Outcomes in Critically Ill Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation Recipients.

RATIONALE: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) recipients are still believed to be poor candidates for intensive care unit (ICU) management. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: We investigated outcomes and determinants of mortality in a large multicenter retrospective cohort of Allo-HSCT patients admitted between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2020 to 14 French ICUs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One thousand one hundred and sixty-four patients were admitted throughout the study period. At the time of ICU admission, 765 (66%) patients presented multiple organ dysfunction, including acute respiratory failure in 40% (n=461). Median SOFA was 6 (4-8). Invasive mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy and vasopressors were required in 438 (38%), 221 (19%) and 468 (41%) patients respectively. ICU mortality was 26% (302 deaths). Day-90, 1-year and 3-year mortality rates were 48%, 63%, and 70%, respectively. By multivariable analysis, age >56 years (OR 2·0 [1·53-2·60], p<0·001), time from Allo-HSCT to ICU admission between 30 and 90 days (OR 1·68 [1·17-2·40], p=0·005), corticosteroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (OR 1·63 [1·38-1·93], p<0·001), need for vasopressors (OR 1·9 [1·42-2·55], p<0·001), and mechanical ventilation (OR 3·1 [2·29-4·18], p<0·001) were independently associated with day-90 mortality. In patients requiring mechanical ventilation, mortality rates ranged from 39% (no other risk factors for mortality) to 100% (4 associated risk factors for mortality). CONCLUSIONS: Most critically ill Allo-HSCT recipients survive their ICU stay, including those requiring mechanical ventilation, with an overall day-90 survival rate reaching 51.8%. A careful assessment of goals of care is required in patients with ≥ 2 risk factors for mortality.

Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Immunocompromised Patients.

Due to higher survival rates with good quality of life, related to new treatments in the fields of oncology, hematology, and transplantation, the number of immunocompromised patients is increasing. But these patients are at high risk of intensive care unit admission because of numerous complications. Acute respiratory failure due to severe community-acquired pneumonia is one of the leading causes of admission. In this setting, the need for invasive mechanical ventilation is up to 60%, associated with a high hospital mortality rate of around 40 to 50%. A wide range of pathogens according to the reason of immunosuppression is associated with severe pneumonia in those patients: documented bacterial pneumonia represents a third of cases, viral and fungal pneumonia both account for up to 15% of cases. For patients with an undetermined etiology despite comprehensive diagnostic workup, the hospital mortality rate is very high. Thus, a standardized diagnosis strategy should be defined to increase the diagnosis rate and prescribe the appropriate treatment. This review focuses on the benefit-to-risk ratio of invasive or noninvasive strategies, in the era of omics, for the management of critically ill immunocompromised patients with severe pneumonia in terms of diagnosis and oxygenation.

Management of hematological patients requiring emergency chemotherapy in the intensive care unit.

Hematological malignancies may require rapid-onset treatment because of their short doubling time, notably observed in acute leukemias and specific high-grade lymphomas. Furthermore, in targeted onco-hematological scenarios, chemotherapy is deemed necessary as an emergency measure when facing short-term, life-threatening complications associated with highly chemosensitive hematological malignancies. The risks inherent in the disease itself, or in the initiation of treatment, may then require admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) to optimize monitoring and initial management protocols. Hyperleukocytosis and leukostasis in acute leukemias, tumor lysis syndrome, and disseminated intravascular coagulation are the most frequent onco-hematological complications requiring the implementation of emergency chemotherapy in the ICU. Chemotherapy must also be started urgently in secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Tumor-induced microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and plasma hyperviscosity due to malignant monoclonal gammopathy represent infrequent yet substantial indications for emergency chemotherapy. In all cases, the administration of emergency chemotherapy in the ICU requires close collaboration between intensivists and hematology specialists. In this review, we provide valuable insights that aid in the identification and treatment of patients requiring emergency chemotherapy in the ICU, offering diagnostic tools and guidance for their overall initial management.

Bloodstream infections among patients receiving therapeutic plasma exchanges in the intensive care unit: a 10 year multicentric study.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic plasma exchanges (TPE), which affect the humoral response, are often performed in combination with immunosuppressive drugs. For this reason, TPE may be associated with an increased susceptibility to infections. We aimed to describe blood stream infection (BSI) incidence in ICU patients treated with TPE and to identify associated risk factors. METHODS: We retrospectively included patients that had received at least one session of TPE in the ICU of one of the 4 participating centers (all in Paris, France) between January 1st 2010 and December 31th 2019. Patients presenting with a BSI during ICU stay were compared to patients without such an infection. Risk factors for BSI were identified by a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: Over 10 years in the 4 ICUs, 387 patients were included, with a median of 5 [2-7] TPE sessions per patient. Most frequent indications for TPE were thrombotic microangiopathy (47%), central nervous system inflammatory disorders (11%), hyperviscosity syndrome (11%) and ANCA associated vasculitis (8.5%). Thirty-one patients (8%) presented with a BSI during their ICU stay, a median of 7 [3-11] days after start of TPE. In a multivariate logistic regression model, diabetes (OR 3.32 [1.21-8.32]) and total number of TPE sessions (OR 1.14 [1.08-1.20]) were independent risk factors for BSI. There was no difference between TPE catheter infection related BSI (n = 11 (35%)) and other sources of BSI (n = 20 (65%)) regarding catheter insertion site (p = 0.458) or rate of TPE catheter related deep vein thrombosis (p = 0.601). ICU course was severe in patients presenting with BSI when compared to patients without BSI, with higher need for mechanical ventilation (45% vs 18%, p = 0.001), renal replacement therapy (42% vs 20%, p = 0.011), vasopressors (32% vs 12%, p = 0.004) and a higher mortality (19% vs 5%, p = 0.010). CONCLUSION: Blood stream infections are frequent in patients receiving TPE in the ICU, and are associated with a severe ICU course. Vigilant monitoring is crucial particularly for patients receiving a high number of TPE sessions.

A randomised controlled trial of a nurse facilitator to promote communication for family members of critically ill patients.

PURPOSE: Suboptimal communication with clinicians, fragmented care and failure to align with patients' preferences are determinants of post intensive care unit (ICU) burden in family members. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of a nurse facilitator on family psychological burden. METHODS: We carried out a randomised controlled trial in five ICUs in France comparing standard communication by ICU clinicians to additional communication and support by nurse facilitators. We included patients > 18 years, with expected ICU length of stay > 2 days, chronic life-limiting illness, and their family members. Facilitators were trained to help families to secure care in line with patient's goals, beginning in ICU and continuing for 3 months. Assessments were made at baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months post-randomisation. Primary outcome was the evolution of family symptoms of depression over 6 months using a linear mixed effects model on the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Secondary outcomes included HADS-Anxiety, Impact of Event Scale-6, goal-concordant care and experience of serious illness (QUAL-E). RESULTS: 385 patients and family members were enrolled. Follow-up at 1-, 3- and 6-month was completed by 284 (74%), 264 (68.6%) and 260 (67.5%) family members respectively. The intervention was associated with significantly more formal meetings between the ICU team and the family (1 [1-3] vs 2 [1-4]; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the intervention and control groups in evolution of symptoms of depression over 6 months (p = 0.91), nor in symptoms of depression at 6 months [0.53 95% CI (- 0.48; 1.55)]. There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: This study does not support the use of facilitators for family members of ICU patients.