ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) recommend regular monitoring and management of kidney function and CKD risk factors. However, the majority of patients with stage 3 CKD lack a diagnosis code, and data on the implementation of these recommendations in the real world are limited. AIM: To assess the implementation of guideline-directed monitoring and management practices in the real world in patients with stage 3 CKD without a recorded diagnosis code. METHODS: REVEAL-CKD (NCT04847531) is a multinational, observational study of patients with stage 3 CKD. Eligible patients had ≥2 consecutive estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) measurements indicative of stage 3 CKD recorded >90 and ≤730 days apart, lacked an International Classification of Diseases 9/10 diagnosis code corresponding to CKD any time before and up to 6 months after the second eGFR measurement. Testing of key measures of care quality were assessed. RESULTS: The study included 435,971 patients from 9 countries. In all countries, the prevalence of urinary albumin-creatinine ratio and albuminuria testing was low. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blocker and statin prescriptions were highly variable, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor prescriptions remained below 21%. Blood pressure measurements were recorded in 20.2%-89.9% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, a large proportion of patients with evidence of stage 3 CKD did not receive recommended, guideline-directed monitoring and management. The variability in standard of care among countries demonstrates a clear opportunity to improve monitoring and management of these patients, most likely improving long-term outcomes.
Subject(s)
Glomerular Filtration Rate , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Humans , Male , Female , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/physiopathology , Aged , Middle Aged , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Albuminuria , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Guideline Adherence , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Creatinine , Blood Pressure/physiology , Practice Guidelines as TopicABSTRACT
This article reviews the efficacy and safety data of tirzepatide, a once-weekly, novel glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist approved in the United States, the European Union, and other regions for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. All doses of tirzepatide demonstrated superiority in reducing A1C and body weight from baseline versus placebo or active comparators. The safety profile of tirzepatide was consistent with that of the GLP-1 receptor agonist class, with mild to moderate and transient gastrointestinal side effects being the most common adverse events. With clinically and statistically significant reductions in A1C and body weight without increased risk of hypoglycemia in various populations, tirzepatide has demonstrated potential as a first-in-class treatment option for many people with type 2 diabetes.
ABSTRACT
Individuals with type 2 diabetes are at increased risk of both renal and cardiovascular events. The convergence of type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease, including heart failure, requires management by a multidisciplinary health care team. Primary care clinicians are likely to be the first and most frequent point of contact for individuals with type 2 diabetes who are at high risk of cardiorenal disease and therefore play a pivotal role in early diagnosis, establishment of effective treatment strategies, and coordination of care. This article presents a clinical perspective with multidisciplinary collaboration on a patient case representative of those seen in routine clinical practice. The authors assess reasons why patients may not receive evidence-based care and identify opportunities to initiate therapies that reduce cardiovascular and renal events in the primary care setting.
ABSTRACT
Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) provides comprehensive assessment of daily glucose measurements for patients with diabetes and can reveal high and low blood glucose values that may occur even when a patient's A1C is adequately controlled. Among the measures captured by CGM, the percentage of time in the target glycemic range, or "time in range" (typically 70-180 mg/dL), has emerged as one of the strongest indicators of good glycemic control. This review examines the shift to using CGM to assess glycemic control and guide diabetes treatment decisions, with a focus on time in range as the key metric of glycemic control.
ABSTRACT
Early-stage (stageĀ 1-3) chronic kidney disease (CKD) has an asymptomatic presentation such that most people with CKD are unaware of their disease status and remain undiagnosed. CKD is associated with multiple long-term conditions (MLTC), or multimorbidity, the most common of these being cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and typeĀ 2 diabetes. Primary care practitioners (PCPs) are crucial in the early identification and management of patients with CKD. For individuals at high risk of CKD, measurements of estimated glomerular filtration rate, urine albumin-creatinine ratio, and blood pressure should be obtained regularly and recorded in a timely manner. The importance of lifestyle changes in the prevention and management of CKD should also be highlighted. A recent addition to the treatment of CKD in people with and without typeĀ 2 diabetes has been the recommendation by clinical practice guidelines of a sodium-glucose co-transporterĀ 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor alongside a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor as foundational therapy. SGLT2 inhibitors prevent CKD progression and reduce fatal and non-fatal kidney and cardiovascular events, hospitalization for heart failure, and all-cause mortality, and they have a favorable safety and tolerability profile. However, uptake has been slow, particularly in people with CKD without typeĀ 2 diabetes. A multifaceted approach is required to ensure that people with CKD receive optimal kidney protection. Measures to raise awareness of the importance of early identification and intervention include local/national campaigns via social media and practice-based education; clinical education programs; integration of clinical decision support tools into electronic health records; detection programs built around electronic health records; and good interdisciplinary communication. PCPs at the forefront of multidisciplinary care are best placed to implement the evidence-based clinical practice CKD guidelines for lifestyle modification and guideline-directed medical therapy.
Chronic kidney disease, or CKD, affects about one in ten adults worldwide. Results from many real-world studies show that early identification and treatment of CKD is crucial to prevent the disease from getting worse. However, because CKD can have no symptoms in its early stages, it is often not diagnosed. Many people with CKD are therefore unaware that they have it. People with CKD are likely to have other long-term health issues as well, including cardiovascular disease, hypertension and diabetes. Primary care practitioners are best placed to offer holistic, patient-centered care to those with CKD, and are the frontline in identifying and managing the risk factors for chronic disease. Primary care practitioners may advise people with CKD on lifestyle changes, such as diet and exercise, as well as helping them understand what treatments are available. SodiumĀglucose co-transporterĀ 2 inhibitors have shown strong kidney-protective effects in clinical trials, and recently updated clinical guidelines recommend their use as foundational therapy alongside more established treatments of CKD. These treatments should be prescribed to people with CKD whether they have diabetes or not. For people at high risk of CKD, primary care practitioners should regularly obtain and record measurements of kidney function and blood pressure. Public and primary care practitioner awareness and education, the use of clinical decision support tools, and good communication between healthcare professionals are all important to drive change in primary care and improve the early identification and management of CKD.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Humans , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Early Diagnosis , Primary Health Care , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Physician's Role , Disease Progression , Physicians, Primary CareABSTRACT
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects more than one in ten people worldwide. However, results from the REVEAL-CKD study suggest that it is often not diagnosed. Many patients are therefore unaware that they have CKD, putting them at increased risk of disease progression and complications. Empowering patients with knowledge about CKD will allow them to become active participants in their own care, driving improvements in diagnosis rates and changing patient outcomes for the better. In this article, we provide patient and clinician perspectives on the importance of early CKD diagnosis and management. We present an overview of the tests commonly used to diagnose CKD in clinical practice, as well as actionable suggestions for patients, clinicians, and health policymakers that could help improve disease detection and treatment. Navdeep Tangri, a nephrologist and epidemiologist at the University of Manitoba, and Jane DeMeis, a patient living with chronic kidney disease, discuss how results from the REVEAL-CKD study highlight the need for change to improve management of chronic kidney disease. Video Abstract (MP4 141866 KB).
Subject(s)
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Humans , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diagnosis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Disease Progression , Early Diagnosis , KidneyABSTRACT
The spectrum of cardiorenal and metabolic diseases comprises many disorders, including obesity, type 2 diabetes (T2D), chronic kidney disease (CKD), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), heart failure (HF), dyslipidemias, hypertension, and associated comorbidities such as pulmonary diseases and metabolism dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and metabolism dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASLD and MASH, respectively, formerly known as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis [NAFLD and NASH]). Because cardiorenal and metabolic diseases share pathophysiologic pathways, two or more are often present in the same individual. Findings from recent outcome trials have demonstrated benefits of various treatments across a range of conditions, suggesting a need for practice recommendations that will guide clinicians to better manage complex conditions involving diabetes, cardiorenal, and/or metabolic (DCRM) diseases. To meet this need, we formed an international volunteer task force comprising leading cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, and primary care physicians to develop the DCRM 2.0 Practice Recommendations, an updated and expanded revision of a previously published multispecialty consensus on the comprehensive management of persons living with DCRM. The recommendations are presented as 22 separate graphics covering the essentials of management to improve general health, control cardiorenal risk factors, and manage cardiorenal and metabolic comorbidities, leading to improved patient outcomes.
Subject(s)
Metabolic Diseases , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Metabolic Diseases/therapyABSTRACT
For patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), the journey to diagnosis may not be straightforward. Patients can present with one of many diabetic complications before a diagnosis of T2D is made. These include heart disease and chronic kidney disease, in addition to cerebrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, retinopathy, and neuropathies, all of which can be asymptomatic in the early stages. In their clinical guidelines on standards of care in diabetes, the American Diabetes Association recommends regular screening for conditions such as kidney disease in patients with T2D. Furthermore, the frequent coexistence of diabetes and cardiorenal and/or metabolic conditions often requires a holistic approach to patient management, with specialists from multiple disciplines, including cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, and primary care physicians, working together. In addition to the use of pharmacological therapies, which can improve prognosis, the management of T2D should include attention to patient self-care, including appropriate dietary changes, consideration of continuous glucose monitoring, and advice on physical exercise. In this podcast, a patient and a clinician discuss a lived experience of the diagnosis of T2D, and the importance of patient education for understanding and managing T2D and its complications. The discussion highlights the central role of the Certified Diabetes Care and Education Specialist, and the role of ongoing emotional support in managing life with T2D, including patient education through reputable online resources and peer support groups. Podcast video with Pamela Kushner (PK) and Anne Dalin (AD) (MP4 92088 KB).
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Guidelines for the treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD) recommend early intervention and management to slow disease progression. However, associations between diagnosis and CKD progression are not fully understood. METHODS: REVEAL-CKD (NCT04847531) is a retrospective observational study of patients with stage 3 CKD. Data were extracted from the US TriNetX database. Eligible patients had two consecutive estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) measurements indicative of stage 3 CKD (≥ 30 and < 60Ā ml/min/1.73Ā m2) recorded 91-730Ā days apart from 2015 to 2020. Diagnosed patients were included if their first CKD diagnosis code was recorded at leastĀ 6Ā months after their second qualifying eGFR measurement. We assessed CKD management and monitoring practices for the 180Ā days before and after CKD diagnosis, annual eGFR decline in the 2Ā years before and after CKD diagnosis, and associations between diagnostic delay and post-diagnosis event rates. RESULTS: The study included 26,851 patients. After diagnosis, we observed significant increases in the prescribing rate of guideline-recommended medications such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (rate ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.87 [1.82,Ā 1.93]), angiotensin receptor blockers (1.91 [1.85,Ā 1.97]) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (2.23 [2.13, 2.34]). Annual eGFR decline was significantly reduced following a CKD diagnosis, from 3.20Ā ml/min/1.73 m2 before diagnosis to 0.74Ā ml/min/1.73 m2 after diagnosis. Delayed diagnosis (by 1-year increments) was associated with elevated risk of CKD progression to stage 4/5 (1.40 [1.31-1.49]), kidney failure (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.63 [1.23-2.18]) and the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke and hospitalization for heart failure (1.08 [1.04-1.13]). CONCLUSIONS: A recorded CKD diagnosis was associated with significant improvements in CKD management and monitoring practices and attenuated eGFR decline. Recorded diagnosis of stage 3 CKD is an important first step to reduce the risk of disease progression and minimize adverse clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04847531.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a long-term condition in which the function of the kidneys is reduced. Kidney function is monitored using a measurement called the estimated glomerular filtration rate. CKD can be separated into stages of severity, ranging from 1 (mild) to 5 (severe), using estimated glomerular filtration rate. Mild to moderate CKD (stages 1Ā3) is difficult to diagnose because there are usually no symptoms. In this study from the REVEAL-CKD programme, we looked at the effects of having undiagnosed stage 3 (moderate) CKD and examined how a CKD diagnosis affects disease management and worsening of the condition. Using a database of medical records for patients in the USA called TriNetX, we looked at data from over 26,000 patients with stage 3 CKD who were identified using estimated glomerular filtration rate measurements. We found that healthcare teams prescribed significantly more guideline-recommended medications and did more clinical monitoring in the 180Ā days after a CKD diagnosis than they did before the diagnosis. Additionally, the rate of decline in kidney function slowed after a CKD diagnosis. Delaying diagnosis by 1Ā year increased the risk of deterioration of the condition by 40%, the risk of needing a kidney transplant or long-term dialysis treatment by 63% and the risk of major heart and blood vessel diseases (known as cardiovascular events) by 8%. Our findings suggest that diagnosis of stage 3 CKD is an important first step to reduce the risk of the disease worsening and other complications. Video Abstract (MP4 82773 KB).
Subject(s)
Delayed Diagnosis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Humans , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diagnosis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacology , Disease ProgressionABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: REVEAL-CKD aims to estimate the prevalence of, and factors associated with, undiagnosed stage 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD). DESIGN: Multinational, observational study. SETTING: Data from six country-specific electronic medical records and/or insurance claims databases from five countries (France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the USA [two databases]). PARTICIPANTS: Eligible participants (≥18 years old) had ≥2 consecutive estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) measurements (calculated from serum creatinine values, sex and age) taken from 2015 onwards that were indicative of stage 3 CKD (≥30 and <60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Undiagnosed cases lacked an International Classification of Diseases 9/10 diagnosis code for CKD (any stage) any time before, and up to 6 months after, the second qualifying eGFR measurement (study index). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was point prevalence of undiagnosed stage 3 CKD. Time to diagnosis was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier approach. Factors associated with lacking a CKD diagnosis and risk of diagnostic delay were assessed using logistic regression adjusted for baseline covariates. RESULTS: The prevalence of undiagnosed stage 3 CKD was 95.5% (19 120/20 012 patients) in France, 84.3% (22 557/26 767) in Germany, 77.0% (50 547/65 676) in Italy, 92.1% (83 693/90 902) in Japan, 61.6% (13 845/22 470) in the US Explorys Linked Claims and Electronic Medical Records Data database and 64.3% (161 254/250 879) in the US TriNetX database. The prevalence of undiagnosed CKD increased with age. Factors associated with undiagnosed CKD were female sex (vs male, range of odds ratios across countries: 1.29-1.77), stage 3a CKD (vs 3b, 1.81-3.66), no medical history (vs a history) of diabetes (1.26-2.77) or hypertension (1.35-1.78). CONCLUSIONS: There are substantial opportunities to improve stage 3 CKD diagnosis, particularly in female patients and older patients. The low diagnosis rates in patients with comorbidities that put them at risk of disease progression and complications require attention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04847531.
Subject(s)
Delayed Diagnosis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Prevalence , Japan/epidemiology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diagnosis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Disease Progression , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Increasing rates of obesity and diabetes have driven corresponding increases in related cardiorenal and metabolic diseases. In many patients, these conditions occur together, further increasing morbidity and mortality risks to the individual. Yet all too often, the risk factors for these disorders are not addressed promptly in clinical practice, leading to irreversible pathologic progression. To address this gap, we convened a Task Force of experts in cardiology, nephrology, endocrinology, and primary care to develop recommendations for early identification and intervention in obesity, diabetes, and other cardiorenal and metabolic diseases. The recommendations include screening and diagnosis, early interventions with lifestyle, and when and how to implement medical therapies. These recommendations are organized into primary and secondary prevention along the continuum from obesity through the metabolic syndrome, prediabetes, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and heart failure (HF). The goal of early and intensive intervention is primary prevention of comorbidities or secondary prevention to decrease further worsening of disease and reduce morbidity and mortality. These efforts will reduce clinical inertia and may improve patients' well-being and adherence.
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Diabetes Mellitus , Hypertension , Humans , Risk Factors , Comorbidity , Obesity/therapy , Cardiovascular Diseases/complications , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & controlABSTRACT
Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, anecdotal reports emerged suggesting non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may increase susceptibility to infection and adversely impact clinical outcomes. This narrative literature review (March 2020-July 2021) attempted to clarify the relationship between NSAID use and COVID-19 outcomes related to disease susceptibility or severity. Twenty-four relevant publications (covering 25 studies) reporting original research data were identified; all were observational cohort studies, and eight were described as retrospective. Overall, these studies are consistent in showing that NSAIDs neither increase the likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 infection nor worsen outcomes in patients with COVID-19. This is reflected in current recommendations from major public health authorities across the world, which support NSAID use for analgesic or antipyretic treatment during COVID-19. Thus, there is no basis on which to restrict or prohibit use of these drugs by consumers or patients to manage their health conditions and symptoms during the pandemic.
Subject(s)
Antipyretics , COVID-19 , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Antipyretics/therapeutic use , Humans , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
Background: Timely diagnosis and treatment of stage 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD) can prevent further loss of kidney function and progression to kidney failure. However, contemporary data on the global prevalence of undiagnosed stage 3 CKD are scarce. REVEAL-CKD is a multinational, multifocal and observational study aiming to provide insights into undiagnosed stage 3 CKD in a large population. Methods: Patients (agedĀ ≥18 years) with data in selected secondary databases from 11 countries will be included if they have at least two estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) measurements from 2015 onwards that are ≥30 and <60Ā mL/min/1.73Ā m2, recorded >90Ā and ≤730 days apart. Undiagnosed cases are those without an International Classification of Diseases 9/10 diagnosis code for CKD (any stage) any time before and up to 6 months after the second qualifying eGFR measurement. Time to diagnosis will be assessed using a Kaplan-Meier approach; patient characteristics associated with undiagnosed CKD will be assessed using adjusted logistical regression analyses. Results: REVEAL-CKD will assess the point prevalence of undiagnosed stage 3 CKD and time to CKD diagnosis in initially undiagnosed cases overall and in individual countries. Trends in undiagnosed CKD prevalence by calendar year will be assessed. Patient characteristics, healthcare resource utilization, adverse clinical outcomes, and CKD management and monitoring practices in patients with versus without a CKD diagnosis will be compared. Conclusions: REVEAL-CKD will increase awareness of the global clinical and economic burden of undiagnosed stage 3 CKD and provide valuable insights to inform clinical practice and policy changes.
ABSTRACT
Type 2 diabetes (T2D), chronic kidney disease (CKD), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), and heart failure (HF)-along with their associated risk factors-have overlapping etiologies, and two or more of these conditions frequently occur in the same patient. Many recent cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) have demonstrated the benefits of agents originally developed to control T2D, ASCVD, or CKD risk factors, and these agents have transcended their primary indications to confer benefits across a range of conditions. This evolution in CVOT evidence calls for practice recommendations that are not constrained by a single discipline to help clinicians manage patients with complex conditions involving diabetes, cardiorenal, and/or metabolic (DCRM) diseases. The ultimate goal for these recommendations is to be comprehensive yet succinct and easy to follow by the nonexpert-whether a specialist or a primary care clinician. To meet this need, we formed a volunteer task force comprising leading cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, and primary care physicians to develop the DCRM Practice Recommendations, a multispecialty consensus on the comprehensive management of the patient with complicated metabolic disease. The task force recommendations are based on strong evidence and incorporate practical guidance that is clinically relevant and simple to implement, with the aim of improving outcomes in patients with DCRM. The recommendations are presented as 18 separate graphics covering lifestyle therapy, patient self-management education, technology for DCRM management, prediabetes, cognitive dysfunction, vaccinations, clinical tests, lipids, hypertension, anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy, antihyperglycemic therapy, hypoglycemia, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), ASCVD, HF, CKD, and comorbid HF and CKD, as well as a graphical summary of medications used for DCRM.
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Cardiovascular System , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Cardiovascular Diseases/complications , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapyABSTRACT
AIM: To explore reasons behind treatment inertia in current approaches to early cardiorenal risk management in type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: A global, web-based, quantitative panel survey of primary care physicians (PCPs) and primary care diabetes specialists treating people living with T2D. The questions covered current management of T2D, particularly the use of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors as second-/third-line therapies. RESULTS: Of 1677 respondents from 18 countries who completed the survey, 73.4% were responsible for second-/third-line therapy initiation. Two thirds had modified treatment decisions based on recent cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs). Respondents cited restricted access to therapies and limits on regular appointments as the greatest barriers to second-/third-line therapy prescription. Although 81.6% agreed that early intensification to second-/third-line therapies is associated with clinical benefits, 46.1% of respondents still reserve these for later lines of therapy, and 23.8% would not consider changing therapeutic approach in patients with well-controlled T2D but increasing cardiovascular risk. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial barriers still prevent optimization of primary setting T2D patient care. Education programs which enable PCPs to translate CVOT evidence into clinical benefits for patients with T2D could address many of the remaining knowledge gaps identified.
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors , Cardiovascular Diseases/complications , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Risk Management , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) improves clinical outcomes in type 1 diabetes, and significant benefits been demonstrated in patients with type 2 diabetes, including improved glycemic control, better treatment adherence, and an increased understanding of their treatment regimens. Currently, there are two types of CGM systems: real-time CGM (rtCGM) and flash CGM (FCGM). Retrospective analysis of CGM data allows patients and their clinicians to identify glycemic patterns that support and facilitate informed therapy decisions. With the increasing prevalence of diabetes, primary care physicians will be compelled to take on more responsibility for managing patients with diabetes. This article focuses on practical approaches and decision-making strategies for utilizing FCGM in primary care settings.
Subject(s)
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/instrumentation , Diabetes Mellitus/blood , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Wearable Electronic Devices , Age Factors , Decision Making , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Patient Preference , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
A number of studies using various imaging techniques have demonstrated that intensive lipid lowering with statins can halt or delay the progression of atherosclerosis and even, in some cases, lead to plaque regression. Improvements in atheroma burden with intensive statin therapy appear to be related not just to decreasing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol but also to anti-inflammatory and antiproliferative effects. Clinical trial results also suggest that achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels even lower than those currently recommended can produce improved clinical outcomes across a range of patient types. Given this body of evidence, it appears appropriate to use intensive statin therapy to treat dyslipidemic patients at high risk for coronary heart disease.
Subject(s)
Atherosclerosis/drug therapy , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Atherosclerosis/blood , Atherosclerosis/complications , Atherosclerosis/diagnosis , Cardiac Catheterization , Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Cholesterol, LDL/drug effects , Clinical Trials as Topic , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Disease/etiology , Coronary Disease/prevention & control , Disease Progression , Drug Monitoring/methods , Echocardiography , Evidence-Based Medicine , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/immunology , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Patient Selection , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography, InterventionalABSTRACT
Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, such as canagliflozin, are used in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In clinical studies, canagliflozin significantly reduced A1C, bodyweight and blood pressure, and was generally well tolerated with no increased risk of hypoglycemia. Most common adverse effects observed were genital mycotic infections and urinary tract infections, and increased urination. Approximately 10% of women treated with canagliflozin experienced a genital mycotic infection compared with 3% treated with placebo; those with a prior history were at greater risk. Approximately 9% of women treated with canagliflozin reported a urinary tract infection compared with 7% treated with placebo. Most adverse events were considered mild to moderate in intensity and responded to standard therapy. Treatment with canagliflozin was effective and generally well tolerated in both women (and men) with T2DM.
Subject(s)
Canagliflozin/adverse effects , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects , Canagliflozin/administration & dosage , Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal/chemically induced , Female , Genital Diseases, Female/chemically induced , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Urinary Tract Infections/chemically inducedABSTRACT
Traditional measures of overall glucose control, such as glycated hemoglobin (A1C), may not fully capture short-term, rapid changes in blood glucose. With the availability of multiple options to control A1C, glycemic fluctuations have emerged as an additional therapeutic goal for the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D).