First International Consensus Conference on lesions of uncertain malignant potential in the breast (B3 lesions).

The purpose of this study is to obtain a consensus for the therapy of B3 lesions. The first International Consensus Conference on lesions of uncertain malignant potential in the breast (B3 lesions) including atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), flat epithelial atypia (FEA), classical lobular neoplasia (LN), papillary lesions (PL), benign phyllodes tumors (PT), and radial scars (RS) took place in January 2016 in Zurich, Switzerland organized by the International Breast Ultrasound School and the Swiss Minimally Invasive Breast Biopsy group-a subgroup of the Swiss Society of Senology. Consensus recommendations for the management and follow-up surveillance of these B3 lesions were developed and areas of research priorities were identified. The consensus recommendation for FEA, LN, PL, and RS diagnosed on core needle biopsy or vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) is to therapeutically excise the lesion seen on imaging by VAB and no longer by open surgery, with follow-up surveillance imaging for 5 years. The consensus recommendation for ADH and PT is, with some exceptions, therapeutic first-line open surgical excision. Minimally invasive management of selected B3 lesions with therapeutic VAB is acceptable as an alternative to first-line surgical excision.

Factors Indicating Surgical Excision in Classical Type of Lobular Neoplasia of the Breast.

Purpose: Classical type of lobular neoplasia (LN) encompassing both atypical lobular hyperplasia and classical lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast is a lesion with uncertain malignant potential and has been the topic of several studies with conflicting outcome results. The aim of our study was to clarify outcome-relevant factors and treatment options of classical LN. Methods: We performed a pathological re-evaluation of the preoperative biopsy specimens and a retrospective clinical and radiological data analysis of 160 patients with LN from the Breast Center Zurich. Open surgery was performed in 65 patients, vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) in 79 patients, and surveillance after breast core needle biopsy (CNB) in 16 patients. Results: The upgrade rate into ductal carcinoma in situ/invasive cancer was the highest in case of imaging/histology discordance (40%). If the number of foci in the biopsy specimen was ≥3, the upgrade rate in the consecutive surgical specimens was increased (p = 0.01). The association of classical LN with histological microcalcification correlated with shortened disease-free survival (p < 0.01), whereas other factors showed no impact on follow-up. Conclusions: Surveillance or subsequent VAB after CNB of LN is sufficient in most cases. Careful consideration of individual radiological and histological factors is required to identify patients with a high risk of upgrade into malignancy. In those cases, surgical excision is indicated.

"I was seen by a radiologist, but unfortunately I can't remember the name and I still have questions. What should I do?" Radiologists should give thoughts to improve service professionalism and patient esteem.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study is to investigate how well patients remember the radiologist's name after a radiological examination, and whether giving the patient a business card improves the patient's perception of the radiologist's professionalism and esteem. METHODS: In this prospective and randomized two-centre study, a total of 141 patients with BI-RADS 1 and 2 scores were included. After screening examination comprising mammography and ultrasound by a radiologist, 71 patients received a business card (group 1), while 70 received no business card (group 2). Following the examination, patients were questioned about their experiences. RESULTS: The patients in group 1 could remember the name of the radiologist in 85% of cases. The patients in group 2, in contrast, could only remember the name in 7% of cases (p < 0.001). 90% of the patients in group 1 believed it was very important that they are able to contact the radiologist at a later time, whereas only 76% of patients in group 2 felt that this was a very important service (p < 0.025). A total of 87% of the patients in group 1 indicated that they would contact the radiologist if they had any questions whereas 73% of the patients in group 2 would like to contact the radiologist but were not able to do so, because they could not remember the name (p < 0.001). All questions were analysed with a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test that took study centre as stratification into account. In some cases, two categories were collapsed to avoid zero cell counts. CONCLUSIONS: Using business cards significantly increased the recall of the radiologist's name and could be an important tool in improving the relationships between patients and radiologists and enhancing service professionalism. TRIAL REGISTRATION: We have a general approval from our ethics committee. The patients have given their consent to this study.

Consensus Meeting of Breast Imaging: BI-RADS® and Beyond.

Organizers of medical educational courses are often confronted with questions that are clinically relevant yet trespassing the frontiers of scientifically proven, evidence-based medicine at the point of care. Therefore, since 2007 organizers of breast teaching courses in German language met biannually to find a consensus in clinically relevant questions that have not been definitely answered by science. The questions were prepared during the 3 months before the meeting according to a structured process and finally agreed upon the day before the consensus meeting. At the consensus meeting, the open questions concerning 2D/3D mammography, breast ultrasound, MR mammography, interventions as well as risk-based imaging of the breast were presented first for electronic anonymized voting, and then the results of the audience were separately displayed from the expert votes. Thereafter, an introductory statement of the moderator was followed by pros/cons of two experts, and subsequently the final voting was performed. With ≥75% of votes of the expert panel, an answer qualified as a consensus statement. Seventeen consensus statements were gained, addressing for instance the use of 2D/3D mammography, breast ultrasound in screening, MR mammography in women with intermediate breast cancer risk, markers for localization of pathologic axillary lymph nodes, and standards in risk-based imaging of the breast. After the evaluation, comments from the experts on each field were gathered supplementarily. Methodology, transparency, and soundness of statements achieve a unique yield for all course organizers and provide solid pathways for decision making in breast imaging.

Esophagus imaging for radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation using a dual-source computed tomography system: preliminary observations.

OBJECTIVE: The very recent introduction of dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) has significantly improved the temporal resolution of ECG-gated multidetector-row cardiac computed tomography (CT). The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether with a DSCT visualization of the esophagus is feasible without any use of contrast in the esophagus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 patients were evaluated. Ten patients underwent examination with a DSCT scanner without a gastric tube. In another ten patients, which served as control group, a CT scan was performed with a radio-opaque gastric tube prior to circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (in seven patients with a 16-slice CT and in three patients with a DSCT). RESULTS: In the control group the gastric tube and the left atrium were reconstructed and were well visualized in all ten patients in the electro-anatomic mapping system, independently whether 16-row CT or DSCT scan was used. In the study group integration of the esophagus into the electro-anatomic mapping system was not feasible, due to the lacking contrast counterpart the surrounding tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Even with the newest generation of DSCT scanner it is not possible to integrate the esophagus image into the 3-D electroanatomic mapping system without contrast by whatever means. However placing a conventional gastric tube before performing the CT scan allowed visualization and integration of the esophagus into the 3-D electro-anatomical map in all patients.

Cavoatrial bypass for occlusion of the inferior caval vein in a patient with Budd-Chiari syndrome.

We report the case of a young man with Budd-Chiari syndrome and occlusion of the inferior caval vein. Peripheral edema was his predominant complaint. Symptoms of portal hypertension were lacking, indicating membranotomy and not portosystemic shunting as the treatment of choice. At operation, membranotomy was not feasible, and a cavoatrial bypass using a 22 mm Gore-Tex graft was placed instead. Shortly after the operation the peripheral edema vanished, diuretic treatment could be withdrawn, and liver function improved. Eighteen months later the bypass remains patent, edema is absent, and liver function is stable. We conclude that cavoatrial bypass is a therapeutic option in patients with occlusion of the inferior vena cava with no clinical symptoms of portal hypertension if transcardiac membranotomy is not feasible.

Assessing ischemic heart disease in patients with left bundle branch block--an emerging role for multislice computed tomography.

Diagnosis of left bundle branch block (LBBB) with concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) alters the prognosis and the therapeutic management. All common non-invasive stress tests have a limited performance to identify CAD in patients with LBBB. Thus invasive coronary angiography is often needed to confirm or defer obstructive CAD. We propose a new diagnostic algorithm in evaluation of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with LBBB.

Dural ectasia in children with Marfan syndrome: a prospective, multicenter, patient-control study.

UNLABELLED: The clinical diagnosis of Marfan syndrome in childhood is difficult, because symptoms may not have developed to their full expression until adulthood. The Ghent nosology for the diagnosis of Marfan syndrome classifies dural ectasia as a major diagnostic criterion. More than two thirds of adult patients with Marfan syndrome show dural ectasia, while the frequency in childhood is unknown. This prospective multicenter observational patient-control study was performed to identify pathologic changes of the lumbosacral spine in young patients with Marfan syndrome. DESIGN: Prospective clinical trial, multicentric, cross-sectional. SETTING: MRI of the lumbosacral spine. PATIENTS: Twenty patients with proven Marfan syndrome, 20 patients suspicious for Marfan syndrome and 38 healthy controls. OUTCOME MEASURES: Vertebral body diameter (VBD) from L1 to S1, dural sac diameter (DSD) from L1 to S1, dural sac ratio (DSR), qualitative assessment of the lumbosacral spine. RESULTS: DSD and VBD in different age groups were higher in patients with proven or suspected Marfan syndrome than in healthy controls (DSD: L1, 6-8 years, P < 0.05). VBD related to body height showed a similar growth related increase in patients with proven or suspected Marfan syndrome and controls. DSD related to body height was elevated in patients with proven or suspected Marfan syndrome at different levels of the lumbar spine. DSD at levels L1, L5, and S1, and DSR at levels L5 and S1 of patients with proven Marfan syndrome were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than in controls. CONCLUSION: Even during childhood pathologic changes inside the lumbosacral spine of patients with Marfan syndrome can be observed. Dural ectasia, which occurs at different levels of the lumbar spine, can be detected at levels L5 and S1 in up to 40% of patients with Marfan syndrome.

Normal values of the sagittal diameter of the lumbar spine (vertebral body and dural sac) in children measured by MRI.

BACKGROUND: The definition of normal values is a prerequisite for the reliable evaluation of abnormality in the lumbar spine, such as spinal canal stenosis or dural ectasia in patients with Marfan syndrome. Values for vertebral body diameter (VBD) and dural sac diameter (DSD) for the lumbar spine have been published in adults. In children, normal values have been established using conventional radiography or myelography, but not by MRI. OBJECTIVE: To define normal values for the sagittal diameter of the vertebral body and dural sac, and to calculate a dural sac ratio (DSR) in the lumbosacral spine (L1-S1) in healthy children using MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 75 healthy children between 6 years and 17 years of age were examined using a sagittal T2-weighted sequence. Sagittal VBD and DSD were measured and a DSR was calculated. This was a retrospective and cross-sectional study. RESULTS: With increasing age there is a significant increase of VBD, a slight increase of DSD, and a slight decrease of DSR. There is no significant sex difference. DSR in healthy children is higher than in healthy adults. CONCLUSIONS: MRI is a reliable method demonstrating the natural shape of the lumbosacral spine and its absolute values. These normal values compare well with those established by conventional radiological techniques. Our data may serve as a reference for defining dural ectasia in children with Marfan syndrome.