation findings was important for surgical planning. A careful follow-up is required to prevent excessive weight regain after revision surgery.

Robot-assisted Valvuloplastic Esophagogastrostomy by Double-flap Technique Using a Knifeless Linear Stapler After Proximal Gastrectomy.

After proximal gastrectomy, valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy by double-flap technique could be the ideal reconstruction to prevent gastroesophageal reflux. However, it is demanding procedure in laparoscopic surgery. In this video, we demonstrate a robot-assisted double-flap technique using a knifeless stapler.