Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Journal subject
Publication year range
1.
J Neurooncol ; 132(3): 401-407, 2017 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28290002

ABSTRACT

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) limits entry of most chemotherapeutic agents into the CNS, resulting in inadequate exposure within CNS tumor tissue. Intranasal administration is a proposed means of delivery that can bypass the BBB, potentially resulting in more effective chemotherapeutic exposure at the tumor site. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and pharmacokinetics (plasma and CSF) of intranasal delivery using select chemotherapeutic agents in a non-human primate (NHP) model. Three chemotherapeutic agents with known differences in CNS penetration were selected for intranasal administration in a NHP model to determine proof of principle of CNS delivery, assess tolerability and feasibility, and to evaluate whether certain drug characteristics were associated with increased CNS exposure. Intravenous (IV) temozolomide (TMZ), oral (PO) valproic acid, and PO perifosine were administered to adult male rhesus macaques. The animals received a single dose of each agent systemically and intranasally in separate experiments, with each animal acting as his own control. The dose of the agents administered systemically was the human equivalent of a clinically appropriate dose, while the intranasal dose was the maximum achievable dose based on the volume limitation of 1 mL. Multiple serial paired plasma and CSF samples were collected and quantified using a validated uHPLC/tandem mass spectrometry assay after each drug administration. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using non-compartmental analysis. CSF penetration was calculated from the ratio of areas under the concentration-time curves for CSF and plasma (AUCCSF:plasma). Intranasal administration was feasible and tolerable for all agents with no significant toxicities observed. For TMZ, the degrees of CSF drug penetration after intranasal and IV administration were 36 (32-57) and 22 (20-41)%, respectively. Although maximum TMZ drug concentration in the CSF (Cmax) was lower after intranasal delivery compared to IV administration due to the lower dose administered, clinically significant exposure was achieved in the CSF after intranasal administration with the lower doses. This was associated with lower systemic exposure, suggesting increased efficiency and potentially lower toxicities of TMZ after intranasal delivery. For valproic acid and perifosine, CSF penetration after intranasal delivery was similar to systemic administration. Although this study demonstrates feasibility and safety of intranasal drug administration, further agent-specific studies are necessary to optimize agent selection and dosing to achieve clinically-relevant CSF exposures.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Administration, Intranasal , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/metabolism , Blood-Brain Barrier , Dacarbazine/administration & dosage , Dacarbazine/analogs & derivatives , Dacarbazine/metabolism , Dacarbazine/pharmacokinetics , Disease Models, Animal , Macaca mulatta , Male , Nasal Absorption , Phosphorylcholine/administration & dosage , Phosphorylcholine/analogs & derivatives , Phosphorylcholine/metabolism , Phosphorylcholine/pharmacokinetics , Temozolomide , Valproic Acid/administration & dosage , Valproic Acid/metabolism , Valproic Acid/pharmacokinetics
3.
Clin Cancer Res ; 22(15): 3810-20, 2016 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26994145

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We undertook a multidimensional clinical genomics study of children and adolescent young adults with relapsed and refractory cancers to determine the feasibility of genome-guided precision therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with non-central nervous system solid tumors underwent a combination of whole exome sequencing (WES), whole transcriptome sequencing (WTS), and high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism array analysis of the tumor, with WES of matched germline DNA. Clinically actionable alterations were identified as a reportable germline mutation, a diagnosis change, or a somatic event (including a single nucleotide variant, an indel, an amplification, a deletion, or a fusion gene), which could be targeted with drugs in existing clinical trials or with FDA-approved drugs. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients in 20 diagnostic categories were enrolled from 2010 to 2014. Ages ranged from 7 months to 25 years old. Seventy-three percent of the patients had prior chemotherapy, and the tumors from these patients with relapsed or refractory cancers had a higher mutational burden than that reported in the literature. Thirty patients (51% of total) had clinically actionable mutations, of which 24 (41%) had a mutation that was currently targetable in a clinical trial setting, 4 patients (7%) had a change in diagnosis, and 7 patients (12%) had a reportable germline mutation. CONCLUSIONS: We found a remarkably high number of clinically actionable mutations in 51% of the patients, and 12% with significant germline mutations. We demonstrated the clinical feasibility of next-generation sequencing in a diverse population of relapsed and refractory pediatric solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res; 22(15); 3810-20. ©2016 AACR.


Subject(s)
Genomics , Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms/therapy , Precision Medicine , Adolescent , Adult , Biomarkers, Tumor , Child , Child, Preschool , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Female , Genomics/methods , Germ-Line Mutation , Humans , Infant , Male , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Mutation , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Precision Medicine/methods , Recurrence , Exome Sequencing , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL