Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Acta Paediatr ; 102(4): 379-84, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23298328

ABSTRACT

AIM: To determine the normal SpO2 in healthy term newborns at mild altitude (MA, 780 metres) compared with sea level (SL), within the context of universal screening for critical congenital heart disease (CCHD). METHODS: We studied 199 (119 at MA and 80 at SL) consecutively born healthy newborns. SpO2 recordings were at 24-72 h using Masimo SET Radical-7 on the right hand and left foot. RESULTS: Mean SpO2 was lower at MA compared with SL in the right hand (97.86 ± 1.58 vs 98.28 ± 1.41, p = 0.05) and left foot (98.49 ± 1.35 vs 98.90 ± 1.16, p = 0.03). No infant with SpO2 <95% had CCHD. Extrapolating with predicted regression lines set at 95% CI, a SpO2 cut-off of 95% would result in up to 3.5 times more false-positive screens at MA compared with SL. CONCLUSIONS: At MA, SpO2 is approximately 0.4% lower compared with SL. Our study supports the AAP recommendation suggesting algorithm cut-offs may need adjustment in high-altitude nurseries and suggest broadening it to MA as well.


Subject(s)
Altitude , Heart Defects, Congenital/diagnosis , Neonatal Screening/methods , Oximetry/methods , Oxygen , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Israel , Male , Reference Values
2.
Nutrients ; 13(11)2021 Nov 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34836353

ABSTRACT

(1) Background: Malnutrition is a highly prevalent complication in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). It is strongly associated with poor clinical outcomes and quality of life. Screening for malnutrition risk is recommended routinely; however, current malnutrition screening tools do not incorporate IBD specific characteristics and may be less adequate for screening these patients. Therefore, we aimed to identify IBD-related risk factors for development of malnutrition. (2) Methods: A retrospective case-control study among IBD patients attending the IBD clinic of the Tel-Aviv Medical Center for ≥2 consecutive physician consultations per year during 2017-2020. Cases who had normal nutritional status and developed malnutrition between visits were compared to matched controls who maintained normal nutritional status. Detailed information was gathered from medical files, including: demographics, disease phenotype, characteristics and activity, diet altering symptoms and comorbidities, medical and surgical history, annual healthcare utility, nutritional intake and the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) score. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify malnutrition risk factors. The independent risk factors identified were summed up to calculate the IBD malnutrition risk score (IBD-MR). (3) Results: Data of 1596 IBD patients met the initial criteria for the study. Of these, 59 patients developed malnutrition and were defined as cases (n = 59) and matched to controls (n = 59). The interval between the physician consultations was 6.2 ± 3.0 months, during which cases lost 5.3 ± 2.3 kg of body weight and controls gained 0.2 ± 2.3 kg (p < 0.001). Cases and controls did not differ in demographics, disease duration, disease phenotype or medical history. Independent IBD-related malnutrition risk factors were: 18.5 ≤ BMI ≤ 22 kg/m2 (OR = 4.71, 95%CI 1.13-19.54), high annual healthcare utility (OR = 5.67, 95%CI 1.02-31.30) and endoscopic disease activity (OR = 5.49, 95%CI 1.28-23.56). The IBD-MR was positively associated with malnutrition development independently of the MUST score (OR = 7.39, 95%CI 2.60-20.94). Among patients with low MUST scores determined during the index visit, identification of ≥2 IBD-MR factors was strongly associated with malnutrition development (OR = 8.65, 95%CI 2.21-33.82, p = 0.002). (4) Conclusions: We identified IBD-related risk factors for malnutrition, highlighting the need for a disease-specific malnutrition screening tool, which may increase malnutrition risk detection.


Subject(s)
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/physiopathology , Malnutrition/diagnosis , Malnutrition/etiology , Nutrition Assessment , Nutritional Status , Adult , Body Mass Index , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/complications , Logistic Models , Male , Malnutrition/epidemiology , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
3.
Breastfeed Med ; 1(3): 168-71, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17661594

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Very little is known about the prevalence of regurgitations in human milk-fed infants in the first days of life. The authors aimed to compare the frequency of regurgitations in formula- and breastfed infants in the first 2 days of life. It was hypothesized that human milk-fed infants experience less episodes of regurgitations than their formula-fed counterparts. DESIGN, SAMPLE, AND OUTCOME VARIABLES: Thirty-two (32) infants were formula fed and 31 were breastfed. In both groups, infants were fed ad libitum, as soon as the mother was ready to feed the infant. All regurgitations were noted on a collection form. RESULTS: The number of regurgitations per infant in the first 48 hours of life was similar in breastfed (range 0 to 7) and formula-fed infants (range 0 to 8). There was also no difference in the number of regurgitations in the first or second 24-hour period. Eighteen of 31 of infants in the breastfed group and 17/32 in the formula fed groups had at least one episode of regurgitation during the 48-hour period. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to this hypothesis, human milk feeding did not confer a "protection" on regurgitations in these young neonates.


Subject(s)
Bottle Feeding/statistics & numerical data , Breast Feeding/statistics & numerical data , Gastroesophageal Reflux/epidemiology , Infant Formula/metabolism , Milk, Human/metabolism , Adult , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Pilot Projects , Prevalence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL