Knowledge matters and empowers: HPV vaccine advocacy among HPV-related cancer survivors.

PURPOSE: To describe knowledge about human papillomavirus (HPV), HPV-related care behavior, and advocacy intent (e.g., vaccine recommendation and willingness to become an advocate for vaccination) and to investigate associations between knowledge, HPV-related care behavior, and advocacy intent among HPV-related cancer survivors. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was offered through Qualtrics to HPV-related cancer survivors who were either volunteers at a cancer center or patients of survivorship clinics. RESULTS: A total of 200 survivors responded. Only 33.2% of respondents reported knowing their cancer was HPV-related and 56.8% reported HPV vaccine is safe. Participants who knew that their cancer was caused by HPV were more likely to have vaccinated their children (p < .001). Also, participants who knew that the vaccine is safe were more willing to recommend the vaccine (p < .001), to be a peer mentor for others with HPV-related cancers (43.2% vs. 14.0%, p < .001), and to act as an advocate for increasing vaccination rates (44.1% vs. 24.4%, p = 0.01). Finally, survivors who were aware of the vaccine's effectiveness in decreasing precancerous lesions were more likely to recommend the vaccine (45.7% vs. 12.0%, p = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Raising survivor awareness of the link between HPV and cancer and HPV vaccine safety may increase their willingness to serve as powerful opinion leaders and peer mentors to promote HPV vaccination. Providers may take the simple step of informing patients that their cancer is HPV-related and HPV vaccine is safe to increase the number of informed and empowered survivors.

Defining the impact of the use of granulocyte colony stimulating factors on the incidence of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with gynecologic malignancies.

Purpose The objectives of this study were to characterize the incidence of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and febrile neutropenia (FN) with specific chemotherapy agents commonly used in the treatment of gynecologic malignancies, as well as defining the impact of granulocyte colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) on the prevention of CIN and FN in this patient population. Methods This retrospective analysis was conducted from a database of 635 gynecologic cancer patients who received chemotherapy between 1 September 2007 and 31 August 2008. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the impact of potential covariates on the overall incidence of CIN. Results Overall, 28.3% of patients experienced CIN with one or more cycles chemotherapy, and 13.1% had treatment delays or dose reduction associated with CIN. The use of G-CSF prior to administration of chemotherapy resulted in a decrease in the incidence of CIN from 29.8% to 19.6% compared to no G-CSF use. No difference was observed in number of treatment delays or dose reductions in the 46 (7.2%) of gynecologic cancer patients that received G-CSF prophylaxis. Multivariate analysis found that both age and the number of current cycles jointly may predict risk of CIN. Conclusions Patients with gynecologic malignancies appear to be at a higher risk of development of neutropenia when treated with chemotherapy. The proactive use of G-CSF did decrease the risk of CIN by over 30%. Prospective study is warranted to determine the impact of G-CSF to reduce CIN in patients with gynecologic malignancies receiving chemotherapy.

Endometrial Cancer: An Overview of Pathophysiology, Management, and Care.

OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of the etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship concerns surrounding endometrial cancer. DATA SOURCES: A review of articles dated 2006-2018 from PubMed and NCCN guidelines. CONCLUSION: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy. Staging and treatment are primarily surgical, with adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy administered as indicated by grade and stage. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Cancer prevention, response to treatment, and quality of life can be affected by lifestyle factors, including nutrition, exercise, and tobacco use. Nurses in diverse roles and practice settings can educate patients about lifestyle choices that can affect individuals across the cancer trajectory.

What women with ovarian cancer think and know about genetic testing.

OBJECTIVES: Few women with ovarian cancer undergo genetic testing for the Breast and Ovarian Cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2. With the prospect of BRCA-directed therapeutics, we investigated ovarian cancer patients' knowledge and willingness to undergo genetic testing. METHODS: All ovarian cancer patients seen in the Gynecology Center of a cancer center and a private clinic were asked to complete an anonymous questionnaire regarding knowledge and willingness to undergo BRCA testing. Women who had prior genetic testing were asked not to participate. Data was analyzed using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Two-hundred and thirty seven ovarian cancer patients voluntarily completed the questionnaire. Fifty-five percent (131/237) of participants had not heard of BRCA testing. Of Caucasian respondents, 51% were unaware of BRCA testing, compared to 70% of Hispanic and 88% of African American respondents (p=0.008). Awareness was correlated with education (p<0.001). Eighty-nine percent of participants were willing to be tested if it would directly affect their therapy and 86.9% would be tested to benefit their family. Seventy-four percent of patients would pay 20% of the cost of testing, only 25.1% would pay in full. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of women with ovarian cancer are not aware of the availability of BRCA testing. This lack of awareness is more profound in minorities. Despite lack of knowledge, most patients would undergo testing if it would impact their care. However, cost may be a barrier. Given the willingness of patients to undergo testing and the possibility of targeted therapy, clinicians who care for these patients should work to make appropriate genetic counseling referrals.

Evaluating patients with mildly elevated transaminase levels.

CASE STUDY: S.B. is a 52-year-old woman with recurrent stage IV ovarian cancer. She initially presented three and a half years ago with complaints of abdominal pain, increased abdominal girth, and abdominal bloating. A CA-125 blood test was elevated, and a computed tomography scan of the abdomen and pelvis revealed bilateral ovarian masses highly suspicious for malignancy. She was taken to surgery for a total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and suboptimal tumor reduction. Pathology revealed poorly differentiated papillary serous ovarian cancer. Metastatic disease was noted in the rectosigmoid area and vaginal apex. Postoperatively, she received six cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin. At completion, her CA-125 normalized and imaging studies showed no evidence of disease. However, within three months, her CA-125 was elevated and a palpable mass at the vaginal apex was proven by biopsy to be recurrent disease.

Evaluation of patient chemotherapy education in a gynecology oncology center.

GOALS OF WORK: To assess the level at which patient chemotherapy education needs are being met by the health-care team in an outpatient clinic setting and to identify any unmet needs regarding patient chemotherapy education. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A questionnaire comprising 17 questions was developed to evaluate patient preferences regarding chemotherapy education. In the clinic, patients were offered a copy of the questionnaire with a cover letter describing the study. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 282 questionnaires were completed, and 190 respondents had previously received chemotherapy. Of the 165 respondents who were previously treated at our institution, 66.7% (110) had received some form of chemotherapy education specifically from our clinic. The majority of all respondents (86.8%) reported that they preferred to receive information about their chemotherapy via written materials and/or through a conversation with a health-care professional. Regardless of the source of information, 62.6% of respondents (119) felt they were provided with adequate information about their chemotherapy treatment, and 42.4% reported that they would like more information about their chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The current practice in our clinic is to provide patients with written information about their chemotherapy that is reviewed with a health-care professional. The data revealed that our current practice is consistent with our patients' preferences. However, this survey did identify new information that patients want to know about chemotherapy, such as how chemotherapy works, why chemotherapy stops working, and drug-drug as well as drug-food interactions. This information will be incorporated into future patient education materials.