ABSTRACT
The ultimate goal of bringing most new drugs to the clinic in hematological malignancy is to improve overall survival. However, the use of surrogate endpoints for overall survival is increasingly considered standard practice, since a well validated surrogate endpoint can accelerate the outcome assessment and facilitate better clinical trial design. Established examples include monitoring minimal residual disease in chronic myeloid leukemia and acute leukemia, and metabolic response assessment in lymphoma. However, what happens when a clinical trial endpoint that is not a good surrogate for disease-modifying potential becomes ingrained as an expected outcome, and new agents are expected or required to meet this endpoint to demonstrate "efficacy"? JAK inhibitors for myelofibrosis have a specific impact on reducing symptom burden and splenomegaly, but limited impact on the natural history of the disease. Since the introduction of ruxolitinib more than a decade ago there has been modest incremental success in clinical trials for myelofibrosis, but no major leap forward to alter the natural history of the disease. We argue that the clinical development of novel agents for myelofibrosis will be accelerated by moving away from using endpoints that are specifically tailored to measure the beneficial effects of JAK inhibitors. We propose that specific measures of relevant disease burden, such as reduction in mutation burden as determined by molecular endpoints, should replace established endpoints. Careful re-analysis of existing data and trials in progress is needed to identify the most useful surrogate endpoints for future MF trials and better serve patient interest.
ABSTRACT
Asciminib is a myristoyl site BCR::ABL1 inhibitor approved for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukaemia (CP-CML) patients failing ≥2 prior lines of therapy. The Australasian Leukaemia & Lymphoma Group (ALLG) conducted the ASCEND study to assess efficacy of asciminib for newly-diagnosed CP-CML. Patients commenced asciminib 40 mg twice daily (BID) and thereafter were managed according to molecular milestones. Patients with treatment failure, defined as BCR::ABL1 >10% (IS) at 3 or 6 months, or >1% at 12 or 18 months, received either imatinib, nilotinib or dasatinib in addition to asciminib. In patients with suboptimal response, defined as levels of 1-10% at 6 months, >0.1-1% at 12 months, or >0.01%-1% at 18 months, the asciminib dose was increased to 80 mg BID. With a median follow-up of 21 months (range 0-36), 82/101 patients continue asciminib. The most frequent reasons for treatment discontinuation were adverse events (6%), loss of response (4%) and withdrawn consent (5%). There were no deaths; one patient developed lymphoid blast crisis at 6 months. The co-primary endpoints were early molecular response (BCR::ABL1 ≤10% at 3 months), achieved in 93% (96% CI 86-97%), and major molecular response by 12 months achieved in 79%; (95% CI 69.7-86.8%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of MR4.5 was 53% by 24 months. One patient had 2 cerebrovascular events; no other arterial occlusive events were reported. Asciminib as frontline therapy in CP-CML produces high rates of molecular response with excellent tolerance and a low rate of discontinuation for toxicity. (ANZ Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12620000851965).
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: Autophagy is an intracellular survival process that has established roles in the long-term survival and function of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC). We investigated the contribution of autophagy to HSC fitness during allogeneic transplantation and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We demonstrate in vitro that both tumor necrosis factor and IL-1ß, major components of GVHD cytokine storm, synergistically promote autophagy in both HSC and their more mature hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC). In vivo we demonstrate that autophagy is increased in donor HSC and HPC during GVHD. Competitive transplant experiments demonstrated that autophagy-deficient cells display reduced capacity to reconstitute the hematopoietic system compared to wild-type counterparts. In a major histocompatibility complex-mismatched model of GVHD and associated cytokine dysregulation, we demonstrate that autophagy-deficient HSC and progenitors fail to establish durable hematopoiesis, leading to primary graft failure and universal transplant related mortality. Using several different models, we confirm that autophagy activity is increased in early progenitor and HSC populations in the presence of T-cell-derived inflammatory cytokines and that these HSC populations require autophagy to survive. Thus, autophagy serves as a key survival mechanism in HSC and progenitor populations after allogeneic stem cell transplant and may represent a therapeutic target to prevent graft failure during GVHD.